scholarly journals C-Band Polarimetric Coherences and Ratios for Discriminating Sea Ice Roughness

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Gupta ◽  
Randall K. Scharien ◽  
David G. Barber

The rapid decline of sea ice in the Arctic has resulted in a variable sea ice roughness that necessitates improved methods for efficient observation using high-resolution spaceborne radar. The utility of C-band polarimetric backscatter, coherences, and ratios as a discriminator of ice surface roughness is evaluated. An existing one-dimensional backscatter model has been modified to two-dimensions (2D) by considering deviation in the orientation (i.e., the slopes) in azimuth and range direction of surface roughness simultaneously as an improvement in the model. It is shown theoretically that the circular coherence (ρRRLL) decreases exponentially with increasing surface roughness. The crosspolarized coherence (ρHHVH) is found to be less sensitive to surface roughness, whereas the copolarized coherence (ρVVHH) decreases at far-range incidence angles for all ice types. A complete validation of the adapted 2D model using direct measurements of surface roughness is suggested as an avenue for further research.


Author(s):  
Anne W. Nolin

Sea ice surface roughness affects ice-atmosphere interactions, serves as an indicator of ice age, shows patterns of ice convergence and divergence, affects the spatial extent of summer melt ponds, and ice albedo. We have developed a method for mapping sea ice surface roughness using angular reflectance data from the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) and lidar-derived roughness measurements from the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM). Using an empirical data modeling approach, we derived estimates of Arctic sea ice roughness ranging from centimeters to decimeters meters within the MISR 275-m pixel size. Using independent ATM data for validation, we find that histograms of lidar and multi-angular roughness values are nearly identical for areas with roughness <20 cm but that for rougher regions, the MISR-derived roughness has a narrower range of values than the ATM data. The algorithm is able to accurately identify areas that transition between smooth and rough ice. Because of its coarser spatial scale, MISR-derived roughness data have a variance of about half that ATM roughness data.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Sterlin ◽  
Thierry Fichefet ◽  
Francois Massonnet ◽  
Michel Tsamados

<p>Sea ice features a variety of obstacles to the flow of air and seawater at its top and bottom surfaces. Sea ice ridges, floe edges, ice surface roughness and melt ponds, lead to a form drag that interacts dynamically with the air-ice and ocean-ice fluxes of heat and momentum. In most climate models, surface fluxes of heat and momentum are calculated by bulk formulas using constant drag coefficients over sea ice, to reflect the mean surface roughness of the interfaces with the atmosphere and ocean. However, such constant drag coefficients do not account for the subgrid-scale variability of the sea ice surface roughness. To study the effect of form drag over sea ice on air-ice-ocean fluxes, we have implemented a formulation that estimates drag coefficients in ice-covered areas comprising the effect of sea ice ridges, floe edges and melt ponds, and ice surface skin (Tsamados et al., 2013) into the NEMO3.6-LIM3 global coupled ice-ocean model. In this work, we thoroughly analyse the impacts of this improvement on the model performance in both the Arctic and Antarctic. A particular attention is paid to the influence of this modification on the air-ice-ocean fluxes of heat and momentum, and the characteristics of the oceanic surface layers. We also formulate an assessment of the importance of variable drag coefficients over sea ice for the climate modelling community.</p>



2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Nolin ◽  
Eugene Mar

Sea ice surface roughness affects ice-atmosphere interactions, serves as an indicator of ice age, shows patterns of ice convergence and divergence, affects the spatial extent of summer meltponds, and affects ice albedo. We have developed a method for mapping sea ice surface roughness using angular reflectance data from the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) and lidar-derived roughness measurements from the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM). Using an empirical data modeling approach, we derived estimates of Arctic sea ice roughness ranging from centimeters to decimeters within the MISR 275-m pixel size. Using independent ATM data for validation, we find that histograms of lidar and multi-angular roughness values were nearly identical for areas with a roughness < 20 cm, but for rougher regions, the MISR-estimated roughness had a narrower range of values than the ATM data. The algorithm was able to accurately identify areas that transition between smooth and rough ice. Because of its coarser spatial scale, MISR-estimated roughness data have a variance about half that of ATM roughness data.



