TRYHARD, a randomized phase II trial (RTOG Foundation 3501) of concurrent accelerated radiation plus cisplatin (cis) with or without lapatinib (Lap) for stage III- IV Non-HPV head and neck carcinoma (HNC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6014-6014
Author(s):  
Stuart J. Wong ◽  
Pedro A. Torres-Saavedra ◽  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
George Shenouda ◽  
Jeffrey Bumpous ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

6014 Background: Chemoradiation (CRT) with cis or anti-EGFR Ab has been shown to improve survival of patients with stage III-IV HNC. Since Lap, a dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitor, has shown effectiveness with CRT in a pilot non-HPV HNC cohort, the RTOG Foundation launched a phase II trial to test the hypothesis that adding Lap to the RT-cis for frontline therapy of stage III-IV Non-HPV HNC improves progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Patients with stage III-IV carcinoma of the oropharynx (p16-negative), larynx, and hypopharynx, having Zubrod performance of 0-1, and meeting predefined blood chemistry criteria were enrolled after providing consent. Patients were randomized (1:1) to 70 Gy (6 weeks) + 2 cycles of CDDP (q3 weeks) plus either Lap (1500 mg daily, Arm A) or placebo (Arm B) starting 1 week prior to RT and concurrent with RT and for 3 months post RT. PFS was the primary endpoint. The protocol specified 69 PFS events (142 patients) for the final analysis based on HR = 0.65, 80% power, 1-sided alpha 0.20, and one interim efficacy and futility analysis at 50% information. PFS rates between arms for all randomized patients were compared by 1-sided log-rank test (1-sided alpha 0.1803). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: From 10/’12 to 04/’17, 142 patients were enrolled, of whom 127 were randomized, 63 to Arm A and 64 to Arm B. Arms A vs B, respectively, were similar in baseline patient characteristics, radiation delivery, completing ≥ 70 Gy (85.7% vs. 82.8%) and cisplatin delivery, completing 200 (±5%) mg/m2 (65.1% vs 70.3%), but dissimilar in Lap/placebo delivery (median dose, 87000 mg vs. 125250 mg). Median follow-up was 4.1 years for surviving patients. The final analysis suggests no improvement in PFS of adding Lap to CRT (HR [A/B]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval CI 0.56-1.46; P= 0.34; 2-year rates: 50.6%, CI 37.5-63.7% vs. 56.2% CI 43.0-69.4%), or in OS (HR: 1.06, CI 0.61-1.86; P = 0.58; 2-year rates: 71.8% CI 60.1-83.5% vs. 76% CI 64.5-87.4%), death within 30 days of therapy (3.3% vs. 3.4%), and overall treatment-related grade 3-5 adverse event rate (86.7% vs. 84.7%). Grade 3-4 mucositis rates on Arm A and Arm B were 21.7% vs. 23.7%, all grade dysphagia and rash rates were 43.3% vs. 59.3%, and 13.3% vs. 6.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of Lap to the radiation-cisplatin platform did not improve progression-free or overall survival in unselected non-HPV HN. Thus, dual EGFR, HER-2 inhibition does not appear to enhance the effects of chemoradiation. Although we showed that accrual to a non-HPV HN specific trial is feasible, new strategies must be investigated to improve the outcome for this poor prognosis HN population.

Final analysis of a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) plus bevacizumab (B) or placebo (P) in patients (pts) with malignant mesothelioma (MM)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7526-7526 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Karrison ◽  
H. L. Kindler ◽  
D. R. Gandara ◽  
C. Lu ◽  
T. L. Guterz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Major Vessel ◽  
Grade 3

