scholarly journals A Dilemma in Staging of Esophageal Cancer: How Should We Stage ypT0 N2 M0 Esophageal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy?

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Sebahattin Celik ◽  
Remzi Erten ◽  
Abdulsamed Batur ◽  
Burak Suvak
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
Esophageal Mucosa

Background. Since neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer began to become popular, a complete pathological response at the primary tumour site has been commonly reported. An issue of conflict is whether complete response in the esophageal lumen means that the esophagus is completely tumour-free. Another important issue is whether lymph nodes that are retrieved from pathologically complete response cases are also tumour-free or not. There is a gap in the esophageal cancer staging system for ypT0 N2 M0 tumours that have received neoadjuvant therapy. Here, we will discuss the problem about staging of esophageal cancer associated with neoadjuvant therapy.Case. A female aged 40 years complaining of dysphagia was diagnosed as having locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy decision was taken by oncology committee. Six weeks after neoadjuvant therapy, with a curative intention, minimal invasive surgery was performed. The pathology report was as follows. “There were no neoplastic cells in the suspected area of the esophageal mucosa upon examination with all staining. There was no cancer at resection margins. Four metastatic lymph nodes were infiltrated with squamous cell cancer.”Conclusion. Despite the growing use of neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced esophageal cancer in world, we do not have a protocol for the evaluation of these patients’ pathology reports. We believe that new studies and new ideas are needed to resolve this dilemma associated with neoadjuvant therapy.

RA03.05: COMPARISON OF OUTCOME OF ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER WITH CLINICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Shuhei Koga ◽  
Yu Ohkura ◽  
Masaki Ueno ◽  
Harushi Udagawa
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Intergroup Difference ◽  
Clinical Complete Response ◽  
Significant Intergroup Difference ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

Abstract Background Treatment for patients who have achieved clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy has not been established, with no consensus regarding the indications for either esophagectomy or non-surgical treatment. Methods Among 1545 patients with esophageal cancer at Toranomon Hospital between January 2006 and August 2017, 39 who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant treatment were divided into two groups according to treatment: esophagectomy group (n = 18) andtreatment group (n = 21) for comparison. Results No significant intergroup difference was observed in baseline characteristics. Pathological complete response was confirmed in 13 (72.2%) of the 18 patients who underwent esophagectomy, while residual tumor was detected at the location of primary tumor in 2 (11.1%) patients and lymph node metastasis was found in 3 (16.7%) patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly longer in the esophagectomy group than in the non-surgical group (P = 0.002). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly longer in the esophagectomy group (P = 0.007). However, no significant intergroup difference was observed in overall survival estimated based on all deaths, including (P = 0.451). Conclusion With improved diagnostic accuracy, non-surgical treatment can be an option for patients estimated as cCR after treatment administered in a neoadjuvant setting. However, surgical resection is considered more appropriate because of residual tumor in some patients with cCR and because of superior DSS and RFS following esophagectomy compared with non-surgical treatment. Future studies must focus on ameliorating late postoperative complications such as respiratory failure and aspiration pneumonia. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Cetuximab, paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiation for esophageal and gastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4029-4029 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Suntharalingam ◽  
T. Dipetrillo ◽  
P. Akerman ◽  
H. Wanebo ◽  
B. Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cell Cancer ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Grade 3

