scholarly journals Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Fuke Qianjin Tablet

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Pan Jie ◽  
Zuo Kai-Ni ◽  
Wang Xiao-Mei ◽  
Zhang Meng-Pei ◽  
Wang Zhi-Heng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reaction Rates ◽  
Inflammatory Factors ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Acute Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Purpose. The aim of the research was to evaluate the efficacy and safety associated with Fuke Qianjin tablet combined with conventional therapy in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory diseases and associated complications (endometritis) using a meta-analysis approach. Patients and Methods. We searched 8 electronic databases up to December 31, 2019, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and SinoMed. Eligible studies were clinical trials of Fuke Qianjin tablet combined with conventional therapy used in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, and endometritis. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA15 software. Results. A total of 125 RCTs (n = 14,494) were shortlisted for the meta-analysis, which included 23 trials for acute pelvic inflammatory disease, 69 trials for chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, and 33 trials for endometritis. The overall analysis illustrated Fuke Qianjin tablet combined with conventional therapy was significantly more efficacious than conventional therapy alone across all types of antibiotics treatment for acute pelvic inflammatory disease (OR = 5.57, 95% CI 4.09–7.58, Z = 10.90, p = 0.001 ), chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (OR = 4.70, 95% CI 4.07–5.42, Z = 21.21, p = 0.001 ) and endometritis (OR = 5.09, 95% CI 4.03–6.43; Z = 13.63, p = 0.001 ) in both primary endpoints and secondary endpoints. There is also a trend that Fuke Qianjin tablet combined with conventional therapy has lower adverse reaction rates than conventional therapy alone. Conclusion. Fuke Qianjin tablet combined with conventional therapy showed better clinical efficacy in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, and endometritis. There were no obvious drug-related adverse reactions. Fuke Qianjin tablet presented advantages in shortening the remission time of clinical symptoms, reducing the concentration of serum inflammatory factors, improving endometrial thickness, menstruation, and reducing relapse rate.

scholarly journals Fuke Qianjin Combined with Antibiotic Therapy for Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
Shaobin Wei ◽  
Li Huang ◽  
Mei Luo ◽  
Yang Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Chinese Patent ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background. Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) without timely and proper treatment can cause long-term sequelae; meanwhile, patients will be confronted with the antimicrobial resistance and side effects. Chinese patent medicine as a supplement is used to treat PID with satisfactory clinical efficacy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Fuke Qianjin (FKQJ) combined with antibiotics in the treatment of PID. Methods. Eight electronic databases and other resources were searched to make a collection of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to 2019. The RCTs contrasting the effect of FKQJ combined with antibiotics regimens and antibiotics alone in reproductive women with PID were included. The antibiotics regimens are all recommended by the guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, the meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 5. 3 software if appropriate. Results. Twenty-three RCTs (2527 women) were included in this review. The evidence showed that FKQJ combined with antibiotics improved the markedly effective rate compared to antibiotics alone group (RR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.49, I2 = 42%), shortened the improvement time of low abdominal pain (MD = −1.11, 95% CI −1.39 to −0.84, I2 = 38%), and increased the rate of lower abdominal pain improvement (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.55, I2 = 0). The implementation of adjuvant reduced the recurrent rate compared with antibiotics alone (RR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.56, I2 = 0%). Conclusions. Based on available evidence, FKQJ combined with antibiotics therapy have certain outcomes on increasing the markedly effective rate, decreasing the recurrent rate compared with antibiotics alone group. This therapy appears to improve lower abdominal pain and curtail the relief time. Due to the low quality and the risk of bias, any high-quality evidence or longer follow-up period should be advisable and necessary in the future.

scholarly journals Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: an overview of systematic reviews

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento ◽  
Dónal P. O’Mathúna ◽  
Thilo Caspar von Groote ◽  
Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem ◽  
Ishanka Weerasekara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Ground Glass Opacity ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Overview Of Systematic Reviews ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Navigating the rapidly growing body of scientific literature on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is challenging, and ongoing critical appraisal of this output is essential. We aimed to summarize and critically appraise systematic reviews of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in humans that were available at the beginning of the pandemic. Methods Nine databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, PDQ-Evidence, WHO’s Global Research, LILACS, and Epistemonikos) were searched from December 1, 2019, to March 24, 2020. Systematic reviews analyzing primary studies of COVID-19 were included. Two authors independently undertook screening, selection, extraction (data on clinical symptoms, prevalence, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, diagnostic test assessment, laboratory, and radiological findings), and quality assessment (AMSTAR 2). A meta-analysis was performed of the prevalence of clinical outcomes. Results Eighteen systematic reviews were included; one was empty (did not identify any relevant study). Using AMSTAR 2, confidence in the results of all 18 reviews was rated as “critically low”. Identified symptoms of COVID-19 were (range values of point estimates): fever (82–95%), cough with or without sputum (58–72%), dyspnea (26–59%), myalgia or muscle fatigue (29–51%), sore throat (10–13%), headache (8–12%) and gastrointestinal complaints (5–9%). Severe symptoms were more common in men. Elevated C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase, and slightly elevated aspartate and alanine aminotransferase, were commonly described. Thrombocytopenia and elevated levels of procalcitonin and cardiac troponin I were associated with severe disease. A frequent finding on chest imaging was uni- or bilateral multilobar ground-glass opacity. A single review investigated the impact of medication (chloroquine) but found no verifiable clinical data. All-cause mortality ranged from 0.3 to 13.9%. Conclusions In this overview of systematic reviews, we analyzed evidence from the first 18 systematic reviews that were published after the emergence of COVID-19. However, confidence in the results of all reviews was “critically low”. Thus, systematic reviews that were published early on in the pandemic were of questionable usefulness. Even during public health emergencies, studies and systematic reviews should adhere to established methodological standards.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document