7526 Background: In phase II trials in MM, GC on a 21-day (D) schedule has response rates of 16%–26% and median overall survival (OS) of 9.6–13 months (mo). Since VEGF has a key role in MM biology, we added anti-VEGF antibody B to GC in a multi-center, double- blind, placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial. Methods: Eligible pts had unresectable MM; no prior chemotherapy; PS 0–1; no thrombosis, bleeding, or major vessel invasion. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Statistics: 90% power to detect HR 0.57. Stratification: PS (0/1), histology (epithelial/other). G 1,250 mg/m2 D 1, 8 Q21D, C 75 mg/m2 D1 Q21D, and B 15 mg/kg or P D1 Q21D was given × 6 cycles, then B or P Q21D until progression. Baseline plasma VEGF was measured. 115 pts enrolled 12/01- 07/05 at 11 sites, 108 (GCB/GCP) 53/55 were evaluable. Male 74%/84%; median age 62/65 (range 44–78/20–84); PS 1 55%/47%; epithelial 74%/67%; pleural 93%/91%; thrombocytosis 40%/40%. Results: Cycles: total 458/424, median 7/6, range 1–42/2–39. Statistically significantly different (SSD) toxicity (p <0.05), any grade: alopecia 60%/38%; epistaxis 62%/24%; hypertension 45%/22%; non-neutropenic infection 15%/4%; proteinuria 62%/47%; stomatitis 23%/7%. There were no SSD toxicities = grade 3. Median PFS 6.9/6.0 mo (HR 0.93, p=0.88). Median OS 15.6/14.7 mo (p=0.91). 1-year survival 59%/57%. Partial response 25%/22%; stable disease 51%/60%. Median VEGF (N=56) 131/154 pg/ml (range 31–1760/5–1786). Higher VEGF was associated with shorter PFS (p=0.02) and OS (p=0.0066). In pts with VEGF = the median, PFS (p=0.043) and OS (p=0.028) were significantly greater for GCB than GCP; in high VEGF strata this was not SSD. Conclusion: Adding B to GC in MM pts does not yield statistically significant differences in PFS, OS, response, or grade ¾ toxicity. GCB-treated pts with low VEGF levels had longer PFS and OS. Supported by NCI grant N01-CM-17102. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of oxaliplatin and docetaxel in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC) who have progressed to two prior regimens of chemotherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15545-15545 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Feinstein ◽  
L. J. Appleman ◽  
D. M. Friedland ◽  
S. A. Jacobs ◽  
W. A. Ferri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

15545 Background: Single agent docetaxel has demonstrated survival benefit in AIPC. In a phase I study of single agent oxaliplatin at our institution, two patients with AIPC experienced a substantial and durable reduction in PSA. Thus, we hypothesised that a combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel maybe beneficial in AIPC. Methods: This single arm phase II trial in patients with previously treated (0–2 regimens) and progressive AIPC commenced in June 2005, with the objectives of evaluating PSA response rates, progression free survival, and the toxicity (tolerance/safety) of the regimen. In patients with soft tissue disease, measurable responses were assessed by RECIST criteria. Using Simon stage II design, a total of 37 patients with AIPC will be accrued. No prior treatment with platinum was allowed. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin (110 mg/m2) and docetaxel (60 mg/m2), administered intravenously every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: 27 men have been enrolled to date: median age 66 yrs (56–84). 21 of 27 men have completed at least two cycles of the above regimen, and are evaluable. Prior therapies included antiandrogens (100%); ketaconazole (14%); docetaxel alone or in combination (27%); anthracyclines (27%); and vaccine (5%). Median PSA at baseline was 88 ng/ml (range 2.2–3559.4). 62% of patients received all six cycles. PSA declines of ≥50% were noted in 11 of 21 patients: 3 of 8 responders being chemo-naïve; and 8 of 13 with prior chemotherapy exposure. In addition, 4 of 11 patients with measurable disease at baseline, had a partial response. Treatment was well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths. The most significant grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (43%). Grade 2 or less fatigue (66%), neuropathy (53%) diarrhea (47%), nausea (41%), anorexia (29%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and anemia (6%). Conclusions: The combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel has promising activity in both chemo-naïve and previously treated AIPC. This 2-stage study will accrue a total of 37 patients. Final analysis will include time to progression, duration of response, and median survival. [Table: see text]

Sorafenib (S) alone versus S combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Final analysis of the randomized phase II GONEXT trial (UNICANCER/FFCD PRODIGE 10 trial).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4028-4028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Assenat ◽  
Valerie Boige ◽  
Simon Thézenas ◽  
Georges-Philippe Pageaux ◽  
Jean-Marie Peron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3