4029 Background: Cetuximab is an IgG1, chimerized, monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cetuximab improves survival when combined with radiation for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the addition of cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiation for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell cancer of the esophagus or stomach without distant organ metastases were eligible. Patients with locally advanced disease from mediastinal, celiac, portal and gastric lymphadenopathy were eligible. Surgical resection was not required. Clinical complete response was defined as no tumor on postreatment endoscopic biopsy. Patients received cetuximab, 400mg/m2 week #1 then 250 mg/m2/week for 5 weeks, paclitaxel, 50 mg/m2/week, and carboplatin, AUC =2 weekly for 6 weeks, with concurrent 50.4 Gy radiation. Results: Thirty-seven patients have been entered. The median age was 61 (range of 30–87). Thirty-four have esophageal cancer and 3 have gastric cancer. Of the patients with esophageal cancer, twenty-five have adenocarcinoma and nine have squamous cell cancer. Thus far, 30 patients have completed treatment and are evaluable for toxicity. There have been no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities and 1 pt had grade 4 neutropenia (3%). Six patients (20%) had grade 3 esophagitis. Other grade 3 toxicities included dehydration (n=5), rash (n=9), and paclitaxel/cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions (n=2). Eighteen of 27 patients (67%) have had clinical complete response. Seven pts out of 16 (43%) who have gone to surgery have had a pathologic CR. Conclusions: Cetuximab can be safely administered with chemoradiation for patients with esophageal cancer. Consistent with the data in head and neck cancer, cetuximab increases cutaneous toxicity but does not increase mucositis/esophagitis when combined with chemoradiation. Further evaluation is ongoing. [Table: see text]

Factors predictive of tumor recurrence and overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer who have pathologic complete response after neo-adjuvant therapy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 170-170
Author(s):  
Alexandra Gangi ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Jessica M. Frakes ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
Luis Pena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Patient Demographics

170 Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy is presumably associated with favorable outcomes in patients (pts) with esophageal cancer, but reported survival rates vary. This study evaluates patterns of recurrence after curative esophagectomy and identifies factors predictive of recurrent disease and overall survival (OS) in patients with pCR. Methods: An IRB-approved, retrospective review of a prospective esophageal cancer database was conducted. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and outcomes were examined. Recurrences were classified as locoregional (LR) or systemic. Cox regression model and Kaplan–Meier (KM) plots were used for survival analysis. Results: 837 pts with invasive esophageal cancer treated at a single institution from 1994 to 2013 were identified. 176 pts underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and had pCR. Of these, 93.7% had adenocarcinoma and 6.3% had squamous cell cancer. Mean age was 56.6 and most pts were white (96.6%) males (79.5%). Median follow up was 42.6 months. 95 pts were treated before 2007 and 81 after. Most pts (85%) underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. All 176 pts received chemotherapy and radiation; dose-specific information was available on 144 pts, of whom most received 50.4 Gy (45%). 170 pts had recurrence data available: 39 (22.9%) had recurrent disease at a mean of 18.3 months; 5 (2.9%) with LR and 34 (20%) with systemic disease. On multivariate analysis, when evaluating patient demographics, pretreatment stage, type of surgery, type of chemotherapy, and number of lymph nodes resected, only pretreatment stage was associated with recurrence (p = 0.04). Median time to recurrence was 26.3 months for LR disease and 10.9 months for systemic disease (p = 0.3). KM estimates determined that pre-treatment stage and time of treatment ( < 2007 or ≥ 2007) were predictive of improved OS (p < 0.01, = 0.03). Conclusions: The incidence of disease recurrence in pts who experience pCR is low. The pretreatment stage and time of treatment were independent predictors of improved OS. Enhancing treatment strategies to maximize pCR would improve outcomes in pts with esophageal cancer.

P221 THE ROLE OF SUBCARINAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN ESOPHAGECTOMY - A 5-YEAR SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eustratia Mpaili ◽  
Dimitrios Schizas ◽  
Maria Mpoura ◽  
Ilias Vagios ◽  
Constantinos Zografos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Subcarinal Lymph Node

