Prognostic Factors after 5 Years Follow-Up in Female Breast Cancer

Oncology ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Aaltomaa ◽  
P. Lipponen ◽  
M. Eskelinen ◽  
V.-M. Kosma ◽  
S. Marin ◽  
...  
1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirpa Aaltomaa ◽  
Pertti Lipponen ◽  
Matti Eskelinen ◽  
Veli-Matti Kosma ◽  
Sinikka Marin ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Singh-Carlson ◽  
F. Wong ◽  
G. Oshan

Background This paper focuses on phase iii of a study evaluating the development and implementation of a survivorship care plan (scp) that could ultimately improve post-treatment quality of life for South Asian (sa) breast cancer survivors (bcss). Evaluating the utility of the scp was important to understand how sociocultural influences might affect uptake of the scp by sa bcss, especially as they transition from treatment to community care.Methods Post-treatment discharge planning using an individualized scp at discharge for sa female breast cancer patients with stage i or ii disease was offered as a pilot service to oncologists at BC Cancer’s Fraser Valley and Abbotsford centres. A longitudinal study using a mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the utility of that service at 1 year after discharge.Results Participants (n = 16) completed a survey about their scp delivery experience, and a 1-year post implementation survey about the scp content and its utility. Most participants reported the discharge appointments to be extremely or very helpful with respect to post-treatment care questions. All have visited their family physicians for follow-up as recommended. The three major sources of support were family, faith, and family physician. Qualitative responses from the health care professionals who developed or implemented the scps identified two challenges in scp delivery: engaging patients or family members in relationship, and translating key information through interpreters.Conclusions It is important to evaluate the utility of scps for sa female survivors, who might differ from the general bcs population because of a different understanding of the disease; language barriers; strong influence of family members; societal stigmas; and personal, social, cultural, and religious beliefs and values. A formal nurse-led discharge appointment with discussions about follow-up care and an individualized scp outlining the short- and long-term effects of treatment are recommended. Particular attention has to be paid to the practical and psychosocial needs of sa bcss and their supporting family members.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11618-e11618
Author(s):  
R. D. Botan ◽  
M. N. Alvares ◽  
A. Hassan

e11618 Background: Treatment for male breast cancer is based on the results of large clinical trials for female breast cancer. Although peculiar differences do exist between men and women, very little is known about the prognostic factors in male breast cancer, even though female breast cancer practical conducts are widely used in male breast cancer. The rarity of this condition makes very difficult to produce randomized trials. Methods: This study is populational and epidemiological and evaluated male breast cancer patients from January 1974 to December 2001 about its prognostic characteristics. Data were collected retrospectively and the sample has been described using descriptive statistics methods. Survival curve was built using Kaplan-Meier method. Staging system was standardized as in the sixth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer, independently on when the diagnose was made. Due to differences throughtout 35 years on therapeutic on breast cancer, treatment options were categorized in groups to make the survival evaluation possible. Results: From 45 patients with male breast cancer, 91% presented ductal histology, 26% were negative axillary, 9.1% were T1, 25% were T2, 4.5% were T3, 50% were T4 and 12.12% presented with distant metastasis at diagnose. Seventy nine percent were submitted to radical local treatment, while 34% had not been submitted to any kind of systemic treatment (neoadjuvant, adjuvant e hormone therapy). Forty percent of patients have not presented distant recurrence, while 58.3% have not presented local recurrence. A median survival of 126 months has been observed to the analyzed population, ranging from 69–182 months. Five-year survival was 72% and 10-year survival was 54%. These data agreed with the available data in the published literature. Conclusions: Male breast cancer appears to behave biologically and clinically very similar to female breast cancer, but differences do exist and need to be elucidated. Randomized multi-center clinical trials become necessary, as systematic reviews, to build higher statistic power studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19525-e19525
Author(s):  
Matthew Parsons ◽  
Jonathan Chipman ◽  
Calvin Rock ◽  
Deborah Marie Stephens ◽  
Harsh Shah ◽  
...  

