Comparison of i-Gel as a Conduit for Intubation between under Fiberoptic Guidance and Blind Endotracheal Intubation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Simulation Study

Purpose. This study aimed to compare intubation performances among i-gel blind intubation (IGI), i-gel bronchoscopic intubation (IBRI), and intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) applying two kinds of endotracheal tube during chest compressions. We hypothesized that IGI using wire-reinforced silicone (WRS) tube could achieve endotracheal intubation most rapidly and successfully. Methods. In 23 emergency physicians, a prospective randomized crossover manikin study was conducted to examine the three intubation techniques using two kinds of endotracheal tubes. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The secondary outcome was the cumulative success rate for each intubation technique. A significant difference was considered when identifying p<0.05 between two devices or p<0.017 in post hoc analysis of the comparison among three devices. Results. The mean intubation time using IGI was shorter (p<0.017) than that of using IBRI and MCL in both endotracheal tubes (17.6 vs. 29.3 vs. 20.2 in conventional polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube; 14.6 vs. 27.4 vs. 19.9 in WRS tube; sec). There were no significant (p<0.05) differences between PVC and WRS tubes for each intubation technique. The intubation time to reach 100% cumulative success rate was also shorter in IGI (p<0.017) than that in IBRI and MCL in both PVC and WRS tubes. Conclusions. IGI was an equally successful and faster technique compared with IBRI or MCL regardless of the use of PVC or WRS tube. IGI might be an appropriate technique for emergent intubation by experienced intubators during chest compressions.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Laryngoscopes in Vomitus and Hematemesis Settings: A Randomized Simulation Trial

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2015/806243 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2015 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Ryosuke Mihara ◽

Nobuyasu Komasawa ◽

Sayuri Matsunami ◽

Toshiaki Minami

Keyword(s):

Tracheal Intubation ◽

Success Rate ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Direct Laryngoscope ◽

Mcgrath Mac ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Intubation Success ◽

Intubation Success Rate

Background.Videolaryngoscopes may not be useful in the presence of hematemesis or vomitus. We compared the utility of the Macintosh laryngoscope (McL), which is a direct laryngoscope, with that of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope (AWS) and McGRATH MAC (McGRATH), which are videolaryngoscopes, in simulated hematemesis and vomitus settings.Methods.Seventeen anesthesiologists with more than 1 year of experience performed tracheal intubation on an adult manikin using McL, AWS, and McGRATH under normal, hematemesis, and vomitus simulations.Results.In the normal setting, the intubation success rate was 100% for all three laryngoscopes. In the hematemesis settings, the intubation success rate differed significantly among the three laryngoscopes (P=0.021). In the vomitus settings, all participants succeeded in tracheal intubation with McL or McGRATH, while five failed in the AWS trial with significant difference (P=0.003). The intubation time did not significantly differ in normal settings, while it was significantly longer in the AWS trial compared to McL or McGRATH trial in the hematemesis or vomitus settings (P<0.001, compared to McL or McGRATH in both settings).Conclusion.The performance of McGRATH and McL can be superior to that of AWS for tracheal intubation in vomitus and hematemesis settings in adults.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Face-to-Face Intubation in Sitting Manikin Model With Limitation of Neck Motion by Unexperienced Personnel

Ramathibodi Medical Journal ◽

10.33165/rmj.2021.44.1.228125 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 44 (1) ◽

pp. 21-28

Author(s):

Phatthranit Phattharapornjaroen ◽

Promphet Nuanprom ◽

Prayoot Suk-um ◽

Manina Thilarak ◽

Chaiyaporn Yuksen

Keyword(s):

Success Rate ◽

Vocal Cord ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Video Laryngoscope ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Intubation Technique ◽

