Vestibuloocular Reflex Signal Modulation During Voluntary and Passive Head Movements

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 2337-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefferson E. Roy ◽  
Kathleen E. Cullen
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Type I ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Wide Range

The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) effectively stabilizes the visual world on the retina over the wide range of head movements generated during daily activities by producing an eye movement of equal and opposite amplitude to the motion of the head. Although an intact VOR is essential for stabilizing gaze during walking and running, it can be counterproductive during certain voluntary behaviors. For example, primates use rapid coordinated movements of the eyes and head (gaze shifts) to redirect the visual axis from one target of interest to another. During these self-generated head movements, a fully functional VOR would generate an eye-movement command in the direction opposite to that of the intended shift in gaze. Here, we have investigated how the VOR pathways process vestibular information across a wide range of behaviors in which head movements were either externally applied and/or self-generated and in which the gaze goal was systematically varied (i.e., stabilize vs. redirect). VOR interneurons [i.e., type I position-vestibular-pause (PVP) neurons] were characterized during head-restrained passive whole-body rotation, passive head-on-body rotation, active eye-head gaze shifts, active eye-head gaze pursuit, self-generated whole-body motion, and active head-on-body motion made while the monkey was passively rotated. We found that regardless of the stimulation condition, type I PVP neuron responses to head motion were comparable whenever the monkey stabilized its gaze. In contrast, whenever the monkey redirected its gaze, type I PVP neurons were significantly less responsive to head velocity. We also performed a comparable analysis of type II PVP neurons, which are likely to contribute indirectly to the VOR, and found that they generally behaved in a quantitatively similar manner. Thus our findings support the hypothesis that the activity of the VOR pathways is reduced “on-line” whenever the current behavioral goal is to redirect gaze. By characterizing neuronal responses during a variety of experimental conditions, we were also able to determine which inputs contribute to the differential processing of head-velocity information by PVP neurons. We show that neither neck proprioceptive inputs, an efference copy of neck motor commands nor the monkey's knowledge of its self-motion influence the activity of PVP neurons per se. Rather we propose that efference copies of oculomotor/gaze commands are responsible for the behaviorally dependent modulation of PVP neurons (and by extension for modulation of the status of the VOR) during gaze redirection.

Integration of Vestibular and Head Movement Signals in the Vestibular Nuclei During Whole-Body Rotation

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 436-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg T. Gdowski ◽  
Robert A. McCrea
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Horizontal Semicircular Canal ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Vestibular Neurons ◽  
Single Unit Recordings

Single-unit recordings were obtained from 107 horizontal semicircular canal-related central vestibular neurons in three alert squirrel monkeys during passive sinusoidal whole-body rotation (WBR) while the head was free to move in the yaw plane (2.3 Hz, 20°/s). Most of the units were identified as secondary vestibular neurons by electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve (61/80 tested). Both non–eye-movement ( n = 52) and eye-movement–related ( n = 55) units were studied. Unit responses recorded when the head was free to move were compared with responses recorded when the head was restrained from moving. WBR in the absence of a visual target evoked a compensatory vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) that effectively reduced the head velocity in space by an average of 33 ± 14%. In 73 units, the compensatory head movements were sufficiently large to permit the effect of the VCR on vestibular signal processing to be assessed quantitatively. The VCR affected the rotational responses of different vestibular neurons in different ways. Approximately one-half of the units (34/73, 47%) had responses that decreased as head velocity decreased. However, the responses of many other units (24/73) showed little change. These cells had signals that were better correlated with trunk velocity than with head velocity. The remaining units had responses that were significantly larger (15/73, 21%) when the VCR produced a decrease in head velocity. Eye-movement–related units tended to have rotational responses that were correlated with head velocity. On the other hand, non–eye-movement units tended to have rotational responses that were better correlated with trunk velocity. We conclude that sensory vestibular signals are transformed from head-in-space coordinates to trunk-in-space coordinates on many secondary vestibular neurons in the vestibular nuclei by the addition of inputs related to head rotation on the trunk. This coordinate transformation is presumably important for controlling postural reflexes and constructing a central percept of body orientation and movement in space.

