Domestic, Regional and Multilateral Investment Liberalization

Author(s):  
Jorge A Huerta Goldman
Author(s):  
Ronald Labonté ◽  
Arne Ruckert

One of the major drivers of contemporary global market integration is trade and investment liberalization. Disease risks and health opportunities have long travelled the same routes of trade and commerce. Today’s binding and complex trade rules introduce new health complications. Using a number of recent trade agreements as exemplars, this chapter reviews the basic premises of liberalization, its claimed benefits, its purported or actual health risks, and how different provisions in trade and investment treaties (which unlike most global governance rules carry economic enforcement measures) are constraining important public health policy flexibilities in countries that are party to such agreements. From initial opposition to trade liberalization in general, progressive global health movements now focus more on how such rules could be written or revised in order to protect governments’ regulatory policy space, and to promote greater global health equity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (34) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Akram Gilal ◽  
Khadim Hussain ◽  
Muhammad Ajmair ◽  
Sabahat Akram

Objective of this paper was to evaluate the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on trade components (exports and imports) of Pakistan using annual data from 1975 to 2013. Engle and Granger two step cointegration method was used for conducting the analysis. This method was adopted because all the variables of interest were non stationary in level and stationary at first difference. Results provide evidence of long run cointegrating relationship as well as short run relationship between FDI and trade components. A rise in FDI causes both exports and imports to increase. Based on these empirical findings, we strongly recommend Government of Pakistan to focus on the strategy of investment liberalization as well as trade openness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Sugeng Ribowo

Foreign Portofolio Investment is one of the parts of foreign investment policy,its existence has the important role to the economic development of a country,especially to the developing countries to prevent the deficit of a country.Indonesia is one of developing countries that has implemented the policyrapidly by liberating foreign portofolio investment. This makes the foreignfund flood Indonesia without any control. Its legally caused legislationproduct regulating the kinds of this investment subtancially do not regulatelegal precision between two countries. Therefore, it gives overborrowingimpacts that have to be guaranted by a country in a certain time. Its differentfrom other developing countries determined foreign portofolio investment withthe strong control and given tax disincentive to the investors, such as China,Corea, Thailand and others.The behavior of this policy, is appereant and it cannot be separate fromforeign influence that suggested by International Monetary Fund (IMF) andWorld Bank (WB) as a financial international institution with the basicfinancial globalization. Financial globalization, directly and indirectly hassupported the government policy that is very kind to the foreign intervention.Its evidenced by the dominated legalize by the ownership of foreign stock inforeign right corporation or financial institution (banking) that has implicitlythrough laws. Therefore, foreign portofolio investment has caused themagnetic strength, especially banking institution to get the traget of big gainby buying and selling it to foreigner than distributing of credit to the smalland medium enterprises.This phenomenon, implicates to the change to the policy in the banking sector,banking experienced shifting of vital function that as to be able to allocate thefund source to the society efficienly and effectivetely. The shifting of vitalbanking function, from traditional activity to the non-traditional activity iscaused by the complicated problems like institution, regulation, andglobalization, especially financial globalization. Therefore, the strength of thestate about political economy is the main solution to solve these problems.This research, will be analyzed comprehensively about the Policy of Foreign Portofolio Investment Liberalization and its Implications toward the NationalBanking Policy on Giving the Credit to the Small and Medium Enterprises.Beside, this research will also be explained the relevant policy to solve thevital functions of banking as intermediation institution to the small andmedium enterprises, its influence can be hoped to the financial stability andeconomic development sustainability.Key words: liberalization, foreign portofolio investment, financial globalization, politicaleconomy, national banking


2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khrushchev U.K. Ekwueme

EKWUEME, KHRUSHCHEV, Nigeria's principal investment laws in the context of international law and practice, Journal of African Law, 49, 2 (2005): 177–206The enactment of the NIPC Act and FEMMP Act in 1995 represent a paradigm shift in Nigeria in three major areas of investment rule-making, namely, investment liberalization, investment protection and settlement of investment disputes. These statutes, especially the NIPC Act, contain certain investment-friendly provisions relating to foreign participation in Nigerian enterprises, guarantees against expropriation, nationalization and currency risk, as well as State-investor arbitration. Although the literature on the NIPC Act and FEMMP Act is vast, no in-depth scholarly study has been done on them in the context of international law and practice. Primarily, this article examines the provisions of these laws through a practical lens by studying them alongside the jurisprudence of the ICSID. It also explores specific constitutional and administrative law questions intimately related to the treatment of foreign investment in Nigeria. Finally, it assesses inflows of FDI into Nigeria and considers some of the impediments to foreign investment in the country.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document