Systematic review and meta-analysis of current rates of first pass effect by thrombectomy technique and associations with clinical outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-216
Author(s):  
Mehdi Abbasi ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Seán Fitzgerald ◽  
Oana Madalina Mereuta ◽  
Jorge L Arturo Larco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Single Pass ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Good Neurologic Outcome

BackgroundFirst pass effect (FPE) in mechanical thrombectomy is thought to be associated with good clinical outcomes.ObjectiveTo determine FPE rates as a function of thrombectomy technique and to compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without FPE.MethodsIn July 2020, a literature search on FPE (defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c–3 after a single pass) and modified FPE (mFPE, defined as TICI 2b–3 after a single pass) and mechanical thrombectomy for stroke was performed. Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes for both FPE and mFPE: overall rates, rates by thrombectomy technique, rates of good neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at day 90), mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) rate.ResultsSixty-seven studies comprising 16 870 patients were included. Overall rates of FPE and mFPE were 28% and 45%, respectively. Thrombectomy techniques shared similar FPE (p=0.17) and mFPE (p=0.20) rates. Higher odds of good neurologic outcome were found when we compared FPE with non-FPE (56% vs 41%, OR=1.78) and mFPE with non-mFPE (57% vs 44%, OR=1.73). FPE had a lower mortality rate (17% vs 25%, OR=0.62) than non-FPE. FPE and mFPE were not associated with lower sICH rate compared with non-FPE and non-mFPE (4% vs 18%, OR=0.41 for FPE; 5% vs 7%, OR=0.98 for mFPE).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that approximately one-third of patients achieve FPE and around half of patients achieve mFPE, with equivalent results throughout thrombectomy techniques. FPE and mFPE are associated with better clinical outcomes.

Abstract P488: The Impact of First Pass Effect on Acute Ischemic Stroke Clinical Outcomes: Why We Need to Continue to Improve Mechanical Thrombectomy?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mahmoud Dibas ◽  
Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ◽  
Sherief Ghozy ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
First Pass ◽  
The Impact

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has significantly improved outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). The first-pass effect (FPE), defined as achieving complete reperfusion (mTICI3/2c) with a single pass, was reported to be associated with higher functional independence rates following EVT and has been emphasized as an important procedural target. We compared MT outcomes in patients who achieved FPE to those who did not in a real world large database. Method: A retrospective analysis of LVO pts who underwent MT from a single center prospectively collected database. Patients were stratified into those who achieved FPE and non-FPE. The primary outcome (discharge and 90 day mRS 0-2) and safety (sICH, mortality and neuro-worsening) were compared between the two groups. Results: Of 580 pts, 261 (45%) achieved FPE and 319 (55%) were non-FPE. Mean age was (70 vs 71, p=0.051) and mean initial NIHSS (16 vs 17, p=0.23) and IV tPA rates (37% bs 36%, p=0.9) were similar between the two groups. Other baseline characteristics were similar. Non-FPE pts required more stenting (15% vs 25%, p=0.003), and angioplasty (19% vs 29%, p=0.01). The FPE group had significantly more instances of discharge (33% vs 17%, p<0.001), and 90-day mRS score 0-2 (29% vs 20%, p<0.001), respectively. Additionally, the FPE group had a significant lower mean discharge NIHSS score (12 vs 17, p<0.001). FPE group had better safety outcomes with lower mortality (14.2% vs 21.6%, p=0.03), sICH (5.7% vs 13.5, p=0.004), and neurological worsening (71.3% vs 78.4%, p=0.02), compared to the non-FPE group. Conclusion: Patients with first pass complete or near complete reperfusion with MT had higher functional independence rates, reduced mortality, symptomatic hemorrhage and neurological worsening. Improvement in MT devices and techniques is vital to increase first pass effect and improve clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Impact of balloon guide catheter on technical and clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Robert M Starke ◽  
M Hassan Murad ◽  
David Fiorella ◽  
Vitor M Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Number Of Passes

Background and purposeFlow arrest with balloon guide catheters (BGCs) is becoming increasingly recognized as critical to optimizing patient outcomes for mechanical thrombectomy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature for studies that compared angiographic and clinical outcomes for patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with and without BGCs.Materials and methodsIn April 2017 a literature search on BGC and mechanical thrombectomy for stroke was performed. All studies included patients treated with and without BGCs using modern techniques (ie, stent retrievers). Using random effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: first-pass recanalization, Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 3 recanalization, TICI 2b/3 recanalization, favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2), mortality, and mean number of passes and procedure time.ResultsFive non-randomized studies of 2022 patients were included (1083 BGC group and 939 non-BGC group). Compared with the non-BGC group, patients treated with BGCs had higher odds of first-pass recanalization (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.55), TICI 3 (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.43 to 3.17), TICI 2b/3 (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.97), and mRS 0–2 (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.22). BGC-treated patients also had lower odds of mortality (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.73) compared with non-BGC patients. The mean number of passes was significantly lower for BGC-treated patients (weighted mean difference −0.34, 95% CI−0.47 to −0.22). Mean procedure time was also significantly shorter for BGC-treated patients (weighted mean difference −7.7 min, 95% CI−9.0to −6.4).ConclusionsNon-randomized studies suggest that BGC use during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is associated with superior clinical and angiographic outcomes. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm the results of this study.