Abstract Aim To evaluate the involvement of subcarinal lymph node dissection (SLND) in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, as well as its impact on surgical outcomes following esophagectomy. Background & Methods Data on patients that underwent esophagectomy from 01/03/2014 to 01/03/2019 were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Based on the medical records, the following parameters were collected and analyzed: patient demographics, histopathological parameters, surgical- oncological outcomes. All patients were staged according to the AJCC 8th edition. Results A total of 79 patients underwent Ivor Lewis or McKeown esophagectomy for either squamous cell carcinoma (n= 7 patients) or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (n= 72 patients). In 26 cases, esophagectomy was performed without SLND, while 53 cases underwent SLND. Among the 53 patients, 50 (94.3%) were men, and 3 (5.7 %) were women. Mean age was 61.4 years, (range 34-78). Mean nodal harvest was 34.7 lymph nodes per patient. Lymph node invasion was noted in 33 patients (62.2%), with a mean of 9 positive lymph nodes per patient. Subcarinal lymph nodes were involved in 5 out of 53 patients (9.4%). The ratio of positive subcarinal lymph nodes to resected ones was 1/2 (50%), 3/3 (100%), 1/2 (50%), 1/2 (50%) and 1/1 (100%) for each patient. Final histopathological report showed adenocarcinoma of moderate or poor differentiation (G2 2/5, G3 3/5) in all five patients (100%). Four out of 5 patients had not received neoadjuvant treatment and their pathological staging was T3N3M0. One patient had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and his final staging was ypT3N2M0. Noteworthy, the seven patients diagnosed with squamous carcinoma, were subjected to SLND and were 100% negative for invasion histologically. Conclusion Subcarinal lymph nodes were infiltrated in 9.4% of patients operated for esophageal cancer. In the squamous cell cancer group, the relative infiltration rate was notably 0%. It seems that omission of subcarinal lymph node dissection during transthoracic esophagectomy cannot be justified.

scholarly journals Verrucous carcinoma of the esophagus with complete response after chemoradiotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Hashimoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Shirakawa ◽  
Shunsuke Tanabe ◽  
Takehiro Tanaka ◽  
Teruki Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Verrucous Carcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Esophageal Mucosa ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Esophagus ◽  
Left Bronchus ◽  
Locally Advanced Tumors

Abstract Background Verrucous carcinoma of the esophagus (VCE) is a rare tumor that is difficult to diagnose. In most cases, biopsies show nonspecific inflammatory and hyperkeratotic changes and do not show malignant findings. Most VCEs are slowly growing, locally advanced tumors with few metastases. Treatments for VCE are the same as for normal esophageal cancer, involving combined chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiation therapy. However, it has been reported that VCE has a poor response to radiation or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). A case of VCE with complete response (CR) after CRT is presented. Case presentation A 70-year-old man was found to have white, irregular esophageal mucosa four years earlier. He had been followed-up as an outpatient as having candidal esophagitis. However, his tumor grew gradually, and biopsy was performed by endoscopic mucosal resection. He was finally diagnosed with VCE. He had no metastases to distant organs, but some lymph node metastases were suspected. The tumor invaded his left bronchus. First, the esophagostomy and gastrostomy were constructed. The patient then underwent definitive CRT. Four weeks after the end of CRT, two-stage esophagectomy was performed. First, he underwent esophagectomy with thoracic lymph node dissection. A latissimus dorsi flap was patched to the bronchus after primary suture of the hole. Six weeks later, reconstruction of the gastric tube was performed through the antethoracic route. The pathological findings showed complete response to CRT, with no proliferative cancer cells in the specimen. Six months after the first-stage operation, no recurrence has been observed. Conclusions A case of locally advanced VCE that achieved a complete response to CRT was presented. In cases in which local resection would be difficult, CRT might be an appropriate neoadjuvant treatment for VCE.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin) in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer (NICE study): Interim results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4060-4060
Author(s):  
Zhigang Li ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Jinchen Shao ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Initial Results

