scholarly journals The Role of VATS in Lung Cancer Surgery: Current Status and Prospects for Development

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dariusz Dziedzic ◽  
Tadeusz Orlowski

Since the introduction of anatomic lung resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) 20 years ago, VATS has experienced major advances in both equipment and technique, introducing a technical challenge in the surgical treatment of both benign and malignant lung disease. The demonstrated safety, decreased morbidity, and equivalent efficacy of this minimally invasive technique have led to the acceptance of VATS as a standard surgical modality for early-stage lung cancer and increasing application to more advanced disease. Formerly there was much debate about the feasibility of the technique in cancer surgery and proper lymph node handling. Although there is a lack of proper randomized studies, it is now generally accepted that the outcome of a VATS procedure is at least not inferior to a resection via a traditional thoracotomy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101
Author(s):  
Jacob Newton Stein ◽  
Samuel Cykert ◽  
Christina Yongue ◽  
Eugenia Eng ◽  
Isabella Kathryn Wood ◽  
...  

101 Background: Racial disparities are well described in the management of early-stage lung cancer, with Black patients less likely to receive potentially curative surgery than non-Hispanic Whites. A multi-site pragmatic trial entitled Accountability for Cancer Care through Undoing Racism and Equity (ACCURE), designed in collaboration with community partners, eliminated racial disparities in lung cancer surgery through a multi-component intervention. The study involved real-time electronic health record (EHR) monitoring to identify patients not receiving recommended care, a nurse navigator who reviewed and addressed EHR alerts daily, and race-specific feedback provided to clinical teams. Timeliness of cancer care is an important quality metric. Delays can lead to disease progression, upstaging, and worse survival, and Black patients are more likely to experience longer wait times to lung cancer surgery. Yet interventions to reduce racial disparities in timely delivery of lung cancer surgery have not been well studied. We evaluated the effect of ACCURE on timely receipt of lung cancer surgery. Methods: We analyzed data of a retrospective cohort at five cancer centers gathered prior to the ACCURE intervention and compared results with prospective data collected during the intervention. We calculated mean time from clinical suspicion of lung cancer to surgery and evaluated the proportion of patients who received surgery within 60 days stratified by race. We performed a t-test to compare mean days to surgery and chi2 for the delivery of surgery within 60 days. Results: 1320 patients underwent surgery in the retrospective arm, 160 were Black. 254 patients received surgery in the intervention arm, 85 were Black. Results are summarized in Table. Mean time to surgery in the retrospective cohort was 41.8 days, compared with 25.5 days in the intervention cohort (p<0.01). In the retrospective cohort, 68.8% of Black patients received surgery within 60 days versus 78.9% of White patients (p<0.01). In the intervention, the difference between Blacks and Whites with respect to surgery within 60 days was no longer significant (89.41% of Black patients vs 94.67% of White patients, p=0.12). Conclusions: Racial disparities exist in the delivery of timely lung cancer surgery. The ACCURE intervention improved time to surgery and timeliness of surgery for Black and White patients with early-stage lung cancer. A combination of real-time EHR monitoring, nurse navigation, and race-based feedback markedly reduced racial disparities in timely lung cancer care. [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M Schwartz ◽  
Ksenia Gorbenko ◽  
Samantha M Kerath ◽  
Raja Flores ◽  
Sheila Ross ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 1915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Tuminello ◽  
Rebecca M. Schwartz ◽  
Bian Liu ◽  
Juan Wisnivesky ◽  
Raja Flores ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205031211667385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlotta Mainini ◽  
Patrícia FS Rebelo ◽  
Roberta Bardelli ◽  
Besa Kopliku ◽  
Sara Tenconi ◽  
...  

Surgical resection appears to be the most effective treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Recent studies suggest that perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation improves functional capacity, reduces mortality and postoperative complications and enhances recovery and quality of life in operated patients. Our aim is to analyse and identify the most recent evidence-based physical exercise interventions, performed before or after surgery. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. We included randomised controlled trials aimed at assessing efficacy of exercise-training programmes; physical therapy interventions had to be described in detail in order to be reproducible. Characteristics of studies and programmes, results and outcome data were extracted. Six studies were included, one describing preoperative rehabilitation and three assessing postoperative intervention. It seems that the best preoperative physical therapy training should include aerobic and strength training with a duration of 2–4 weeks. Although results showed improvement in exercise performance after preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation, it was not possible to identify the best preoperative intervention due to paucity of clinical trials in this area. Physical training programmes differed in every postoperative study with conflicting results, so comparison is difficult. Current literature shows inconsistent results regarding preoperative or postoperative physical exercise in patients undergoing lung resection. Even though few randomised trials were retrieved, treatment protocols were difficult to compare due to variability in design and implementation. Further studies with larger samples and better methodological quality are urgently needed to assess efficacy of both preoperative and postoperative exercise programmes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 271 ◽  
pp. 04022
Author(s):  
Liusheng Wu ◽  
Xiaoqiang Li

With the rapid development of imaging technology and the improvement of people's health awareness, more early lung cancers are found. For very early lung cancer (mainly manifested as ground glass nodules), lobectomy is still the standard surgical treatment for lung cancer, and segmental resection has been used clinically as a treatment method. 3D navigation is an effective tool for precise lung segment and sub-segment resection. Three-dimensional vascular reconstruction technology is an advanced imaging technology. Accurate segment resection under thoracoscopy is considered the best surgical treatment for early stage lung cancer. It is difficult to accurately estimate the morphology, nature and other characteristics of the tumor and its surroundings by two-dimensional imaging alone. Therefore, the precise resection operation adds great difficulty and risk to the surgeon. In recent years, 3D navigation and vascular reconstruction techniques have been widely developed and applied in the medical field, and they are rarely used in thoracic surgery. This article has conducted a more in-depth study on the application of 3D navigation technology and vascular reconstruction technology in precision lung resection, and has achieved certain research results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document