Immunohistochemical Expression of Multidrug Resistance Proteins as a Predictor of Poor Response to Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Patients with Nodal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Oncology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 68 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 422-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Ohsawa ◽  
Yoshihiro Ikura ◽  
Hiroko Fukushima ◽  
Nobuyuki Shirai ◽  
Yoshimi Sugama ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iñigo Espinosa ◽  
Javier Briones ◽  
Ramon Bordes ◽  
Salut Brunet ◽  
Rodrigo Martino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (A) ◽  
pp. 98-105
Author(s):  
Hussam Zawam ◽  
Noha E. Ibrahim ◽  
Rasha Salama ◽  
Mai Samir ◽  
Walaa Abdelfattah ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing landscape of genetic drivers in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, yet their clinical implication is still unclear and R-CHOP regimen remains a “one size fits all” therapy. We aimed in this study to examine the prevalence of EZH2, BCL211 and MYD 88 genetic polymorphisms in DLBCL patients and correlate the results with various clinical and survival outcomes. METHODS: Genotyping of MYD88 (rs387907272 T/C), EZH2 (rs3757441 C/T), and BCL2L11 (rs3789068 A/G) polymorphisms were conducted using real time polymerase chain reaction analysis in a total of 75 DLBCL patients. RESULTS: Most of our cases carried the wild TT genotype of MYD88 gene (64%), the mutant TT genotype of EZH2 gene (52%) and the wild AA genotype of BCL2L11 gene (48%). Regarding cell of origin, Germinal Centre (GC) phenotype was present in 56% of cases while 44% expressed the Post-GC (PGC) phenotype. Poor response outcome to first line R-CHOP was significantly correlated with the mutated CC genotype of MYD 88 (p=0.02), while better response to R-CHOP was significantly associated with younger age <50 years (p <0.0001), good PS (p=0.046), normal LDH level (p=0.003), earlier stage (p <0.0001), good IPI score (p=0.009), absence of extranodal disease (p <0.0001) and absence of bulky disease (p=0.004). The median PFS and the 2 year OS were significantly higher in younger age, earlier stage, good IPI score, absence of extranodal disease, absence of bulky disease and in GC phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasized that the mutated genotype of MYD 88 gene polymorphism is significantly associated with poor response to R-CHOP therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Rasha Haggag ◽  
Naglaa A. Mostafa ◽  
Marwa Nabil ◽  
Hala A. Shokralla ◽  
Neveen F. H. Sidhom

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.Patients and methods: This retrospective study was collected data from 64 de novo DLBCL patients, who received standardized R-CHOP therapy at two oncology centers. CXCR4 and mTOR expressions were assessed by immunohistochemistry.Results: Out of the 64 DLBCL patients, 40 patients were positive for CXCR4 (62.5%) and 35 patients for mTOR (54.7%) expressions. CXCR4 expression was positively correlated with mTOR expression (r = 0.7; p < .001). While mTOR expression was significantly associated with high lactate dehydrogenase level (p = .03) and number of extranodal sites one or more (p =.02), CXCR4 expression was significantly associated with high IPI score (p < .001) and ECOG PS (p = .005). Furthermore, theexpression levels of mTOR and CXCR4 were significantly associated with older ages and poor response to treatment (p = .04, <.001 and .04, .03, respectively). After a median Follow up of 22 months, mean ± SD overall survival (OS) was 65.391 ± 4.705. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients positive for mTOR and CXCR4 expression had shorter DFS (p = .01 & .02) and OS (p = .02 & .04). Multivariate analysis showed that CXCR4 and mTOR positivity is an independent prognostic factor for significantly poorer DFS (p = .03, and .02 respectively) but not for OS (p = .09 and .08 respectively) in the DLBCL pateints.Conclusion: Our results indicate that the expression of CXCR4 and mTOR may be poor prognostic biomarkers in DLBCL.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1179545X1882116
Author(s):  
Priyavadhana Balasubramanian ◽  
Prashant Ramteke ◽  
Saumyaranjan Mallick ◽  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Pranay Tanwar

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) accounts for 30% to 40% of the newly diagnosed adult non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but rarely presents in leukaemic phase. Here in, we report a case of DLBCL presenting in leukaemic phase and masquerading as acute leukaemia. A 28-year-old woman presented to our outpatient department with complaints of fever for 1 week. Her peripheral blood smear showed 5% to 8% blasts. Bone marrow aspirate showed an infiltration by ~30% blasts. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry confirmed relapse of DLBCL. Also, patient’s poor response to therapeutic regimen for DLBCL prompted to consider second differential diagnosis of acute leukaemia. This case is a learning case, as it emphasizes the combined role of diagnostic ancillary techniques along with clinical judgments for management. The case also makes us more vigilant towards the pathobiology of DLBCL and dynamics of personalized individual treatment response.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4636-4636
Author(s):  
Carlos Chiattone ◽  
Marineide P. Carvalho ◽  
Roberto P. Paes ◽  
Karina C.B. Ribeiro ◽  
Fernando Soares