Abstract P545: First Pass TICI 2b versus Multiple Passes TICI 3 for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: Is First Pass TICI 2b Enough?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mahmoud Dibas ◽  
Sherief Ghozy ◽  
Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Single Pass ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
P 16 ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background and Objective: Prompt and complete reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is essential to improve outcome in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recently, first-pass effect (FPE), defined as achieving complete reperfusion with a single pass, has been emphasized as a potentially important MT target. We aimed to compare outcomes between patients who achieve mTICI 2b with first pass to those with multiple devise passes (MDP) mTICI 3. Methods: From a single comprehensive stroke center database, we retrospectively grouped LVO pts treated with MT into those who achieved mTICI 2b after a single pass and mTICI 3 after MDP. Clinical outcome (discharge and 90-day mRS), discharge NIHSS and safety (sICH, neurological worsening, mortality) were compared between the two groups. Results: Of 186 pts included, 153 (82%) achieved mTICI 3 with MDP, and 33 (18%) had mTICI 2b after a single pass. Mean age (71 vs 69), NIHSS (17 vs 16, p=0.2) were similar between the two groups. Patients with a single pass mTICI 2b had numerically higher IV tPA administration (33% vs 46%, p=.16). There was no difference in other baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in discharge (21% vs 24.2%, p=0.65) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (24% vs 24%, p=0.5), MDP mTICI 3 and single pass mTICI 2b, respectively. Also, there was no difference in discharge NIHSS score (13.6 vs 16.7, p=0.26), mortality (16.3% vs 18.2%, p=0.8) and sICH rates (7.8% vs 18.2%, p=0.095) or neurological worsening (76.5% vs 69.7%, p=1). Conclusion: Our results did not show a significant difference between mTICI 3 with multiple passes and mTICI 2b after a single pass. Future large studies are warranted to explore the possibility of extending the first pass effect to patients who achieve mTICI 2b with a single pass.

scholarly journals Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke. Experience from Switching from Stent Retriever Only to Stent Retriever Combined with Aspiration Catheter

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1802
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Meder ◽  
Paweł Żuchowski ◽  
Wojciech Skura ◽  
Violetta Palacz-Duda ◽  
Milena Świtońska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Need To Evaluate ◽  
The Difference

Endovascular treatment is a rapidly evolving technique; therefore, there is a constant need to evaluate this method and its modifications. This paper discusses a single-center experience and the results of switching from the stent retriever only (SO) mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to the combined approach (CA), with a stent retriever and aspiration catheters. Methods: The study involved a retrospective analysis of 70 patients undergoing MT with the use of either SO or CA. The primary endpoint was the frequency of perfect reperfusion defined as grade 3 of the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (mTICI) after the first pass. The secondary endpoints were the procedure success, defined as mTICI grades 2b-3; time of the procedure; clinical outcome, measured by 90 days’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score; Δ NIHSS, defined as the difference between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at patients’ admission and discharge; and the total number of device passes. Results: Out of the 70 patients included, 33 were treated with SO and 37 with CA. In both groups, a total number of 42 patients received intravenous recombined tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rTPA: 20 patients (60.6%) in the SO group and 22 patients (59.5%) in the CA group (p = 1.000). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding first-pass success rate, with 46% in the CA group and 18% in the SO group, (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.28 to 11.44, p = 0.016). Complete procedure success tended to be more frequent in the CA group than in the SO group—94.6% vs. 84.8% (OR 3.13, 95% CI 0.56 to 17.34, p = 0.193)—and CA tended to require a lower number of passes than SO (mean 1.76 vs. 2.09 passes per procedure, p = 0.114), yet these differences did not reach statistical significance. Mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter in the CA group than in the SO group (49 min vs. 64 min, p = 0.017). There was a significant difference in clinical outcomes, with higher Δ NIHSS (9.3 in the CA group vs. 6.7 in the SO group, p = 0.025) after the procedure and 90-day mRS (median 2 in the CA group vs. 4 in the SO group, p = 0.031). Conclusions: Combining stent retrievers with aspiration catheters may offer a beneficial effect on angiographic results and clinical outcomes in stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment.

Abstract W P26: Meta-analysis Of Studies Using Solitaire And Trevo Pro Stent Retriever Devices For Mechanical Thromboembolectomy In Acute Cerebral Ischemia

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Jadhav ◽  
Mushtaq H Qureshi ◽  
Malik M Adil ◽  
Amna Zarar ◽  
Nidaullah Mian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Analysis Software ◽  
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Acute Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Random Models ◽  
Log Odds ◽  
Event Rates