2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 457-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvie Marie Cafarella ◽  
Randall Scharien ◽  
Torsten Geldsetzer ◽  
Stephen Howell ◽  
Christian Haas ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Pirazzini ◽  
Henna-Reetta Hannula ◽  
David Brus ◽  
Ruzica Dadic ◽  
Martin Scnheebeli

&lt;p&gt;Aerial albedo measurements and detailed surface topography of sea ice are needed to characterize the distribution of the various surface types (melt ponds of different depth and size, ice of different thicknesses, leads, ridges) and to determine how they contribute to the areal-averaged albedo on different horizontal scales. These measurements represent the bridge between the albedo measured from surface-based platforms, which typically have metre-to-tens-of-meters footprint, and satellite observations or large-grid model outputs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two drones were operated in synergy to measure the albedo and map the surface topography of the sea ice during the leg 5 of the MOSAiC expedition (August-September 2020), when concurrent albedo and surface roughness measurements were collected using surface-based instruments. The drone SPECTRA was equipped with paired Kipp and Zonen CM4 pyranometers measuring broadband albedo and paired Ocean Optics STS VIS (350 &amp;#8211; 800 nm) and NIR (650-1100 nm) micro-radiometers measuring visible and near-infrared spectral albedo, and the drone Mavic 2 Pro was equipped with camera to perform photography mapping of the area measured by the SPECTRA drone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here we illustrate the collected data, which show a drastic change in sea ice albedo during the observing period, from the initial melting state to the freezing and snow accumulation state, and demonstrate how this change is related to the evolution of the different surface features, melt ponds and leads above all. From the data analysis we can conclude that the 30m albedo is not significantly affected by the individual surface features and, therefore, it is potentially representative of the sea ice albedo in satellite footprint and model grid areas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of the sea ice surface obtained from UAV photogrammetry are combined with the DEMs based on Structure From Motion technique that apply photos manually taken close to the surface. This will enable us to derive the surface roughness from sub-millimeter to meter scales, which is critical to interpret the observed albedo and to develop correction methods to eliminate the artefacts caused by shadows.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The UAV-based albedo and surface roughness are highly complementary also to analogous helicopter-based observations, and will be relevant for the interpretation of all the physical and biochemical processes observed at and near the sea ice surface during the transition from melting to freezing and growing.&lt;/p&gt;



2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Johnson ◽  
Michel Tsamados ◽  
Jan-Peter Muller ◽  
Julienne Stroeve

&lt;div&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;p&gt;Surface roughness is a crucial parameter in climate and oceanographic studies, constraining momentum transfer between the atmosphere and ocean, providing preconditioning for summer melt pond extent, while also closely related to ice age. High resolution roughness estimates from airborne laser measurements are limited in spatial and temporal coverage while pan-Arctic satellite roughness have remained elusive and do not extended over multi-decadal time-scales. &amp;#160;The MISR (Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer) instrument acquires optical imagery at 275m (red channel) and 1.1 km (all channels) resolutions from nine near-simultaneous camera view zenith angles sampling specular anisotropy, since 1999. Extending on previous work to model sea ice surface roughness from MISR angular reflectance signatures, a training dataset of cloud-free pixels and coincident probability distribution functions of lidar derived elevations from the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) is generated. Surface roughness, defined as the standard deviation of the within-pixel elevations to a best-fit plane, is modelled using Support Vector Regression with a Radial Basis Function kernel, hyperparameters are tuned using GridSearchCV, and performance is assessed using nested cross-validation. We present derived instantaneous and monthly averaged sea ice roughness products at 1.1km and 17.6km resolution over the timespan of IceBridge campaigns (March and April for 2009-2018) on an EASE-2 (Equal-Area Scalable Earth) grid. These show considerable promise in detecting newly formed smooth ice from polynyas, and detailed surface features such as ridges and leads.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;



2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (69) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin F. Beckers ◽  
Angelika H.H. Renner ◽  
Gunnar Spreen ◽  
Sebastian Gerland ◽  
Christian Haas

AbstractWe present sea-ice surface roughness estimates, i.e. the standard deviation of relative surface elevation, in the Arctic regions of Fram Strait and the Nansen Basin north of Svalbard acquired by an airborne laser scanner and a single-beam laser altimeter in 2010. We compare the scanner to the altimeter and compare the differences between the two survey regions. We estimate and correct sensor roll from the scanner data using the hyperbolic response of the scanner over a flat surface. Measurement surveys had to be longer than 5 km north of Svalbard and longer than 15 km in Fram Strait before the statistical distribution in surface roughness from the scanner and altimeter became similar. The shape of the surface roughness probability distributions agrees with those of airborne electromagnetic induction measurements of ice thickness. The ice in Fram Strait had a greater mean surface roughness, 0.16 m vs 0.09 m, and a wider distribution in roughness values than the ice in the Nansen Basin. An increase in surface roughness with increasing ice thickness was observed over fast ice found in Fram Strait near the coast of Greenland but not for the drift ice.



Author(s):  
Ane S. Fors ◽  
Camilla Brekke ◽  
Sebastian Gerland ◽  
Anthony P. Doulgeris ◽  
Justin F. Beckers


2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 1271-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack C. Landy ◽  
Dustin Isleifson ◽  
Alexander S. Komarov ◽  
David G. Barber




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document