scholarly journals Effect of Fluid Flow Rate on Efficacy of Fluid Warmer: An In Vitro Experimental Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Vorasruang Thongsukh ◽  
Chanida Kositratana ◽  
Aree Jandonpai
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Core Body Temperature ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Outlet Temperature ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Fluid Flow Rate ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Fluid Warmer

Introduction. In patients who require a massive intraoperative transfusion, cold fluid or blood transfusion can cause hypothermia and potential adverse effects. One method by which to prevent hypothermia in these patients is to warm the intravenous fluid before infusion. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the fluid flow rate on the efficacy of a fluid warmer. Methods. The room air temperature was controlled at 24°C. Normal saline at room temperature was used for the experiment. The fluid was connected to an infusion pump and covered with a heater line, which constantly maintained the temperature at 42°C. The fluid temperature after warming was measured by an insulated thermistor at different fluid flow rates (100, 300, 600, 900, and 1200 mL/h) and compared with the fluid temperature before warming. Effective warming was defined as an outlet fluid temperature of >32°C. Results. The room temperature was 23.6°C ± 0.9°C. The fluid temperature before warming was 24.95°C ± 0.5°C. The outlet temperature was significantly higher after warming at all flow rates (p<0.001). The increases in temperature were 10.9°C ± 0.1°C, 11.5°C ± 0.1°C, 10.2°C ± 0.1°C, 10.1°C ± 0.7°C, and 8.4°C ± 0.2°C at flow rates of 100, 300, 600, 900, and 1200 mL/h, respectively. The changes in temperature among all different flow rates were statistically significant (p<0.001). The outlet temperature was >32°C at all flow rates. Conclusions. The efficacy of fluid warming was inversely associated with the increase in flow rate. The outlet temperature was <42°C at fluid flow rates of 100 to 1200 mL/h. However, all outlet temperatures reached >32°C, indicating effective maintenance of the core body temperature by infusion of warm fluid.

scholarly journals Influence of flow rate, fluid temperature, and extension line on Hotline and S-line heating capability: an in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosu Kim ◽  
Tae Kyong Kim ◽  
Sukha Yoo ◽  
Jin-Tae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
High Flow ◽  
High Flow Rate ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Fluid Warmer

Abstract Background A fluid warmer can prevent hypothermia during the perioperative period. This study evaluated the heating capabilities of Hotline and Barkey S-line under different flow rates and initial fluid temperatures, as well as after the extension line installation. Methods We measured the temperature of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution at the fluid warmer outlet (TProx) and the extension line end (TDistal) with three different initial fluid temperatures (room, warm, and cold) and two flow rates (250 ml/hr and 100 mL/hr). Results At a 250 ml/hr flow rate, the TProx and TDistal values were observed to be higher in Hotline than in S-line when using room-temperature or cold fluid. Administering of the warm fluid at the same flow rate significantly increased the TProx and TDistal values in S-line more than the cold and room-temperature fluids. At flow rates of 100 ml/hr, TDistal values were significantly lower than TProx values in both devices regardless of the initial fluid temperature. Conclusions Hotline outperformed S-line for warming fluids at a high flow rate with cold or room-temperature fluids. Administering warm fluid in S-line prevented a decrease in the fluid temperature at a high flow rate. However, at a low flow rate, the fluid temperature significantly decreased in both devices after passing through an extension line.

scholarly journals Influence of flow rate, fluid temperature, and extension line on Hotline and S-line heating capability: an in vitro study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosu Kim ◽  
Tae Kyong Kim ◽  
Sukha Yoo ◽  
Jin-Tae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
High Flow ◽  
High Flow Rate ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Fluid Warmer

Abstract Background A fluid warmer can prevent hypothermia during the perioperative period. This study evaluated the heating capabilities of Hotline and Barkey S-line under different flow rates and initial fluid temperatures, as well as after the extension line installation. Methods We measured the temperature of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution at the fluid warmer outlet (TProx) and the extension line end (TDistal) with three different initial fluid temperatures (room, warm, and cold) and two flow rates (250 ml/hr and 100 mL/hr). Results At a 250 ml/hr flow rate, the TProx and TDistal values were observed to be higher in Hotline than in S-line when using room-temperature or cold fluid. Administering of the warm fluid at the same flow rate significantly increased the TProx and TDistal values in S-line more than the cold and room-temperature fluids. At flow rates of 100 ml/hr, TDistal values were significantly lower than TProx values in both devices regardless of the initial fluid temperature. Conclusions Hotline outperformed S-line for warming fluids at a high flow rate with cold or room-temperature fluids. Administering warm fluid in S-line prevented a decrease in the fluid temperature at a high flow rate. However, at a low flow rate, the fluid temperature significantly decreased in both devices after passing through an extension line.