4028 Background: HCC is a vascular tumor with poor prognosis. Although S has been shown to improve survival, its ability to induce tumor shrinkage is very low. Given the activity of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in HCC, a phase II trial combining S with GEMOX was undertaken to define efficacy and safety profile. Methods: Patients with inoperable advanced and/or metastatic HCC (BCLCC B or C), with or without prior palliative chemoembolization, Child pugh score A, WHO performance status (PS) 0-1, were eligible for this two-stage, randomized phase II trial. Patients received S (400 mg BID) alone (arm A) or in combination with GEMOX every 2 weeks (gem. 1000 mg/m² [10 mg/m²/min] on D1; oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m² on D2) (arm B). Randomization was stratified according to CLIP score (0-1 vs. 2-3) and center. Primary endpoint was crude 4-mo Progression-Free Survival (PFS) rate (H0, < 50%; H1, ≥ 70%; α = 10%; 1- β= 90%). Results: From Dec 2008 to Oct. 2011, 94 pts were enrolled: median age, 64 yrs; male, 88%; PS 0 (69%) 1(31%), CLIP 0-1 (48%) 2-3 (52%), cirrhosis (63%), portal vein thrombosis (29%), extra liver metastasis (69%). These characteristics were well balanced in both arms. Median duration and dose intensity of S were 4 mo (1-27) and 81% in both arms, respectively. Median number of GEMOX cycles was 7 (1-12) in arm B. Main severe (grade 3-4) toxicity (arm A/B) consisted of neutropenia (grade 3-4: 0%/7%), fatigue (18%/24%), thrombocytopenia (0%/9%), diarrhea (grade 2-4: 10%/21%), peripheral neuropathy (grade 2-3: 0%/10%), and hand foot syndrome (grade 2-3: 13%/7%). For evaluable pts (n = 83), ORR was 9% / 16% and DCR was 70%/77% in arms A/B, respectively. For all pts (median follow-up, 17.6 mo), 4-mo PFS rate was 54%/61%, median PFS was 4.6 (3.9-6.2)/6.2 (3.8-6.8) mo, and median OS was 13.0 (10.4-22.2) /13.5 (7.5-19.1) mo in arms A/B, respectively. Conclusions: S plus GEMOX was feasible in HCC. This trial met its primary endpoint (4-mo PFS ≥ 50%) and ORR, median PFS and OS were encouraging data. Exploratory analyses are underway to identify subgroups of patients likely to derive most benefit from this combination. Clinical trial information: NCT00941967.

A randomized, multicenter, phase II trial of gemcitabine (G), cisplatin (C) +/- veliparib (V) in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and a known germline (g)BRCA/ PALB2 mutation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 639-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Mary O'Reilly ◽  
Jonathan W. Lee ◽  
Mark Zalupski ◽  
Marinela Capanu ◽  
Jennifer Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Type I ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Entire Cohort

639 Background: gBRCA 1,2 mutations occur in 5-8% PDAC. Platinum and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) effective in BRCA-mut cancers. Phase I GC + V high RR 78%; combination may delay resistance in PDAC (O’Reilly, Cancer, 2018). Herein, we evaluate GC +/- V in a multi-national, randomized phase II trial. Methods: Eligibility: Untreated germline (g)BRCA, PALB2 mut PDAC; measurable stage III/IV; ECOG 0-1. Randomized 1:1 Arm A or B. Treatment: Arm A: G 600 mg/m2 IV, C 25 mg/m2 IV, d3 and 10, V 80 mg PO BID day 1-12, all q 3 weeks or Arm B: GC only. Primary endpoint: RECIST 1.1 response rate (RR). Simon 2-stage per arm: null hypothesis 10% vs promising 28%; type I, II error 10%. Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), OS (m), disease control rate (CR+PR+SD), safety and correlative analyses. PFS, OS compared between arms using log-rank test and RR, DCR using Fisher’s exact test between arms. Results: N = 52 enrolled 01/14- 11/18. N = 2 withdrew Arm B. N = 50 for ITT. Male = 22 (44%), Female = 28. Median age = 64 years (range 37-82). BRCA1 N = 12, BRCA2 N = 35, PALB2 N = 3. Stage III N = 8; Stage IV N = 42. Hematologic Toxicity: Arm A vs Arm B: Gd 3-4 neutropenia 13 (48%) vs 7 (30%); Gd 3-4 platelets 15 (55%) vs 2 (9%); Gd 3-4 anemia 14 (52%) vs 8 (35%). Non-hematologic toxicity similar Arm A vs B. Exploratory analyses (combined Arms): Med OS if > 4 m platinum → PARPi: 23 m (95%CI 6.5- 53.9). Med OS by BRCA: BRCA1: 14 m (8.1- 18.5); BRCA2: 20.2 m (12.3- 24.4). Med OS by ECOG: ECOG 0: 23 m (13.8- 24.5); ECOG 1: 14.3 (8.1 vs 16.4). Two-year OS rate for entire cohort: 30.6% and 3-year OS: 17.8%. Conclusions: GC +/- V very active in gBRCA/PALB2 mut PDAC with high RR, PFS, OS with both A, B significantly exceeding threshold RR. Improved DCR arm A vs B, but with greater heme toxicity A vs B. Study confirms GC as reference treatment in gBRCA/PALB2 with durable survival in subset. Funding: National Cancer Institute, CTEP, Lustgarten Foundation, AbbVie. Clinical trial information: NCT01585805 . [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Digestive Group of French Federation of Cancer Centers.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2739-2744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Bécouarn ◽  
M Ychou ◽  
M Ducreux ◽  
C Borel ◽  
F Bertheault-Cvitkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Peripheral Sensory

