SUPERSYMMETRY AND THE FOUR-DIMENSIONAL COUNTERPART OF DIMENSIONAL REGULARIZATION

1992 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-59
Author(s):  
J. NOVOTNÝ

A supersymmetric generalization of the natural four-dimensional counterpart of canonical dimensional regularization developed recently is discussed for SUSY QED. The gauge invariance of the regularization scheme is proved and the method illustrated by simple examples of explicit calculation of one-loop supergraphs. The relation to the regularization by dimensional reduction is briefly discussed.

1992 ◽  
Vol 07 (28) ◽  
pp. 2575-2582 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. NOVOTNÝ

An explicit calculation of the one-loop topological mass term within a broad class of gauge invariant regularization schemes developed recently is presented for (2+1)-dimensional QED. This provides an uniform description of the results obtained recently in the literature and an explanation of their regularization scheme dependence. The Pauli-Villars and dimensional regularization are discussed in more detail in this context and an alternative formulation of dimensional regularization in (2+1) dimensions is described.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Chen

AbstractThis article discusses a prescription to compute polarized dimensionally regularized amplitudes, providing a recipe for constructing simple and general polarized amplitude projectors in D dimensions that avoids conventional Lorentz tensor decomposition and avoids also dimensional splitting. Because of the latter, commutation between Lorentz index contraction and loop integration is preserved within this prescription, which entails certain technical advantages. The usage of these D-dimensional polarized amplitude projectors results in helicity amplitudes that can be expressed solely in terms of external momenta, but different from those defined in the existing dimensional regularization schemes. Furthermore, we argue that despite being different from the conventional dimensional regularization scheme (CDR), owing to the amplitude-level factorization of ultraviolet and infrared singularities, our prescription can be used, within an infrared subtraction framework, in a hybrid way without re-calculating the (process-independent) integrated subtraction coefficients, many of which are available in CDR. This hybrid CDR-compatible prescription is shown to be unitary. We include two examples to demonstrate this explicitly and also to illustrate its usage in practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-191
Author(s):  
I. A. Shershan ◽  
T. V. Shishkina

The problem of the bremsstrahlung contribution calculation as a part of the radiative corrections in the case of single gauge boson production was discussed. It was shown that the hard photon bremsstrahlung contribution can be divided into the finite and divergent terms. The exact calculation of soft photon bremsstrahlung and infrared part of hard photon bremsstrahlung was presented in frame of the dimensional regularization scheme. Numerical analysis of radiative corrections to the cross sections of single gauge boson production was performed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (08) ◽  
pp. 1367-1389 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. DE ANDRADE ◽  
O.M. DEL CIMA

In this work the supersymmetric gauge-invariant action for the massive Abelian N=1 super-QED 2+2 in the Atiyah-Ward space-time (D=2+2) is formulated. The questions concerning the scheme of the gauge invariance in D=2+2 by means of gauging the massive N=1 super-QED 2+2 are investigated. We study how to ensure the gauge invariance at the expense of the introduction of a complex vector superfield. We discuss the Wess-Zumino gauge and thereupon we conclude that, in this gauge, only the imaginary part of the complex vector field, Bμ, gauges a U(1) symmetry. whereas its real part gauges a Weyl symmetry. We build up the gauge-invariant massive term by introducing a pair of chiral and antichiral superfields with opposite U(1) charges. We carry out a dimensional reduction à la Scherk of the massive N=1 super-QED 2+2 action from D=2+2 to D=1+2. Truncations are needed in order to suppress nonphysical modes, and we end up with a parity-preserving N=1 super-QED 1+2 (rather than N=2) in D=1+2. Finally, we show that the N=1 super-QED 1+2 we have obtained is the supersymmetric version of τ3 QED .


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (31) ◽  
pp. 1350164 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. INAGAKI ◽  
D. KIMURA ◽  
H. KOHYAMA ◽  
A. KVINIKHIDZE

Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model used to investigate low energy phenomena is nonrenormalizable, therefore the results depend on the regularization parameter in general. A possibility of the finite in four-dimensional limit and even the in regularization parameter (this is dimension in the dimensional regularization scheme) independent analysis is shown in the leading order of the 1/Nc expansion.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 1250081 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUSAMA AGARWALA

The β function for a scalar field theory describes the dependence of the coupling constant on the renormalization mass scale. This dependence is affected by the choice of regularization scheme. I explicitly relate the β functions of momentum cut-off regularization and dimensional regularization on scalar field theories by a gauge transformation using the Hopf algebras of the Feynman diagrams of the theories.


Open Physics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabor Cynolter ◽  
Endre Lendvai

AbstractA Lorentz and gauge symmetry preserving regularization method is proposed in 4 dimensions based on a momentum cutoff. We use the conditions of gauge invariance or equivalently the freedom to shift the loop momentum to define the evaluation of the terms carrying even number of Lorentz indices, e.g. proportional to k µ k ν. The remaining scalar integrals are calculated with a four dimensional momentum cutoff. The finite terms (independent of the cutoff) are free of ambiguities coming from subtractions in non-trivial cases. Finite parts of the result are equal to that of dimensional regularization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (supp01) ◽  
pp. 1441001
Author(s):  
Héctor Luna García ◽  
Luz María García

We review Davydychev method for calculating Feynman integrals for massive and no massive propagators, by employing Mellin–Barnes transformation and the dimensional regularization scheme, same that lead to hypergeometric functions. In particular, an example is calculated explicitly from such a method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document