Firing Behavior of Vestibular Neurons During Active and Passive Head Movements: Vestibulo-Spinal and Other Non-Eye-Movement Related Neurons

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 416-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. McCrea ◽  
Greg T. Gdowski ◽  
Richard Boyle ◽  
Timothy Belton
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Firing Behavior ◽  
Vestibular Neurons ◽  
Gaze Saccades ◽  
Stimulation Of

The firing behavior of 51 non-eye movement related central vestibular neurons that were sensitive to passive head rotation in the plane of the horizontal semicircular canal was studied in three squirrel monkeys whose heads were free to move in the horizontal plane. Unit sensitivity to active head movements during spontaneous gaze saccades was compared with sensitivity to passive head rotation. Most units (29/35 tested) were activated at monosynaptic latencies following electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve. Nine were vestibulo-spinal units that were antidromically activated following electrical stimulation of the ventromedial funiculi of the spinal cord at C1. All of the units were less sensitive to active head movements than to passive whole body rotation. In the majority of cells (37/51, 73%), including all nine identified vestibulo-spinal units, the vestibular signals related to active head movements were canceled. The remaining units ( n = 14, 27%) were sensitive to active head movements, but their responses were attenuated by 20–75%. Most units were nearly as sensitive to passive head-on-trunk rotation as they were to whole body rotation; this suggests that vestibular signals related to active head movements were cancelled primarily by subtraction of a head movement efference copy signal. The sensitivity of most units to passive whole body rotation was unchanged during gaze saccades. A fundamental feature of sensory processing is the ability to distinguish between self-generated and externally induced sensory events. Our observations suggest that the distinction is made at an early stage of processing in the vestibular system.

Behavior of the Position Vestibular Pause (PVP) Interneurons of the Vestibuloocular Reflex During Head-Free Gaze Shifts in the Monkey

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 4481-4490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert F. Fuchs ◽  
Leo Ling ◽  
James O. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Type I ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Behavioral Studies ◽  
Entire Duration ◽  
Gain Reduction ◽  
The Subject

Most behavioral studies indicate that the efficacy (gain) of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in primates is modulated during the voluntary head movements that accompany large shifts in the direction of gaze. However, the timing and degree of this modulation is the subject of some debate. The neurophysiological substrate for this apparent gain reduction has been sought in the behavior of the type I position vestibular pause (PVP) neuron, a well-known type of interneuron in the direct VOR pathway. With the head fixed, PVPs increase their firing rates with contraversive eye position and with ipsiversive passive head rotation and also cease firing (pause) for the duration of ipsiversive saccades. During head-free ipsiversive gaze shifts, the eyes and head move in the same direction. If the vestibular signal carried by PVPs provides the primary drive for the VOR, the vestibular signal should be present during ipsiversive gaze shifts to the degree that the VOR is present. Of 25 type I PVPs recorded, 21 ceased their discharge for the entire duration of the rapid, eye-saccade component of an ipsiversive gaze shift. The resumption of activity occurred, on average, 13 ms after the end of the saccade. These results suggest that the activity of the vast majority of PVP neurons do not reflect the state of the VOR, but rather PVPs are completely eliminated from participation in the reflex during head-free gaze movements. We conclude that if any modulation of the VOR does exist, it must occur through other, probably longer-latency, pathways.

Rapid horizontal gaze movement in the monkey

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1632-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. Phillips ◽  
L. Ling ◽  
A. F. Fuchs ◽  
C. Siebold ◽  
J. J. Plorde
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Head Position ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Small Correction ◽  
Horizontal Gaze

1. We studied horizontal eye and head movements in three monkeys that were trained to direct their gaze (eye position in space) toward jumping targets while their heads were both fixed and free to rotate about a vertical axis. We considered all gaze movements that traveled > or = 80% of the distance to the new visual target. 2. The relative contributions and metrics of eye and head movements to the gaze shift varied considerably from animal to animal and even within animals. Head movements could be initiated early or late and could be large or small. The eye movements of some monkeys showed a consistent decrease in velocity as the head accelerated, whereas others did not. Although all gaze shifts were hypometric, they were more hypometric in some monkeys than in others. Nevertheless, certain features of the gaze shift were identifiable in all monkeys. To identify those we analyzed gaze, eye in head position, and head position, and their velocities at three points in time during the gaze shift: 1) when the eye had completed its initial rotation toward the target, 2) when the initial gaze shift had landed, and 3) when the head movement was finished. 3. For small gaze shifts (< 20 degrees) the initial gaze movement consisted entirely of an eye movement because the head did not move. As gaze shifts became larger, the eye movement contribution saturated at approximately 30 degrees and the head movement contributed increasingly to the initial gaze movement. For the largest gaze shifts, the eye usually began counterrolling or remained stable in the orbit before gaze landed. During the interval between eye and gaze end, the head alone carried gaze to completion. Finally, when the head movement landed, it was almost aimed at the target and the eye had returned to within 10 +/- 7 degrees, mean +/- SD, of straight ahead. Between the end of the gaze shift and the end of the head movement, gaze remained stable in space or a small correction saccade occurred. 4. Gaze movements < 20 degrees landed accurately on target whether the head was fixed or free. For larger target movements, both head-free and head-fixed gaze shifts became increasingly hypometric. Head-free gaze shifts were more accurate, on average, but also more variable. This suggests that gaze is controlled in a different way with the head free. For target amplitudes < 60 degrees, head position was hypometric but the error was rather constant at approximately 10 degrees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effect of Adaptation to Telescopic Spectacles on the Initial Human Horizontal Vestibuloocular Reflex