PURPOSE To evaluate the objective tumor response rate and safety profile of oxaliplatin when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 39 patients were entered onto this phase II trial. One patient was excluded for having had a second cancer, so the study was based on 38 patients. Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, every 21 days. Patients were assessed for response every three courses. All clinical and radiologic data were reviewed by an external panel of experts, with their assessment being considered definitive. RESULTS Nine partial responses (PRs) were observed (response rate, 24.3%; 95% confidence interval, 11.8% to 41.2%). The median duration of response was 216+ days. Fifteen patients (40.5%) had stable disease and 13 (35.2%) had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival time for all patients was 126+ days (range, 21 to 447+). The main toxicity was peripheral sensory neuropathy. Grade 3 neurotoxicity (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI-CTC]) was reported in 13%. Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were mild. The incidence of grade 3 neutropenia was 5.2%, while that of grade 3 or 4 thrombopenia was 7.9%. Vomiting (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 7.9% of patients and grade 3 diarrhea in 2.6%. CONCLUSION This phase II study provides clear evidence of the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin monotherapy at this dose and schedule in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Phase II study (RESOUND)

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (35) ◽  
pp. 4009-4017
Author(s):  
Silvia Bozzarelli ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Simona Sala ◽  
Maria Chiara Tronconi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Aim: Regorafenib may be active in different cancer types. This Phase II trial included patients with various refractory cancer types treated with regorafenib. Here, we report the results of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohort. Methods: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 8 weeks; further investigation of regorafenib would be warranted with a PFS rate ≥50%. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The best response was stable disease in four patients (20%). The 8-week PFS rate was 25% with a median PFS of 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.5–2.0). A total of 13 patients (65%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: The study did not meet its primary end point. Further investigation of regorafenib monotherapy in this setting is not recommended. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02307500

