scholarly journals Endogenous Production of IL1B by Breast Cancer Cells Drives Metastasis and Colonization of the Bone Microenvironment

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 2769-2782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Tulotta ◽  
Diane V. Lefley ◽  
Katy Freeman ◽  
Walter M. Gregory ◽  
Andrew M. Hanby ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerald E. Dumas ◽  
Akia N. Parks ◽  
Manu O. Platt

ABSTRACTBreast cancer metastasis to bone continues to be a major clinical problem, and patient-to-patient variability in rates of disease progression and metastasis complicate treatment even further. This may be due to differences in the cancer cells, the osteoclasts, or the pre-metastatic niche, but all of these contribute to proteolytic remodeling necessary for osteolytic lesion establishment, primarily through secretion of cathepsin K, the most powerful human collagenase. There is debate about the relative contributions of breast cancer cells and osteoclasts and synergism between the two in altering the biochemical and biomechanical properties of the colonized bone, as these are difficult to parse with animal models. To quantify the relative contributions of breast cancer cells and osteoclasts in bone resorption, we have been developing engineered bone microenvironment tissue surrogates by adapting a poly(ester urethane) urea system embedded with microbone particles. Here, we report their use with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and RAW264.7 derived osteoclasts, to provide temporal, multiscale reporters of bone resorption that can be measured non-destructively: 1) collagen degradation measured by C-terminal collagen fragment release, 2) mineral dissolution by measuring calcium released with the calcium arsenazo assay, and also show their beneficial effects in upregulating cathepsin K expression compared to tissue culture polystyrene controls. These more natural derived bone surrogates may be useful tools in mimicking bone metastatic niche and determining differences between proteolytic activity of different patients’ tumor and bone resident cells in a controlled manner.


Nitric Oxide ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal B Evig ◽  
Eric E Kelley ◽  
Christine J Weydert ◽  
Yi Chu ◽  
Garry R Buettner ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. R567-R576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Wilson ◽  
Hannah Brown ◽  
Ingunn Holen

Multiple factors influence the survival of disseminated breast tumour cells (DTCs) in bone. Whereas gene signature studies have identified genes that predict a propensity of tumours to metastasise to bone, the bone environment is key in determining the fate of these tumour cells. Breast cancer cells locate to specific niches within the bone that support their survival, regulated by host factors within the bone microenvironment including bone cells, cells of the bone micro vasculature, immune cells and the extracellular matrix. Reproductive endocrine hormones that affect bone and clinical studies across the menopausal transition have provided comprehensive understanding of the changes in the bone microenvironment during this time. Menopause is characterized by a decrease in ovarian oestradiol and inhibins, with an increase in pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone and this review will focus on the role of these three hormones in determining the fate of DTCs in bone. Both in vivo and clinical data suggest that premenopausal bone is a conducive environment for growth of breast cancer cells in bone. Adjuvant cancer treatment aims to reduce the risk of tumour recurrence by affecting DTCs. Drugs targeting the bone resorbing osteoclasts, such as bisphosphonates, have therefore been evaluated in this setting. Both preclinical and adjuvant clinical studies have shown that bisphosphonates’ ability to decrease tumour growth in bone is influenced by the levels of endocrine hormones, with enhanced effects in a postmenopausal bone microenvironment. The challenge is to understand the molecular mechanisms behind this phenomenon and to evaluate if alternative adjuvant bone-targeted therapies may be effective in premenopausal women.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1100-1117.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor L. Bado ◽  
Weijie Zhang ◽  
Jingyuan Hu ◽  
Zhan Xu ◽  
Hai Wang ◽  
...  

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Young Kim ◽  
Bongkun Choi ◽  
Ji-Eun Kim ◽  
Si-On Park ◽  
Sang-Min Kim ◽  
...  

