scholarly journals Natural echolocation sequences evoke echo-delay selectivity in the auditory midbrain of the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 1323-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Macías ◽  
Jinhong Luo ◽  
Cynthia F. Moss
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Sweep Rate ◽  
Eptesicus Fuscus ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Temporal Patterning ◽  
Stimulus Context ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
New Findings ◽  
Echo Delay ◽  
Delay Tuning

Echolocating bats must process temporal streams of sonar sounds to represent objects along the range axis. Neuronal echo-delay tuning, the putative mechanism of sonar ranging, has been characterized in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the mustached bat, an insectivorous species that produces echolocation calls consisting of constant frequency and frequency modulated (FM) components, but not in species that use FM signals alone. This raises questions about the mechanisms that give rise to echo-delay tuning in insectivorous bats that use different signal designs. To investigate whether stimulus context may account for species differences in echo-delay selectivity, we characterized single-unit responses in the IC of awake passively listening FM bats, Eptesicus fuscus, to broadcasts of natural sonar call-echo sequences, which contained dynamic changes in signal duration, interval, spectrotemporal structure, and echo-delay. In E. fuscus, neural selectivity to call-echo delay emerges in a population of IC neurons when stimulated with call-echo pairs presented at intervals mimicking those in a natural sonar sequence. To determine whether echo-delay selectivity also depends on the spectrotemporal features of individual sounds within natural sonar sequences, we studied responses to computer-generated echolocation signals that controlled for call interval, duration, bandwidth, sweep rate, and echo-delay. A subpopulation of IC neurons responded selectively to the combination of the spectrotemporal structure of natural call-echo pairs and their temporal patterning within a dynamic sonar sequence. These new findings suggest that the FM bat’s fine control over biosonar signal parameters may modulate IC neuronal selectivity to the dimension of echo-delay. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Echolocating bats perform precise auditory temporal computations to estimate their distance to objects. Here, we report that response selectivity of neurons in the inferior colliculus of a frequency modulated bat to call-echo delay, or target range tuning, depends on the temporal patterning and spectrotemporal features of sound elements in a natural echolocation sequence. We suggest that echo responses to objects at different distances are gated by the bat’s active control over the spectrotemporal patterning of its sonar emissions.

Distribution of combination-sensitive neurons in the ventral fringe area of the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Edamatsu ◽  
M. Kawasaki ◽  
N. Suga
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Functional Organization ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Sound Pulse ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
Mustached Bat ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Tritiated Amino Acids ◽  
Pulse Echo ◽  
Echo Delay

1. The orientation sound (pulse) of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, consists of long constant-frequency components (CF1-4) and short frequency-modulated components (FM1-4). The auditory cortex of this bat contains several combination-sensitive areas: FM-FM, DF, VA, VF, and CF/CF. The FM-FM area consists of neurons tuned to a combination of the pulse FM1 and the echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4) and has an echo-delay (target-range) axis. Our preliminary anatomical studies with tritiated amino acids suggest that the FM-FM area projects to the dorsal fringe (DF) area, which in turn projects to the ventral fringe (VF) area. The aim of our study was to characterize the response properties of VF neurons and to explore the functional organization of the VF area. Acoustic stimuli delivered to the bats were CF tones, FM sounds, and their combinations mimicking the pulse emitted by the mustached bat and the echo. 2. Like the FM-FM and DF areas, the VF area is composed of three types of FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons: FM1-FM2, FM1-FM3, and FM1-FM4. These neurons show little or no response to a pulse alone, echo alone, single CF tone or single FM sound. They do, however, show a strong facilitative response to a pulse-echo pair with a particular echo delay. The essential components in the pulse-echo pair for facilitation are the FM1 of the pulse and the FMn of the echo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Properties of echo delay-tuning receptive fields in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat

2012 ◽  
Vol 286 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Macías ◽  
Emanuel C. Mora ◽  
Julio C. Hechavarría ◽  
Manfred Kössl
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Mustached Bat ◽  
Echo Delay ◽  
Delay Tuning

Chronotopically Organized Target-Distance Map in the Auditory Cortex of the Short-Tailed Fruit Bat

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 322-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Hagemann ◽  
Karl-Heinz Esser ◽  
Manfred Kössl
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Neural Representation ◽  
Spatial Distance ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
Distance Map ◽  
Fruit Bat ◽  
Object Distance ◽  
Auditory Cortices ◽  
Echo Delay