A Phase II Trial of Doxil, Vincristine and Reduced Schedule Dexamethasone (DVd) for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2415-2415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Masci ◽  
Mary A. Karam ◽  
Luba Platt ◽  
Steven Andresen ◽  
Alan Lichtin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) typically have responses to initial cytotoxic or steroid based therapy. Disease relapse occurs in all patients. As high as 90% of patients with relapsed or refractory disease will have over-expression of the multi-drug resistance (MDR) gene. Pharmacokinetic data suggest that prolonged exposure to high concentrations of doxorubicin can overcome MDR. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin can theoretically achieve this goal as the angiogenic activity of the MM bone marrow is significantly increased. We proceeded with a phase II trial to evaluate the response rate of patients with relapsed or refractory MM (R/R-MM) to the DVd regimen. Eligible patients had clinically active R/R-MM following at least one prior cytotoxic based treatment regimen. Patients received intravenous (IV) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 day 1, vincristine 2 mg day 1 and oral or IV dexamethasone 40 mg daily days 1–4. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for a minimum of 6 cycles and 2 cycles after best response. Myeloma parameters were measured at the start of each cycle. SWOG criteria were used to determine response. Thirty-five patients (21 male and 14 female) with R/R-MM clinically active disease were enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range 43–87). Patients received a median of 2 (range 1–4) prior cytotoxic based treatments. All patients received at least one cycle of treatment (median=5; range 1–12) and were evaluable for response. Ten (29%) patients responded to therapy; 5 partial responses (PR &gt; 50%) and 5 responses (R &gt; 75%) were observed after a median of 2 cycles (range 1–9). Median progression free survival of responding patients (PR + R) was 4.5 mos. (range 0.67–44.8). Patients achieving R had a median progression free survival of 32.5 mos. (3.0–44.8). Thirteen (37%) patients had stable disease (SD) for a median of 1.4 mos. (range 0.8–9.9). Twelve (34%) patients had progressive disease after a median of 1 cycle (range 1–5). The most common toxicities were hematologic; there were four occurrences of febrile neutropenia. Three patients experienced grade 3 constipation and one grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysethesia was observed. This study suggests that in patients with R/R-MM, DVd alone yields response rates similar to bortezomib with patients achieving an R experiencing a durable plateau phase. Ongoing studies of DVd in combination with thalidomide or CC-5013 in patients with R/R-MM have resulted in higher and better quality response rates (comparable to autologous SCT) translating to a durable progression free survival. We would not recommend the DVd regimen in patients with R/R-MM without the addition of an immune modulator such as thalidomide.

Sorafenib In Combination with Standard Induction and Consolidation Therapy In Elderly AML Patients: Results From a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 333-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Serve ◽  
Ruth Wagner ◽  
Cristina Sauerland ◽  
Uta Brunnberg ◽  
Utz Krug ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Elderly Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

Abstract Abstract 333 Background: Standard chemotherapy for elderly AML patients results in a median overall survival of only about one year. Case reports and early phase I/II data have shown that the kinase inhibitor Sorafenib might show clinical benefit for Flt3-ITD-positive AML patients (Metzelder S Blood 2009; 113:6567) and that its addition to standard chemotherapy is feasible (Ravandi F JCO 2010; 28:1856). Sorafenib is a potent Raf, c-Kit and FLT3 inhibitor that may also affect AML blasts and bone marrow (BM) stroma cells via VEGFR and PDGFR-β inhibition. Therefore, we performed a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial in elderly (&gt;60 y) AML patients analyzing the effect of Sorafenib in addition to standard chemotherapy and as a maintenance therapy for up to one year. Methods: 197 AML patients in 16 centers received up to two cycles of standard 7+3 induction chemotherapy plus two cycles of consolidation therapy with intermediate dose (6 × 1g/sqm) AraC. Before start of treatment, they were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or Sorafenib (400 mg bid between the cycles and after chemotherapy for up to one year after start of induction). The primary aim was to compare the event-free survival (EFS) of the two treatment groups. Secondary end points were to compare EFS and overall survival (OS) of predefined subgroups according to NPM and FLT3 mutation status and toxicity of treatment. Results: Among the 197 evaluable patients, 102 pts received Sorafenib and 95 pts placebo. EFS and OS were not significantly different between the two treatment groups (placebo vs. Sorafenib: EFS: Median: 7 vs. 5 months, hazard Ratio (HR): 1.261(p=0.13); OS: Median: 15 vs. 13 months, HR 1.025 (p=0.89)). CR or blast clearance without complete blood count recovery was observed in 49 (48%) and 9 (8.8%) Sorafenib patients and 57 (60%) and 4 (4.2%) placebo pts, respectively. Exploratory subgroup analyses did not reveal any significant difference between the treatment groups but showed a tendency towards decreased EFS in the Sorafenib arm for NPM1-wild type AML cases. Flt3-ITD mutations were found in 28 out of 197 patients (14.2%), in line with the reported incidence in the target population. No differences in EFS or OS were to be noted in this small patient population. Also, CR rate was not improved by the study drug in this subgroup of patients. Sorafenib was relatively well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events (AE) ≥grade 3 were febrile neutropenia, pneumonia in neutropenia, sepsis, diarrhea, skin rash, mucositis, hypertension (77 vs 74, 54 vs 35, 15 vs 15, 17 vs 6, 14 vs 7, 9 vs 6, 8 vs 5 events in the Sorafenib vs the placebo group). A hand-foot-skin reaction (≥grade 3) was noted in 5 vs 0 events in Sorafenib vs control pts. There was a trend of slower regeneration of leukocytes and thrombocytes within the Sorafenib arm compared to the control arm after the first and second induction course but not after consolidation cycles. Conclusion: Although the combination regimen appeared to be feasible and tolerable in elderly AML pts, Sorafenib treatment did not improve EFS or OS in this unselected elderly AML patient population. Further studies should focus on selected AML target populations for Sorafenib, especially FLT3-ITD+ AML patients. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Sorafenib (multikinase inhibitor) is given in combination with standard chemotherapy in elderly AML patients. (See title of the abstract!).

Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine and Prednisone Plus Rituximab (CHOP-R) in Fludarabine (F) Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or CLL with Autoimmune Cytopenia (AIC) or Richter's Transformation (RT): Final Analysis of a Phase II Study of the German CLL Study Group

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2860-2860
Author(s):  
Petra Jenke ◽  
Barbara Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Nadine Anheier ◽  
Ulrich Duehrsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Richter's Transformation ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2860 Introduction: In the last decade, important progress has been achieved in the treatment of CLL through the use of purine analog-based chemoimmunotherapies. Several conditions remain a challenge, often with a poor outcome. Amongst these therapeutic problems are Richter's transformation (RT), refractoriness to F-based therapies (Fref), and the occurrence of AIC, which are sometimes induced by F. Fref and RT pts have a very poor prognosis with an estimated overall survival (OS) of only 10 and 8 months (mos), respectively. Therefore, therapeutic alternatives are urgently warranted. CHOP-R has improved the outcome of pts with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. To test the efficacy and tolerability of the CHOP-R regimen in CLL patients with RT, Fref, or AIC, the GCLLSG initiated a prospective phase II trial. Material and Methods: 62 patients were included in the study. Due to protocol violations, 2 patients were excluded. Within the group of Fref pts, the medical review detected 11 patients who had received pre-treatment with F (Fpret), but were not refractory according to the updated guidelines (Hallek et al., Blood 2008). Thus, 26 pts were classified as Fref/pret, 19 pts as AIC and 15 pts as RT. All patients received CHOP every 3 weeks (cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, adriamycin 50mg/m2 and vincristine 1, 4mg/m2 d1; prednisone 100mg/m2 d1–5). Rituximab was added starting with the 2nd cycle (375mg/m2 on each d0, and 21 days after the last CHOP-R). RT pts received up to 8, Fref/pret and AIC up to 6 courses of CHOP-R. In case of PD after 3 cycles, pts went off-study. The primary endpoints were remission rate, quality and duration of response. Results: 79%, 73%, and 40% of AIC, Fref/pret, and RT pts were male, respectively. The median age was 65 years (y) for Fref/pret-pts, 66y in the AIC and 69y in the RT group. Binet stages for Fref/pret pts were: A: 8%; B: 27% C: 65 %. All but 3 AIC pts were at Binet stage C. Initial RT stages according to Ann Arbor were: II: 13%, III: 13%, IV 73%. The median number of previous therapies were 3 for Fref/pret, 2 for AIC and 2 for RT. A total of 314 cycles were administered, with a median number of 3 cycles for AIC and Fref pts and a median number of 4 cycles for the RT group. Due to toxicity 73% of cycles in the Fref/pret group, 66% in the AIC and 87% in the RT group were dose-reduced. 69% of Fref/pret-pts and 58% of AIC-pts received full 6 cycles of therapy and only 40% of RT-pts completed 8 cycles of therapy. Treatment was stopped in 6 pts because of PD. Due to treatment related toxicity treatment was stopped in 16 pts (27%). Treatment related mortality was 3% (2 pts). Treatment toxicity was reported according to NCI common toxicity criteria (CTC) version 2.0. Adverse events grade 3 or 4 for anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were documented in 75%, 55% and 65% of patients, respectively. Infections were the most common non-hematologic toxicity and occurred in 67%; severe infections CTC grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28%. All 26 Fref/pret-pts were available for response evaluation. CHOP-R achieved 54% PR, 35% SD and 12% PD. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median treatment-free survival (TFS) were 11 and 14 mos. OS was 27 mos with a significant difference concerning F-ref (n=15) and F-pret (n=11) pts (17 vs. 35m; p=0.05). We evaluated the response of all 15 RT-pts with 60% PR, 7% CR, 13% SD and 20% PD. The PFS was 15 mos, TFS was 17 mos and OS 27 mos. 17 AIC pts were available for response evaluation with 82% PR, 6% SD and 12% PD. The PFS and TFS were only 14 and 16 mos. The OS was 50 mos. The population had a high incidence of unfavourable genetic markers: deletion of chromosome 17p [del(17p)] was detected in 24%, del(11q) in 34% and unmutated IGHV in 70%. 85% had high levels of serum thymidine kinase (sTK > 10 U/l), and 49% had high levels of ß2-microglobulin (ß2M > 3.5 mg/l). Patients with del(17p) had an unfavourable response rate and achieved significant less a PR or CR (36% vs. 76%; p=0.03). Multivariate analyses showed that del(17p) and ECOG performance status had a negative prognostic impact on OS (p<0.0001). Moreover the presence of a del(17p) predicted a short PFS (6 vs. 16.9 mos; p=0.001). Conclusion: CHOP-R achieves promising response rates in CLL patients with Fref and RT and very good response rates in patients with AIC. However, the progression-free survival and overall survival remain unsatisfactory. Therefore, CHOP-R might be used as induction therapy prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in physically fit patients. Disclosures: Eichhorst: Hoffmann La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Grants; Mundipharma: Research Funding, Travel Grants; Gilead: Consultancy. Dreyling:Roche: Research Funding, Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Bergmann:Celgene: Honoraria. Stilgenbauer:Hoffmann La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel Grants. Fink:Hoffmann La Roche: travel grants. Fischer:Hoffmann La Roche:. Wendtner:Hofmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hallek:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

