scholarly journals Radial Head Resection versus Arthroplasty in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures Mason Type III and Type IV: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Catellani ◽  
Francesca De Caro ◽  
Carlo F. De Biase ◽  
Vincenzo R. Perrino ◽  
Luca Usai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Stability Range ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Radial Head Resection ◽  
Comminuted Fractures ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Unrepairable comminuted fractures of the radial head Mason type III or type IV have poor outcomes when treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Radial head resection has been proposed as good option for surgical treatment, while in the last decades, the development of technology and design in radial head prosthesis has increased efficacy in prosthetic replacement. The present review was conducted to determine the best surgical treatment for comminuted radial head when ORIF is not possible. Better outcomes are reported for radial head arthroplasty in terms of elbow stability, range of motion, pain, and fewer complications compared to radial head excision. Nevertheless, radial head resection still can be considered an option of treatment in isolated radial head fractures with no associated ligament injuries lesion of ligaments or in case of older patients with low demanding function.

scholarly journals Radial head fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
RP van Riet ◽  
MPJ van den Bekerom ◽  
A Van Tongel ◽  
C Spross ◽  
R Barco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Valgus Stress ◽  
Proximal Ulna ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Radial Head Replacement ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Radial Head Resection ◽  
Type 3

The shape and size of the radial head is highly variable but correlates to the contralateral side. The radial head is a secondary stabilizer to valgus stress and provides lateral stability. The modified Mason–Hotchkiss classification is the most commonly used and describes three types, depending on the number of fragments and their displacement. Type 1 fractures are typically treated conservatively. Surgical reduction and fixation are recommended for type 2 fractures, if there is a mechanical block to motion. This can be done arthroscopically or open. Controversy exists for two-part fractures with >2 mm and <5 mm displacement, without a mechanical bloc as good results have been published with conservative treatment. Type 3 fractures are often treated with radial head replacement. Although radial head resection is also an option as long-term results have been shown to be favourable. Radial head arthroplasty is recommended in type 3 fractures with ligamentous injury or proximal ulna fractures. Failure of primary radial head replacement may be due to several factors. Identification of the cause of failure is essential. Failed radial head arthroplasty can be treated by implant removal alone, interposition arthroplasty, revision radial head replacement either as a single stage or two-stage procedure.

Surgical treatment of the radial head is crucial for the outcome in terrible triad injuries of the elbow

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1620-1628
Author(s):  
Alexander Klug ◽  
Angela Nagy ◽  
Yves Gramlich ◽  
Reinhard Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Independent Effect ◽  
Type I ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Terrible Triad ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Type Iii

Aims To evaluate the outcomes of terrible triad injuries (TTIs) in mid-term follow-up and determine whether surgical treatment of the radial head influences clinical and radiological outcomes. Methods Follow-up assessment of 88 patients with TTI (48 women, 40 men; mean age 57 years (18 to 82)) was performed after a mean of 4.5 years (2.0 to 9.4). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were evaluated. Radiographs of all patients were analyzed. Fracture types included 13 Mason type I, 16 type II, and 59 type III. Surgical treatment consisted of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all type II and reconstructable type III fractures, while radial head arthroplasty (RHA) was performed if reconstruction was not possible. Results At follow-up the mean MEPS was 87.1 (20 to 100); mean OES, 36.9 (6 to 48); and mean DASH score, 18.6 (0 to 90). Mean movement was 118° (30° to 150°) for extension to flexion and 162° (90° to 180°) for pronation to supination. The overall reoperation rate was 24%, with nine ORIF, ten RHA, and two patients without treatment to the radial head needing surgical revision. When treated with RHA, Mason type III fractures exhibited significantly inferior outcomes. Suboptimal results were also identified in patients with degenerative or heterotopic changes on their latest radiograph. In contrast, more favourable outcomes were detected in patients with successful radial head reconstruction after Mason type III fractures. Conclusion Using a standardized protocol, sufficient elbow stability and good outcomes can be achieved in most TTIs. Although some bias in treatment allocation, with more severe injuries assigned to RHA, cannot be completely omitted, treatment of radial head fractures may have an independent effect on outcome, as patients subjected to RHA showed significantly inferior results compared to those subjected to reconstruction, in terms of elbow function, incidence of arthrosis, and postoperative complications. As RHA showed no apparent advantage in Mason type III injuries between the two treatment groups, we recommend reconstruction, providing stable fixation can be achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1620–1628.

