Influence of menstrual cycle on shivering, skin blood flow, and sweating responses measured at night

1985 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1902-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Hessemer ◽  
K. Bruck
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Cutaneous Vasodilation ◽  
Threshold Temperatures ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
Heat Clearance

In 10 women, external cold and heat exposures were performed both in the middle of luteal phase (L) and in the early follicular phase (F) of the menstrual cycle. Serum progesterone concentrations in L and F averaged 46.0 and 0.9 nmol X l-1, respectively. The experiments took place between 3:00 and 4:30 A.M., when the L-F core temperature difference is maximal. At neutral ambient temperature, esophageal (Tes), tympanic (Tty), rectal (Tre), and mean skin (Tsk) temperatures averaged 0.59 degrees C higher in L than in F. The thresholds for shivering, chest sweating, and cutaneous vasodilation (heat clearance technique) at the thumb and forearm were increased in L by an average of 0.47 degrees C, related to mean body temperature [Tb(es) = 0.87Tes + 0.13 Tsk] and to Tes, Tty, Tre, or Tsk. The above-threshold chest sweat rate and cutaneous heat clearances at the thumb and forearm were also enhanced in L, when related to Tb(es) or time. The metabolic rate, arm blood flow, and heart rate at thermoneutral conditions were increased in L by 5.0%, 1.1 ml X 100 ml-1 X min-1, and 4.6 beats X min-1, respectively. The concomitant increase in threshold temperatures for all autonomic thermoregulatory responses in L supports the concept of a resetting of the set point underlying the basal body temperature elevation in L. The effects of the increased threshold temperatures are counteracted by enhanced heat loss responses.

Influence of menstrual cycle on thermoregulatory, metabolic, and heart rate responses to exercise at night

1985 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1911-1917 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Hessemer ◽  
K. Bruck
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Cycle Ergometer ◽  
Exercise Heart Rate ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Early Follicular Phase ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Resting Period

Ten women [mean maximal O2 uptake (VO2max), 2.81 l X min-1] exercised for 15 min on a cycle ergometer in the middle of the luteal phase (L) and in the early follicular phase (F) of the menstrual cycle at the same constant work rates (mean 122 W) and an ambient temperature of 18 degrees C. Serum progesterone averaged 44.7 nmol X l-1 in L and 0.7 nmol X l-1 in F. After a 4-h resting period, exercise was performed between 3 and 4 A.M., when the L-F core temperature difference is maximal. Preexercise esophageal (Tes), tympanic (Tty), and rectal (Tre) temperatures averaged 0.6 degrees C higher in L. During exercise Tes, Tty, and Tre averaged 0.5 degrees C higher. The thresholds for chest sweating and cutaneous vasodilation (heat clearance technique) at the thumb and forearm were elevated in L by an average of 0.47 degrees C, related to mean body temperature (Tb(es) = 0.87Tes + 0.13Tskin), Tes, Tty, or Tre. The above-threshold chest sweat rate and cutaneous heat clearances were also increased in L. The mean exercise heart rate was 170.0 beats X min-1 in L and 163.8 beats X min-1 in F. The mean exercise VO2 in L (2.21 l X min-1) was 5.2% higher than in F (2.10 l X min-1), the metabolic rate was increased in L by 5.6%, but the net efficiency was 5.3% lower. No significant L-F differences in the respiratory exchange ratio and postexercise plasma lactate were demonstrated.

Circadian rhythm in sweating and cutaneous blood flow

1984 ◽  
Vol 246 (3) ◽  
pp. R321-R324 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Stephenson ◽  
C. B. Wenger ◽  
B. H. O'Donovan ◽  
E. R. Nadel
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Circadian Rhythm ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Forearm Blood Flow ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Circadian Variation ◽  
Esophageal Temperature ◽  
Cutaneous Blood Flow ◽  
Cutaneous Vasodilation ◽  
Cutaneous Blood