The interleukin-22 (IL-22) signaling pathway is well known to be involved in the progression of various cancer types but its role in bone metastatic breast cancer remains unclear. We demonstrate using human GEO profiling that bone metastatic breast cancer displays elevated interleukin-22 receptor 1 (IL-22R1) and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) expression. Importantly, IL-22 stimuli promoted the expression of IL-22R1 and S1PR1 in aggressive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. IL-22 treatment also increased sphingosine-1-phosphate production in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and induced the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)-mediated chemotactic migration of MDA-MB-231 cells. This effect was inhibited by an S1P antagonist. In addition to the S1PR1 axis, IL-22 stimulated the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), thereby promoting breast cancer cell invasion. Moreover, IL-22 induced IL22R1 and S1PR1 expression in macrophages, myeloid cell, and MCP1 expression in MSCs to facilitate macrophage infiltration. Immunohistochemistry indicated that IL-22R1 and S1PR1 are overexpressed in invasive malignant breast cancers and that this correlates with the MMP-9 levels. Collectively, our present results indicate a potential role of IL-22 in driving the metastasis of breast cancers into the bone microenvironment through the IL22R1-S1PR1 axis.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4439-4439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attaya Suvannasankha ◽  
Colin D Crean ◽  
Douglas R Tompkins ◽  
Jesus Delgado-Calle ◽  
Teresita M Bellido ◽  
...  

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease (MMBD) is characterized by activation of osteoclasts and suppression of osteoblastic differentiation, with these changes in the bone microenvironment supporting MM cell growth and drug resistance. These complex interactions between MM cells and bone cells are incompletely understood. Current bone targeted therapy with bisphosphonates or Denosumab only blocks bone resorption but has no effect on osteoblast activity and only modest effects on MM growth. Therefore, new MMBD treatments are needed. Semaphorin-4D (Sema4D; CD100), is made by osteoclasts and inhibits osteoblasts by binding to the Plexin B receptor. Breast cancers also express Sema4d, and silencing sema4D in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells suppresses bone metastasis (Yang Y et al, PLoS One 2016). Since breast cancers and MM both cause osteolytic bone destruction and soluble Sema4D and Plexin B levels are increased in sera of MM patients (Terpos et al, 2012), we tested if sema4D contributed to MMBD. qPCR analysis of human MM cell lines and primary CD138+ cells showed MM cells express high levels of sema4D mRNA, comparing to the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Analysis of previously reported gene expression array data confirmed that MM cells express sema4D at a higher level compared to bone marrow plasma cells of MGUS and healthy donors (GenomicScape.com; Zhan F et al, Blood 2007; Mattiolo M et al, Oncogene, 2005). These results plus those of Terpos et al suggest that MM cells commonly express Sema4D. We next asked if the bone microenvironment increases MM expression of Sema4D. We co-cultured human MM cell lines RPMI8226 and JJN3 with mouse bones. Species -specific changes in tumor and bone were evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR. MM cells engrafted onto mouse bones, increasing markers of osteolysis similar to those seen in MM bone disease. After a week of co-culture, Sema4D expression was increased in MM cells (mean ±SD; 4.2±0.4; p=0.023), compared to MM cells grown alone. In addition, bones co-cultured with MM cells expressed higher Sema4D mRNA than bones alone (mean ±SD; 3.6±0.21; p=0.03). While co-culture increased both MM and bone Sema4D, markers of osteoblast activity, Col1a1, alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin were suppressed. Preliminary experiments suggest that osteocytes are a major source of Sema4D expression in bone, in addition to active osteoclasts, which are much rarer cells than osteocytes. The induction of Sema4D in bone was only partially inhibited by 100nM zoledronic acid to inhibit osteoclast activity. Since osteocytes can physically interact with MM cells in vivo (Delgado Calle, Cancer Res 2016), we then tested the effect of MM cells on osteocyte sema4D expression in co-cultures of RPMI 8226 and JJN3 MM cells with MOL-Y4 osteocytic cells, separated by transwells. Both MM cell lines increased the Sema4D mRNA content of MLO-Y4 cells (mean ±SD; 3.1±0.4; p=0.036), suggesting that myeloma-secreted factors regulate osteocyte Sema4D expression. Since Sema4D is a potent osteoblast inhibitor, our data suggest that osteocyte -derived Sema4D may be a major contributor to MMBD, and that neutralization of Sema4D activity should improve the suppressed bone formation in MM. Disclosures Roodman: Amgen: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document