Influence of Flow Rate, Fluid Temperature, and Extension Line on Hotline and S-Line Heating Capability: an in Vitro Study
Abstract Background A fluid warmer can prevent hypothermia during the perioperative period. This study evaluated the heating capabilities of Hotline and Barkey S-line under different flow rates and initial fluid temperatures, as well as after the extension line installation. Methods We measured the temperature of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution at the fluid warmer outlet (TProx) and the extension line end (TDistal) with three different initial fluid temperatures (room, warm, and cold) and two flow rates (250 ml/hr and 100 mL/hr). Results At a 250 ml/hr flow rate, the TProx and TDistal values were observed to be higher in Hotline than in S-line when using a room-temperature fluid; similar results were observed for the cold fluid. Administration of the warm fluid was observed to significantly increase the TProx and TDistal values in S-line at rates of 250 ml/hr more than the administration of the cold and room-temperature fluids. At flow rates of 100 ml/hr, TDistal values were significantly lower than TProx values in both devices regardless of the initial fluid temperature. Conclusions Hotline outperformed S-line for warming fluids at a high flow rate with cold or room-temperature fluids. The administration of the initially warm fluid prevented a decrease in the fluid temperature at a high flow rate in S-line. However, at a low flow rate, the fluid temperature significantly decreased in both devices after passing through an extension line.