scholarly journals The Effect of Peritubal Infiltration with Bupivacaine and Morphine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isra Karaduman ◽  
Derya Karasu ◽  
Canan Yilmaz ◽  
Sedat Oner ◽  
Hilal Erdem Solak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Analgesic Consumption ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Perinephric Fat

Objective. We aimed to investigate the effect of peritubal local anesthetic and opioid infiltration on pain scores and analgesic consumption in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Material and Methods. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years and ASA I-III were included in this double-blind, randomized study. The patients were divided into two groups. All patients underwent spinoepidural anesthesia. 20 mL of 0.25 percent bupivacaine + 5 mg morphine (0.5 mL), in Group P (n=66), infiltrated the renal capsule, perinephric fat, muscles, subcutaneous tissue, and skin under fluoroscopy. In Group C (n=64), none of the patients received a peritubal injection. In the first 24 h pain scores, time of the first analgesic demand, the mean number of analgesic demands, and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Results. The mean VAS score at postoperative 8, 12, and 24 h and dynamic VAS score at postoperative 4, 8, 12, and 24 h were significantly lower in Group P. VAS score at postoperative 4 h was not significant. Time of the first analgesic demand was significantly longer in Group P. Conclusion. Our study results suggest that peritubal infiltration of bupivacaine with morphine after percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective method for postoperative pain control and reduces analgesic consumption.

scholarly journals Perioperative pregabalin for reducing pain, analgesic consumption, and anxiety and enhancing sleep quality in elective neurosurgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical study

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. 1513-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nir Shimony ◽  
Uri Amit ◽  
Bella Minz ◽  
Rachel Grossman ◽  
Marc A. Dany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Analgesic Consumption ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Neurosurgical Patients ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess in-hospital (immediate) postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption (primary goals) and preoperative anxiety and sleep quality (secondary goals) in patients who underwent craniotomy and were treated with pregabalin (PGL). Whenever possible, out-of-hospital pain scores and analgesics usage data were obtained as well. METHODS This prospective, randomized, double-blind and controlled study was conducted in consenting patients who underwent elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection at Tel Aviv Medical Center between 2012 and 2014. Patients received either 150 mg PGL (n = 50) or 500 mg starch (placebo; n = 50) on the evening before surgery, 1.5 hours before surgery, and twice daily for 72 hours following surgery. All patients spent the night before surgery in the hospital, and no other premedication was administered. Opioids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were used for pain, which was self-rated by means of a numerical rating scale (score range 0–10). RESULTS Eighty-eight patients completed the study. Data on the American Society of Anesthesiologists class, age, body weight, duration of surgery, and intraoperative drugs were similar for both groups. The pain scores during postoperative Days 0 to 2 were significantly lower in the PGL group than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). Analgesic consumption was also lower in the PGL group, both immediately and 1 month after surgery. There were fewer requests for antiemetics in the PGL group, and the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower. The preoperative anxiety level and the quality of sleep were significantly better in the PGL group (p < 0.01). There were no PGL-associated major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative use of twice-daily 150 mg pregabalin attenuates preoperative anxiety, improves sleep quality, and reduces postoperative pain scores and analgesic usage without increasing the rate of adverse effects. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01612832 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Local Infiltrative Anesthetic Effect of Tramadol Compared to Lidocaine for Excision of Cutaneous Lesions: Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Despoina Kakagia ◽  
Theodosia Vogiatzaki ◽  
Savvas Eleftheriadis ◽  
Gregory Trypsiannis ◽  
Christos Iatrou
Keyword(s):  
Injection Site ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Cutaneous Lesions ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Pain Scores

Background: In this double-blind, randomized study, the efficacy of tramadol, an atypical opioid, was tested versus lidocaine in excision of cutaneous lesions of the face. Methods: Eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 mg/kg tramadol 2% plus adrenaline 1:200,000 (group T, n = 46) or 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% plus adrenaline 1:200,000 (group L, n = 42) for excision of cutaneous lesions. Pain at the injection site, 2 and 20 minutes postinjection and 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively, was monitored on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Irritation at the injection point and the duration of postoperative analgesia were also recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data, topography, size of the lesions removed, and operative time between the two groups. A tendency toward lower injection NRS pain scores was observed in group L compared to group T (p = .064). No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found at 2 and 20 minutes postinjection (p = .741 and p = .142, respectively); however, pain scores were significantly higher in group L at 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (all p < .001). Erythema at the injection site was observed in nine group T and two group L patients (p = .076). No postoperative analgesics were required in the tramadol group of patients, whereas acetaminophen with or without codeine was administered in all but five lidocaine group patients during the first 12 hours. Conclusion: Tramadol may be used as a reliable local anesthetic agent, providing longer postoperative analgesia compared to lidocaine; however, it bears a higher incidence of irritation at the injection site.