To characterize the changes in the control of the heat loss responses associated with the circadian variation in body temperature, we studied five men during 20 min of exercise in 25 degrees C on 6 separate days. Experiments were conducted at six times, equally spaced over the 24-h day. Esophageal temperature (Tes) and chest sweat rate (msw) were measured continuously, and forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured one to two times per minute. The thresholds for sweating and forearm vasodilation were significantly higher at 1600 and 2000 than at 2400 and 0400, averaging 0.57 and 0.65 degrees C higher, respectively, at 1600 than at 0400. Resting Tes and the Tes thresholds for cutaneous vasodilation and sweating during exercise all showed a similar circadian rhythm. The level at which core temperature is regulated therefore varies over the 24-h day with the zenith occurring around 1600 and the nadir at 0400. However, whereas the slope of the msw-to-Tes relation did not change over the 24-h day, the slope of the FBF-to-Tes relation tended to increase between 0400 and 2400, implying that the circadian rhythm may be more complex than just a shift in the central reference temperature.

scholarly journals Temperature of water ingested before exercise alters the onset of physiological heat loss responses

2019 ◽  
Vol 316 (1) ◽  
pp. R13-R20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan B. Morris ◽  
Georgia K. Chaseling ◽  
Anthony R. Bain ◽  
Ollie Jay
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Relative Humidity ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Vascular Conductance ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Local Sweat Rate ◽  
Cutaneous Vascular Conductance

This study sought to determine whether the temperature of water ingested before exercise alters the onset threshold and subsequent thermosensitivity of local vasomotor and sudomotor responses after exercise begins. Twenty men [24 (SD 4) yr of age, 75.8 (SD 8.1) kg body mass, 52.3 (SD 7.7) ml·min−1·kg−1peak O2consumption (V̇o2peak)] ingested 1.5°C, 37°C, or 50°C water (3.2 ml/kg), rested for 5 min, and then cycled at 50% V̇o2peakfor 15 min at 23.0 (SD 0.9) °C and 32 (SD 10) % relative humidity. Mean body temperature (Tb), local sweat rate (LSR), and skin blood flow (SBF) were measured. In a subset of eight men [25 (SD 5) yr of age, 78.6 (SD 8.3) kg body mass, 48.9 (SD 11.1) ml·min−1·kg−1V̇o2peak], blood pressure was measured and cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was determined. The change in Tbwas greater at the onset of LSR measurement with ingestion of 1.5°C than 50°C water [ΔTb= 0.19 (SD 0.15) vs. 0.11 (SD 0.12) °C, P = 0.04], but not 37°C water [ΔTb= 0.14 (SD 0.14) °C, P = 0.23], but did not differ between trials for SBF measurement [ΔTb= 0.18 (SD 0.15) °C, 0.11 (SD 0.13) °C, and 0.09 (SD 0.09) °C with 1.5°C, 37°C, and 50°C water, respectively, P = 0.07]. Conversely, the thermosensitivity of LSR and SBF was not different [LSR = 1.11 (SD 0.75), 1.11 (SD 0.75), and 1.34 (SD 1.11) mg·min−1·cm−2·°C−1with 1.5°C, 37°C, and 50°C ingested water, respectively ( P = 0.46); SBF = 717 (SD 882), 517 (SD 606), and 857 (SD 904) %baseline arbitrary units (AU)/°C with 1.5°C, 37°C, and 50°C ingested water, respectively ( P = 0.95)]. After 15 min of exercise, LSR and SBF were greater with ingestion of 50°C than 1.5°C water [LSR = 0.40 (SD 0.17) vs. 0.31 (SD 0.19) mg·min−1·cm−2( P = 0.02); SBF = 407 (SD 149) vs. 279 (SD 117) %baseline AU ( P < 0.001)], but not 37°C water [LSR = 0.50 (SD 0.22) mg·min−1·cm−2; SBF = 324 (SD 169) %baseline AU]. CVC was statistically unaffected [275 (SD 81), 340 (SD 114), and 384 (SD 160) %baseline CVC with 1.5°C, 37°C, and 50°C ingested water, respectively, P = 0.30]. Collectively, these results support the concept that visceral thermoreceptors modify the central drive for thermoeffector responses.