Abstract Recent studies have shown correlations between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCBL) prognosis and molecular features using genome profiles by cDNA microarrays. Since this analysis is not routinely used, immunohistochemical tests for prediction of DLBCL survival are gaining major importance, using markers as, CD10, BCL-6 and MUM-1 to identify germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB, respectively. The goal of this study was to evaluate the significant effect on survival within GCB and non-GCB subgroup. Patients and Methods: Seventy-four untreated pts (median age: 58 yrs: 38M/36F) with DLBCL de novo diagnosed in a single institution, treated with CHOP-like regimens. Tissue microarrays (TMA) blocks were created from paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed block and stained with antibodies to CD20 (clone L26, Dako), CD10 (clone 56C6; Novocastra; NCL-CD10-270), BCL-6 (clone GI 191E/A8; Cell Mark; CMC 798) and MUM1 (clone MUM1p; Dako, CA; M7259). Results. Cases were subclassified using CD10, BCL-6, and MUM1 expression, and 25 cases (33.8%) were considered GCB and 49 cases (66.2%) non-GCB. The 2-year overall survival (OS) for the GCB group was 80% compared with only 38.9% for the non-GCB (p&lt;0.001). In the multivariate analysis, only the International Prognostic Index score (IPI 3-4 HR=2.6, p=0.013) and the GCB phenotype (Non-GCB HR=2.7, p=0.054) were independent prognostic factors. In summary, immunohistochemical expression of CD10, BCL-6 and MUM1 are able to determine the GCB and non-GCB subtypes of DLBCL and predict survival.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1925-1925
Author(s):  
Mary J. Ninan ◽  
Ajay Rawal ◽  
Hector Mesa ◽  
Dennis Knapp ◽  
Pankaj Gupta

Abstract Abstract 1925 Poster Board I-948 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) regulates the function of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF-4E) which mediates nucleo-cytoplasmic transport and cap-dependent translation of specific transcripts. eIF-4E expression itself is elevated in several carcinomas and hematopoietic malignancies. Hypophosphorylated 4E-BP1 binds eIF-4E and inhibits cap-dependent translation. Phosphorylated 4E-BP1 dissociates from eIF-4E, thereby allowing translation of several cap-dependent transcripts responsible for cell cycling, survival and angiogenesis. Hyper-phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 may thus be associated with oncogenesis and the malignant phenotype; its influence on the response to chemotherapy and prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is unknown. We examined diagnostic tissues from 85 patients with DLBCL for 4E-BP1 expression and phosphorylation, and correlated these with clinical outcomes. Samples were stained for total and phosphorylated 4E-BPI using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Slides were scored for percent cells positive for the two markers (0% to 100%) and the intensity of expression (0 to 3+) by hematopathologists (A.R. and H.M.) blinded to the clinical data. An Expression Score was calculated from their product ([% cells positive × intensity]/10), thus ranging from 0-30. In parallel, expression of bcl-2 was determined by IHC on the same samples. Patients had a median age of 75 years (range, 25-91). The majority received CHOP-based chemotherapy with/without rituximab. Total 4E-BP1 was expressed uniformly (by 97% of the cases). However, there was marked heterogeneity in the level of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 (none [Expression Score = 0] in 35%, uniformly high [Expression Score = 30] in 34%, and variable [Expression Score = 1-29] in the remainder [31%]). We therefore examined if the level of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 varied with clinical features at diagnosis, and whether it correlated with response to chemotherapy and survival. The level of expression or phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 did not correlate with the clinical stage, IPI score or bcl-2 expression at diagnosis, and did not influence the likelihood of achieving complete remission with CHOP-based chemotherapy. However, in patients with low IPI scores (IPI 0-2), the level of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 correlated significantly with overall survival (OS). In these patients, the OS was significantly different (P = 0.031) in patients with low levels of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 (Expression Score = 0-15) compared to those with higher levels of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation (Expression Score = 16-30). The median survival was >146.4 months vs 20.6 months, and the 5-year survival was 73% vs 31%, in patients with low and high levels of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation, respectively. The difference in survival between the two groups was not a consequence of differences in age or IPI score at diagnosis or inclusion of rituximab in the treatment regimen. The level of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 did not have any further impact on the survival of patients with high IPI scores (IPI 4-5). We conclude that while the large majority of DLBCL express the translation regulatory protein 4E-BP1, the level of phosphorylation (indicative of biological activity) of this protein varies widely. Importantly, the level of phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 further stratifies DLBCL patients who would be expected to have a favorable prognosis based on low IPI scores, and identifies a subset of these patients who do poorly following standard CHOP-based chemotherapy. Since hyper-phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 increases the activity of eIF-4E, this study provides the rationale for trials incorporating novel targeted agents that inhibit eIF-4E into the therapeutic regimen, specifically in DLBCL patients with low IPI scores and high levels of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhong Hu ◽  
Chao Deng ◽  
Wen Zou ◽  
Guangsen Zhang ◽  
Jingjing Wang