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Crane ◽  
Joseph L. Demer
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Rotational Axis ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Head Acceleration ◽  
Gain Enhancement ◽  
Lower Head ◽  
Distant Target

Gain of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) not only varies with target distance and rotational axis, but can be chronically modified in response to prolonged wearing of head-mounted magnifiers. This study examined the effect of adaptation to telescopic spectacles on the variation of the VOR with changes in target distance and yaw rotational axis for head velocity transients having peak accelerations of 2,800 and 1,000°/s2. Eye and head movements were recorded with search coils in 10 subjects who underwent whole body rotations around vertical axes that were 10 cm anterior to the eyes, centered between the eyes, between the otoliths, or 20 cm posterior to the eyes. Immediately before each rotation, subjects viewed a target 15 or 500 cm distant. Lighting was extinguished immediately before and was restored after completion of each rotation. After initial rotations, subjects wore 1.9× magnification binocular telescopic spectacles during their daily activities for at least 6 h. Test spectacles were removed and measurement rotations were repeated. Of the eight subjects tolerant of adaptation to the telescopes, six demonstrated VOR gain enhancement after adaptation, while gain in two subjects was not increased. For all subjects, the earliest VOR began 7–10 ms after onset of head rotation regardless of axis eccentricity or target distance. Regardless of adaptation, VOR gain for the proximate target exceeded that for the distant target beginning at 20 ms after onset of head rotation. Adaptation increased VOR gain as measured 90–100 ms after head rotation onset by an average of 0.12 ± 0.02 (SE) for the higher head acceleration and 0.19 ± 0.02 for the lower head acceleration. After adaptation, four subjects exhibited significant increases in the canal VOR gain only, whereas two subjects exhibited significant increases in both angular and linear VOR gains. The latencies of linear and early angular target distance effects on VOR gain were unaffected by adaptation. The earliest significant change in angular VOR gain in response to adaptation occurred 50 and 68 ms after onset of the 2,800 and 1,000°/s2 peak head accelerations, respectively. The latency of the adaptive increase in linear VOR gain was ∼50 ms for the peak head acceleration of 2,800°/s2, and 100 ms for the peak head acceleration of 1,000°/s2. Thus VOR gain changes and latency were consistent with modification in the angular VOR in most subjects, and additionally in the linear VOR in a minority of subjects.

Effects of Viewing Distance on the Responses of Vestibular Neurons to Combined Angular and Linear Vestibular Stimulation

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 2538-2557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiju Chen-Huang ◽  
Robert A. McCrea
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Viewing Distance ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Horizontal Canal ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Vestibular Neurons ◽  
Axis Of Rotation

Effects of viewing distance on the responses of vestibular neurons to combined angular and linear vestibular stimulation. The firing behavior of 59 horizontal canal–related secondary vestibular neurons was studied in alert squirrel monkeys during the combined angular and linear vestibuloocular reflex (CVOR). The CVOR was evoked by positioning the animal’s head 20 cm in front of, or behind, the axis of rotation during whole body rotation (0.7, 1.9, and 4.0 Hz). The effect of viewing distance was studied by having the monkeys fixate small targets that were either near (10 cm) or far (1.3–1.7 m) from the eyes. Most units (50/59) were sensitive to eye movements and were monosynaptically activated after electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve (51/56 tested). The responses of eye movement–related units were significantly affected by viewing distance. The viewing distance–related change in response gain of many eye-head-velocity and burst-position units was comparable with the change in eye movement gain. On the other hand, position-vestibular-pause units were approximately half as sensitive to changes in viewing distance as were eye movements. The sensitivity of units to the linear vestibuloocular reflex (LVOR) was estimated by subtraction of angular vestibuloocular reflex (AVOR)–related responses recorded with the head in the center of the axis of rotation from CVOR responses. During far target viewing, unit sensitivity to linear translation was small, but during near target viewing the firing rate of many units was strongly modulated. The LVOR responses and viewing distance–related LVOR responses of most units were nearly in phase with linear head velocity. The signals generated by secondary vestibular units during voluntary cancellation of the AVOR and CVOR were comparable. However, unit sensitivity to linear translation and angular rotation were not well correlated either during far or near target viewing. Unit LVOR responses were also not well correlated with their sensitivity to smooth pursuit eye movements or their sensitivity to viewing distance during the AVOR. On the other hand there was a significant correlation between static eye position sensitivity and sensitivity to viewing distance. We conclude that secondary horizontal canal–related vestibuloocular pathways are an important part of the premotor neural substrate that produces the LVOR. The otolith sensory signals that appear on these pathways have been spatially and temporally transformed to match the angular eye movement commands required to stabilize images at different distances. We suggest that this transformation may be performed by the circuits related to temporal integration of the LVOR.

