Evidence-based Consensus on Intravenous Contrast Media and Acute Kidney Injury Will Improve Patient Care in the Emergency Department

Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (2) ◽  
pp. E2-E2
Author(s):  
Michael R. Ehmann ◽  
Eili Y. Klein ◽  
Jeremiah S. Hinson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Contrast Media ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Intravenous Contrast ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Intravenous Contrast Media

scholarly journals Risk of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in emergency department

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792091339
Author(s):  
Seda Dağar ◽  
Emine Emektar ◽  
Hüseyin Uzunosmanoğlu ◽  
Şeref Kerem Çorbacıoğlu ◽  
Özge Öztekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Contrast Media ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Intravenous Contrast ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography

Background: Despite its risks associated with renal injury, intravenous contrast media increases diagnostic efficacy and hence the chance of early diagnosis and treatment, which leaves clinicians in a dilemma regarding its use in emergency settings. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the risk and predictors of contrast-induced acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast media administration for computed tomography in the emergency department. Methods: All patients aged 18 years and older who had a basal creatinine measurement within the last 8 h before contrast-enhanced computed tomography and a second creatinine measurement within 48–72 h after computed tomography scan between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 were included in the study. Characteristics of patients with and without contrast-induced acute kidney injury development were compared. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the predictors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Results: A total of 631 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. After contrast media administration, contrast-induced acute kidney injury developed in 4.9% ( n = 31) of the patients. When the characteristics of patients are compared according to the development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, significant differences were detected for age, initial creatinine, initial estimated glomerular filtration rate, and all acute illness severity indicators (hypotension, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and need for intensive care unit admission). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The need for intensive care unit admission (odds ratio: 6.413 (95% confidence interval: 1.709–24.074)) and hypotension (odds ratio: 5.575 (95% confidence interval: 1.624–19.133)) were the main factors for contrast-induced acute kidney injury development. Conclusion: Our study results revealed that hypotension, need for intensive care, and advanced age were associated with acute kidney injury in patients receiving contrast media. Therefore, we believe that to perform contrast-enhanced computed tomography in emergency department should not be decided only by checking for renal function tests and that these predictors should be taken into consideration.

MO419THE ROLE OF SHORT-TERM, HIGH-DOSE ATORVASTATIN FOR PREVENTION OF CONTRAST-INDUCED ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY (CI-AKI) IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES UNDERGOING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY WITH INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST ADMINISTRATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Vasin ◽  
Olga Mironova ◽  
Viktor Fomin
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Contrast Media ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Intravenous Contrast ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Intravenous Contrast Media ◽  
Contrast Media Administration

Abstract Background and Aims Computed tomography with intravenous contrast media is widely used in hospitals. The incidence of CI-AKI due to intravenous contrast media administration in high-risk patients remains not studied as well as CI-AKI after intraarterial contrast media administration is. According to other researchers, the use of statins in the prevention of AKI after intra-arterial administration of a contrast agent is currently considered an efficient preventive measure. The aim of our study is to assess the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with cardiovascular diseases during CT scan with intravenous contrast media and analyze the efficacy and safety of various statin dosing regimens for prevention of CI-AKI. Method A randomized controlled open prospective study is planned. Statin naive patients with cardiovascular diseases will be divided into 3 groups. Patients in the first group will receive atorvastatin 80mg 24 hours and 40mg 2 hours before CT scans and 40 mg after. The second group – 40 mg 2 hours before CT scans and 40 mg after. A third group is a control group. Exclusion criteria were current or previous statin treatment, contraindications to statins, severe renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, administration of nephrotoxic drugs. The primary endpoint will the development of CI-AKI, defined as an increase in serum Cr concentration 0.5 mg/dl (44.2 mmol/l) or 25% above baseline at 72 h after exposure to the contrast media. Results We assume a higher incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in the group of patients not receiving statin therapy (about 5-10%). At the same time, it is unlikely to get a significant difference between statin dosing regimens. Risk factors such as age over 75 years, the presence of chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and chronic heart failure increase the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Conclusion Despite the significantly lower incidence of CI-AKI with intravenous contrast compared to intra-arterial, patients with CVD have a greater risk of this complication even with intravenous contrast. Therefore, the development of prevention methods and scales for assessing the likelihood of CI-AKI is an important problem. As a result of the study, we expect to conclude the benefits of statins in CI-AKI prevention and the optimal dosage regimen. This information will help us to reduce the burden of CI-AKI after CT scanning in statin naive patients with cardiovascular diseases in everyday clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04666389