scholarly journals Influence of flow rate, fluid temperature, and extension line on Hotline and S-line heating capability: an in vitro study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosu Kim ◽  
Tae Kyong Kim ◽  
Sukha Yoo ◽  
Jin-Tae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
High Flow ◽  
High Flow Rate ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Fluid Warmer

Abstract Background A fluid warmer can prevent hypothermia during the perioperative period. This study evaluated the heating capabilities of Hotline and Barkey S-line under different flow rates and initial fluid temperatures, as well as after the extension line installation. Methods We measured the temperature of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution at the fluid warmer outlet (TProx) and the extension line end (TDistal) with three different initial fluid temperatures (room, warm, and cold) and two flow rates (250 ml/hr and 100 mL/hr). Results At a 250 ml/hr flow rate, the TProx and TDistal values were observed to be higher in Hotline than in S-line when using room-temperature or cold fluid. Administering of the warm fluid at the same flow rate significantly increased the TProx and TDistal values in S-line more than the cold and room-temperature fluids. At flow rates of 100 ml/hr, TDistal values were significantly lower than TProx values in both devices regardless of the initial fluid temperature. Conclusions Hotline outperformed S-line for warming fluids at a high flow rate with cold or room-temperature fluids. Administering warm fluid in S-line prevented a decrease in the fluid temperature at a high flow rate. However, at a low flow rate, the fluid temperature significantly decreased in both devices after passing through an extension line.

scholarly journals Influence of Flow Rate, Fluid Temperature, and Extension Line on Hotline and S-Line Heating Capability: an in Vitro Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosu Kim ◽  
Tae Kyong Kim ◽  
Sukha Yoo ◽  
Jin-Tae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
High Flow ◽  
High Flow Rate ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Fluid Warmer

Abstract Background A fluid warmer can prevent hypothermia during the perioperative period. This study evaluated the heating capabilities of Hotline and Barkey S-line under different flow rates and initial fluid temperatures, as well as after the extension line installation. Methods We measured the temperature of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution at the fluid warmer outlet (TProx) and the extension line end (TDistal) with three different initial fluid temperatures (room, warm, and cold) and two flow rates (250 ml/hr and 100 mL/hr). Results At a 250 ml/hr flow rate, the TProx and TDistal values were observed to be higher in Hotline than in S-line when using a room-temperature fluid; similar results were observed for the cold fluid. Administration of the warm fluid was observed to significantly increase the TProx and TDistal values in S-line at rates of 250 ml/hr more than the administration of the cold and room-temperature fluids. At flow rates of 100 ml/hr, TDistal values were significantly lower than TProx values in both devices regardless of the initial fluid temperature. Conclusions Hotline outperformed S-line for warming fluids at a high flow rate with cold or room-temperature fluids. The administration of the initially warm fluid prevented a decrease in the fluid temperature at a high flow rate in S-line. However, at a low flow rate, the fluid temperature significantly decreased in both devices after passing through an extension line.

Analytical Dynamic Modeling of Line-Focus Solar Collectors

1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Industrial Process ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Outlet Temperature ◽  
Fluid Flow Rate ◽  
Digital Controllers ◽  
Dynamics Models ◽  
Line Focus

Solar thermal electric power and industrial process heat systems may require a constant outlet temperature from the collector field. This constant temperature is most efficiently maintained by adjusting the circulating fluid flow rate. Successful tuning of analog or digital controllers requires a knowledge of system dynamics. Models relating deviations in outlet temperature to changes in inlet temperature, insolation, and fluid flow rate illustrate the basic responses and the distributed-parameter nature of line-focus collectors. When plotted in dimensionless form, the frequency response of a given collector is essentially independent of the operating conditions, suggesting that feedback controller settings are directly related to such easily determined quantities as collector gain and fluid residence time.

scholarly journals Experimental Study of The Influence of Fluid Flow Rate on The Risk of Rock Destruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudad H Al-Obaidi
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Design Flow ◽  
Fluid Flow Rate ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Rock Destruction ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Deformation Properties ◽  
Gas Fields

