scholarly journals Biparametric MRI prior to Radical Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in a Caribbean Population: Implications for Risk Group Stratification and Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. e200007
Author(s):  
Maria A. Gosein ◽  
Dylan Narinesingh ◽  
Shastri Motilal ◽  
Adrian P. Ramkissoon ◽  
Cristal M. Goetz ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 702-709
Author(s):  
Alejandro Berlin ◽  
Ardalan E. Ahmad ◽  
Melvin L.K. Chua ◽  
Fabio Y. Moraes ◽  
Haiyan Jiang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
B. Avuzzi ◽  
C. Cozzarini ◽  
T. Rancati ◽  
I. Improta ◽  
F. Palorini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukihiro Hama ◽  
Etsuko Tate

Abstract Radical radiation therapy for oligorecurrent prostate cancer is considered to improve both overall and disease-specific survival. Therefore, accurate diagnosis by imaging is important when considering the indications for radiation therapy. We present a case of marginal recurrence of bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with radical radiation therapy, which could not be detected by bone single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) but could be diagnosed by 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT). Bone SPECT/CT showed false-positive tracer uptake in the lesion previously irradiated. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan showed no abnormal uptake in the previously irradiated lesion, but showed intense uptake in the newly developed metastasis near the irradiated site. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan may be able to diagnose marginal recurrence after radiation therapy more accurately than bone SPECT/CT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
Jonathan David Tward ◽  
Constantine Mantz ◽  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Paul Nguyen ◽  
Isla Garraway ◽  
...  

195 Background: This study evaluated the ability of the combined clinical cell-cycle risk score (CCR) to prognosticate the risk of prostate cancer metastasis in men receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods: The CCR score is a validated model that combines the cell cycle progression score (CCP) with the UCSF Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score (CAPRA). The CCR score and a CCR-based multimodality threshold score (2.112) were evaluated in a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort of men with National Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCN) intermediate- or high-risk localized disease (N = 741) who received single (RT) or multimodality therapy (ADT with RT). Effects of prognostic variables were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: Median follow-up was 5.9 years. CCR predicted metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.21, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.70-2.87, p < 0.001]. The CCR score was a better prognosticator of metastasis (C-index 0.78) than either NCCN-risk group (C-index 0.70), CAPRA score (C-index 0.71), or CCP score (C-index 0.69) alone. In bivariate analyses, the CCR score remained highly prognostic for metastasis when comparing any ADT vs none (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.97, p < 0.001), ADT duration as a continuous variable (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54-2.72, p < 0.001), or ADT use given as less than or at the recommended duration for each NCCN risk group (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.71-2.88, p < 0.001). Men with CCR scores either below or above the threshold (2.112) had a 10-year risk of metastasis of 4.2% and 25.3%, respectively. For men below the threshold receiving RT alone versus RT+ADT, the 10-year risk of metastasis was 4.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Conclusions: CCR is a highly precise and accurate predictor of metastasis in men undergoing dose-escalated RT, with or without ADT. CCR adds clinically actionable information relative to guideline recommended therapies that are based on NCCN risk groups or CAPRA alone. Men with scores below the multimodality threshold may not significantly reduce their 10-year risk of metastasis with the addition of ADT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document