scholarly journals Skin blood flow and local temperature independently modify sweat rate during passive heat stress in humans

2010 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 1301-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Wingo ◽  
David A. Low ◽  
David M. Keller ◽  
R. Matthew Brothers ◽  
Manabu Shibasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Skin Blood Flow ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Local Temperature ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Local Cooling ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Local Skin ◽  
Doppler Flowmetry

Sweat rate (SR) is reduced in locally cooled skin, which may result from decreased temperature and/or parallel reductions in skin blood flow. The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses that decreased skin blood flow and decreased local temperature each independently attenuate sweating. In protocols I and II, eight subjects rested supine while wearing a water-perfused suit for the control of whole body skin and internal temperatures. While 34°C water perfused the suit, four microdialysis membranes were placed in posterior forearm skin not covered by the suit to manipulate skin blood flow using vasoactive agents. Each site was instrumented for control of local temperature and measurement of local SR (capacitance hygrometry) and skin blood flow (laser-Doppler flowmetry). In protocol I, two sites received norepinephrine to reduce skin blood flow, while two sites received Ringer solution (control). All sites were maintained at 34°C. In protocol II, all sites received 28 mM sodium nitroprusside to equalize skin blood flow between sites before local cooling to 20°C (2 sites) or maintenance at 34°C (2 sites). In both protocols, individuals were then passively heated to increase core temperature ∼1°C. Both decreased skin blood flow and decreased local temperature attenuated the slope of the SR to mean body temperature relationship (2.0 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.7 mg·cm−2·min−1·°C−1 for the effect of decreased skin blood flow, P = 0.01; 1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 0.07 ± 0.05 mg·cm−2·min−1·°C−1 for the effect of decreased local temperature, P = 0.02). Furthermore, local cooling delayed the onset of sweating (mean body temperature of 37.5 ± 0.4 vs. 37.6 ± 0.4°C, P = 0.03). These data demonstrate that local cooling attenuates sweating by independent effects of decreased skin blood flow and decreased local skin temperature.

Menstrual cycle phase and time of day alter reference signal controlling arm blood flow and sweating

1985 ◽  
Vol 249 (2) ◽  
pp. R186-R191 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Stephenson ◽  
M. A. Kolka
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Water Vapor Pressure ◽  
Reference Signal ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Menstrual Cycle Phase ◽  
Cutaneous Vasodilation ◽  
Effector Activity ◽  
Exercise Transients

The changes occurring in the esophageal temperature (Tes) thresholds for initiation of heat loss responses as affected by the circadian period and menstrual cycle were studied. Four women exercised at 60% peak Vo2 in 35 degrees C (ambient water vapor pressure 1.73 kPa) for 30 min at 0400 and 1600 during the follicular (F) and luteal (L) phase. Tes, arm sweating rate (msw), and forearm blood flow (FBF) were measured frequently. At rest, Tes averaged 0.3 degrees C higher during L than F at both 0400 and 1600 and approximately 0.4 degrees C higher at 1600 than at 0400 during both phases. During exercise transients, the slopes of the FBF:Tes and the msw:Tes relationships were not different among treatments. The thresholds for initiation of sweating and cutaneous vasodilation were higher at 1600 than 0400 during both phases. Thresholds during F at 0400 averaged 36.44 degrees C for msw and 36.80 degrees C for vasodilation. The thresholds during L at 1600 averaged 37.46 and 37.53 degrees C for sweating and vasodilation, respectively. Our data indicate that the thermoregulatory effector activity during exercise is a function of numerous inputs, and one of these may be hormonal or hormonal-like in action. Controlling time of day and menstrual cycle phase are as important as controlling for aerobic power, age, and fitness in studying female thermoregulatory responses during exercise.