Role of the Cerebellar Flocculus Region in the Coordination of Eye and Head Movements During Gaze Pursuit

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 1614-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Belton ◽  
Robert A. McCrea
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Head Tracking ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Body Rotation ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Tracking ◽  
Eye Velocity

The contribution of the flocculus region of the cerebellum to horizontal gaze pursuit was studied in squirrel monkeys. When the head was free to move, the monkeys pursued targets with a combination of smooth eye and head movements; with the majority of the gaze velocity produced by smooth tracking head movements. In the accompanying study we reported that the flocculus region was necessary for cancellation of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) evoked by passive whole body rotation. The question addressed in this study was whether the flocculus region of the cerebellum also plays a role in canceling the VOR produced by active head movements during gaze pursuit. The firing behavior of 121 Purkinje (Pk) cells that were sensitive to horizontal smooth pursuit eye movements was studied. The sample included 66 eye velocity Pk cells and 55 gaze velocity Pk cells. All of the cells remained sensitive to smooth pursuit eye movements during combined eye and head tracking. Eye velocity Pk cells were insensitive to smooth pursuit head movements. Gaze velocity Pk cells were nearly as sensitive to active smooth pursuit head movements as they were passive whole body rotation; but they were less than half as sensitive (≈43%) to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements. Considered as a whole, the Pk cells in the flocculus region of the cerebellar cortex were <20% as sensitive to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements, which suggests that this region does not produce signals sufficient to cancel the VOR during smooth head tracking. The comparative effect of injections of muscimol into the flocculus region on smooth pursuit eye and head movements was studied in two monkeys. Muscimol inactivation of the flocculus region profoundly affected smooth pursuit eye movements but had little effect on smooth pursuit head movements or on smooth tracking of visual targets when the head was free to move. We conclude that the signals produced by flocculus region Pk cells are neither necessary nor sufficient to cancel the VOR during gaze pursuit.

scholarly journals Matching the Oculomotor Drive During Head-Restrained and Head-Unrestrained Gaze Shifts in Monkey

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 811-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard P. Bechara ◽  
Neeraj J. Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Abducens Nucleus ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Burst Neurons ◽  
Eye Velocity

High-frequency burst neurons in the pons provide the eye velocity command (equivalently, the primary oculomotor drive) to the abducens nucleus for generation of the horizontal component of both head-restrained (HR) and head-unrestrained (HU) gaze shifts. We sought to characterize how gaze and its eye-in-head component differ when an “identical” oculomotor drive is used to produce HR and HU movements. To address this objective, the activities of pontine burst neurons were recorded during horizontal HR and HU gaze shifts. The burst profile recorded on each HU trial was compared with the burst waveform of every HR trial obtained for the same neuron. The oculomotor drive was assumed to be comparable for the pair yielding the lowest root-mean-squared error. For matched pairs of HR and HU trials, the peak eye-in-head velocity was substantially smaller in the HU condition, and the reduction was usually greater than the peak head velocity of the HU trial. A time-varying attenuation index, defined as the difference in HR and HU eye velocity waveforms divided by head velocity [α = ( Ḣhr − Ėhu)/ Ḣ] was computed. The index was variable at the onset of the gaze shift, but it settled at values several times greater than 1. The index then decreased gradually during the movement and stabilized at 1 around the end of gaze shift. These results imply that substantial attenuation in eye velocity occurs, at least partially, downstream of the burst neurons. We speculate on the potential roles of burst-tonic neurons in the neural integrator and various cell types in the vestibular nuclei in mediating the attenuation in eye velocity in the presence of head movements.