Surgical treatment of the radial head is critical to the outcome of Monteggia-like lesions

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1512-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Klug ◽  
Felix Konrad ◽  
Yves Gramlich ◽  
Reinhard Hoffmann ◽  
Kay Schmidt-Horlohé
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Type I ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Coronoid Fracture ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of Monteggia-like lesions at midterm follow-up and to determine whether the surgical treatment of the radial head influences the clinical and radiological results. Patients and Methods A total of 78 patients with a Monteggia-like lesion, including 44 women and 34 men with a mean age of 54.7 years (19 to 80), were available for assessment after a mean 4.6 years (2 to 9.2). The outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Radiographs were analyzed for all patients. A total of 12 Mason type I, 16 type II, and 36 type III fractures were included. Surgical treatment consisted of screw fixation for all type II and reconstructable type III fractures, while radial head arthroplasty (RHA) or excision was performed if reconstruction was not possible. Results The mean MEPS was 88.9 (40 to 100), mean OES was 40.1 (25 to 48), mean MMWS was 88.1 (50 to 100), mean DASH score was 14.7 (0 to 60.2), and mean movement was 114° (sd 27) in extension/flexion and 155° (sd 37) in pronation/supination. Mason III fractures, particularly those with an associated coronoid fracture treated with RHA, had a significantly poorer outcome. Suboptimal results were also identified in patients who had degenerative changes or heterotopic ossification on their latest radiograph. In contrast, all patients with successful radial head reconstruction or excision had a good outcome. Conclusion Good outcomes can be achieved in Monteggia-like lesions with Mason II and III fractures, when reconstruction is possible. Otherwise, RHA is a reliable option with satisfactory outcomes, especially in patients with ligamenteous instability. Whether the radial head should be excised remains debatable, although good results were achieved in patients with ligamentous stability and in those with complications after RHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1512–1519

scholarly journals Extracorporeal Reconstruction of the Radial Head

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kow Ren Yi ◽  
Zaharul Azri Mustapha Zakaria ◽  
Ruben Jaya Kumar ◽  
Low Chooi Leng ◽  
Khairul Nizam Siron Baharom
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Radial Head Fracture ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Elbow Function ◽  
Radial Head Excision

Radial head fractures are common in adults. The radial head acts as an important stabilizer of the radius, especially during the forearm pronation and supination. Surgical treatment of Mason type III fracture of the radial head includes radial head excision, radial head replacement and open reduction and internal fixation. For patients treated with radial head excision, the radius might migrate proximally, causing complications such as chronic pain at the wrist, forearm, and elbow. On the other hand, radial head arthroplasty is associated with a high revision and removal rate. Hence, openreduction and internal fixation are preferred when feasible. This is technically demanding due to the severe displacement of the radial head fragments and limited surgical space. Mr K, a 30-year-old manual worker sustained a closed right radial head fracture Mason type III after an alleged fall. The radial head was displaced anteriorly. Intra-operatively, the radial headpieces were retrieved and were reconstructed extracorporeal and fixed with a miniplate. The patient subsequently recovered with good function. The new technique of extracorporeal reconstruction of the radial head offers a viable option to the surgeon with similar, or even better, outcomes in terms of elbow function.

scholarly journals Reconstruction of Mason type-III and type-IV radial head fractures with a new fixation device: 23 patients followed 1–4 years

2007 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C Koslowsky ◽  
Konrad Mader ◽  
Thomas Gausepohl ◽  
Dietmar Pennig
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Fixation Device ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type Iv

scholarly journals Radial Head Arthroplasty with A Modular Prosthesis – Initial Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
V. Petrov ◽  
B. Matev ◽  
D. Dikov
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Load Transfer ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Joint Dislocations

SummaryThe Mason type III and IV radial head fractures are severe injuries that lead to decreased range of motion, alteration in the kinematics, the load transfer and the stability of the elbow. They are often in conjunction with ligament injuries, anterior or posterior joint dislocations and fractures of the coronoid process, the humeral capitulum and the olecranon. The resection of the head leads to elbow instability, late complications and arthrosis of the elbow. The open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in Mason type III and IV fractures is not able to restore and sustain the anatomical structure and function of the radiocapitellar joint. That is why these fractures require arthroplasty. The best results are reported with the use of metal bipolar prosthetics. We present our initial experience with radial head arthroplasty on three patients with mean follow up 18 months and a review of the English literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document