Isolation and Analysis of Non-Histone Chromatin Proteins from Rat-Liver Nuclei by Three Different Methods

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 1143-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Suria ◽  
C. C. Liew
Keyword(s):  
Rat Liver ◽  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Soluble Proteins ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Pulse Labelling ◽  
Rat Liver Nuclei ◽  
Liver Nuclei ◽  
Chromatin Proteins

Non-histone chromatin proteins were isolated from rat-liver nuclei by three different methods, and defined as (I) phenol-soluble proteins, (II) SDS-soluble proteins and (III) proteins not adsorbed by cation-exchange chromatography. About 62–70% of chromatin proteins were recovered from the total nuclear proteins. The yield of non-histone chromatin proteins varied from 17 to 26% of chromatin proteins, depending on the method used. The amino-acid composition of these proteins showed that they are acidic in nature. Their phosphorus content was found to be 0.9, 1.1, and 1.4%, respectively, according to method I, II, or III. In-vivo pulse-labelling experiments indicated that chromatin proteins were highly labelled with 3H-acetate and 32P-phosphoric acid. In particular, the specific activities of 32P incorporation were higher in all non-histone chromatin proteins isolated as compared with histones. One-dimensional SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that at least 26 similar fractions can be detected in the samples prepared by these three methods.The similarity of some of the proteins obtained from methods I and III was further confirmed by fractionation of the non-histone chromatin proteins in an isoelectro-focusing system followed by a second-dimensional SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. It was found that more than 100 components could be identified. However, some minor variations of the non-histone chromatin proteins were detected by this system. The differences in proteins isolated by these methods are mainly quantitative rather than qualitative. The methods examined are not specific for the fractionation of a certain class of non-histone chromatin proteins.

scholarly journals High total histone/deoxyribonucleic acid ratios for rat liver nuclei

1973 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subir K. Chanda ◽  
Regina Ickowicz ◽  
Alexander L. Dounce
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Direct Measurement ◽  
Rat Liver ◽  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Total Histone ◽  
Rat Liver Nuclei ◽  
Calf Thymus ◽  
Liver Nuclei

The ratios of total histone to DNA for rat liver nuclei isolated by four methods as well as for calf liver nuclei isolated by one method were determined by obtaining the ratios of the total areas of the electrophoretic histone peaks for the liver nuclei to the corresponding total area given by a known amount of standard calf thymus histone. Ratios of total histone to DNA of approx. 2 for rat liver nuclei isolated at pH3.8 or 5.8 and for calf liver nuclei isolated at pH3.8 were confirmed twice by the above procedure and also by direct measurement, by the method of Lowry et al. (1951), of histone extracted in 0.2m-H2SO4. The histones of calf thymus, calf liver and rat liver were characterized by their amino acid compositions and by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis.

Ultrastructural localization of specific nucleoprotein fractions

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
G. L. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Mouse Liver ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Ultrastructural Localization ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Acid Solutions ◽  
Low Salt ◽  
Liver Nuclei ◽  
Phosphate Groups

Bismuth (Bi) stains nucleoproteins (NPs) by interacting with available amino and primary phosphate groups. These two staining mechanisms are distinguishable by glutaraldehyde crosslinking (Fig. 1,2).Isolated mouse liver nuclei, extracted with salt and acid solutions, fixed in either formaldehyde (form.) or gl utaraldehyde (glut.) and stained with Bi, were viewed to determine the effect of the extractions on Bi stainina. Solubilized NPs were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.Extraction with 0.14 M salt does not change the Bi staining characteristics (Fig. 3). 0.34 M salt reduces nucleolar (Nu) staining but has no effect on interchromatinic (IC) staining (Fig. 4). Proteins responsible for Nu and glut.- insensitive IC staining are removed when nuclei are extracted with 0.6 M salt (Fig. 5, 6). Low salt and acid extraction prevents Bi-Nu staining but has no effect on IC staining (Fig. 7). When nuclei are extracted with 0.6 M salt followed by low salt and acid, all Bi-staining components are removed (Fig. 8).

In-vivo and in-vitro secretion of prolactin by lactating rat adenohypophyses as a function of intracellular age

1984 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Mena ◽  
G. Martínez-Escalera ◽  
C. Clapp ◽  
C. E. Grosvenor
Keyword(s):  
Pituitary Gland ◽  
Incubation Period ◽  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Pituitary Glands ◽  
H 26

ABSTRACT Adenohypophysial prolactin of lactating rats was pulse-labelled by [3H]leucine injected i.v. at the time of removal of the pups. The [3H]prolactin concentration in the pituitary gland, analysed by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis, progressively fell as the time from labelling to removal of the pituitary gland increased from 8 to 24 h, which suggests that there was a loss of hormone as it aged within the gland. Suckling effectively provoked the depletion–transformation of total and [3H]prolactin (extracted at pH 7·2) when applied after 8 h but not when applied after either 16 or 24 h after removing the pups. In rats whose pups were removed for 8 h, suckling also depleted–transformed [3H]prolactin labelled 4 h, but not that labelled 1 h before suckling. The pituitary glands of other lactating rats were labelled with [3H]leucine injected i.v. at various times before removing the glands and incubating them in medium 199. The secretion into the medium of [3H]prolactin labelled either 4, 8, 16 or 24 h beforehand was maximal during the first 30 min then declined from 30 to 240 min of incubation. However, secretion of prolactin labelled 1 h and 10 min beforehand reached a maximum after 0·5–1 h and 2 h of incubation respectively, then remained constant during the remainder of the 4-h incubation period. The total 4-h secretion of [3H]prolactin was greatest (65% of preincubation concentration) from those glands labelled 4 h before in contrast to those labelled 10 min (15%) or 1 (38%), 8 (34%), 16 (18%) or 24 h (26%) before incubation. Taken together, these data suggest that prolactin synthesized 4 h earlier is more likely to be released in response to physiological stimuli than is more recently formed prolactin or prolactin which has remained in the pituitary gland for 16 h or longer. J. Endocr. (1984) 101, 27–32

Purification and partial characterization of cysteine-glutamate transaminase from rat liver

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 958-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. C. Ip ◽  
R. J. Thibert ◽  
D. E. Schmidt Jr.
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Rat Liver ◽  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl ◽  
Liver Homogenate ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Gel Chromatography ◽  
Labile Hydrogen ◽  
Apparent Homogeneity

Cysteine-glutamate transaminase (cysteine aminotransferase; EC 2.6.1.3) has been purified 149-fold to an apparent homogeneity giving a specific activity of 2.09 IU per milligram of protein with an overall yield of 15%. The isolation procedures involve the preliminary separation of a crude rat liver homogenate which was submitted sequentially to ammonium sulfate fractionation, TEAE-cellulose column chromatography, ultrafiltration, and isoelectrofocusing. The final product was homogenous when examined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). A minimal molecular weight of 83 500 was determined by Sephadex gel chromatography. The molecular weight as estimated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of SDS was 84 000. The purified enzyme exhibited a pH optimum at 8.2 with cysteine and α-ketoglutarate as substrates. The enzyme is inactivated slowly when kept frozen and is completely inactivated if left at room temperature for 1 h. The enzyme does not catalyze the transamination of α-methyl-DL-cysteine, which, when present to a final concentration of 10 mM, exhibits a 23.2% inhibition of transamination of 30 mM of cysteine. The mechanism apparently resembles that of aspartate-glutamate transaminase (EC 2.6.1.1) in which the presence of a labile hydrogen on the alpha-carbon in the substrate is one of the strict requirements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document