scholarly journals Aspiration of Public-Private Partnership Projects’ Risk Management Supported on Probabilistic Linguistic Terms amid Weakened Hedges

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Yunpeng Sun ◽  
Muneeb Ahmad ◽  
Li Rui ◽  
Saleem Ahmad ◽  
Yousaf Ali Khan

The provision of risk involved in a deal for a public-private partnership (PPP) is an essential aspect of triumph that should be based on the best smart party’s opinion to organize it. This study anticipated the importance of risk management in PPP projects to adjust the risk management dilemma of the PPP projects’ pedestal on the P-LTWHs with a new notion of FMEA. The dynamic linguistic expressions, P-LTWHs, were suggested in the theoretical aspect to articulate decision-makers’ assessments, who take the reluctant information with weakened hedges and the likelihood of the linguistic information into account. Besides, the biprojection technique was used to rank risk management problem failure modes in a PPP project. The probabilistic linguistic terms with compromised hedges evaluate the risk management of the novel failure mode and impact analysis (NFMEA) and rank failure modes with the biprojection technique (P-LTWHs). This study also shows that it is possible to spread risks based on fuzzy set theory among public-private parties effectively. Likewise, with the biprojection practice of LTWHs with the VIKOR technique of P-LTWHs, the predicted model is estimated.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165
Author(s):  
Iryna Boiarko ◽  
Oleksandra Tverezovska ◽  
Jan Polcyn ◽  
Radoslaw Miskiewicz

This paper recapitulates the argumentations from various scientific discussion concerning the issue of projects` risk management. The article mainly is aimed to analyze the process of risk-management of the innovation projects in the form of public-private partnership, to describe a methodologies of Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis and Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, to use above mentioned models in the evaluation of the stability risk of public-private partnership innovation projects. Previous research studies on the topic of public-private partnership defined the efficiency of state sector and business cooperation in a form of public-private partnership, demonstrated that it will allow making investments in the production capacity development, broaden the scope of domestic and foreign markets, accelerate industrial growth, refine the quality of goods, services and works, business activity and investment attractiveness. Especially it can be achieved through innovation project implementation. Moreover, systematization the results in the overview process of literary sources and approaches in the issue of innovation public-private projects` risk-management problem-solving specifies that a huge number of theoretical and practical problems, especially of risk evaluation is urgent, remain unsolved and still studied not enough nowadays. An underdevelopment of innovation projects’ risk-management system, especially in our country, is conditioned the relevance of that scientific problem additionally existing in the circumstances of complex public-private partnership innovation projects` risks evaluation. Investigation of the topic «Risk management of public-private partnership innovation projects» in the article is fulfilled in the following logical sequence: defining the problems while literature review, focusing on project risk-management issue, describing the methodology of the research, demonstrating the results, and making conclusions. The object of research is the chosen by creating a prototype of innovation project in the infrastructure field, suggested that it will be implemented in the form of public-private partnership.


EDPACS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 6-19
Author(s):  
Alex Sidorenko ◽  
Vladimir Kilinkarov ◽  
Alexey Belkov

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antti Tieva ◽  
Juha-Matti Junnonen

Public‐private‐partnership projects are long term, complex and very challenging contractual arrangements and relationships. They bring new roles for public sector and also for private sector in terms of construction and services. This paper will go through some features of the Finnish PPPs. Proactive law focuses in practical views as regards contract law and contractual issues. The main target is to prevent problems instead of confronting them. This paper will clarify what proactive law is about in terms of contract law and contracting especially in PPPs. For instance, 20–40 years’ partnership relation with PPPs brings up also dozens of different risks into the picture. This paper will discuss the risks and risk management in terms of proactive law and after that, focus on PPPs in Finland. Santruka Viešojo ir privataus sektoriu partnerystes (VPP) projektai ‐ tai ilgalaikiai, sude tin gi ir itin daug pastangu reikalaujantys sutartiniai susitarimai ir santykiai. Ne tik viešajame, bet ir privačiajame sektoriuje jie sukuria naujus, su statyba ir paslaugomis susijusius, vaidmenis. Šiame darbe apžvelgiami kai kurie Suomijos VPP bruožai. Iniciatyvi teise glaudžiai susijusi su prak ti nemis pažiūromis, sutarčiu teise ir pan. Pagrindinis tikslas ‐ išvengti problemu užuot jas sprendus. Šiame darbe paaiškinama iniciatyvios teises esme sudarant sutartis, ypač VPP. Pavyzdžiui, kai VPP trunka 20–40 metu, susiduriama su daugybe ivairiu rizikos rūšiu. Todel straipsnyje pirmiausia aptariamos rizikos rūšys ir rizikos valdymo būdai taikant iniciatyvia teise, o po to ‐ Suomijos VPP.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 675-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjian Ke ◽  
ShouQing Wang ◽  
Albert P. C. Chan

