Abstract 4353: Preclinical evaluation of the PARP inhibitor niraparib and cytotoxic chemotherapy alone or in combination in a panel of 25 triple-negative breast cancer PDX models: Relevance of BRCA mutations, HRD status and other biomarkers

Author(s):  
Olivier Deas ◽  
Stefano Cairo ◽  
Keith Wilcoxen ◽  
Keith Mikule ◽  
Truong-An Tran ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 2056
Author(s):  
Kitti Andreidesz ◽  
Balazs Koszegi ◽  
Dominika Kovacs ◽  
Viola Bagone Vantus ◽  
Ferenc Gallyas ◽  
...  

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis as the therapy has several limitations, most importantly, treatment resistance. In this study we examined the different responses of triple-negative breast cancer line MDA-MB-231 and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer line MCF7 to a combined treatment including olaparib, a poly-(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum compound and LY294002, an Akt pathway inhibitor. We applied the drugs in a single, therapeutically relevant concentration individually and in all possible combinations, and we assessed the viability, type of cell death, reactive oxygen species production, cell-cycle phases, colony formation and invasive growth. In agreement with the literature, the MDA-MB-231 cells were more treatment resistant than the MCF7 cells. However, and in contrast with the findings of others, we detected no synergistic effect between olaparib and oxaliplatin, and we found that the Akt pathway inhibitor augmented the cytostatic properties of the platinum compound and/or prevented the cytoprotective effects of PARP inhibition. Our results suggest that, at therapeutically relevant concentrations, the cytotoxicity of the platinum compound dominated over that of the PARP inhibitor and the PI3K inhibitor, even though a regression-based model could have indicated an overall synergy at lower and/or higher concentrations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dandan Song ◽  
Huan He ◽  
Indranil Sinha ◽  
Linnea Hases ◽  
Feifei Yan ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayca Gucalp ◽  
Tiffany A. Traina

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype distinguished by negative immunohistochemical assays for expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2) represents 15% of all breast cancers. Patients with TNBC generally experience a more aggressive clinical course with increased risk of disease progression and poorer overall survival. Furthermore, this subtype accounts for a disproportionate number of disease-related mortality in part due to its aggressive natural history and our lack of effective targeted agents beyond conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology, risk factors, prognosis, and the molecular and clinicopathologic features that distinguish TNBC from other subtypes of breast cancer. In addition, we will examine the available data for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of TNBC in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting and explore the ongoing development of newer targeted agents.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexia Cotte ◽  
Michèle Beniey ◽  
Takrima Haque ◽  
Nelly Béchir ◽  
Audrey Hubert ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A644-A644
Author(s):  
Anita Mehta ◽  
Madeline Townsend ◽  
Madisson Oliwa ◽  
Patrice Lee ◽  
Nicholas Saccomano ◽  
...  

BackgroundPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have improved the outcomes of BRCA-associated breast cancer; however, treatment responses are often not durable. Our preclinical studies demonstrated that PARPi activates the cGAS/STING pathway and recruitment of anti-tumor CD8+ T-cells that are required for tumor clearance [1]. These studies contributed to development of clinical trials testing PARPi plus immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Unfortunately, early phase trials of PARPi + ICB have not yet suggested efficacy will be superior to PARPi monotherapy. Lack of demonstrated clinical synergy between PARPi + ICB underscores the need to study the tumor microenvironment (TME) during PARPi therapy to identify optimal strategies to enhance T-cell activation. We recently showed that PARPi induces CSF-1R+ suppressive tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) that restrict antitumor immune responses, contributing to PARPi resistance [2]. Removing TAMs with anti-CSF-1R therapy in combination with PARPi significantly enhanced overall survival (OS) compared to PARPi monotherapy in preclinical models [2]. Here, we investigate how modulating TAMs can enhance PARPi + ICB.MethodsMice bearing BRCA1-deficient TNBC (K14-Cre;Brca1f/f;p53f/f) tumors were treated for 98 days with PARPi (Talazoparib) ± small molecule inhibitor of CSF-1R (ARRAY-382; CSF-1Ri) ± anti-PD-1 and then followed for survival. Flow cytometry was employed to elucidate changes in the TME after treatment.ResultsPARPi conferred a significant survival advantage over vehicle treated mice (median OS 33 v. 14 days; p=0.0034) and 2/8 PARPi-treated mice experienced complete tumor clearance at day 98. PARPi + CSF-1Ri treated mice (median OS 140 days) remarkably cleared 7/10 tumors by day 98. The addition of anti-PD-1 to PARPi did not enhance OS compared to PARPi monotherapy. The triple combination of anti-PD-1 + PARPi + CSF-1Ri has not yet significantly enhanced the median OS compared to PARPi + CSF-1Ri (ongoing; 168 v. 140 days); nor did it increase clearance of tumor by day 98 (7/10). However, the triple combination led to superior long term tumor clearance. At day 161 the triple combination exhibited 5/10 tumor free mice compared to 2/10 treated with PARPi + CSF-1Ri. To elucidate how CSR-1Ri enhanced PARPi + ICB responses, flow cytometry was performed and revealed increased expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD80, reduced tissue resident macrophages (CX3CR1+) and lower CSF-1R expression compared to PARPi + ICB.ConclusionsThese data suggest that targeting immunosuppressive macrophages may induce a favorable anti-tumor immune response and enhance responses to PARPi plus ICB. We are currently evaluating the adaptive immune response in this context.ReferencesPantelidou, C., et al., PARP inhibitor efficacy depends on CD8+ T cell recruitment via intratumoral STING pathway activation in BRCA-deficient models of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Discovery, 2019: p. CD-18-1218.Mehta, A.K., et al., Targeting immunosuppressive macrophages overcomes PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Cancer, 2021. 2(1): p. 66–82.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. ix59 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hashimoto ◽  
Y. Kitamura ◽  
Y. Takashima ◽  
Y. Kodera ◽  
S. Shimma ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 3254-3258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Greenup ◽  
Adam Buchanan ◽  
Wendy Lorizio ◽  
Keelia Rhoads ◽  
Salina Chan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Pitts ◽  
Dennis M Simmons ◽  
Stacey M Bagby ◽  
Sarah J Hartman ◽  
Betelehem W Yacob ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype defined by lack of hormone receptor expression and non-amplified HER2. Adavosertib (AZD1775) is a potent, small molecule, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase that potentiates the activity of many DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics and is currently in clinical development for multiple indications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combination of AZD1775 and capecitabine/5-FU in preclinical TNBC models. Methods: TNBC cell lines were treated with AZD1775 and 5-FU and cellular proliferation was assessed in real-time using IncuCyte® Live Cell Analysis. Apoptosis was assessed via the Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay system. Western blotting was used to assess changes in expression of downstream effectors. TNBC PDX models were treated with AZD1775, capecitabine, or the combination and assessed for tumor growth inhibition. Results: From the initial PDX screen, two of the four TNBC PDX models demonstrated a better response in the combination treatment than either of the single agents. As confirmation, two PDX models were expanded for statistical comparison . Both PDX models demonstrated a significant growth inhibition in the combination versus either of the single agents. (TNBC012, p<0.05 combo vs adavosertib or capecitabine, TNBC013, p<0.01 combo vs adavosertib or capecitabine ). An enhanced antiproliferative effect was observed in the adavosertib/5-FU combination treatment as measured by live cell analysis. An increase in apoptosis was observed in two of the four cell lines in the combination when compared to single agent treatment. Treatment with single agent adavosertib resulted in an increase in p-CDC2 in a dose dependent manner that was also observed in the combination treatment. Similar results were observed with γH2AX in two of the four cell lines tested. No significant changes were observed in Bcl-xL following treatment in any of the cell lines. Conclusions: The combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5-FU demonstrated enhanced combination effects both in vitro and in vivo in preclinical models of TNBC. These results support the clinical investigation of this combination in patients with TNBC, including those with brain metastasis given the CNS penetration of both agents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document