Topographic cortical representation of echo delay, the cue for target range, is an organizational feature implemented in the auditory cortices of certain bats dedicated to catch flying insects. Such cortical echo-delay maps provide a calibrated neural representation of object spatial distance. To assess general requirements for echo-delay computations, cortical delay sensitivity was examined in the short-tailed fruit bat Carollia perspicillata that uses frequency-modulated (FM) echolocation signals. Delay-tuned neurons with temporal specificity comparable to those of insectivorous bats are located within the high-frequency (HF) field of the auditory cortex. All recorded neurons in the HF field respond well to single pure-tone and FM-FM stimulus pairs. The neurons respond to identical FM harmonic components in echolocation pulse and delayed echo (e.g., FM2-FM2). Their characteristic delays (CDs) for low echo amplitudes range between 1 and 24 ms, which is comparable to other bat species. Maps of the topography of FM-FM neurons show that they are distributed across the entire HF area and organized along a rostrocaudal echo-delay axis representing object distance. Rostrally located neurons tuned to delays of 2–8 ms are overrepresented (66% of CDs). Neurons with longer delays (≥10 ms) are located throughout the caudal half of the HF field. The delay-sensitive chronotopic area covers ∼3.3 mm in rostrocaudal and ∼3.7 mm in dorsoventral direction, which is comparable or slightly larger than the size of cortical delay-tuned areas in insectivorous constant frequency bats, the only other bat species for which cortical chronotopy has been demonstrated. This indicates that chronotopic cortical organization is not only used exclusively for precise insect localization in constant frequency bats but could also be of advantage for general orientation tasks.

Differences in response properties of neurons between two delay-tuned areas in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1700-1712 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Edamatsu ◽  
N. Suga
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Sound Pulse ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Mustached Bat ◽  
Echo Delay ◽  
Delay Tuning

1. The orientation sound (pulse) of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, consists of four harmonics (H1-4), each containing a long constant-frequency component (CF1-4) followed by a short frequency-modulated component (FM1-4). The auditory cortex of this species contains several "combination-sensitive" areas: FM-FM, dorsal fringe (DF), ventral fringe (VF), CF/CF, and H1-H2. The FM-FM, DF, and VF areas each consist of neurons tuned to particular delays of echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4) from pulse FM1, and have an echo-delay (target-range) axis. This delay axis is from 0.4 to approximately 18 ms in the FM-FM area, to approximately 9 ms in the DF area, and to approximately 5 ms in the VF area. Therefore we hypothesized that the VF area was more specialized for the processing of range information in the terminal phase of echolocation than was the FM-FM area. The aim of our present studies was to find differences in response properties between neurons with best delays shorter than 6 ms in the VF and FM-FM areas and thus to test our hypothesis. 2. In the terminal phase of target-directed flight, the rate of pulse emission becomes higher, pulse duration (in particular, CF duration) becomes shorter, echo delay becomes shorter, and echoes (both the CF and FM components) are less Doppler shifted. Therefore, a "temporal-pattern-simulating (TPS)" stimulus was designed to mimic the train of pulse-echo pairs that would be heard by the bat during the terminal phase, and responses of single neurons to the TPS stimulus and other types of stimuli were recorded from the VF and FM-FM areas of the auditory cortex of unanesthetized bats with a tungsten-wire microelectrode. 3. Best delays of the neurons studied range between 0.9 and 5.5 ms (2.64 +/- 0.72 ms, N = 181) for the VF area, and between 0.6 and 6.0 ms (3.64 +/- 1.14, N = 144) for the FM-FM area. More neurons in the VF area than those in the FM-FM area showed no response or a poor response to the TPS stimulus. Therefore VF neurons are less suited than neurons in the FM-FM area for processing target ranges in the terminal phase of target-directed flight. Facilitative delay-tuning curves were commonly sandwiched between inhibitory delay-tuning curves. The lack of response or poor response to the TPS stimulus can be explained by this inhibition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparison of properties of cortical echo delay-tuning in the short-tailed fruit bat and the mustached bat

2010 ◽  
Vol 197 (5) ◽  
pp. 605-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Hagemann ◽  
Marianne Vater ◽  
Manfred Kössl
Keyword(s):  
Fruit Bat ◽  
Mustached Bat ◽  
Echo Delay ◽  
Delay Tuning

Effects of Auditory Stimulus Context on the Representation of Frequency in the Gerbil Inferior Colliculus

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 1113-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Malone ◽  
M. N. Semple
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Duty Cycle ◽  
Selective Adaptation ◽  
Stimulus Context ◽  
Effective Stimulus ◽  
Spatial Stimulus ◽  
Interaural Phase ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Conditioned Responses ◽  
Frequency Changes