Forearm cutaneous vascular and sudomotor responses to whole body passive heat stress in young smokers

2015 ◽  
Vol 309 (1) ◽  
pp. R36-R42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole E. Moyen ◽  
Hannah M. Anderson ◽  
Jenna M. Burchfield ◽  
Matthew A. Tucker ◽  
Melina A. Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Stress ◽  
Sweat Gland ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Doppler Flowmetry ◽  
Cutaneous Vasodilation ◽  
Local Sweat Rate ◽  
Vasomotor Activity ◽  
Young Smokers

The purpose of this study was to compare smokers and nonsmokers' sudomotor and cutaneous vascular responses to whole body passive heat stress. Nine regularly smoking (SMK: 29 ± 9 yr; 10 ± 6 cigarettes/day) and 13 nonsmoking (N-SMK: 27 ± 8 yr) males were passively heated until core temperature (TC) increased 1.5°C from baseline. Forearm local sweat rate (LSR) via ventilated capsule, sweat gland activation (SGA), sweat gland output (SGO), and cutaneous vasomotor activity via laser-Doppler flowmetry (CVC) were measured as mean body temperature increased (ΔTb) during passive heating using a water-perfused suit. Compared with N-SMK, SMK had a smaller ΔTb at the onset of sweating (0.52 ± 0.19 vs. 0.35 ± 0.14°C, respectively; P = 0.03) and cutaneous vasodilation (0.61 ± 0.21 vs. 0.31 ± 0.12°C, respectively; P < 0.01). Increases in LSR and CVC per °C ΔTb (i.e., sensitivity) were similar in N-SMK and SMK (LSR: 0.63 ± 0.21 vs. 0.60 ± 0.40 Δmg/cm2/min/°C ΔTb, respectively, P = 0.81; CVC: 82.5 ± 46.2 vs. 58.9 ± 23.3 Δ%max/°C ΔTb, respectively; P = 0.19). However, the plateau in LSR during whole body heating was higher in N-SMK vs. SMK (1.00 ± 0.13 vs. 0.79 ± 0.26 mg·cm−2·min−1; P = 0.03), which was likely a result of higher SGO (8.94 ± 3.99 vs. 5.94 ± 3.49 μg·gland−1·min−1, respectively; P = 0.08) and not number of SGA (104 ± 7 vs. 121 ± 9 glands/cm2, respectively; P = 0.58). During whole body passive heat stress, smokers had an earlier onset for forearm sweating and cutaneous vasodilation, but a lower local sweat rate that was likely due to lower sweat output per gland. These data provide insight into local (i.e., forearm) thermoregulatory responses of young smokers during uncompensatory whole body passive heat stress.

Postural vasoconstriction in women during the normal menstrual cycle

1990 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. K. Hassan ◽  
G. Carter ◽  
J. E. Tooke
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Swelling Rate ◽  
Dependent Flow

1. Postural vasoconstriction in the foot was examined in 15 women during the menstrual, follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle, and in 13 age-matched men on two separate occasions, in a constant-temperature environment (22°C). 2. Skin blood flow was measured using laser Doppler flowmetry with the subject lying down, first with the foot maintained at heart level, then with the foot lowered passively 50 cm below the heart. In six of the women, at the time of experiment, serum oestradiol and progesterone were determined by radioimmunoassay. In four women and three men, foot swelling rate was also measured in the dependent foot using a strain gauge plethysmograph in addition to the postural changes in flow. At each visit, in all subjects, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, foot skin temperature and body weight were also recorded. 3. The men showed no significant changes in all the variables assessed. In contrast, in women during the luteal phase diastolic and mean arterial pressures were significantly reduced, whereas heart rate, body temperature, foot skin temperature and body weight were significantly increased, as compared with the follicular and menstrual phases of the cycle. 4. During the follicular phase, when oestradiol concentration was high, there were significant reductions in dependent flow and foot swelling rate associated with a significantly augmented postural fall in flow, whereas during the luteal phase, when both oestradiol and progesterone levels were high, there were significant increases in dependent flow and foot swelling rate associated with a significantly impaired postural fall in flow. Four women who reported premenstrual ankle oedema showed significantly higher flow values during the luteal phase than the rest of women. 5. These results confirm the modulating influence of female sex hormones on peripheral blood flow and vascular tone. The partially impaired postural vasoconstrictor response during the luteal phase of the cycle might be partly implicated in the pathogenesis of premenstrual oedema in some women.