e19525 Background: Survivors of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are at increased risk of secondary malignancies (SM). We quantified this risk in survivors with over 40 years of follow-up, and evaluated differences in risk by treatment modality. Methods: Standardized incidence ratios (SIR, observed-to-expected [O/E] ratio), which accounts for patient years at risk, and absolute excess risk of SM were assessed in 142,837 patients diagnosed with NHL as a first malignancy between 1975 and 2016 in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Follow up was available through 2016. Non-melanoma skin cancers were not counted as SM. SIRs were also evaluated for patients stratified by age at and latency from diagnosis. Results: In all, 14,101 patients received radiotherapy alone (RT), 68,424 received chemotherapy alone (CT), and 18,339 received chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). In total, 15,979 patients (11%) developed SM, more than the endemic rate (O/E 1.29; P < .01). Overall, patients treated with any RT (RT+CRT) had a similar risk of SM as those who did not receive RT (O/E 1.29 for both compared to endemic rate). Patients treated with RT had more risk of female breast cancer and less risk of leukemia than unirradiated patients (P < .05). Patients treated with any CT (CT+CRT) had increased SM rates compared with those who did not receive CT [O/E 1.33 (95% CI 1.30-1.35) vs 1.24 (95% CI 1.21-1.26), respectively], which included increased risks of leukemia, Kaposi sarcoma, kidney, pancreas, rectal, head and neck, and colon cancers and decreased risk of prostate cancer (P < 0.05). When stratified by four treatment groups (no CT or RT, RT alone, CT alone, CRT), there were no differences in SM rates between the no therapy and RT alone groups (O/E 1.24 95% CI 1.21-1.27 and O/E 1.23 95% CI 1.18-1.28 respectively). CT alone and CRT were associated with increased risk of secondary malignancy compared to the no therapy group (O/E 1.32 95% CI 1.29-1.35 and O/E 1.35 95% CI 1.29-1.40 respectively). CT alone was also associated with increased risk of leukemia, Kaposi sarcoma, kidney, head and neck and thyroid cancers, and a decreased risk of prostate cancer (P < .05). CRT was associated with increased risk of head and neck and female breast cancers (P < .05). There was no difference in the overall risk of SM between the CT alone and CRT groups and female breast cancer was the only site at which CRT was associated with higher risk than CT alone. Of note, female breast cancer risk was highest in those diagnosed under 25 years of age and at latencies of greater than 10 years. Conclusions: This is the largest study to examine secondary malignancy risk in patients with NHL and has the longest follow-up. Patients treated with RT alone did not have an increased SM risk compared to those who received no RT or CT. The risk of SMs was increased overall for NHL survivors and varied with treatment modality.


Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Sherihan AbdelHamid ◽  
Hala El-Mesallamy ◽  
Hany Abdel Aziz ◽  
Abdel-Rahman Zekri

Evidence on the prognostic relevance of BRCA1/2 mutations on breast cancer survival is still debatable. To address this ambiguity, we sought to elucidate the impact of BRCA1/2 mutation carriership on long-term clinical outcomes for the first time in Egyptian female breast cancer patients. This study comprised 103 Egyptian female breast cancer patients previously tested for BRCA1/2 mutations. Clinicopathological characteristics and long-term follow-up data were retrieved from clinical records until death or loss to follow-up. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were compared in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. Pathogenic variants (Class 5 according to ACMG/AMP guidelines) were observed in 29 cases. The profile of the detected variants was previously reported. After median follow-up time of 6.9 years (range, 4.2–24.4 years), BRCA1/2 carriers exhibited significantly worse RFS compared to non-carriers (p = 0.01; HR = 3.00 (95%CI 1.35–6.68)). However, we couldn’t demonstrate statistically significant difference between carriers of pathogenic mutations and non-carriers regarding MFS (p = 0.24; HR = 1.38 (95%CI 0.8–2.4)), DFS (p = 0.11; HR = 1.23 (95%CI 0.74–2.06)), or OS (p = 0.36; HR = 1.23 (95%CI 0.58–2.61)). Though no significant impact was observed in OS, yet BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were at high risk of recurrence, highlighting the importance of adopting BRCA screening strategies and prophylactic measures.


1993 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirpa Aaltomaa ◽  
Pertti Lipponen ◽  
Matti Eskelinen ◽  
Veli-Matti Kosma ◽  
Sinikka Marin ◽  
...  

Oncology ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Aaltomaa ◽  
P. Lipponen ◽  
M. Eskelinen ◽  
V.-M. Kosma ◽  
S. Mari ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 2199-2209
Author(s):  
Guo Sang ◽  
Hong Pan ◽  
Chen Lu ◽  
Rongneng Sun ◽  
Xiaoming Zha ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Eskelinen ◽  
Pertti Lipponen ◽  
Sari Papinaho ◽  
Sirpa Aaltomaa ◽  
Veli-Matti Kosma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2530-2533
Author(s):  
Said Zaman Khan ◽  
Sabih Nofil ◽  
Anum Arif ◽  
Maria Mir Jan ◽  
Bismah Riaz ◽  
...  

Post mastectomy pain syndrome is one of the most common complications after axillary surgery for breast cancer. PMPS is considered a neuropathic pain and is thought to be caused by a variety of pre-operative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors. In this study all post operative patients for breast cancer were interviewed at follow-up visits for symptoms of pain according to DN4 neuropathic pain score questionnaire and VAS scale for pain intensity. A total of 97 patients were included according to inclusion criteria. Among them 24(24.74%) patients were having PMPS and 73(77.06%) were having no PMPS. Among risk factors, ALND was found to be the most important risk factor for development of PMPS. In most patients the pain was mild in intensity according to VAS scale. And site of the pain was mostly found to be ipsilateral chest wall and axilla and majority of patients pin responded to simple NSAIDS and Arm exercises. Keywords: Breast cancer, mastectomy, pain


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document