P1-12-18: Change in HER2 Status in HER2 Positive Operable Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Anti-HER2 Therapy: Analysis of Two Consecutive Cohorts.

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Barbieri ◽  
F Piacentini ◽  
MV Dieci ◽  
G Ficarra ◽  
S Bettelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive

scholarly journals Relationship Between Obesity and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among Women With Operable Breast Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (25) ◽  
pp. 4072-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Litton ◽  
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
Carla L. Warneke ◽  
Aman U. Buzdar ◽  
Shu-Wan Kau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Purpose To understand the mechanism through which obesity in breast cancer patients is associated with poorer outcome, we evaluated body mass index (BMI) and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in women with operable breast cancer. Patients and Methods From May 1990 to July 2004, 1,169 patients were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and received NC before surgery. Patients were categorized as obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), overweight (BMI of 25 to < 30 kg/m2), or normal/underweight (BMI < 25 kg/m2). Logistic regression was used to examine associations between BMI and pathologic complete response (pCR). Breast cancer–specific, progression-free, and overall survival times were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Median age was 50 years; 30% of patients were obese, 32% were overweight, and 38% were normal or underweight. In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in pCR for obese compared with normal weight patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.26). Overweight and the combination of overweight and obese patients were significantly less likely to have a pCR (OR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.95; and OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.99, respectively). Obese patients were more likely to have hormone-negative tumors (P < .01), stage III tumors (P < .01), and worse overall survival (P = .006) at a median follow-up time of 4.1 years. Conclusion Higher BMI was associated with worse pCR to NC. In addition, its association with worse overall survival suggests that greater attention should be focused on this risk factor to optimize the care of breast cancer patients.

Comparison of HER2 Status by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry to Predict Benefit From Dose Escalation of Adjuvant Doxorubicin-Based Therapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 4287-4297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn G. Dressler ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
David Cowan ◽  
Kelly Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose HER2 is a clinically important tumor marker in breast cancer; however, there is controversy regarding which method reliably measures HER2 status. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. Methods This is a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study, using 524 tumor blocks collected from breast cancer patients registered to clinical trial CALGB 8541. IHC employed CB11 and AO-11-854 monoclonal antibodies; FISH used PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe kit; PCR utilized differential PCR (D-PCR) methodology. Results Cases HER2 positive by IHC, FISH and D-PCR were 24%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. FISH and IHC were clearly related (κ = 64.8%). All three methods demonstrated a similar relationship for DFS and OS. By any method, for patients with HER2-negative tumors, there was little or no effect of dose of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. For patients with HER2-positive tumors, all three methods predicted a benefit from dose-intense (high-dose) compared with low- or moderate-dose adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. Conclusion FISH is a reliable method to predict clinical outcome following adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy for stage II breast cancer patients. There is a moderate level of concordance among the three methods (IHC, FISH, PCR). None of the methods is clearly superior. Although IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors yielded the greatest interaction with dose of therapy in predicting outcome, no combination of assays tested was statistically superior.

Prognostic factors in breast cancer patients evaluated by PET/CT prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12113-e12113
Author(s):  
Mark K Farrugia ◽  
Geraldine M. Jacobson ◽  
Mohamad Adham Salkeni
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Primary Breast Tumor ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Pre Treatment

e12113 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an important modality in breast cancer treatment. We sought to identify pre-treatment prognostic factors in patients who had positron emission tomography paired with diagnostic quality contrast-enhanced CT (PET/CT) prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with respect to pathologic complete response (pCR) , survival and relapse-free survival (RFS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 118 breast cancer patients who had pre-treatment PET/CT imaging and received NAC from 2008-2014. We collected data on molecular markers, PET/CT, pCR, survival, and disease status. Results: The median follow up was 44 months(range 7.3-101.5),median age was 51 years; 47% were stage II, 53% stage III. 52% of patients had hormone receptor (HR) positive/HER2 negative disease, 31% of tumors were HER2 positive, and 17% of tumors were triple-negative. 92.5% with HER2 positive tumors received NAC containing at least one HER2 targeted agent. Pre-treatment standard uptake value (SUV) max of the primary breast tumor showed no statistically significant relationship to survival, RFS, or pCR. PET avid (>2 SUV) extra-axillary nodes such as internal mammary and supraclavicular was associated with a non-statistically significant trend towards reduced RFS (p=0.06, HR=0.13-1.06). pCR overall was 37.5% for HER2 positive tumors, 15% in triple-negative tumors, and 8% in HR positive/HER2 negative tumors. Log-rank analysis with post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference between the RFS of triple-negative tumors and HER2 positive tumors (p=0.001), while comparison between HR positive/HER2 negative and HER2 positive was not statistically significant (p=0.11). Multivariate cox regression analysis, which included grade and stage of tumors, showed HER2 positivity to be associated with a favorable outcome (p=0.04, HR=0.22 (0.05-0.94)). Conclusions: Within this cohort, pre-treatment SUV max of the primary tumor showed no prognostic value with regard pCR or RFS. PET avid extra-axillary metastasis trended towards reduced RFS. Patients with HER2 positive tumors had the highest pCR and RFS comparable to classically favorable subgroups such as HR positive/HER 2 negative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document