Objective: To report rates of recanalization and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) after mechanical thromboembolectomy using Solitaire and Trevo Pro devices in acute cerebral ischemia using meta-analysis of published studies. Methods: We identified all studies that used Solitaire or Trevo devices for mechanical thromboembolectomy in treatment of acute cerebral ischemia using a search on PubMed and Cochrane libraries, stroke trials database, proceedings of neurology and neurosurgery related conferences, and supplemented by a review of bibliographies of selected publications. Recanalization was assessed using TICI >2a and rates of SICH were recorded. For the meta-analysis, forest plots and statistical analysis including event rates [ER] with 95% confidence intervals [CI] based on both fixed and random models were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The presence of publication bias was interrogated by funnel plot of Standard Error by log odds ratio. Results: Eighteen studies with Solitaire device and five with Trevo device were identified and included in the meta-analysis. There were a total of 433/505 (85%, ER 0.85 [CI] 0.80-0.88, P<0.001) successful recanalizations with Solitaire device whereas 196/243 (80%, ER 0.80 [CI] 0.74-0.85, P<0.001) successful recanalizations were noted with Trevo device. The incidence of SICH was 45/505 (9%, ER 0.09 [CI] 0.06-0.14, P<0.001) with Solitaire device and 17/243 (6%, ER 0.06 [CI] 0.049-0129, P<0.001) with Trevo device after mechanical thrombectomy. There was no publication bias. Conclusions: Meta-analysis of studies reveals similar rates for recanalization and SICH after mechanical thromboembolectomy using Solitaire or Trevo Pro devices.

Abstract 11526: Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events During PCI for ACS Are Associated With Increased Adverse Ischemic Events at 30 Days: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramez Nairooz ◽  
Partha Sardar ◽  
Saurav Chatterjee ◽  
Zubair Ahmed ◽  
Dmitriy N Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Stent Thrombosis ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Repeat Revascularization ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
Ischemic Events

Background: Data regarding intraprocedural thrombotic events (IPTE) including slow reflow or no reflow, distal embolization, intraprocedural stent thrombosis and abrupt vessel closure during PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are scarce. Their association with subsequent adverse ischemic events needs further investigation. Aim: To evaluate effect of IPTE on in-hospital and at 30-days clinical outcomes after PCI for ACS. Hypothesis: IPTE during PCI are associated with adverse ischemic events while in-hospital and at 30 days. Methods: We performed a literature search of all published full-length articles of randomized trials that reported data on patients with IPTE compared with no IPTE during PCI for patients with ACS. We calculated odd ratios via random effects model for in-hospital ischemic outcomes and 30 day outcomes. Results: Our literature search yielded 3 randomized trials reporting clinical outcomes with IPTE and no IPTE for ACS patients undergoing PCI: ACUITY, HORIZONS-AMI and EARLY-ACS trials. We report clinical outcomes (in-hospital and at 30 days) in 8,043 patients in total, of those 673 had IPTE. At 30 days, patients with IPTE had more major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (Odds ratio (OR) 3.97, 95% Confidence interval (CI) [1.81-8.69]; p=0.0006), mortality (OR 4.54, 95% CI [1.99, 10.39]; p=0.0003), myocardial infarction (OR 4.54, 95% CI [1.99, 10.39]; p=0.0003), repeat revascularization (OR 4.54, 95% CI [1.99, 10.39]; p=0.0003), total stent thrombosis (OR 4.54, 95% CI [1.99, 10.39]; p=0.0003) and non-CABG related major bleeding (OR 4.54, 95% CI [1.99, 10.39]; p=0.0003) than those with no IPTE. Similarly, in-hospital clinical outcomes were all significantly higher in patients with IPTE than those without. Conclusion: IPTE during PCI is associated with more adverse ischemic events, including mortality, both in-hospital and at 30 days.

scholarly journals Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Spine Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanthika Wasinpongwanich ◽  
Tanawin Nopsopon ◽  
Krit Pongpirul
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Spine Diseases

Purpose Surgical treatment is mandatory in some patients with lumbar spine diseases. To obtain spine fusion, many operative techniques were developed with different fusion rates and clinical results. This study aimed to collect randomized controlled trial (RCT) data to compare fusion rate, clinical outcomes, complications among Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF), and other techniques for lumbar spine diseases. Methods A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases was searched for studies up to 13 February 2020. The meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model. Pooled risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval of fusion rate, clinical outcomes, and complication in TLIF and other techniques for lumbar diseases. Results The literature search identified 3,682 potential studies, 15 RCTs (915 patients) were met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to other techniques, TLIF had slightly lower fusion rate (RR=0.84 [95% CI 0.72, 0.97], p=0.02, I2=0.0%) at 1-year follow-up while there was no difference on fusion rate at 2-year follow up (RR=1.06 [95% CI 0.96, 1.18], p=0.27, I2=69.0%). The estimated risk ratio of total adverse events (RR=0.90 [95% CI 0.59, 1.38], p=0.63, I2=0.0%) and revision rate (RR=0.78 [95%CI 0.34, 1.79], p=0.56, I2=39.0%) showed no difference. TLIF had approximately half an hour more operative time than other techniques (MD=31.88 [95% CI 5.33, 58.44], p=0.02, I2=92.0%). There was no significant difference between TLIF and other techniques in terms of the blood loss, and clinical outcomes. Conclusions Besides fusion rate at 1-year follow-up and operative time, our study demonstrated similar outcomes of TLIF with other techniques for lumbar diseases in regard to fusion rate, clinical outcomes, and complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document