Abstract
Current operational ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) are designed specifically for medium-range forecasting, but there is also considerable interest in predictability in the short range, particularly for potential severe-weather developments. A possible option is to use a poor man’s ensemble prediction system (PEPS) comprising output from different numerical weather prediction (NWP) centers. By making use of a range of different models and independent analyses, a PEPS provides essentially a random sampling of both the initial condition and model evolution errors. In this paper the authors investigate the ability of a PEPS using up to 14 models from nine operational NWP centers. The ensemble forecasts are verified for a 101-day period and five variables: mean sea level pressure, 500-hPa geopotential height, temperature at 850 hPa, 2-m temperature, and 10-m wind speed. Results are compared with the operational ECMWF EPS, using the ECMWF analysis as the verifying “truth.” It is shown that, despite its smaller size, PEPS is an efficient way of producing ensemble forecasts and can provide competitive performance in the short range. The best relative performance is found to come from hybrid configurations combining output from a small subset of the ECMWF EPS with other different NWP models.
Test of a Poor Man’s Ensemble Prediction System for Short-Range Probability Forecasting