4060 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of preoperative chemotherapy with albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with camrelizumab (NICE regimen), in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with multiple lymph nodes metastasis. Initial results were analyzed to assess the efficacy and safety of this strategy. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, open, single arm, phase II trial. Eligible patients were histologically confirmed thoracic ESCC, staged as T1b-4a, N2-3 (≥ 3 stations), and M0 or M1 lymph node metastasis (confined to the supraclavicular lymph nodes) according to the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer. Patients received neoadjuvant treatment (NICE regimen) with intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg, day 1) plus albumin paclitaxel (100 mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15) and carboplatin (area under curve 5, day 1) of each 21-day cycle, for two cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the per-protocol population, which included all patients who had tumor resection and received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, adverse events and disease-free survival. Safety was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Results: Of the planned 60 patients enrolled, 55 (91.7%) patients have received the full two-cycles NICE regimen successfully, 4 patients didn’t receive the complete neoadjuvant therapy due to intolerance (3 patients) and drop out (1 patient), 1 patient died due to pneumonia on the second cycle of neoadjuvant therapy. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) rate was 53.3% and TRAEs resulting in discontinuation rate was 6.7%. The common grade 3-5 TRAEs included lymphopenia (50%), thrombocytopenia (10%), pneumonia (5%) and thyroid dysfunction (3.3%). At the time of writing, 47 patients underwent surgery within 27-85 days (median 36 days) after NICE treatment, in which 7 patients had delays to surgery due to TRAEs. All patients achieved radical (R0) resection. There was no in-hospital and postoperative 30-day mortality. pCR (ypT0N0) was identified in 20 (42.5%) of 47 patients and 5 (10.6%) patients had complete pathological response of the primary tumor but residual disease in lymph nodes alone (ypT0N+). Conclusions: Preoperative NICE regimen has achieved satisfatory initial results of disease response in locally advanced thoracic ESCC. A phase III randomized controlled trial is required to demonstarate the possible survival improvement. Trial registration: ChiCTR1900026240 Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900026240.

Accuracy of clinical staging with EUS for early stage esophageal cancer: Are we denying patients beneficial neoadjuvant chemo-radiation?

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 163-163
Author(s):  
Carrie Luu ◽  
Norbert Garcia-Henriquez ◽  
Jason Klapman ◽  
Cynthia L. Harris ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Surgical Pathology ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Cancer Center

163 Background: Esophagectomy alone has been considered the standard of care for early stage esophageal cancer (EC) while neoadjuvant therapy is now standard for locally advanced disease. The choice of treatment therefore hinges on accurate locoregional staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Our objective is to evaluate the accuracy of EUS performed in a high-volume tertiary cancer center in clinical stage T1N0 (cT1N0) and T2N0 (cT2N0) esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of the esophageal cancer database at a single institution was performed. Patients with cT1N0 and cT2N0 esophageal cancer based on EUS undergoing esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment were evaluated. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment were reviewed. Surgical pathology was compared to EUS staging. Results: Between 2000 and 2015, 139 patients were identified. There were 25 (18%) female and 114 (82%) male patients. The tumor location included the middle 1/3 of the esophagus in 11 (8%) and lower 1/3 and gastroesophageal junction in 128 (92%) patients. Eighty-one percent of patients had adenocarcinoma, 9% had squamous cell carcinoma, 9% had Barrett’s dysplasia, and 1% had mixed histology. Clinical staging were as follows: 110 (79%) patients had cT1N0 and 29 (21%) patients had cT2N0 tumors. For the entire cohort, preoperative EUS matched the final surgical pathology in 76/139 patients for an accuracy rate of 53%. Twenty-nine patients (21%) were under-staged by EUS; of those, 19 (14%) had unrecognized nodal disease. This included 12/109 (11%) of cT1N0 and 7/29 (24%) of cT2N0 patients. Conclusions: The accuracy of preoperative EUS staging in early esophageal cancer remains sub-optimal. Interestingly, a significant proportion (24%) of cT2N0 EC patients were found to have positive lymph nodes on surgical pathology, and perhaps these patients could have benefitted from neoadjuvant therapy. In light of these findings, the current management of cT2N0 esophageal cancer should be reconsidered.

