Abstract
Aim
The prognostic significance of different hypertension subtypes in young hypertensives, in particular of isolated systolic hypertensives (ISHs) is still debated. The aim of the present study was to investigate clinical and haemodynamic characteristics and blood pressure (BP) evolution of different hypertension subtypes in young stage I hypertensives.
Methods
We investigated 1206 young subjects from the HARVEST study: 81 normotensives (NTs), 146 ISHs, 281 isolated diastolic hypertensives (IDHs) and 698 systolic-diastolic hypertensives (SDHs) according to office BP values at baseline. Data on baseline haemodynamic and metabolic characteristics, BP and heart rate changes during follow-up (mean 7 years) were collected. ANCOVA analysis was used for all comparisons adjusting for age and sex.
Results
Males were more frequent among ISHs (90.4%) compared to other categories (70.4, 67.3, 71.5% among NTs, IDHs, SHDs). Moreover, ISHs were younger compared to the others (25.6±6.6 years, p<0.001) and thinner compared to SDHs (24.6±.2.6 vs 25.8±3.6 kg/m2, p=0.028). Heart rate was higher among ISHs (75.7±9.4 bpm) and SDHs (75.8±9.7) compared to other categories (p<0.001). Metabolic characteristics were not significantly different among groups. ISHs were more active in sports (55.5%) and drank less alcohol compared to others (p<0.001, p=0.05 respectively). Systolic white coat effect was higher among ISH (17.6±12.4 mmHg) compared to others (p<0.001), as was cardiac output ISH (6.3±1.2 ml/min) compared to NTs and IDHs (p<0.001); Peripheral resistances were similar in ISHs and NTs and were lower than in IDHs and SDHs (p<0.001). Small and large artery compliance was higher, central systolic BP and augmentation index were lower among NTs and ISHs compared to IDHs and SDHs, even if these differences were not statistically significant. During follow-up systolic BP decreased (−7.6±14.4 mmHg) among ISHs, while it increased among NTs and IDHs (p<0.001). Heart rate decreased in all categories but to a higher extent among ISHs (−3.8±10.9 bpm) and SDHs (−3.4±10.8 bpm) (p=0.002 vs others). Changes in diastolic BP were similar among ISHs and NTs and higher than those observed among IDHs and SDHs (p<0.001). The percent of patients who started pharmacological treatment during follow-up was 70.6% among SDHs, 54.1% among IDHs, 41.1% among ISHs, and 39.5% among NTs (p<0.001).
Conclusions
ISHs had increased cardiac output and white coat effect and lower peripheral resistances compared to other hypertension subtypes while distensibility parameters did not differ significantly among groups. The percent of patients who developed hypertension needing treatment was lower among ISHs than other hypertensives. This was due to a favourable time course of BP during follow-up. Longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the lower risk profile of ISH of the young
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None