Cervical Spine Injuries ◽

Face To Face ◽

Spine Injuries

Background: Trauma patients who entrapped in the accident vehicle are predispose to have cervical spine injuries and they needed to be intubated with face-to-face intubation technique using Macintosh laryngoscope. Nowadays, video laryngoscope has been introduced to improve the intubation technique. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for face-to-face intubation in sitting manikin model with limitation of neck motion. Methods: The study was performed in a randomized experimental study. Subjects were divided into 2 groups both did face-to-face intubation using video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in a sitting manikin model with limitation of neck motion. The success rate of intubation, time to finish intubation, and vocal cord visualization were analyzed. Results: Of 41 subjects including 2nd and 3rd year paramedic students, 21 subjects went to video laryngoscope group, and 20 subjects went to Macintosh laryngoscopes group. The Macintosh laryngoscope intubation technique showed significantly better success rate compared to video laryngoscope (100% and 25%, P < .001). In addition, intubation time of Macintosh laryngoscope was significantly less than video laryngoscope (mean [SD], 27 [24.7] and 75 [66.3] seconds, P < .001). However, vocal cord visualization from both laryngoscope techniques showed no statistically significant (P = .08). Conclusions: Intubation training of Macintosh laryngoscope for in sitting model with neck motion limitation showed better success rate and less time than video laryngoscope, with the same vocal cord visualization.

Download Full-text

Comparisons of the Pentax-AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Intubation Performance during Mechanical Chest Compressions in Left Lateral Tilt: A Randomized Simulation Study of Maternal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2015/975649 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2015 ◽

pp. 1-8 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Sanghyun Lee ◽

Wonhee Kim ◽

Hyunggoo Kang ◽

Jaehoon Oh ◽

Tae Ho Lim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Airway Management ◽

Success Rate ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Lateral Tilt ◽

Glottic View ◽

Advanced Airway ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Maternal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Purpose. Rapid advanced airway management is important in maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study aimed to compare intubation performances among Pentax-AWS (AWS), Glidescope (GVL), and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) during mechanical chest compression in 15° and 30° left lateral tilt.Methods. In 19 emergency physicians, a prospective randomized crossover study was conducted to examine the three laryngoscopes. Primary outcomes were the intubation time and the success rate for intubation.Results. The median intubation time using AWS was shorter than that of GVL and MCL in both tilt degrees. The time to visualize the glottic view in GVL and AWS was significantly lower than that of MCL (allP<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between the two video laryngoscopes (in 15° tilt,P=1; in 30° tilt,P=0.71). The progression of tracheal tube using AWS was faster than that of MCL and GVL in both degrees (allP<0.001). Intubations using AWS and GVL showed higher success rate than that of Macintosh laryngoscopes.Conclusions. The AWS could be an appropriate laryngoscope for airway management of pregnant women in tilt CPR considering intubation time and success rate.

Download Full-text

Macintosh laryngoscope, i-view™, and C-MAC® video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box: A randomized, crossover, manikin study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-90522/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Toshiyuki Nakanishi ◽

Yoshiki Sento ◽

Yuji Kamimura ◽

Kazuya Sobue

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Tracheal Intubation ◽

Success Rate ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Video Laryngoscope ◽

Interquartile Range ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Lehane Grade ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Difficulty Scale

Abstract Background: The aerosol box was designed to prevent cough droplets from spreading, but it can impede tracheal intubation. We tested the hypothesis that the C-MAC® video laryngoscope (C-MAC) with an external display is more useful than the i-view™ video laryngoscope (i-view) with an integrated display, or a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (Macintosh) for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box.Methods: This prospective, randomized, crossover simulation study was conducted at an operating room of the two hospitals (a university hospital and a tertiary teaching hospital). We recruited 37 medical personnel (36 anesthesiologists and 1 dental anesthesiologist) who were working in the fields of anesthesia and intensive care with > 2 years of dedicated anesthesia experience from five hospitals. We divided the participants into six groups to use the laryngoscope in a determined order. After the training using each laryngoscope without a box, the participants performed tracheal intubation thrice with each laryngoscope with at least two-hour intervals. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The secondary outcomes were the success rate, Cormack-Lehane grade, and subjective difficulty scale score (numeric rating scale 0–10, 0: no difficulty, 10: highest difficulty). We used the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni adjustment. Data are shown as median [interquartile range].Results: Thirty-seven personnel (11 women and 26 men) with 12 [5–19] (median [interquartile range]) years of anesthesia and intensive care experience were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the intubation time: 30 [26–32] s for Macintosh, 29 [26–32] s for i-view, and 29 [25–31] s for C-MAC (P=0.247). The success rate was 95%–100% without significant difference (P=0.135). The i-view and C-MAC video laryngoscopes exhibited superior Cormack-Lehane grades and lower subjective difficulty scale scores than the Macintosh laryngoscope; however, there were no differences between the i-view and C-MAC video laryngoscopes.Conclusions: Rapid and highly successful tracheal intubation was possible with Macintosh laryngoscope, i-view, and C-MAC video laryngoscopes on a manikin with an aerosol box. Improved Cormack-Lehane grade and ease of procedure may support the use of video laryngoscopes.Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, identifier UMIN000040269.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial

Emergency Medicine International ◽

10.1155/2019/7306204 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Togay Evrin ◽

Jacek Smereka ◽

Damian Gorczyca ◽

Szymon Bialka ◽

Jerzy Robert Ladny ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Airway Management ◽

Success Rate ◽

Endotracheal Intubation ◽

Chest Compression ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Intubation Success ◽

Intubation Success Rate ◽

Difficult Airways

Introduction. Airway management is one of key elements of resuscitation. Endotracheal intubation is still considered the gold standard for airway management during resuscitation. Aim. The aim of the study was to compare success rates and intubation time of different endotracheal intubation methods during emergency intubation with difficult airways in the conditions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a standardized manikin model. Methods. The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. It involved 46 paramedics with at least 5 years of experience in Emergency Medical Service. The participants performed endotracheal intubation under difficult airway conditions during continuous chest compression, implemented with the LUCAS3 chest compression system. Three methods of tracheal intubation were applied: (1) standard Macintosh laryngoscope without a bougie stylet; (2) standard laryngoscope and a standard bougie stylet; (3) standard laryngoscope and a new bougie stylet. Results. The overall intubation success rate was 100% in the standard bougie and new bougie groups and lower (86.9%) when no bougie stylet was used (P=0.028). The intubation success rate with the 1st attempt equalled 91.3% for the new bougie group, 73.9% for standard bougie, and only 23.9% in the no-bougie group. The median intubation time was shortest in the new bougie group, where it amounted to 29 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–38); the time equalled 38s (IQR:31–44.5) in the standard bougie group and 47.5s (IQR:36–58) in the no-bougie group. The ease of use was lowest in the no-bougie group (85, IQR:63–88), average in the standard bougie group (44, IQR:30–51), and highest in the new bougie stylet group (32, IQR:19–41). Conclusion. In this manikin-based study, paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation with higher efficacy and in a shorter time using the new bougie stylet as compared with the standard bougie stylet.

Download Full-text

Macintosh laryngoscope and i-view™ and C-MAC® video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box: a randomized crossover manikin study

JA Clinical Reports ◽

10.1186/s40981-021-00455-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Toshiyuki Nakanishi ◽

Yoshiki Sento ◽

Yuji Kamimura ◽

Kazuya Sobue

Keyword(s):

Tracheal Intubation ◽

Success Rate ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Video Laryngoscope ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Care Experience ◽

Manikin Study ◽

Lehane Grade ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Difficulty Scale

Abstract Background We tested the hypothesis that the C-MAC® video laryngoscope (C-MAC) with an external display is more useful than the disposable i-view™ video laryngoscope (i-view) with an integrated display or a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (Macintosh) for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box. Methods In this randomized, crossover manikin study, we recruited 37 medical personnel with > 2 years of dedicated anesthesia experience from five hospitals. After the three successful intubations within 60 s using each laryngoscope without a box, the participants performed tracheal intubation thrice with each laryngoscope with at least 2-h intervals in a determined order. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The secondary outcomes were success rate, Cormack-Lehane grade, and subjective difficulty scale score. Results Thirty-seven personnel (11 women and 26 men) with 12 [5–19] (median [interquartile range]) years of anesthesia and intensive care experience were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the intubation time: 30 [26–32] s for Macintosh, 29 [26–32] s for i-view, and 29 [25–31] s for C-MAC (P = 0.247). The success rate was 95–100%, without a significant difference (P = 0.135). The i-view and C-MAC exhibited superior Cormack-Lehane grades and lower subjective difficulty scale scores than the Macintosh; however, there were no differences between the i-view and C-MAC. Conclusions Rapid and highly successful tracheal intubation was possible with both Macintosh, i-view, and C-MAC on a normal airway manikin in an aerosol box. Improved Cormack-Lehane grade and the ease of performing the procedure may support the use of video laryngoscopes. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000040269. Registered 30 April 2020.