Background: The current standard therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (RCHOP). The role of radiotherapy (RT) after complete response (CR) to RCHOP in patients with DLBCL remains unclear. This systematic review with a meta-analysis is an attempt to evaluate this role. Methods: Studies that evaluated RT versus no-RT after CR to RCHOP for DLBCL patients were searched in databases. Hazard ratios (HR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 4 qualified retrospective studies (633 patients) were included in this review. The results suggested that RT improved overall survival (OS; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77) and progression-free/event-free survival (PFS/EFS; HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.50) in all patients compared with no-RT. In a subgroup analysis of patients with stage III-IV DLBCL, RT improved PFS/EFS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.51) and local control (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.44), with a trend of improving OS (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.05). Conclusion: Consolidation RT could significantly improve outcomes of DLBCL patients who achieved a CR to RCHOP. However, the significance of these results was limited by these retrospective data. Further investigation of the role of consolidation RT in the rituximab era is needed.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5184-5184
Author(s):  
Mario I Vega ◽  
Miriam Hernandez-Atenogenes ◽  
Alberto Valencia ◽  
Gabriel G Vega ◽  
Altagracia Maldonado-Valenzuela ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5184 Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is a transcription factor expressed in a variety of tissues in humans and has been implicated in several physiologic processes including development, differentiation, and tissue homeostasis. KLF4 is a bi-functional transcription factor that can either activate or repress transcription depending on the target gene. Human KLF4 is a protein of 470 amino acids with a 55 kDa. It contains three C-terminal C2H2-type zinc fingers that bind DNA. It is divided into three separate domains, namely, an N-terminal activation domain, a central repression domain and a C-terminal DNA-binding domain. For instance, KLF4 acts as a tumor suppressor gene in several cancers (colon, gastric, esophageal, bladder, and NSCLC) or as an oncogene (laryngeal carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, ductal carcinoma of the breast). However, the role of KLF4 in hematologic malignancies is still poorly understood. Reported studies in leukemia suggested that KLF4 may be a tumor suppressor. The goal of this study was to investigate the expression and the clinical significance of KLF4 in B-Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (B-NHLs). Both B-NHL cell lines and patient-derived tumor tissues (TMA) were examined by western blot and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The expression of KLF4 was calculated based on the intensity and the percentage of the area stained, and scoring was corroborated by two pathologists. The complete absence of KLF4 expression was considered as KLF4 negative. Normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells expressed low levels of KLF4, in contrast, there was a significant overexpression of KLF4 in Ramos and Raji (Burkitt's lymphoma) and 2F7 (AIDS lymphoma) B-NHL cell lines. However, the DHL4 (DBLCL) cell line showed similar expression to normal cells. Among the 73 childhood lymphomas studied, 13/23 (57%) of lymphoblastic lymphoma, 7/20 (35%) of large B-cell lymphoma, 4/4 (100%) of anaplastic large cell lymphoma and 5/6 NHL not otherwise specified were KLF4 positive. Noteworthy, 18/18 (100%) Burkitt's lymphoma was KLF4 positive. In addition, the nuclear expression of KLF4 was significantly higher in Burkitt's lymphoma (n=18) compared to the remaining subtypes (lymphoblastic lymphoma, n=23, large B-cell lymphoma n=20 and others). All patients were treated with chemotherapy and the majority of the patients that were KLF4 positive had a stage 3–4 disease. Analysis of the EFS demonstrated that patients' tumors that were KLF4 negative had significantly higher EFS as compared to tumors that were KLF4 positive. Likewise, there was significant prolongation of survival in patients with tumors that were KLF4 negative. We suggest that the expression of KLF4 and poor response to chemotherapy may be attributed to its role in resistance via its regulation by the resistance factor Notch31. In contrast, the absence of KLF4 and good response to chemotherapy may be due to shifting p53 activity from cellular repair to cell death2. The present findings demonstrate that KLF4 may be considered as an oncogene in Burkitt's lymphoma and subsets of other types of lymphoma. The findings also suggest that the expression of KLF4 may be a potential prognostic factor, though, this need to be validated in a large cohort of patients. We propose that KLF4 may be a therapeutic target in patients with B-NHL lymphomas. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document