First-in-human phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SAR408701 in advanced solid tumors: Dose-expansion cohort of patients (pts) with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ NSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9072-9072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Gazzah ◽  
Sophie Cousin ◽  
Valentina Boni ◽  
Charles Ricordel ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Cell Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

9072 Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) is a cell-surface glycoprotein highly expressed in several tumor types. This Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study (NCT02187848) investigated SAR408701, a DM4 conjugated ADC targeting CEACAM5, in pts with advanced solid tumors. During dose escalation, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SAR408701 was 100 mg/m2 IV once every 2 weeks in 14-day cycles. Interim analysis of an ongoing expansion cohort in pts with NSQ NSCLC with CEACAM5 expression in ≥ 50% of the tumor cell population is reported. Methods: SAR408701 was administered at MTD. Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR; expansion phase). Secondary endpoints include safety and pharmacokinetics (PK). Tumor assessments were performed every 4 cycles (8 weeks). Results: As of Aug 2, 2018, 22 pts with NSQ NSCLC (21 adenocarcinoma; 1 not yet reported) received SAR408701 at MTD. Median age: 60 years; male: 72.7%; ECOG PS (n = 21): 0 = 38.1%, 1 = 61.9%. Median number of prior anticancer therapies for advanced disease was 3; 66.7% (14/21) received ≥ 3 lines; 59.1% had prior anti-tubulin-based treatments. Pts received a median of 6.5 cycles. 15 pts discontinued due to progressive disease and 1 due to an adverse event (AE; peripheral neuropathy); 6 pts remain on study. ORR was estimated at 22.7% (5/22 pts; 90% CI 11.5–39.9); 40.9% had stable disease. Most frequently occurring all-grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were corneal events (40.9%; including keratitis 22.7% [1 Grade 3] and keratopathy 18.2%), dyspnea (31.8%; 5 Grade ≥ 3), asthenic conditions (31.8%) and diarrhea (27.3%). 6 pts had ≥ 1 dose modification due to a TEAE. PK analysis was performed in 14 pts at Cycle 1; mean Cmax, AUC, clearance and t1/2z were 53.1 µg/mL, 297 µg.day/mL, 0.685 L/day and 6.19 days, respectively. Conclusions: In pts with advanced NSQ NSCLC and CEACAM5 expression in ≥ 50% of tumor cells, SAR408701 had a favorable safety profile. Interim analysis of 22 pts achieved the predefined boundary for efficacy (≥ 4 of 30 pts). These data support further development in NSQ NSCLC. Funding: Sanofi Clinical trial information: NCT02187848.

265 Phase 1b study of avelumab + M9241 (NHS-IL12) in patients with advanced solid tumors: interim analysis results from a urothelial carcinoma (UC) dose-expansion cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A291-A291
Author(s):  
Jean-Laurent Deville ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Marco Maruzzo ◽  
Theodore Gourdin ◽  
Michele Maio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Expansion Cohort

BackgroundAvelumab is an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of advanced UC after disease progression during or following platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance treatment in patients whose disease has not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.1–3 M9241 is an immunocytokine composed of 2 heterodimers of IL-12 fused to the heavy chains of a human antibody targeting DNA released from necrotic tumor cells.4 During dose-escalation, avelumab + M9241 was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, including 2 objective responses in patients with UC.5 We report on an interim analysis of efficacy and safety from the dose-expansion part of JAVELIN IL-12 (NCT02994953).MethodsEligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic UC that had progressed on first-line therapy, were aged =18 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and were immune checkpoint inhibitor naive. Patients received the recommended phase 2 dose5 of avelumab 800 mg intravenously once weekly (QW) in combination with M9241 16.8 µg/kg subcutaneously Q4W for the first 12 weeks, then continued the combination with avelumab Q2W. The primary endpoints were confirmed best overall response (BOR) per investigator assessment (RECIST 1.1) and safety. The expansion cohort followed a 2-stage design. During stage 1 (single-arm part of the study), 16 patients were enrolled and treated. A futility analysis based on BOR was planned to determine if stage 2 (randomized controlled part of the study) would be initiated.ResultsAt data cut-off (Jun 3, 2020), 16 patients had received avelumab + M9241 for a median duration of 8 weeks (range, 4.0–25.0 weeks). No complete or partial responses were observed; the study failed to meet the criterion (>2 responders) to initiate stage 2. Two patients (12.5%) had stable disease, 13 (81.3%) had progressive disease, and 1 (6.3%) was not evaluable. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15 patients (93.8%); the most common (in =4 patients) were pyrexia (50.0%), nausea (37.5%), asthenia (31.3%), anemia (25.0%), and hyperthermia (25.0%); grade 4 gamma-glutamyltransferase increased occurred in 1 patient (6.3%). No TRAEs led to death. Pharmacodynamic effects on the peripheral immune system and results of pharmacokinetic and biomarker analyses will also be reported.ConclusionsThe predefined efficacy criterion to proceed to stage 2 was not met. The combination was well tolerated; no new safety signals emerged and the profile was consistent with the dose-escalation part of the study.5Trial RegistrationNCT02994953Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by each site’s independent ethics committee.ConsentN/AReferencesBavencio(avelumab) injection [package insert]. Rockland, MA: EMD Serono, Inc; New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2020.Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada.html. Accessed July 31, 2020.US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves avelumab for urothelial carcinoma maintenance treatment. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-avelumab-urothelial-carcinoma-maintenance-treatment. Accessed July 31, 2020.Fallon J, Tighe R, Kradjian G, et al. The immunocytokine NHS-IL12 as a potential cancer therapeutic. Oncotarget. 2014;5:1869–1884.Strauss J, Vugmeyster Y, Sznol M, et al. Phase 1b, open-label, dose escalation study of M9241 (NHS-IL12) plus avelumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5 Suppl):Abstract 4062.