Signals used to compute errors in monkey vestibuloocular reflex: possible role of flocculus

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1140-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Lisberger ◽  
F. A. Miles ◽  
D. S. Zee
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Species Difference ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Adaptive Changes ◽  
Ventral Paraflocculus ◽  
Sinusoidal Optokinetic Stimulation ◽  
Eye Velocity

Adaptive changes were induced in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of monkeys by oscillating them while they viewed the visual scene through optical devices (“spectacles”) that required changes in the amplitude of eye movement during head turns. The “gain” of the VOR (eye velocity divided by head velocity) during sinusoidal oscillation in darkness underwent gradual changes that were appropriate to reduce the motion of images on the retina during the adapting procedures. Bilateral ablation of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus caused a complete and enduring loss of the ability to undergo adaptive changes in the VOR. Partial lesions caused a substantial but incomplete loss of the adaptive capability. We conclude that the flocculus is necessary for adaptive changes in the monkey's VOR. Further experiments in normal animals determined the types of stimuli that were necessary and/or sufficient to cause changes in VOR gain. Full-field visual stimulation was not necessary to induce adaptive changes in the VOR. Monkeys tracked a small spot in conditions that elicited the same combination of eye and head movements seen during passive oscillation with spectacles. The gain of the VOR showed changes 50-70% as large as those produced by the same duration of oscillation with spectacles. Since the effective tracking conditions cause a consistent correlation of floccular output with vestibular inputs, these data are compatible with our previous suggestion that the flocculus may provide signals used by the central nervous system to compute errors in the gain of the VOR. Prolonged sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation with the head stationary caused only a slight increase in VOR gain. Left-right reversal of vision and eye movement during sinusoidal vestibular oscillation caused decreases in VOR gain. In rabbits, both of these stimulus conditions produced large increases in the gain of the VOR, which implied that eye velocity signals were used instead of vestibular inputs to compute errors in the VOR. Our different results argue that vestibular signals are necessary for computing errors in VOR gain in the monkey. The species difference may reflect the additional role that smooth pursuit eye movements play in stabilizing gaze during head turns in monkeys.

Eye-head coordination in cats

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1030-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Guitton ◽  
R. M. Douglas ◽  
M. Volle
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Maximum Velocity ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Visual Axis ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Rapid Eye Movements ◽  
Motor Strategy

Gaze is the position of the visual axis in space and is the sum of the eye movement relative to the head plus head movement relative to space. In monkeys, a gaze shift is programmed with a single saccade that will, by itself, take the eye to a target, irrespective of whether the head moves. If the head turns simultaneously, the saccade is correctly reduced in size (to prevent gaze overshoot) by the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Cats have an oculomotor range (OMR) of only about +/- 25 degrees, but their field of view extends to about +/- 70 degrees. The use of the monkey's motor strategy to acquire targets lying beyond +/- 25 degrees requires the programming of saccades that cannot be physically made. We have studied, in cats, rapid horizontal gaze shifts to visual targets within and beyond the OMR. Heads were either totally unrestrained or attached to an apparatus that permitted short unexpected perturbations of the head trajectory. Qualitatively, similar rapid gaze shifts of all sizes up to at least 70 degrees could be accomplished with the classic single-eye saccade and a saccade-like head movement. For gaze shifts greater than 30 degrees, this classic pattern frequently was not observed, and gaze shifts were accomplished with a series of rapid eye movements whose time separation decreased, frequently until they blended into each other, as head velocity increased. Between discrete rapid eye movements, gaze continued in constant velocity ramps, controlled by signals added to the VOR-induced compensatory phase that followed a saccade. When the head was braked just prior to its onset in a 10 degrees gaze shift, the eye attained the target. This motor strategy is the same as that reported for monkeys. However, for larger target eccentricities (e.g., 50 degrees), the gaze shift was interrupted by the brake and the average saccade amplitude was 12-15 degrees, well short of the target and the OMR. Gaze shifts were completed by vestibularly driven eye movements when the head was released. Braking the head during either quick phases driven by passive head displacements or visually triggered saccades resulted in an acceleration of the eye, thereby implying interaction between the VOR and these rapid-eye-movement signals. Head movements possessed a characteristic but task-dependent relationship between maximum velocity and amplitude. Head movements terminated with the head on target. The eye saccade usually lagged the head displacement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document