scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin–Paclitaxel Compared with Carboplatin–Paclitaxel–Trastuzumab in Advanced (Stage III–IV) or Recurrent Uterine Serous Carcinomas that Overexpress Her2/Neu (NCT01367002): Updated Overall Survival Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 3928-3935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda N. Fader ◽  
Dana M. Roque ◽  
Eric Siegel ◽  
Natalia Buza ◽  
Pei Hui ◽  
...  
The Breast ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 769-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Janni ◽  
Tomasz Sarosiek ◽  
Boguslawa Karaszewska ◽  
Joanna Pikiel ◽  
Elzbieta Staroslawska ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6014-6014
Author(s):  
Stuart J. Wong ◽  
Pedro A. Torres-Saavedra ◽  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
George Shenouda ◽  
Jeffrey Bumpous ◽  
...  

6014 Background: Chemoradiation (CRT) with cis or anti-EGFR Ab has been shown to improve survival of patients with stage III-IV HNC. Since Lap, a dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitor, has shown effectiveness with CRT in a pilot non-HPV HNC cohort, the RTOG Foundation launched a phase II trial to test the hypothesis that adding Lap to the RT-cis for frontline therapy of stage III-IV Non-HPV HNC improves progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Patients with stage III-IV carcinoma of the oropharynx (p16-negative), larynx, and hypopharynx, having Zubrod performance of 0-1, and meeting predefined blood chemistry criteria were enrolled after providing consent. Patients were randomized (1:1) to 70 Gy (6 weeks) + 2 cycles of CDDP (q3 weeks) plus either Lap (1500 mg daily, Arm A) or placebo (Arm B) starting 1 week prior to RT and concurrent with RT and for 3 months post RT. PFS was the primary endpoint. The protocol specified 69 PFS events (142 patients) for the final analysis based on HR = 0.65, 80% power, 1-sided alpha 0.20, and one interim efficacy and futility analysis at 50% information. PFS rates between arms for all randomized patients were compared by 1-sided log-rank test (1-sided alpha 0.1803). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: From 10/’12 to 04/’17, 142 patients were enrolled, of whom 127 were randomized, 63 to Arm A and 64 to Arm B. Arms A vs B, respectively, were similar in baseline patient characteristics, radiation delivery, completing ≥ 70 Gy (85.7% vs. 82.8%) and cisplatin delivery, completing 200 (±5%) mg/m2 (65.1% vs 70.3%), but dissimilar in Lap/placebo delivery (median dose, 87000 mg vs. 125250 mg). Median follow-up was 4.1 years for surviving patients. The final analysis suggests no improvement in PFS of adding Lap to CRT (HR [A/B]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval CI 0.56-1.46; P= 0.34; 2-year rates: 50.6%, CI 37.5-63.7% vs. 56.2% CI 43.0-69.4%), or in OS (HR: 1.06, CI 0.61-1.86; P = 0.58; 2-year rates: 71.8% CI 60.1-83.5% vs. 76% CI 64.5-87.4%), death within 30 days of therapy (3.3% vs. 3.4%), and overall treatment-related grade 3-5 adverse event rate (86.7% vs. 84.7%). Grade 3-4 mucositis rates on Arm A and Arm B were 21.7% vs. 23.7%, all grade dysphagia and rash rates were 43.3% vs. 59.3%, and 13.3% vs. 6.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of Lap to the radiation-cisplatin platform did not improve progression-free or overall survival in unselected non-HPV HN. Thus, dual EGFR, HER-2 inhibition does not appear to enhance the effects of chemoradiation. Although we showed that accrual to a non-HPV HN specific trial is feasible, new strategies must be investigated to improve the outcome for this poor prognosis HN population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Kunos ◽  
Stephen J. Andrews ◽  
Kathleen N. Moore ◽  
Hye Sook Chon ◽  
S. Percy Ivy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2001-2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. B. Nabors ◽  
T. Mikkelsen ◽  
T. Batchelor ◽  
G. Lesser ◽  
M. Rosenfeld ◽  
...  

2001 Background: EMD 121974 (cilengitide) is a selective integrin receptor inhibitor that is well tolerated and has demonstrated biological activity in patients with malignant glioma. The objectives of this phase II trial were to determine safety when combined with chemoradiation and estimate the overall survival for two different doses in newly diagnosed GBM. Methods: A total of 112 patients were accrued onto the trial through the NABTT CNS consortium. Cilengitide was administered by one-hour infusion twice a week with 18 patients treated in a safety run-in phase of 6 patients at the tested dose levels of 500 mg, 1000 mg, and 2000 mg. After safety completion, 94 patients were randomly assigned to either 500 mg or 2000 mg groups. To date, 55 out of 112 (49%) patients have died. Overall survival was estimated using all patients in this trial regardless of their treating dose. Results: The median age was 55 years old (range: 22–88) and the median KPS was 90 (range: 60–100). 86 out of the 112 (76.8%) had a craniotomy as their initial surgical procedure and 25 patients (22%) had a biopsy. There were no DLTs during the safety run-in phase. The estimated median survival time is 18.9 months (95% CI: 16.3 -30.0 months) for patients treated with RT+TMZ+EMD. The trial was closed to accrual on December 31, 2007. To date, 89 out of 112 patients were alive 12 months from their initial diagnosis. The overall survival at 12 months for all patients is 79.5% (95% CI: 71–87%). MGMT methylation status and survival based on dose levels received are not currently available. Conclusions: EMD 121974 (cilengitide) is well-tolerated when combined with standard chemoradiation (TMZ+RT) and may improve survival for patients newly diagnosed with GBM given the substantial differences between the estimated median survival and that seen in the EORTC study (Stupp, N Engl J Med, 2005). [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9097-9097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Mazieres ◽  
Fabrice Barlesi ◽  
Isabelle Rouquette ◽  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Isabelle Monnet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document