Dose escalation and expansion cohort study for DS-8895a in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

99 Background: Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor A2 (EPHA2) is overexpressed on the cell surface of many tumors and is associated with poor prognosis, suggesting EPHA2 as a target for cancer therapy. DS-8895a is an afucosylated, humanized anti-EPHA2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody with potent cytotoxicity. We report results from a phase I clinical trial to determine safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DS-8895a in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02004717). Methods: Step 1 (dose escalation cohort) had patients with advanced solid tumors and comprised of six dose levels (0.1–20 mg/mL, intravenous infusion, every 2 weeks [Q2W]) with a 28-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. Step 2 (expansion cohort) patients had gastric or esophageal cancer confirmed to be EPHA2 positive by immunohistochemistry. Dose level in Step 2 was determined based on results obtained in Step 1. We evaluated safety, PK, potential biomarkers including circulating NK cells and cytokines, and tumor response. Results: Maximum tolerated dose was not reached in Step 1 (n = 22). DS-8895a was administered at 20 mg/kg Q2W in Step 2 (n = 15). Among 37 patients in the safety analysis set, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 97.3% (64.9% drug-related); 35.1% presented grade ≥ 3 AEs (8.1% drug-related). Dose delay and study discontinuation due to AEs (treatment related: grade 4 platelet decrease, hypoesthesia, hypotension, peripheral coldness, nausea, and vomiting) were observed in one and four patients (20 mg/kg), respectively. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 51.4% of patients resulting in 10 dose interruptions with one discontinuation. Serum inflammatory cytokines were transiently increased 4 h from the end of infusion drug administration. Serum DS-8895a maximum and trough concentrations increased dose-dependently. Biomarkers had no apparent relationship to best overall response. Seven patients in Step 1 achieved stable disease; in Step 2, six patients achieved stable disease and one patient achieved partial response. Conclusions: DS-8895a was safe and well tolerated up to 20 mg/kg. The PK of DS-8895a was dose-dependent as expected. Clinical trial information: NCT02004717.

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

SWOG S1221: A phase 1 dose escalation study co-targeting MAPK-dependent and MAPK-independent BRAF inhibitor resistance in BRAF mutant advanced solid tumors with dabrafenib, trametinib, and GSK2141795 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01902173).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2578-2578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Patrick Algazi ◽  
James Moon ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Roger Lo ◽  
Kari Lynn Kendra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Braf Mutant

2578 Background: Aberrant PI3K/AKT signaling in BRAF mutant cancers contributes to resistance to MAPK pathway blockade. We conducted parallel phase 1 dose escalation studies of the doublet of the BRAFi dabrafenib with the AKT inhibitor GSK2141795 and of the triplet of dabrafenib, the MEKi trametinib, and GSK2141795. Methods: Patients (pts) with BRAF-V600E/K mutant advanced solid tumors with adequate end-organ function were eligible regardless of prior BRAFi and MEKi exposure. All pts received dabrafenib at 150 mg twice daily (bid), in the doublet cohorts together with dose escalation (3 + 3 scheme) of GSK2141795 started at 50 mg daily (qd), and in the triplet cohorts with dose escalation of both trametinib starting at 1.5 mg qd and GSK2141795 starting at 25 mg qd. DLTs included significant grade 3 and 4 adverse events (CTCAE v4) within the first 56 days of treatment. Radiographic responses were assessed at 8-week intervals. Results: No DLTs were observed in the doublet cohorts (N = 8) up to dabrafenib 150 mg bid and GSK2141795 75 mg qd. In the triplet cohorts (N = 11), no DLTs were observed at doses of up to trametinib 1.5 mg daily with GSK2141795 75 mg daily. At the highest triplet dose with dabrafenib 150 mg bid, trametinib 2 mg qd with GSK2141795 75 mg qd, 1 of 2 evaluable pts had a DLT of grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 maculo-papular rash. 2/2 treatment-naïve in the doublet cohorts had PRs (1 melanoma and 1 thyroid) the latter lasting over 1 year. 1/6 BRAF inhibitor-refractory (melanoma) pts also had an objective response. In the triplet cohorts, 3 of 6 treatment-naïve pts had a PR (1 melanoma, 2 lung). One lung pt remains in PR at 2 months and the otherhas an uPR at 1.2 months. Conclusions: Inhibition of both MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways was well tolerated, leading to durable objective responses in pts with metastatic melanoma, thyroid cancer, and lung cancer. Further study of dual pathway inhibition is warranted. Funding: Supported in part by NIH/NCI grants CA180888, CA180819; and in part by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. Clinical trial information: NCT01902173.

Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study of ABBV-399, an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) targeting c-Met, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2510-2510 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Strickler ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
Colin D. Weekes ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Eric Angevin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Drug Conjugate ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Antibody Drug

Phase 1 dose escalation study of XMT-1536, a novel NaPi2b-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients (pts) with solid tumors likely to express NaPi2b.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3010-3010
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
Susanna Varkey Ulahannan ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
Ursula A. Matulonis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3010 Background: XMT-1536 is a Dolaflexin ADC targeting the sodium-phosphate cotransporter NaPi2b, expressed in ovarian, non-squamous lung, papillary thyroid, endometrial, papillary renal and salivary duct cancers. Methods: In this ongoing Phase 1 study, pts with solid tumors likely to express NaPi2b, who progressed on standard therapy, are treated with intravenous XMT-1536 using a 3+3 design with a modified Fibonacci escalation. NaPi2b expression by IHC is being examined retrospectively in archived tumors. Primary objectives in dose escalation are safety and tolerability and determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03319628). Results: As of Jan. 28, 2019, 36 pts (22 ovarian, 7 endometrial, 4 NSCLC, 3 other) have received treatment with XMT-1536. Treatment was initially given every 3 weeks (q3w); 20 pts were treated in dose cohorts from 3 to 40 mg/m2. There was one DLT of reversible AST elevation at 40 mg/m2. The dosing interval was then changed to every 4 weeks (q4w), and dose escalation was restarted at 20 mg/m2. There was one DLT of reversible AST elevation at 30 mg/m2 on the q4w schedule. Further followup and dose escalation are ongoing. The most common (≥10% of patients) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) have been nausea, fatigue, headache, increased AST, anorexia, increased alkaline phosphatase, fever, increased GGT, myalgia, and vomiting. Grade 3 TRAEs were reversible AST increases in 3 patients and increased GGT, decreased lymphocytes, and systolic congestive heart failure in 1 patient each. Treatment-related serious AEs of fever and systolic congestive heart failure occurred in 1 patient each. Among patients dosed at 20 mg/m2 or higher who had restaging scans (n=20), there were 2 PR, in ovarian cancer pts at 30 mg/m2 q3w and 20 mg/m2 q4w, and 11 SD, with disease control maintained for up to 24 weeks. Patient-level results for NaPi2b expression will be presented. The systemic exposure of total payload showed approximately dose-proportional increase. Plasma concentration of free drug payload and its active metabolite were low. Conclusions: XMT-1536 has been well-tolerated up to the 30 mg/m2 dose level with early signs of anti-tumor activity. Dose escalation continues in pts with advanced solid tumors likely to express NaPi2b. Clinical trial information: NCT03319628.

A phase IB study of the combination of selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) and cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced solid tumors with an expansion cohort in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2587-2587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuradha Krishnamurthy ◽  
A. Dasari ◽  
Anne M. Noonan ◽  
Janice M. Mehnert ◽  
Albert C. Lockhart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclosporin A ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Wnt Pathway ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

2587 Background: MEK inhibition is of interest in cancer drug development. However, better strategies are needed to overcome acquired resistance to MEK inhibitors. Preclinical studies have shown Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A (CsA), a non-canonical Wnt pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We conducted an NCI CTEP-approved Phase I/IB trial (NCI # 9571/COMIRB # 13-2628/NCT02188264) of selumetinib and CsA combination. Biomarkers of response are being co-developed. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with the combination of selumetinib and CsA in dose escalation followed by an expansion cohort in patients with irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC (n = 20). The expansion cohort utilized a selumetinib “run-in” to evaluate efficacy in RAS-WT and RAS-MT mCRC to identify those patients most likely to respond to the combination. Results: As of January 2017, 18 patients were enrolled in the dose escalation phase and 20 patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase. The most common adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities were rash, hypertension, and edema. Three DLTs - Grade 3 hypertension, rash and increased creatinine were reported. The maximum tolerated dose was identified as selumetinib 75 mg BID and CsA 2 mg/kg BID on a 28-day cycle. The selumetinib “run-in” did not favor a specific RAS type. Two partial responses were noted. Sixteen patients had stable disease, and 6 patients had progression of disease as their best response to therapy. Conclusions: Selumetinib in combination with cyclosporin A appears to be well tolerated with evidence of activity in mCRC. Tumor response data are currently being updated. FZD will be evaluated as a potential biomarker of response. Clinical trial information: NCT02188264.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document