Download Full-text

Should the Glidescope video laryngoscope be used first line for all oral intubations or only in those with a difficult airway? A review of current literature

Journal of Perioperative Practice ◽

10.1177/1750458918788985 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 28 (12) ◽

pp. 322-333 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Terrie-Marie Russell ◽

Anil Hormis ◽

Keyword(s):

Difficult Airway ◽

Success Rate ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Review Literature ◽

Video Laryngoscope ◽

Intubation Time ◽

First Line ◽

Glottic View ◽

Glidescope Video Laryngoscope ◽

Difficult Airways

The purpose of this study was to review literature that looked into the efficacy of the Glidescope video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope in oral endotracheal intubations. We aimed to answer the question ‘Should the Glidescope video laryngoscope laryngoscopes be used as first line intubation aids or only in the difficult airway?’ A systematic search of electronic databases was made. The inclusion criteria included: Glidescope, video laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope in human studies. The study aimed to compare first attempt success rate, glottic view and intubation time in papers dating between 2009 and 2017. Eleven trials with a total of 7,919 patients with both difficult and normal airways were included. The trials showed an improvement in first attempt success rate and glottic view with the Glidescope video laryngoscope especially in those with difficult airways. Overall time to intubate showed no significant differences between the Glidescope video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope although it was identified that with increased training and experience with the Glidescope video laryngoscope, intubation time was reduced. Glidescope video laryngoscopes show advantages over the Macintosh laryngoscopes in obtaining better glottic views in those with difficult airways. However its use is not supported in all routine intubations.

Download Full-text

Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis-associated glaucoma: a retrospective comparison of primary Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.15244.2 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 ◽

pp. 876

Author(s):

Hamed Esfandiari ◽

Nils A. Loewen ◽

Kiana Hassanpour ◽

Ali Fatourechi ◽

Shahin Yazdani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Success Rate ◽

Mitomycin C ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Rare Complication ◽

Case Series ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Final Visit ◽

Cumulative Probability ◽

Ahmed Glaucoma Valve ◽

Significant Difference

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of primary trabeculectomy with mitomycin C and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation in patients with Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis (FHIC)-related glaucoma, a rare complication of an uncommon form of uveitis. Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, 26 FHIC-associated glaucoma patients received trabeculectomy (n=12) or an AGV (n=14). Primary outcome measures were surgical success, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mmHg, decreasing ≥20% from baseline, and no secondary glaucoma surgery. Secondary outcome measures were the number of glaucoma medications, complications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and IOP. Results: The follow-up was 34.0±17.7 months in patients that received trabeculectomy and 33.4±18.6 months in AGV (P= 0.837). The cumulative probability of success rate was 41.7% for trabeculectomy and 85.7% for AGV, with no significant difference in complications (P>0.05). The IOP in patients that received trabeculectomy dropped from 23.4±3.3 mmHg to 21.6±5.2 mmHg at the final visit (P= 0.041). In patients that received AGV, the IOP decreased from 24±7.8 to 17.1±2.6 mmHg (P= 0.003). The number of glaucoma medications at baseline were 3.3±0.5 in those that received trabeculectomy and 3±0.6 in those that received AGV (P=0.233), and decreased to 2.4±1.0 (P=0.008) and 1.7±0.6 (P=0.002), respectively. BCVA was equal in both groups and did not change (P>0.05). Conclusion: Primary AGV had a higher success rate than trabeculectomy, with patients also needing fewer medications for the management of FHIC-associated glaucoma.

Download Full-text

Comparison Of Stress Response Performing Endotracheal Intubation By Direct Laryngoscopy, Fibreoptic Intubation And Intubation By The Glidescope Laryngoscope

Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences Section B Natural Exact and Applied Sciences ◽

10.2478/v10046-008-0028-8 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 62 (4-5) ◽

pp. 176-181

Author(s):

Nataļja Jakušenko ◽

Uldis Kopeika ◽

Māris Mihelsons ◽

Dace Nagobade ◽

Aina Vija Putniña ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stress Response ◽

Endotracheal Intubation ◽

Patient Group ◽

Direct Laryngoscopy ◽

Fibreoptic Intubation ◽

Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽

Fibreoptic Bronchoscope ◽

Amylase Level ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Patient Groups