scholarly journals Comparison of Visual Analog Pain Score Reported to Physician vs Nurse in Nonoperatively Treated Foot and Ankle Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1444-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Martin ◽  
Trevor McBride ◽  
Jeffrey Wake ◽  
Jeffrey Preston Van Buren ◽  
Cuyler Dewar
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are taking a more prominent role in orthopedics as health care seeks to define treatment outcomes. The visual analog scale (VAS) is considered a reliable measure of acute pain. A previous study found that operative candidates’ VAS pain score was significantly higher when reported to the surgeon compared to the nurse. This study’s aim is to examine whether this phenomenon occurs in patients that do not undergo an operative procedure. We hypothesized that patients’ VAS pain scores reported to the surgeon vs the nurse would be the same. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort of 201 consecutive nonoperative foot and ankle patients treated by a single surgeon. Patients were asked to rate pain intensity by a nurse followed by the surgeon using a horizontal VAS, 0 “no pain” to 10 “worst pain.” Differences in reported pain levels were compared with data from the previous cohort of 201 consecutive operative foot and ankle patients. Results: The mean VAS score reported to the nurse was 3.2 whereas the mean VAS score reported to the surgeon was 4.2 ( P < .001). The mean difference in VAS scores reported for operative patients was 2.9, whereas the mean difference for nonoperative patients was 1.0 ( P < .001). Conclusion: This study found statistically significant differences between VAS pain scores reported to the surgeon vs the nurse in nonoperative patients. These results support the trend found in our previous study, where operative patients reported significantly higher pain scores to the surgeon vs the nurse. The mean difference between reported pain scores was significantly higher for operative patients compared to nonoperative patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

scholarly journals Caudal Blockade for Postoperative Analgesia: A Useful Adjunct to Intramuscular Opiates following Emergency Lower Leg Orthopaedic Surgery

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. McCrirrick ◽  
D. T. O. Ramage
Keyword(s):  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
Lower Leg ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Blind Manner ◽  
Effective Adjunct ◽  
Caudal Blockade

The efficacy of a single caudal epidural injection of bupivacaine 20 ml 0.5% following emergency orthopaedic surgery to the lower leg and ankle was investigated. Forty adult patients were studied, randomised to either the caudal or control group. The mean 24 hour postoperative papaveretum consumption was significantly reduced in the caudal group. Analogue pain scores as assessed in a double-blind manner were also significantly reduced in this group. The duration of analgesia after caudal blockade was approximately eight hours as estimated by the average time to the first dose of papaveretum. Our study demonstrates that caudal blockade represents an effective adjunct to intramuscular opiates following this type of surgery.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Perioperative and Postoperative Effects of Levobupivacaine and of Levobupivacaine + Adrenaline in Pediatric Tonsillectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Cicekci ◽  
Cigdem Sizer ◽  
Sait Selcuk Atici ◽  
Sule Arican ◽  
Adnan Karaibrahimoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Trial Registry ◽  
Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Total Consumption ◽  
Pain Scores

Objectives. We aimed to assess the effects of levobupivacaine and of levobupivacaine + adrenaline administered during pediatric tonsillectomy on the postoperative period. Methods. A total of 90 patients between the ages of five and twelve were divided randomly into two groups before tonsillectomy: levobupivacaine only (0.5%) 0.4 mg·kg−1 or levobupivacaine (0.5%) 0.4 mg·kg−1 + adrenaline (1 : 200.000) administered by means of peritonsillar infiltration. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores recorded at various intervals until 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to first oral intake, time to the first administration of analgesics and total consumption of analgesics, and the amount of bleeding for all children. Results. In both groups, patients had the same postoperative pain scores and PONV rates, and equal amounts of analgesics were consumed up to 24 hours postoperatively. The two groups also had the same time until first oral intake, recovery time and time to the first analgesic request, and amount of bleeding. Conclusions. Perioperative levobupivacaine infiltration on its own is a valid alternative to the combination of levobupivacaine + adrenaline for perioperative and postoperative effectiveness in pediatric tonsillectomy. This trial is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN: ACTRN12617001167358.

scholarly journals Intercostal Nerve Block and Peritubal Infiltration with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomised Clinical Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karunakaran Binil ◽  
Kaniyil Suvarna ◽  
Kannammadathy Poulose Biji
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Intercostal Nerve ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
P Value ◽  
Intercostal Nerve Block ◽  
Analgesic Consumption ◽  
Pain Scores

Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a common endourologic procedure for removal of renal stones is associated with significant pain. Regional blocks are being used for postoperative analgesia after PCNL. Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy of intercostal nerve block and fluoroscopic guided peritubal infiltration in terms of duration of analgesia, postoperative pain scores and total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours. Materials and Methods: This was a randomised clinical trial conducted from May 2018 to October 2018 on total of eighty patients, randomly allocated to two groups of 40 each. Group IC received intercostal nerve block and group IF received fluoroscopy guided peritubal infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine. Duration of analgesia was assessed from postoperative pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during rest and coughing). Total analgesic consumption for 24 hours was also noted. Data was analysed using Chi-square test for categorical variables and independent Student’s t-test for quantitative variables. Results: The duration of analgesia was 702.00±140.022 minutes in Group IC and 346.50±129.566 minutes in group IF which was significant statistically with a p-value of <0.001. Resting and dynamic NRS were lower upto 12 hours postoperatively in group IC (p-value less than 0.05). Both tramadol (50.00±11.32 mg vs 82.50±24.15 mg) and paracetamol (100±303.82mg vs 850±622.23mg) requirements were lower in group IC as compared to group IF with p-values less than 0.001. Total consumption of first rescue analgesic tramadol as well as second analgesic Paracetamol both were significantly lesser(p-value<0.001) in group IC than group IF. Conclusion: Intercostal Nerve Block (INB) provided superior analgesia compared to fluoroscopic guided peritubal infiltration after PCNL.

Lack of hemodynamic interaction between CGRP-receptor antagonist telcagepant (MK-0974) and sumatriptan: Results from a randomized study in patients with migraine

Cephalalgia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (16) ◽  
pp. 1292-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Depré ◽  
C MacLeod ◽  
J Palcza ◽  
MO Behm ◽  
I de Lepeleire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Linear Mixed Effects ◽  
Weighted Averages ◽  
Limited Sampling ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cgrp Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Randomized Crossover Study ◽  
Sampling Times

Objective The objective of this article is to assess the effects of sumatriptan monotherapy, telcagepant monotherapy, and their combination on blood pressure (BP) in migraine patients during a headache-free period. Methods A double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period, single-dose, randomized crossover study in 24 migraine patients was conducted. In each period, patients received a single oral dose of sumatriptan 100 mg alone, telcagepant 600 mg alone, sumatriptan 100 mg coadministered with telcagepant 600 mg, or placebo. Semi-recumbent BP was measured pre-dose and at seven post-dose timepoints over a period of six hours. Individual time-weighted averages in mean arterial pressure (MAP) were evaluated using a linear mixed-effects model. The pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan alone and in the presence of telcagepant were also evaluated using limited sampling times. Results The mean difference in time-weighted (0–2.5 h) MAP (90% confidence interval) was 1.2 mmHg (−0.2, 2.7) between telcagepant and placebo, 4.0 mmHg (2.5, 5.5) between sumatriptan and placebo, and 1.5 mmHg (0.0, 3.0) between telcagepant with sumatriptan vs sumatriptan alone. When coadministered with telcagepant, the AUC0–6h and Cmax of sumatriptan were increased by 23% and 24%, respectively. The small MAP increases observed after coadministration could possibly be associated with the slight elevations in sumatriptan levels. Conclusion Telcagepant does not elevate mean MAP, and coadministration of telcagepant with sumatriptan results in elevations in MAP similar to those observed following administration of sumatriptan alone in migraineurs during the interictal period. When coadministered, telcagepant slightly increases the plasma levels of sumatriptan, but without an apparent clinically meaningful effect.

Randomized Trial of Buffered Versus Plain Lidocaine for Local Anaesthesia in open Carpal Tunnel Decompression

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. WATTS ◽  
P. GASTON ◽  
G. HOOPER
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Bicarbonate ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Control Study

We performed a randomized double-blind case–control study in 64 consecutive patients undergoing open carpal tunnel decompression under local anaesthetic to assess the pain experienced on injection of plain lidocaine (pH 6.4) compared with lidocaine buffered with sodium bicarbonate (pH 7.4). The results showed no statistical difference in the pain scores reported by patients. The mean pain scores for all patients were low, and most patients reported that they were “not at all anxious” about receiving a similar injection in the future.

scholarly journals Effect of Analgesia Administration Timing on Early Post-operative Period Characteristics: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 483-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ö Mavioğlu ◽  
S Özkardełler ◽  
A Tałdöğen ◽  
M Akan ◽  
B Candüz
Keyword(s):  
Total Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Analgesic Consumption ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Anaesthesia Care ◽  
Administration Timing ◽  
Verbal Stimulation

This study investigated the effect of time of analgesia administration in 64 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Patients received standard general anaesthesia and were divided randomly into two equal groups. At the time of fascia closure, patients in the intra-operative (Iop) group received 0.5 mg/kg pethidine intravenously. On arrival in the post-anaesthesia care unit, the same dose of pethidine was given to patients in the post-operative (Pop) group. All patients then used a patient-controlled analgesia pump to administer pethidine analgesia as required. Times to extubation, response to verbal stimulation and orientation, post-operative pain scores and analgesic consumption were recorded. Times to extubation and response to verbal stimulation were significantly longer in the Iop group. Pain scores, analgesic consumption and additional analgesic requirements were significantly higher in the Pop group in the first 2 h post-operatively. In conclusion, intra-operative administration of pethidine provided better pain management than post-operative administration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document