New global atomic mass formulas

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (25) ◽  
pp. 1745024
Author(s):  
William J. M. F. Collis

We illustrate the improved empirical methods of estimating atomic masses using Garvey–Kelson like local relations and global equations using generic point functions.

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kaptay

Atomic masses (weights?) is an essential information for mining and metallurgy. The paper discusses four subjects around this problem. First, the classification of all the elements is suggested into 4 classes, based on their isotope features, determining the accuracy of their known atomic masses. As part of that, the class of elements is discussed with uncertain atomic weights in accordance with the 2009 IUPAC recommendations. A better (easier to use) format of atomic weights is presented for this class of elements. Third, it is found not informative to leave empty spaces instead of approximate atomic weights for elements with unstable isotopes. Fourth, the term atomic weight vs the term atomic mass is discussed shortly, in agreement with the SI system of units and in contrary to the questionable IUPAC convection.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Kozier ◽  
K. S. Sharma ◽  
R. C. Barber ◽  
J. W. Barnard ◽  
R. J. Ellis ◽  
...  

The 1.00 m radius high resolution mass spectrometer at the University of Manitoba ('Manitoba II') has been used to determine the atomic masses of 47Ti and 48Ti. These data are somewhat superior in precision to existing values and improve the reliability of atomic mass data in that region of the mass table.


1980 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1311-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Kozier ◽  
K. S. Sharma ◽  
R. C. Barber ◽  
J. W. Barnard ◽  
R. J. Ellis ◽  
...  

The 1.00 m radius high resolution mass spectrometer at the University of Manitoba ("Manitoba II") has been used to determine both atomic masses and atomic mass differences for all the naturally occurring isotopes of Hg with a precision superior to existing values. The mass difference data are in excellent agreement with recently tabulated values, while the atomic masses themselves differ significantly.


1954 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Hogg ◽  
Henry E. Duckworth

A number of new atomic masses are reported in the region 82 < n < 126 and are used to study nuclear stability in this region. No stability effects associated with a particular neutron number are noticed but rather there is a broad general increase in stability between the 82 and 126 neutron shells.


1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Sharma ◽  
K. S. Kozier ◽  
J. W. Barnard ◽  
R. C. Barber ◽  
S. S. Haque ◽  
...  

The 1 m radius, second order double focusing mass spectrometer at the University of Manitoba has been used to obtain atomic mass differences for eleven mass doublets. These data are combined with well known values for the atomic masses of 13C, l6O, 35Cl, and 37Cl to derive both atomic masses and mass differences for all of the naturally-occurring isotopes of W and Re.


Author(s):  
Christopher O. Oriakhi

Many chemists use the terms formula mass and molecular mass interchangeably when dealing with chemical compounds of known formula. But there is a slight difference between the two terms, as explained below. The formula mass of a compound is the sum of the atomic masses of all the atoms in a formula unit of the compound, whether it is ionic or molecular (covalent). The formula mass is based on the ratio of different elements in a formula, as opposed to the molecular mass, which depends on the actual number of each kind of atom (compare section 6.2, “Empirical Formula”). Formula masses are relative since they are derived from relative atomic masses. For example, the formula mass of phosphoric acid, H3PO4, is 97.98 atomic mass units (amu), which is obtained by adding the atomic masses (taken from the periodic table) of the elements in one formula unit (i.e., 3 H + 1 P + 4 O). (3×At. wt. of H)+(1×At. wt. of P)+(4×At. Wt. of O) = (3×1.00)+(1×30.97)+(4×16.00) = 97.97 Once the actual formula of a chemical substance is known, the molecular mass can be determined in a manner similar to calculating the formula mass. The molecular mass of a compound is the sum of the atomic masses of all the atoms in one molecule of the compound. The term applies only to compounds that exist as molecules, such as H2O, SO2, and glucose, C6H12O6. For example, the molecular mass of ethanol, C2H5OH, is: (2×C)+(6×H)+(1×O) (2×12.0)+(6×1.0)+(1×16.0) = 46 When ionic compounds such as NaCl, Zn(NO3)2, andNH4Cl, are in the crystalline state or in solution form, they do not contain physically distinct uncharged molecular entities. Therefore chemists often use the term formula mass to represent the total composition of such substances. Example 4.1 Calculate the formula mass (FM) of NaOH using a table of atomic masses (AM).


1965 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1288-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. W. Cameron ◽  
R. M. Elkin

Cameron has interpreted the heavy uranium mass yield curve from the Mike thermonuclear explosion as indicating that conventional atomic mass formulas do not give realistic values of neutron binding energies for neutron-rich nuclei off the valley of beta stability. In this paper two mass formulas are constructed which differ in the treatment of the nuclear symmetry energy. In one, essentially of conventional form, very neutron-rich nuclei become unbound. In the other, of a modified "exponential" form, very neutron-rich nuclei remain slightly bound. The three adjustable coefficients in each formula were determined by least-squares fits to the measured masses near the valley of beta stability; the formulas fit these masses about equally well with nearly the same values of the coefficients. Additional shell and pairing corrections were determined empirically. These corrections suggest a preference for the exponential formula. Some astrophysical applications of these results are qualitatively discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document