Comparison Of Stress Response Performing Endotracheal Intubation By Direct Laryngoscopy, Fibreoptic Intubation And Intubation By The Glidescope Laryngoscope Stress response is regulated by two primary neuroendocrine systems—the hypothalamuspituitary- adrenocortical (HPA) and sympathetic adrenomedullary (SAM) systems. Salivary alphaamylase (AA) levels can be used as an index of the SAM activity, and serum cortisol as an index of HPA activity. The aim of the study was to compare patient stress response to different intubation techniques. Sixty adult patients, ASA I-III, scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were included in this study, with median age of 54±18 years. Patients were prospectively randomly divided into three groups-intubation with a GlideScope (GS), Macintosh laringoscope (ML) and PENTAX fibreoptic bronchoscope (FB). After preoxygenation for 3 min anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 mkg/kg, mivacuronium 0.2 mg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg, injected intravenously over 20 seconds. Intubation was started 2 min after mivacuronium injection. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1-2 vol% and fentanyl 1 mkg/kg as needed. Intubation time (IT) was measured, blood and saliva samples were collected before and shortly after intubation. Haemodynamic response was recorded. Intubation time was statistically significantly longer in the FB group (120±65 s) versus the ML group (29±5 s) and GS group (26±9 s), P < 0.05. In the three patients groups the initial AA level was similar (54±20 KU/ml, P > 0.05). In GS patients the alpha amylase level after intubation significantly decreased (42±15 KU/ml, P < 0.05), but in ML and FB patients—significantly increased (68±24 KU/ml and 73±32 KU/ml, respectively, P < 0.05). After intubation, blood cortisol did not differ between the ML (377±181 U/ml) and GS (484±61 U/ml) patient groups, but was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the FB group (530±79 U/ml). Both heart rate and blood pressure increased during intubation, the difference between groups was not significant. All intubations were successful, but in the FB patient group IT was significantly longer than in the ML and GS patient group. IT in the GS and FB patient groups did not statistically significantly differ. In our opinion, shorter and more confident intubations with a GlideScope produce less nociceptive stimulus and less stress to the patient. Intubations using GlideScope videolaryngoscope causes lesser stress response in comparison to intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope or fibreoptic bronchoscope.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of use of electromagnetic guidance with responsive insertion technology (RIT) during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/a-0754-1879 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 07 (02) ◽

pp. E225-E231

Author(s):

Shajan Peter ◽

Nipun Reddy ◽

Mohammed Naseemuddin ◽

Jenine Zaibaq ◽

Gerald McGwin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Controlled Trial ◽

Block Design ◽

Primary Outcome Measure ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Intubation Time ◽

Cecal Intubation ◽

Cecal Intubation Time ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Manual Pressure ◽

A Prospective Study

Abstract Background and study aims Colonoscopy can be technically challenging and cause discomfort in patients. The integrated Scope Guide assist is built in to show that with its use outcomes are improved during colonoscopy. We aimed to test the usefulness of the Magnetic Scope Guide Assist (ScopeGuide) with respect to cecal intubation time, and other procedural quality outcomes. Patients and methods We conducted a prospective study of outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy at the endoscopic units of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) from March 2016 to July 2016. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 block design to groups that either had standard colonoscopy or Scope-guided colonoscopy. The primary outcome measure was cecal intubation time (CIT). Secondary outcome measures included use of manual pressure, position changes for cecal intubation and sedation requirements. Results Three hundred patients were randomized to either group; standard (n = 150) vs. Scope-guided (n = 150). The mean CIT was not statistically different for the standard and the Scope-guided groups (4.6 vs. 4.3 minutes; P = 0.46). There were also no statistical differences in frequency of manual pressure applied (16.7 % for Scope-guided vs. 19.1 % for standard; P = 0.65) or position changes (11.4 % for scope guided vs. 8.8 % standard; P = 0.56). Sedation requirements showed lesser use of midazolam (3.9 mg vs. 4.7 mg, P = 0.003) in the Scope-guide group, while there was no significant difference in use of fentanyl (fentanyl – 62.1 mg vs. 68.9 mg, P = 0.09 similar between groups, for Scope-guided vs. standard groups, respectively). Adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusions In patients undergoing routine elective colonoscopy, use of ScopeGuide by experienced colonoscopists did not improve CIT or affect the frequency of ancillary maneuvers. The benefit of this device during training of endoscopists could be considered for further studies.

Download Full-text