Prior studies of dynamic conditioning have focused on modulation of binaural localization cues, revealing that the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons to particular values of interaural phase and level disparities depend critically on the context in which they occur. Here we show that monaural frequency transitions, which do not simulate azimuthal motion, also condition the responses of IC neurons. We characterized single-unit responses to two frequency transition stimuli: a glide stimulus comprising two tones linked by a linear frequency sweep (origin-sweep-target) and a step stimulus consisting of one tone followed immediately by another (origin-target). Using sets of glide and step stimuli converging on a common target, we constructed conditioned response functions (RFs) depicting the variability in the response to an identical stimulus as a function of the preceding origin frequency. For nearly all cells, the response to the target depended on the origin frequency, even for origins outside the excitatory frequency response area of the cell. Results from conditioned RFs based on long (2–4 s) and short (200 ms) duration step stimuli indicate that conditioning effects can be induced in the absence of the dynamic sweep, and by stimuli of relatively short duration. Because IC neurons are tuned to frequency, changes in the origin frequency often change the “effective” stimulus duty cycle. In many cases, the enhancement of the target response appeared related to the decrease in the “effective” stimulus duty cycle rather than to the prior presentation of a particular origin frequency. Although this implies that nonselective adaptive mechanisms are responsible for conditioned responses, slightly more than half of IC neurons in each paradigm responded significantly differently to targets following origins that elicited statistically indistinguishable responses. The prevailing influence of stimulus context when discharge history is controlled demonstrates that not all the mechanisms governing conditioning depend on the discharge history of the recorded neuron. Selective adaptation among the neuron's variously tuned afferents may help engender stimulus-specific conditioning. The demonstration that conditioning effects reflect sensitivity to spectral as well as spatial stimulus contrast has broad implications for the processing of a wide range of dynamic acoustic signals and sound sequences.

Are the initial frequency-modulated components of the mustached bat's biosonar pulses important for ranging?

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1951-1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Fitzpatrick ◽  
N. Suga ◽  
H. Misawa
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Amplitude ◽  
Signal Amplitude ◽  
Frequency Component ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
Range Resolution ◽  
Mustached Bat ◽  
Pteronotus Parnellii ◽  
Target Ranging ◽  
The Mean

1. FM-FM neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii, are specialized to process target range. They respond when the terminal frequency-modulated component (TFM) of a biosonar pulse is paired with the TFM of the echo at a particular echo delay. Recently, it has been suggested that the initial FM components (IFMs) of biosonar signals may also be important for target ranging. To examine the possible role of IFMs in target ranging, we characterized the properties of IFMs and TFMs in biosonar pulses emitted by bats swung on a pendulum. We then studied responses of FM-FM neurons to synthesized biosonar signals containing IFMs and TFMs. 2. The mustached bat's biosonar signal consists of four harmonics, of which the second (H2) is the most intense. Each harmonic has an IFM in addition to a constant-frequency component (CF) and a TFM. Therefore each pulse potentially consists of 12 components, IFM1-4, CF1-4, and TFM1-4. The IFM sweeps up while the TFM sweeps down. 3. The IFM2 and TFM2 depths (i.e., bandwidths) were measured in 217 pulses from four animals. The mean IFM2 depth was much smaller than the mean TFM2 depth, 2.87 +/- 1.52 (SD) kHz compared with 16.27 +/- 1.08 kHz, respectively. The amplitude of the IFM2 continuously increased throughout its duration and was always less than the CF2 amplitude, whereas the TFM2 was relatively constant in amplitude over approximately three-quarters of its duration and was often the most intense part of the pulse. The maximum amplitude of the IFM2 was, on average, 11 dB smaller than that of the TFM2. Because range resolution increases with depth and the maximum detectable range increases with signal amplitude, the IFMs are poorly suited for ranging compared with the TFMs. 4. FM-FM neurons (n = 77) did not respond or responded very poorly to IFMs with depths and intensities similar to those emitted on the pendulum. The mean IFM2 depth at which a just-noticeable response appeared was 4.48 +/- 1.98 kHz. Only 14% of the pulses emitted on the pendulum had IFM2 depths that exceeded the mean IFM2 depth threshold of FM-FM neurons. 5. Most FM-FM neurons responded to IFMs that had depths comparable with those of TFMs. However, when all parameters were adjusted to optimize the response to TFMs and then readjusted to maximize the response to IFMs, 52% of 27 neurons tested responded significantly better to the optimal TFMs than to the optimal IFMs (P less than 0.05, t test).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document