Risk factors for acute bronchiolitis-related return visits to the emergency department

Purpose: Acute bronchiolitis (AB)-related return visits incur overuse of emergency medicine resources, crowding of emergency departments (EDs), and deterioration of rapport with the guardians. The authors aimed to analyze factors associated with the return visits to the ED.Methods: This study was conducted based on the medical records of 447 children aged 24 months or younger with AB who visited the ED from January 2019 through December 2020. A return visit was defined as an AB-related visit to the ED within 7 days of index visit. According to the return visit, we compared the clinical features. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent factors for the return visit.Results: Of the 323 children with AB, 77 (23.8%) made return visits. The returning children showed a younger median age (6 [interquartile range, 2-10] vs. 8 months [3-14]; P < 0.001), a lower mean oxyhemoglobin saturation (92.9 ± 4.3% vs. 97.1 ± 1.8%; P < 0.001), and higher frequencies of congenital heart diseases (22.1% vs. 10.6%; P = 0.009) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (11.7% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.013), and respiratory syncytial virus infection (57.1% vs. 37.0%; P = 0.002). No other variables, such as the hospitalization rate, differed as per return visits. The factors associated with return visits were respiratory syncytial virus infection (adjusted odds ratio, 9.41; 95% confidence interval, 2.13-41.57), lower oxygen saturation (2.00; 1.64-2.43), and age younger than 3 months (1.25; 1.07-1.24).Conclusion: AB-related return visits may be associated with age younger than 3 months, lower oxygen saturation, and respiratory syncytial virus infection.

Experiences and perspectives of older patients with a return visit to the emergency department within 30 days: patient journey mapping

Purpose Up to 22% of older patients who visit the emergency department (ED) have a return visit within 30 days. To achieve patient-centered care for this group at the ED it is important to involve the patient perspective and strive to provide the best possible experience. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the experiences and perspectives of older patients from initial to return ED visit by mapping their patient journey. Methods We performed a qualitative patient journey study with 13 patients of 70 years and older with a return ED visit within 30 days who presented at the Amsterdam UMC, a Dutch academic hospital. We used semi-structured interviews focusing on the patient experience during their journey and developed a conceptual framework for coding. Results Our sample consisted of 13 older patients with an average age of 80 years, and 62% of them were males. The framework contained a timeline of the patient journey with five chronological main themes, complemented with an ‘experience’ theme, these were divided into 34 subthemes. Health status, social system, contact with the general practitioner, aftercare, discharge and expectations were the five main themes. The experiences regarding these themes differed greatly between patients. The two most prominent subthemes were waiting time and discharge communication, which were mostly related to a negative experience. Conclusions This study provides insight into the experiences and perspectives of older patients from initial to return ED visit. The two major findings were that lack of clarity regarding waiting times and suboptimal discharge communication contributed to negative experiences. Recommendations regarding waiting time (i.e. a two-hour time out at the ED), and discharge communication (i.e. checklist for discharge) could contribute to a positive ED experience and thereby potentially improve patient-centered care.

Odds of return: a prospective study using provider assessment to predict short-term patient return visits to the emergency department

ObjectivePrevious studies have assessed patient-level characteristics associated with emergency department (ED) return visits, but none have used provider assessment. We prospectively investigate whether clinical providers could accurately predict ED return visits.MethodsProspective cohort study.SettingSingle academically affiliated urban county hospital.ParticipantsDischarged ED patients over a 14-month period with a provider assessment of the likelihood of patient return within 7 days of ED discharge.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome of interest was a return visit to the ED within 7 days. Additional outcome measures included a return visit within 72 hours and a return visit resulting in admission. We also measured the accuracy of provider gestalt, and provide measures of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios.ResultsOf the 11 922 ED discharges included in this study, providers expected 2116 (17.7%) to result in a return visit within 7 days. Providers were much more likely to perceive a return visit if the patient left against medical advice (OR: 5.97, 95% CI: 4.67 to 7.62), or was homeless (OR: 5.69, 95% CI: 5.14 to 6.29). Patients who actually returned were also more likely to be homeless, English speaking and to have left the ED against medical advice on the initial encounter. The strongest predictor of a return visit at both 72 hours and 7 days in multivariable modelling was provider assessment (OR: 3.77, 95% CI: 3.25 to 4.37; OR: 3.72, 95% CI: 3.29 to 4.21, respectively). Overall sensitivity and specificity of provider gestalt as a measure of patient return within 7 days were 47% and 87%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.51 and 0.61, respectively.ConclusionsClinician assessment was the strongest predictor of a return visit in this dataset. Clinician assessment may be used as a way to screen patients during the index visit and enrol them in efforts to decrease return visits.

Initial Medication Adherence by Psychiatric Outpatients in a General Hospital and Relevant Factors

Background: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research proposed two types of medication adherence: initial and long-term. Initial adherence is a predictor of long-term adherence and thus is a crucial metric to explore and support. This study aimed to investigate initial medication adherence by psychiatric outpatients and relevant factors. Methods: The study surveyed psychiatric outpatients using a 30-day timely return visit rate (TRVR) after the first visit to indicate initial adherence. All participants agreed to engage in the self-designed survey and assessments of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90). Clients who missed timely return visits received telephone follow-up to determine the main reasons. Results: The overall TRVR was 59.4%, and 40.6% of clients missed return visits. Logistic regression analysis revealed risk factors for initial adherence were work, tense family atmosphere, negative attitudes towards medication, higher EPQ psychoticism score, and lower SCL-90 phobic anxiety score. The main reasons given for non-timely return visits were improvement suggesting lack of need for a return visit, various limitations, no improvement, and side effects. Conclusion: Psychiatric outpatients had poor initial medication adherence related to multiple dimensional factors, including job, family, personality characteristics, mental status, and thoughts about mental illness and treatments.

Late-presenting Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in a Non-Endemic Setting During COVID-19 Travel Restrictions

ABSTRACT We report a case of febrile Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a 36-year-old male patient occurring 14 years after immigration from and more than 12 months since a return visit to the endemic area. The critical need for awareness regarding late presentations of P. falciparum is discussed.

Inpatient Outcomes Following a Return Visit to the Emergency Department: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) revisits are traditionally used to measure potential lapses in emergency care. However, recent studies on in-hospital outcomes following ED revisits have begun to challenge this notion. We aimed to examine inpatient outcomes and resource use among patients who were hospitalized following a return visit to the ED using a national database. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. One-third of ED visits from 2012–2013 were randomly selected and their subsequent hospitalizations included. We analyzed the inpatient outcomes (mortality and intensive care unit [ICU] admission) and resource use (length of stay [LOS] and costs). Comparisons were made between patients who were hospitalized after a return visit to the ED and those who were hospitalized during the index ED visit. Results: Of the 3,019,416 index ED visits, 477,326 patients (16%) were directly admitted to the hospital. Among the 2,504,972 patients who were discharged during the index ED visit, 229,059 (9.1%) returned to the ED within three days. Of them, 37,118 (16%) were hospitalized. In multivariable analyses, the inpatient mortality rates and hospital LOS were similar between the two groups. Compared with the direct-admission group, the return-admission group had a lower ICU admission rate (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.84), and lower costs (adjusted difference, -5,198 New Taiwan dollars, 95% CI, -6,224 to -4,172). Conclusion: Patients who were hospitalized after a return visit to the ED had a lower ICU admission rate and lower costs, compared to those who were directly admitted. Our findings suggest that ED revisits do not necessarily translate to poor initial care and that subsequent inpatient outcomes should also be considered for better assessment.