A bi-dimensional numerical study for the Porosity Effects on Perforated GTC Efficiency under Constant Surface Heat Flux Condition

Author(s):  
Asmaa Amrani ◽  
Mohammed Habchi ◽  
Saad Chaouch
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1077-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gaspar ◽  
Y. Corre ◽  
J-L. Gardarein ◽  
M. Firdaouss ◽  
D. Guilhem ◽  
...  

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1493
Author(s):  
Najiyah Safwa Khashi’ie ◽  
Iskandar Waini ◽  
Nurul Amira Zainal ◽  
Khairum Hamzah ◽  
Abdul Rahman Mohd Kasim

This numerical study was devoted to examining the occurrence of non-unique solutions in boundary layer flow due to deformable surfaces (cylinder and flat plate) with the imposition of prescribed surface heat flux. The hybrid Al2O3-Cu/water nanofluid was formulated using the single phase model with respective correlations of hybrid nanofluids. The governing model was simplified by adopting a similarity transformation. The transformed differential equations were then numerically computed using the efficient bvp4c solver with the ranges of the control parameters 0.5%≤ϕ1,ϕ2≤1.5% (Al2O3 and Cu volumetric concentration), 0≤K≤0.2 (curvature parameter), 2.6<S≤3.2 (suction parameter) and −2.5<λ≤0.5 (stretching/shrinking parameter). Dual steady solutions are presentable for both a cylinder (K>0) and a flat plate (K=0) with the inclusion of only the suction (transpiration) parameter. The real and stable solutions were mathematically validated through the stability analysis. The Al2O3-Cu/water nanofluid with ϕ1=0.5% (alumina) and ϕ2=1.5% (copper) has the highest skin friction coefficient and heat transfer rate, followed by the hybrid nanofluids with volumetric concentrations (ϕ1=1%,ϕ2=1%) and (ϕ1=1.5%,ϕ2=0.5%), respectively. Surprisingly, the flat plate surface abates the separation of boundary layer while it enhances the heat transfer process.


2020 ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Yuri P. Zarichnyak ◽  
Vyacheslav P. Khodunkov

The analysis of a new class of measuring instrument for heat quantities based on the use of multi-valued measures of heat conductivity of solids. For example, measuring thermal conductivity of solids shown the fallacy of the proposed approach and the illegality of the use of the principle of ambiguity to intensive thermal quantities. As a proof of the error of the approach, the relations for the thermal conductivities of the component elements of a heat pump that implements a multi-valued measure of thermal conductivity are given, and the limiting cases are considered. In two ways, it is established that the thermal conductivity of the specified measure does not depend on the value of the supplied heat flow. It is shown that the declared accuracy of the thermal conductivity measurement method does not correspond to the actual achievable accuracy values and the standard for the unit of surface heat flux density GET 172-2016. The estimation of the currently achievable accuracy of measuring the thermal conductivity of solids is given. The directions of further research and possible solutions to the problem are given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document