Variability and capture efficiency of bongo and Tucker trawl samplers in the collection of ichthyoplankton and other macrozooplankton
We examined the sampling variability and capture efficiency of bongo nets and a modified Tucker trawl used in the sampling of ichthyoplankton and other macrozooplankton by taking seven replicate samples at each of two stations on two separate occasions. Sample variance was highly significantly related to sample mean for all major taxonomic categories (i.e., fish eggs, fish larvae, crustaceans, and medusae-chaetognaths). Sampling variability of the bongo nets was significantly greater than that of the Tucker trawl for both fish eggs and larvae. Sampling variability of macrozooplankton was significantly greater than that of ichthyoplankton. For larval fish of 5 mm or less, bongo nets generally yielded higher estimates of abundance than the Tucker trawl and the reverse was true for lengths above 10 mm, but there was a significant influence of species-specific morphological characters. The large sample volume of the Tucker trawl relative to the bongo nets resulted in significantly higher estimates of species diversity for fish eggs and larvae but not for crustaceans or medusae. Although bongo and Tucker samplers are efficient at catching a wide range of sizes of larval fish, the latter's lower variability may make it a more effective sampler.