Phase II study of TS-1 (S) plus cisplatin (P) with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18070-18070
Author(s):  
F. Ohyanagi ◽  
N. Yamamoto ◽  
A. Horiike ◽  
T. Horai ◽  
K. Gomi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Fourth Generation ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
Grade 3

18070 Background: Although combined chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in stage III NSCLC, the optimal chemotherapy regimen is not established. S-1, a fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine is an active new agent for NSCLC and the combination with cisplatin has a favorable toxicity profile. The objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of S plus P with concurrent radiation for unresectable stage III NSCLC. Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC, 20 to 75 years in age, performance status 0–1, with no prior chemotherapy were eligible for the study. Patients were treated with P (60 mg/m2 on day 1) and S (orally at 40 mg/m2/dose bid (80 mg/m2/d), on days 1 to 14) repeated every 3–4 weeks for 4 cycles and TRT (60 Gy/30 fr over 6 weeks starting on day 2). The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and planned sample size for this phase II study was 28 patients (Simon’s two-stage minimax design, P0=70%, P1=90%, a =0.1, β = 0.1). Results: Of 28 patients enrolled between August 2005 and October 2006, 28 were evaluable. There were 24 males and 4 females, median age of 63 (range 40–74) and 11 IIIA and 17 IIIB. Chemoradiotherapy was well tolerated; 2 cycles of SP and 60 Gy of TRT were administered in all patients and 24 (86%) patients received 4 cycles of SP. During concurrent chemoradiotherapy, grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (8 pts), leukopenia (6 pts), fatigue (6 pts), anorexia (5 pts), febrile neutropenia (4 pts) and, esophagitis (4 pts). Only one grade 4 leukopenia were observed. During consolidation therapy, grade 3–4 neutropenia, anemia, esophagitis, and pneumonitis were developed in 4, 1, 1 and 2 patients, respectively. No toxic deaths have occurred. Overall RR was 85.7% (95% CI: 79.1- 98.7%) with 4 SDs and 24 PRs. The median progression-free survival and median survival is not mature enough to estimate as only 4 progression and no deaths have occurred. Conclusions: This chemoradiotherapy regimen produced promising response rate in patients with stage III NSCLC and it seems to be well-tolerated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document