scholarly journals Strong and electromagnetic decays of the radially excited $$D_s$$ and $$B_s$$ mesons in light cone QCD sum rules

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bilmis

AbstractRecently, LHCb Collaboration announced the discovery of radial excitations of $$D_s$$ D s and $$B_s$$ B s mesons. In present work, we calculate the most promising strong and electromagnetic decay widths of radially excited $$D_s(2S)$$ D s ( 2 S ) and $$B_s(2S)$$ B s ( 2 S ) mesons within the light cone QCD sum rules method.

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 3237-3245 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAO HUANG ◽  
ZUO-HONG LI ◽  
XING-GANG WU ◽  
FEN ZUO

Semileptonic B(Bs, Bc) decays are investigated systematically in the light-cone QCD sum rules. Special emphasis is put on the LCSR calculation on weak form factors with an adequate chiral current correlator, which turns out to be particularly effective to control the pollution by higher twist components of spectator mesons. The result for each channel depends on the distribution amplitude of the the producing meson. The leading twist distribution amplitudes of the related heavy mesons and charmonium are worked out by a model approach in the reasonable way. A practical scenario is suggested to understand the behavior of weak form factors in the whole kinematically accessible ranges. The decay widths and branching ratios are estimated for several B(Bc) decay modes of current interest.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Aliev ◽  
S. Bilmis ◽  
M. Savci

The strong coupling constants of newly observed Ωc0 baryons with spins J=1/2 and J=3/2 decaying into Ξc+K- are estimated within light cone QCD sum rules. The calculations are performed within two different scenarios on quantum numbers of Ωc baryons: (a) all newly observed Ωc baryons are negative parity baryons; that is, the Ωc(3000), Ωc(3050), Ωc(3066), and Ωc(3090) have quantum numbers JP=1/2- and JP=3/2- states, respectively; (b) the states Ωc(3000) and Ωc(3050) have quantum numbers JP=1/2- and JP=1/2+, while the states Ωc(3066) and Ωc(3090) have the quantum numbers JP=3/2- and JP=3/2+, respectively. By using the obtained results on the coupling constants, we calculate the decay widths of the corresponding decay. The results on decay widths are compared with the experimental data of LHC Collaboration. We found out that the predictions on decay widths within these scenarios are considerably different from the experimental data; that is, both considered scenarios are ruled out.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1250054 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. ALIEV ◽  
M. SAVCI ◽  
V. S. ZAMIRALOV

Using the calculated values of the strong coupling constants of the heavy sextet spin-3/2 baryons to sextet and antitriplet heavy spin-1/2 baryons with light vector mesons within the light cone QCD sum rules method, and vector meson dominance assumption, the radiative decay widths are calculated. These widths are compared with the "direct" radiative decay widths predicted in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rules.


Universe ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Haifa I. Alrebdi ◽  
Thabit Barakat

Within the framework of the light-cone QCD sum rules method (LCSR’s), the radiative Δ(1600)→γN decay is studied. In particular, the magnetic dipole moment GM1(0) and the electric quadrupole moment GE1(0) are estimated. We also calculate the ratio REM=−GE1(0)GM1(0) and the decay rate. The predicted multipole moments and the decay rate strongly agree with the existing experimental results as well as with the other available phenomenological approaches.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (37) ◽  
pp. 2761-2782 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHI-GANG WANG

In this paper, we study the [Formula: see text] form-factors with the light-cone QCD sum rules, where the B-meson light-cone distribution amplitudes are used. In calculations, we observe that the line-shapes of the B-meson light-cone distribution amplitude ϕ+(ω) have significant impacts on the values of the form-factors, and expect to obtain severe constraints on the parameters of the B-meson light-cone distribution amplitudes from the experimental data in the future.


2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Agamaliev ◽  
T. M. Aliev ◽  
M. Savcı

2002 ◽  
Vol 527 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M. Aliev ◽  
A. Özpineci ◽  
M. Savcı
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document