Project risks were not properly managed in the many past Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects in China. Although numerous research studies have been conducted on risk management in China's PPP projects, the realization of risk management in China's construction industry especially in PPP projects with high risk exposure and complicated contract structure has hitherto not been well studied. This paper therefore attempted to examine the current use of risk management in China's PPP projects by an empirical survey. The results indicated that the use of risk management was inadequate; qualitative risk analysis methods were preferred to quantitative and semi-quantitative methods; risk management usage in the execution was found to be much higher than in the planning, conceptual or termination stage; interviewees were unfamiliar with most of the risk identification and assessment tools. All above could be partly due to the project nature, but more fundamentally due to the local industrial culture. The absence of risk management culture was found to be the dominant factor which limited the implementation of risk management in practice. Recommendations to alleviate the difficulties of risk management were thereafter provided in this paper.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 837-837
Author(s):  
Patricia Haggerty ◽  
Daniel Raiten

Abstract Objectives Background: In 2007 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) collaborated to address concerns about the safety and efficacy of interventions to prevent and treat nutritional iron deficiency (NID) particularly in the context of malaria. The “Iron and Malaria Project” (IMP) addressed how iron might not be safe, iron assessment, and the value of interventions to address NID. This presentation will: Describe the novel approach used to achieve the IMP goals, describe the IMP accomplishments and impacts, and summarize lessons learned. Methods The IMP had: 1) Research Track: NICHD initiated 2 funding opportunity announcements resulting in 10 funded projects; 2) Translation Track: a) consultations with global stakeholders; b) risk: benefit analyses on the use of interventions to prevent and treat NID; c) a collaboration with the CDC to develop standards for a sTfR assay; d) the BOND project to harmonize the process for discovery, development and deployment of nutrient biomarkers; e) the INSPIRE project, a review of extant evidence on reciprocal relationships between nutrition and inflammation; and f) the BRINDA project, a collaboration with the CDC, GAIN, and WHO to study the impact of inflammation on interpretation of biomarkers of iron and other determinants of anemia and develop approaches to account for this interaction. Results Funded grants included 4 basic science projects exploring mechanisms to explain iron and malaria interactions and 6 clinical studies addressing various aspects of the iron malaria relationship. To date, 72 journal publications have resulted. Using the NIH Relative Citation Ratio metric, 2/3 have scientific influence scores ≥the 50th percentile of all NIH-funded research publications and 15 have scores ≥ the 90th percentile. Conclusions The IMP leveraged the attributes of this public-private partnership between BMGF and NICHD/NIH to accomplish its goals. The partnership's complementarity and synergy resulted in broad traction and collaboration with a global community invested in solving the challenges of iron and malaria. Funding Sources BMGF $9.3 million, NIH Office of Dietary Supplements $1.3 million.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 80-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Osei-Kyei ◽  
Albert P. C. Chan

The criteria for measuring the success of public–private partnership (PPP) projects have become very topical because of the global interest in PPP project success. This article empirically investigates the differences and similarities of PPP project success criteria in developing and developed economies, represented by Ghana and Hong Kong, respectively. Results reveal profitability, meeting output specifications, and adherence to budget as the top three success criteria in Ghana, whereas adherence to budget, adherence to time, and effective risk management are considered more important in Hong Kong. The findings inform practitioners of the success measures considered in PPP in developing and developed countries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 101-114
Author(s):  
Usman Ahmad ◽  
Yusnidah Ibrahim ◽  
Arpah Abu Bakar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document