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Intravenous Contrast Media Administration

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 577-586.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah S. Hinson ◽  
Michael R. Ehmann ◽  
Derek M. Fine ◽  
Elliot K. Fishman ◽  
Matthew F. Toerper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Contrast Media ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Intravenous Contrast ◽  
Intravenous Contrast Media ◽  
Contrast Media Administration

Interprofessional Education

2018 ◽  
pp. 520-541
Author(s):  
Rebecca Moote
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Design And Implementation ◽  
Assessment Strategies ◽  
Improve Patient

Interprofessional education (IPE) is recognized as an important component in the education of healthcare students. The goal of bringing students together to learn with, from, and about each other is to ultimately impact collaborative practice and improve patient care. Over the last 20 years there has been increased focus on the design and implementation of IPE experiences. Several IPE collaborative organizations and IPE centers have been formed to provide evidence-based recommendations and guidelines. Strategies have been created for designing and implementing high quality IPE activities, developing faculty in IPE, overcoming student stereotypes, determining assessment strategies, and identifying barriers to IPE. This chapter will focus on each of these elements and provide specific recommendations on how to create and implement IPE that improves student learning.

scholarly journals P108: Characterizing use of next-day ultrasound from the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S103
Author(s):  
C. Roberts ◽  
T. Oyedokun ◽  
B. Cload ◽  
L. Witt
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Additional Stress ◽  
Start Date ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals ◽  
Improve Patient

Introduction: Formal ultrasound imaging, with use of ultrasound technicians and radiologists, provides a valuable diagnostic component to patient care in the Emergency Department (ED). Outside of regular weekday hours, ordering formal ultrasounds can produce logistical difficulties. EDs have developed protocols for next-day ultrasounds, where the patient returns the following day for imaging and reassessment by an ED physician. This creates additional stress on ED resources – personnel, bed space, finances – that are already strained. There is a dearth of literature regarding the use of next-day ultrasounds or guidelines to direct efficient use. This study sought to accumulate data on the use of ED next-day ultrasounds and patient oriented clinical outcomes. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of 150 patients, 75 from each of two different tertiary care hospitals in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. After a predetermined start date, convenience samples were collected of all patients who had undergone a next-day ultrasound ordered from the ED until the quota was satisfied. Patients were identified by an electronic medical record search for specific triage note phrases indicating use of next-day ultrasounds. Different demographic, clinical, and administrative parameters were collected and analyzed. Results: Of the 150 patients, the mean age was 35.9 years and 75.3% were female. Median length of stay for the first visit was 4.1 hours, and 2.2 hours for the return visit. Most common ultrasound scans performed were abdomen and pelvis/gyne (34.7%), complete abdomen (30.0%), duplex extremity venous (10.0%). Most common indications on the ultrasound requisition were nonspecific abdominal pain (18.7%), vaginal bleeding with or without pregnancy (17.3%), and hepatobiliary pathology (15.3%). Ultrasounds results reported a relevant finding 56% of the time, and 34% were completely normal. After the next-day ultrasound 5.3% of patients had a CT scan, 10.7% had specialist consultation, 8.2% were admitted, and 7.3% underwent surgery. Conclusion: Information was gathered to close gaps in knowledge about the use of next-day ultrasounds from the ED. A large proportion of patients are discharged home without further interventions. Additional research and the development of next-day ultrasound guidelines or outpatient pathways may improve patient care and ED resource utilization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document