The stresses acting in the vicinity of wells have a significant impact on the flow properties of the reservoir and, as a result, on the flow rate of oil wells. The magnitude of such stresses depends on the deformation properties of the rock and on the oil pressure at the bottom of the well. In this work, an attempt to study the effect of flow fields (formation flow rate, well flow rates) on rocks in near-wellbore zones was performed. For this purpose, the correlation of such indicators as the fluid flow rate and the risk of destruction of the rocks of the productive deposits of one of the gas fields were experimentally studied. The experiments were performed on chosen core samples with quite wide range of flow and volumetric reservoir properties. It was concluded that the rock samples of the productive deposits of the studied formation do not collapse under the influence of pressure gradients corresponding to the design flow rates.

Temperature Control of Line-Focus Solar Collectors

1983 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-199
Author(s):  
J. D. Wright ◽  
M. Masterson
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Rate Control ◽  
Industrial Process ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Outlet Temperature ◽  
Fluid Flow Rate ◽  
Controller Tuning ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Rules Of Thumb ◽  
Flow Rate Control

Solar thermal electric power and industrial process heat systems may require a constant outlet temperature from the collector. This temperature may be efficiently maintained by adjusting the circulating fluid flow rate. Using frequency response techniques, simple relations are developed which relate controller tuning constants to collector construction and field layout. Successful controller tuning is shown to be a compromise between good response at high flow rates and stability at low flow rates. The rules of thumb are then tested by performing dynamic numerical simulations of a collector row with flow rate control.

scholarly journals Process Simulation for Crude Oil Stabilization by Using Aspen Hysys

2020 ◽  
pp. 14-28
Author(s):  
Hussein Al- Ali
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Vapor Pressure ◽  
Crude Oil ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Water Flow Rate ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Fluid Flow Rate ◽  
Aspen Hysys ◽  
True Vapor

A light fluid from different reservoir formation started recently to associate the production of the crude oil stabilization plant which is unfortunately not enough to release off all light components and as a results the true vapor pressure increased in the storage tanks more than 12 psi. From the results in Aspen Hysys, it was found that manipulating of working parameters for the existing plant likewise the inlet temperature, dry fluid flow rate, water flow rate and the temperature of the outlet fluid from Fired heater have no great effect on the true vapor pressure (TVP). The TVP at normal feed conditions of 50.5 C and for the plant with third and fourth stages are 14.96 Kg/Cm2. a and 10.23 Kg/Cm2. a, respectively. It was found that for the third stage, the changing in feed flow rates for both dry and water have no effect on the reducing TVP, while to stabilized the TVP for the exported crude oil within range of (68947.6 – 82737.1) Pa/(10 – 12) psia when the the fourth separator used in the process plant, the feed dry fluid flow rate (26.4 – 105.6) KBD, the minimum base sediment and water cut in the feed stream 4 Vol%, the inlet fluid temperature (43-51.5)⁰C and the differential temperature across the fired heater in range of (16-24)⁰C with feed temperature range (40-55)⁰C.

scholarly journals Assessment of the Influence of Graphene Nanoparticles on Thermal Conductivity of Graphene/Water Nanofluids Using Factorial Design of Experiments

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivasan Manikandan Periasamy ◽  
Rajoo Baskar
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Factorial Design ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Fluid Temperature ◽  
Fluid Flow Rate ◽  
23 Factorial Design ◽  
Contour Plots ◽  
Factorial Design Of Experiments

In this study, 23 factorial design of experiment was employed to evaluate the effect of parameters of hot fluid inlet temperature, graphene nanofluid concentration and hot fluid flow rate on thermal conductivity of graphene/water nanofluid. The levels of  hot fluid inlet temperature are kept at 35°C and 85°C, nanofluid concentration is kept at 0.1 and 1.0 volume% (vol.%) and the hot fluid flow rate are kept at 2 lpm and 10 lpm. Experiments were conducted with 16 runs as per MINITAB design software using graphene/water nanofluids in the corrugated plate type heat exchanger.  The nanofluid thermal conductivity was determined using the mixing rule for different nanofluid concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.0%. Normal, Pareto, Residual, Main and Interaction effects, Contour Plots were drawn. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of test results depict that the hot fluid temperature and nanofluid concentration have significant effect on the thermal conductivity of graphene/water nanofluid (response variable).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document