Family History Assessment to Detect Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer: Conceptual Considerations and a Preliminary Economic Analysis

1513 Background: Hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable; however, identification of individuals at sufficiently high risk to warrant heightened surveillance is difficult. Lynch Syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer syndrome due to germline mutation in a DNA mismatch repair gene. For women with LS, the lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC) is 64% and CRC is 54%. Fifty percent of women with LS will present with EC or ovarian cancer prior to CRC. Therefore, women with LS associated EC represent an ideal group for CRC prevention. The optimal method to identify women with LS associated EC is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of Amsterdam II and Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Criteria (modified Bethesda criteria that use EC as the sentinel cancer) in identifying women with LS associated EC. Our ultimate goal is to identify women at increased risk of CRC. Methods: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for DNA mismatch repair proteins and MLH1 methylation analyses were used to identify LS associated EC among 388 women. EC was designated as LS if there was loss of mismatch repair protein expression. Absence of MLH1 methylation was required to confirm LS in tumors with MLH1 protein loss. Results: Fifty-nine (15.2%) of the EC patients tested had LS. These patients are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Clinical criteria to detect LS identify 17/59 (29%) - 44/59 (74%) of women who present with EC first. EC with MSH2 loss is most likely to occur in younger women and women with positive family history of EC and CRC, features classically associated with LS. In general, the MSH6 mutation is associated with older age at diagnosis and fewer familial CRCs, however, we found a large number of MLH1 (50%) and PMS2 (86%) cases diagnosed at greater than 50 years with no family history of CRC. Our data suggest that classic clinical screening criteria are inadequate to detect patients with LS who present with EC, potentially missing up to 25% of these patients. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

The role of nursing in obtaining a three-generation familial cancer history intake tool (FCHT) and the care of patients with hereditary gastrointestinal syndromes.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.30_suppl.216 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽

pp. 216-216

Author(s):

Lucia Fontes-Borts ◽

Howard Safran ◽

Kimberly Perez

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Sex Education ◽

Hereditary Cancer ◽

Familial Cancer ◽

Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Generation Family ◽

Cancer Syndromes ◽

The Impact

216 Background: Of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 5-10% of all cancers are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Since hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes convey a markedly increased risk for developing cancer, identification of affected families is important. Studies have found that clinicians are unlikely to adequately or routinely collect family history information on their patients. This study assessed the implementation of a validated three-generation family history intake tool by an advanced practiced nurse practitioner (APNP) and the impact on clinical practice at a mid-size academic affiliated Medical Oncology practice. Methods: From September 2013 to January 2014, 100 patients with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer were assessed after a clinic session with a physician by an APNP. The APNP utilized a validated 3 - generation family history tool. Information regarding age, sex, education, annual income, family ethnicity, diet, exercise and previous genetic testing was also collected. Data collected was then analyzed to assess risk of hereditary syndrome. A chart review of the patients was performed to analyze microsatellite instability testing and prior genetic counseling referrals. Results: Of the 100 screened, 93 patients were evaluable. There were 52 males: 39 female participants with a median age of 60.71 years (range 28-90). The implementation of FCHT was associated with an increase in identification of individuals at risk; 16 (17.2%) patients reported a diagnosis of CRC at age less than 50. The rate of referrals for genetic evaluation tripled after the implementation of the FCHT (6.5% to 16.3%). Of the 17 referred, five had been referred prior to implementation of the FCHT. Conclusions: Institution of a separate session with an APNP to assess family history resulted in a 3-fold increase in rates of detection of patients with high risk for hereditary cancer syndromes associated with colorectal cancer.This study demonstrates that APNP’s are well positioned to promote preventative health by engaging in family history intake and genetic assessment referral.

Download Full-text

Polyposis Syndromes

10.2310/7800.16031 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Katherine A Kelley ◽

Daniel O Herzig

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Future Research ◽

Molecular Characteristics ◽

Inherited Disorders ◽

Polyposis Syndrome ◽

Screening Guidelines ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Polyposis Syndromes

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men and women. Although about one third of cancers arise in patients with a family history of CRC, only 5% arise in the setting of mendelian-inherited disorders. Patients without a family history but with a significant polyp burden (> 20 polyps) should be considered to have polyposis syndrome. The field of polyposis syndromes continues to advance, based on new genetic discoveries that define the genetic etiologies of polyposis syndromes. When considered in relation to an individual’s phenotype, these discoveries help guide screening and treatment based on the cancer risk created by specific mutations. Patients with polyposis syndromes carry an increased risk of CRC and some other extracolonic cancers. Future research will provide additional insight into the cause of polyposis syndromes without a currently detectable gene defect and will improve early identification and cancer prevention in affected individuals. Identification of additional molecular characteristics may lead to a more personalized approach to treatment for these individuals. This review contains 7 figures, 11 tables and 52 references. Key words: attenuated familial polyposis, colorectal cancer risk, familial adenomatous polyposis, hamartomatous polyposis syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, MUTYH-associated polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, polyposis syndromes, screening guidelines, serrated polyposis syndrome

Download Full-text

Polyposis Syndromes

10.2310/cgso.16031 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Katherine A Kelley ◽

Daniel O Herzig

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Future Research ◽

Molecular Characteristics ◽

Inherited Disorders ◽

Polyposis Syndrome ◽

Screening Guidelines ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Polyposis Syndromes

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men and women. Although about one third of cancers arise in patients with a family history of CRC, only 5% arise in the setting of mendelian-inherited disorders. Patients without a family history but with a significant polyp burden (> 20 polyps) should be considered to have polyposis syndrome. The field of polyposis syndromes continues to advance, based on new genetic discoveries that define the genetic etiologies of polyposis syndromes. When considered in relation to an individual’s phenotype, these discoveries help guide screening and treatment based on the cancer risk created by specific mutations. Patients with polyposis syndromes carry an increased risk of CRC and some other extracolonic cancers. Future research will provide additional insight into the cause of polyposis syndromes without a currently detectable gene defect and will improve early identification and cancer prevention in affected individuals. Identification of additional molecular characteristics may lead to a more personalized approach to treatment for these individuals. This review contains 7 figures, 11 tables and 52 references. Key words: attenuated familial polyposis, colorectal cancer risk, familial adenomatous polyposis, hamartomatous polyposis syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, MUTYH-associated polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, polyposis syndromes, screening guidelines, serrated polyposis syndrome

Download Full-text