Sintilimab plus oxaliplatin/capecitabine (CapeOx) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric (G)/esophagogastric junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Author(s):  
Haiping Jiang ◽  
Xiongfei Yu ◽  
Mei Kong ◽  
Zhiming Ma ◽  
Donghui Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Tumor Imaging ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Imaging Evaluation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

211 Background: The application of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies in neoadjuvant setting has not been well established. This phase 2 study (NCT04065282) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus CapeOx as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed resectable G/GEJ adenocarcinoma (stage cT3-4NxM0) were enrolled to receive neoadjuvant therapy with sintilimab (3mg/kg for wt < 60kg, 200mg for wt ≥60kg, Q3W) plus CapeOx (oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 iv D1, capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid po D1-14, Q3W) for 3 cycles. Gastrectomy was scheduled within 4 weeks after last dose of neoadjuvant treatment. Tumor imaging evaluation was performed at baseline and within 1 week before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) per Becker criteria. Results: As of August 4, 2020, 36 pts were enrolled. Patients who had received gastrectomy after neoadjuvant treatment (n = 26) were included in this analysis. 25 (96.2%) pts completed 3 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, except one completed 2 cycles due to grade 3 AST increased. All pts received complete resection (R0). 6 (23.1%) pts achieved pCR (TRG1a) and 14 (53.8%) pts achieved major pathologic response (MPR, TRG1a/b). 3 pts had partial response (ORR was 3/5 among pts with target lesions) and no patients progressed per RECIST 1.1 before surgery. Among 18 pts who received PET-CT evaluation per PERCIST, 11 (61.1%) achieved partial metabolic response (PMR). Neoadjuvant treatment-related AEs (neoTRAEs) to any drug were reported in 25 (96.2%) pts. Mostly TRAEs were grade 1-2, and only 6 (23.1%) pts experienced grade 3 TRAEs (Neutropenia in 4 pts, Leukopenia, Thrombocytopenia, AST increased, and GGT increased in 1 pt each). One patient experienced grade 1 hypothyroidism which is considered to be immune-related AE. There is no serious peri-operative complication and mortality. Conclusions: Sintilimab plus oxaliplatin/capecitabine showed promising efficacy with high pCR and MPR rate and well-tolerated safety profile in neoadjuvant settings. This combination regimen might present a new option for patients with locally advanced, resectable G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04065282.

P204 DETECTING PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AFTER NEOADJUVANT THERAPY BASED ON IMAGING TECHNIQUES: A DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D J J M de Gouw ◽  
B R Klarenbeek ◽  
M Dressen ◽  
S A W Bouwense ◽  
F van Workum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pet Ct

Abstract Background Up to 32% of patients with esophageal cancer show a pathological complete response (ypCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. To prevent overtreatment, the indication to perform esophagectomy in these patients should be reconsidered. Implementing an organ-preserving strategy for patients with ypCR requires an accurate assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of imaging techniques used for detection of ypCR after neoadjuvant therapy but before resection in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods A systematic literature search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed from January 1, 2000, to December 13, 2017. Eligible studies were diagnostic studies that compared results of imaging modalities after neoadjuvant therapy to histopathological findings in the resection specimen after esophagectomy. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2, model. Primary outcome measures were true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative values of imaging techniques predicting ypCR. A meta-analysis was performed by pooling sensitivities and specificities by using a bivariate model. Results A total of 4420 articles were identified. After exclusion of irrelevant titles and abstracts, 360 articles were reviewed in full text. In total, four imaging modalities (computed tomography [CT], positron emission tomography [PET-CT], endoscopic ultrasound [EUS], and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were used for restaging. The meta-analysis was conducted with data from 56 studies involving 3625 patients. The pooled sensitivities of CT, PET-CT, EUS, and MRI for detecting ypCR were 0.35, 0.62, 0.01 and 0.80, respectively, whereas the pooled specificities were 0.83, 0.73, 0.99, and 0.83, respectively. The positive predictive value in detecting ypCR was 0.47 for CT, 0.41 for PET-CT, not applicable for EUS, and 0.61 for MRI. Conclusions Current imaging modalities such as CT, PET-CT, and EUS seem to be insufficiently accurate to identify complete responders. More accurate diagnostic tests are needed to improve restaging accuracy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document