scholarly journals Sustained increases in skin blood flow are not a prerequisite to initiate sweating during passive heat exposure

2017 ◽  
Vol 313 (2) ◽  
pp. R140-R148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Ravanelli ◽  
Ollie Jay ◽  
Daniel Gagnon
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Skin Blood Flow ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Heat Exposure ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Local Skin ◽  
Sweat Production ◽  
Sweating Efficiency ◽  
Change In Mean

Some studies have observed a functional relationship between sweating and skin blood flow. However, the implications of this relationship during physiologically relevant conditions remain unclear. We manipulated sudomotor activity through changes in sweating efficiency to determine if parallel changes in vasomotor activity are observed. Eight young men completed two trials at 36°C and two trials at 42°C. During these trials, air temperature remained constant while ambient vapor pressure increased from 1.6 to 5.6 kPa over 2 h. Forced airflow across the skin was used to create conditions of high (HiSeff) or low (LoSeff) sweating efficiency. Local sweat rate (LSR), local skin blood flow (SkBF), as well as mean skin and esophageal temperatures were measured continuously. It took longer for LSR to increase during HiSeff at 36°C (HiSeff: 99 ± 11 vs. LoSeff: 77 ± 11 min, P < 0.01) and 42°C (HiSeff: 72 ± 16 vs. LoSeff: 51 ± 15 min, P < 0.01). In general, an increase in LSR preceded the increase in SkBF when expressed as ambient vapor pressure and time for all conditions ( P < 0.05). However, both responses were activated at a similar change in mean body temperature (average across all trials, LSR: 0.26 ± 0.15 vs. SkBF: 0.30 ± 0.18°C, P = 0.26). These results demonstrate that altering the point at which LSR is initiated during heat exposure is paralleled by similar shifts for the increase in SkBF. However, local sweat production occurs before an increase in SkBF, suggesting that SkBF is not necessarily a prerequisite for sweating.

Attenuated thermoregulatory sweating and cutaneous vasodilation after 14-day bed rest in humans

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisaku Michikami ◽  
Atsunori Kamiya ◽  
Qi Fu ◽  
Satoshi Iwase ◽  
Tadaaki Mano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Skin Blood Flow ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Hot Water ◽  
Tympanic Temperature ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Threshold Temperature ◽  
Cutaneous Vasodilation ◽  
Skin Temperatures

We investigated the effect of head-down bed rest (HDBR) for 14 days on thermoregulatory sweating and cutaneous vasodilation in humans. Fluid intake was ad libitum during HDBR. We induced whole body heating by increasing skin temperature for 1 h with a water-perfused blanket through which hot water (42°C) was circulated. The experimental room was air-conditioned (27°C, 30–40% relative humidity). We measured skin blood flow (chest and forearm), skin temperatures (chest, upper arm, forearm, thigh, and calf), and tympanic temperature. We also measured sweat rate by the ventilated capsule method in which the skin area for measurement was drained by dry air conditioned at 27°C under similar skin temperatures in both trials. We calculated cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) from the ratio of skin blood flow to mean blood pressure. From tympanic temperature-sweat rate and -CVC relationships, we assessed the threshold temperature and sensitivity as the slope response of variables to a given change in tympanic temperature. HDBR increased the threshold temperature for sweating by 0.31°C at the chest and 0.32°C at the forearm, whereas it reduced sensitivity by 40% at the chest and 31% at the forearm. HDBR increased the threshold temperature for cutaneous vasodilation, whereas it decreased sensitivity. HDBR reduced plasma volume by 11%, whereas it did not change plasma osmolarity. The increase in the threshold temperature for sweating correlated with that for cutaneous vasodilation. In conclusion, HDBR attenuated thermoregulatory sweating and cutaneous vasodilation by increasing the threshold temperature and decreasing sensitivity. HDBR increased the threshold temperature for sweating and cutaneous vasodilation by similar magnitudes, whereas it decreased their sensitivity by different magnitudes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document