scholarly journals P169 Comparison of the FTD™ Urethritis Plus (7-Plex) detection kit with routine sexual health clinic nucleic acid amplification testing for detection ofNeisseria gonorrhoeaeandChlamydia trachomatisin urine, vaginal, pharyngeal and rectal samples: Abstract P169 Table 1

2016 ◽  
Vol 92 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A76.2-A77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Harrison ◽  
Emma Harding-Esch ◽  
Claire Broad ◽  
Clare Soares ◽  
Sebastian Fuller ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. sextrans-2020-054690
Author(s):  
Ayoma Ratnappuli ◽  
Melanie Bissessor ◽  
Shehara Arumugam ◽  
Deborah A Williamson ◽  
Eric P F Chow ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn a previous study of men attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre who had Neisseria gonorrhoeae detected by urine Aptima Combo 2 (AC2) testing, 11% were asymptomatic. This study aimed to determine whether N. gonorrhoeae can be cultured from asymptomatic men screening positive for N. gonorrhoeae by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) of urine.MethodsBetween 1 July 2017 and 31 March 2019, all men attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre were tested for N. gonorrhoeae by AC2 testing of urine whether urethral symptoms were reported or not. NAAT-positive men were recalled and a urethral swab performed for gonococcal culture using modified Thayer-Martin media with determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by agar dilution.ResultsThere were 1001 cases (860 individuals) positive for N. gonorrhoeae by urine AC2: 892 (89%) reported urethral symptoms; 109 (11%) did not. Twenty-five asymptomatic cases were excluded because of antibiotic use at or following screening. Of the remaining 84 asymptomatic men, 41 (49%) had a urethral swab performed a median of 5 days after screening. Twenty-one men had urethral discharge at the return visit, 11 of whom reported the discharge at the return visit. Of the 41 men who were swabbed, 31 (76%; 95% CI 60% to 88%) were culture positive for N. gonorrhoeae. Among the 21 men who subsequently developed discharge, 19 (90%; 95% CI 70% to 99%) were culture positive. Among the 20 men who remained asymptomatic, 12 (60%; 95% CI 36% to 81%) were culture positive. MIC profiles were obtained from all isolates.ConclusionsGonorrhoea was isolated in most but not all asymptomatic men screening positive for N. gonorrhoeae by urine NAAT. Clinicians should consider performing urethral culture in such men to ensure optimal surveillance for antimicrobial resistance. Isolation of N. gonorrhoeae by culture in men without discharge indicates these are true infections with viable organisms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 104792
Author(s):  
Bryan A. Stevens ◽  
Catherine A. Hogan ◽  
Kenji O. Mfuh ◽  
Ghazala Khan ◽  
Malaya K. Sahoo ◽  
...  

Sexual Health ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher K. Fairley ◽  
Marcus Y. Chen ◽  
Catriona S. Bradshaw ◽  
Sepehr N. Tabrizi

The use of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), as well as or in preference to culture for non-genital sites is now recommended both in Australia and overseas because of their greater sensitivity and improved specificity. A survey of 22 Australian sexual health clinics who each year test over 14 500 men who have sex with men (MSM) show that culture remains the predominate method for detecting gonorrhoea at pharyngeal (64%) and rectal (73%) sites. This editorial discusses the potential disadvantages of using culture over NAAT in relation to optimal gonorrhoea control among MSM and advocates that significantly improved control would be achieved by moving to NAAT with the proviso that culture samples are taken wherever possible on NAAT-positive samples and from clients with urethritis to ensure continued surveillance for antimicrobial resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document