Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in Nonagenarians

Introduction: Increased life expectancy results in a rapid increase of nonagenarian patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). We conducted this study to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (ET) in this age group with use of imaging-based selection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from 2 different comprehensive stroke centers and compared the outcomes of ET versus intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone among eligible nonagenarians with LVO in anterior circulation and evidence of salvageable tissue on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: A total of 617 patients of AIS had been treated with IVT or ET, including 23 eligible nonagenarians. Among these, 9 patients were treated with IVT alone (IVT group) and 14 patients received ET group. Notably, the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were significantly lower after ET than after IVT (European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study II criteria, 0 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.047; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke criteria, 7.1 vs. 66.7%; p = 0.005). Moreover, although there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups on efficacy, ET tended to lead to greater early neurologic recovery at discharge (71.4 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.102) and improve functional outcome at 90 days (71.4 vs. 44.4%, p = 0.383), respectively. Conclusion: By using MRI-based selection, ET in nonagenarians with AIS caused by LVO within anterior circulation was safe and may lead to improve early neurologic recovery and functional independence at 90 days, as compared with IVT alone. Randomized trial in larger sample size testing efficacy of ET using diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch selection in this age group appears feasible.

Download Full-text

Intravenous fibrinolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy versus direct endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: clinical and infarct volume results.

10.21203/rs.2.482/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Massimo Gamba ◽

Nicola Gilberti ◽

Enrico Premi ◽

Angelo Costa ◽

Michele Frigerio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Infarct Volume ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Abstract Background and Purpose endovascular therapy (ET) is the standard of care for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). The role of adjunctive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in these patients is still unclear. The present study aims to test whether IVT plus ET (CoT, combined therapy) provides additional benefits over direct ET for anterior circulation AIS by LVO. Methods we performed a single center retrospective observational study of patients with AIS caused by anterior circulation LVO, referred to our center between January 2014 and January 2017 and treated with ET. The patients were divided in 2 groups based on the treatment they received: CoT and, if IVT contraindicated, direct ET. We compared functional recovery (modified Rankin at 3-months follow-up), recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] score) and time, early follow-up infarct volume (EFIV) (for recanalized patients only) as well as safety profile, defined as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality, between groups. Results 145 subjects were included in the study, 70 in direct ET group and 75 in CoT group. Patients who received CoT presented more frequently a functional independence at 3-months follow-up compared to patients who received direct ET (mRS score 0-1: 48.5% vs 18.6%; P<0.001. mRS score 0-2: 67.1% vs 37.3%; P<0.001), higher first-pass success rate (62.7% vs 38.6%, P<0.05), higher recanalization rate (84.3% vs 65.3%; P=0.009) and, in recanalized subjects, smaller EFIV (16.4ml vs 62.3ml; P=0.003). The safety profile was similar for the 2 groups. In multivariable regression analysis, low baseline NIHSS score (P<0.05), vessel recanalization (P=0.05) and CoT (P=0.03) were indipendent predictors of 3-month favorable outcome. Conclusions CoT appears more effective than ET alone for anterior circulation AIS with LVO, with similar safety profile.

Download Full-text

Intravenous fibrinolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy versus direct endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: clinical and infarct volume results.

10.21203/rs.2.482/v2 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Massimo Gamba ◽

Nicola Gilberti ◽

Enrico Premi ◽

Angelo Costa ◽

Michele Frigerio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Infarct Volume ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Download Full-text

Abstract T P48: Intravenous Thrombolysis Using Low-Dose Alteplase for Nonagenarians with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SAMURAI rtPA Registry

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tp48 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mikito Hayakawa ◽

Masatoshi Koga ◽

Shoichiro Sato ◽

Shoji Arihiro ◽

Yoshiaki Shiokawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Low Dose ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Multivariate Adjustment ◽

Potential Efficacy ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Objective: Although intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) using alteplase for octogenarians with acute ischemic stroke becomes relatively familiar, it is unclear whether IVT for nonagenarians is a futile intervention. The purpose of this study is to clarify the efficacy and safety of IVT using low-dose alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) for nonagenarians compared with octogenarians. Methods: Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-factor Assessment and Improvement (SAMURAI) rtPA registry retrospectively collected 600 consecutive acute stroke patients receiving IVT from 10 Japanese stroke centers between October 2005 and July 2008. We extracted all octogenarians (O group) and nonagenarians (N group) from the registry. We compared baseline characteristics, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and 3-month outcomes between the groups. 3-month outcomes include; functional independence (FI) defined as a mRS score 0-2, good outcome (GO) as a mRS score 0-2 or same as the premorbid mRS, poor outcome (PO) defined as a mRS score 5-6, and death. Results: Twenty-five nonagenarians (mean age, 93 years) and 124 octogenarians (mean age, 84 years) were included. N group was more female-predominant (76% versus 56%, p=0.06) and premorbidly dependent (44% versus 14%, p<0.001) than O group. There were no significant differences of median baseline NIHSS score (16 versus 14, p=0.95) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (9 versus 9, p=0.36) between the groups. The rate of FI tended to be lower in N group than O group (16% versus 36%, p=0.06), otherwise, the differences of the rates of GO (28% versus 37%, p=0.39), PO (40% versus 36%, p=0.73), death (20% versus 11%, p=0.23) and SICH (0% versus 2.4%, p=1.00) were not significant between the groups. In comparison with O group, N group was not associated with 3-month clinical outcomes (FI; OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.15-2.42, GO; 0.98; 0.31-3.07, PO; 0.63; 0.15-2.70, death; 3.18; 0.62-16.3) and SICH (0.68; 0.17-2.69) after multivariate adjustment. Conclusions: IVT using low-dose alteplase for N group resulted in less frequent achievement of FI mainly because of more premorbid dependency than O group, however, showed at least a similar safety and a potential efficacy.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP28: Intravenous Thrombolysis is Associated With Better Functional Outcomes in Endovascular Thrombectomy Patients Requiring Multiple-Passes to Achieve Reperfusion

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.tp28 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Christopher Blair ◽

Cecilia Cappelen-Smith ◽

Dennis Cordato ◽

Leon Edwards ◽

Amer Mitchelle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Functional Outcomes ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Independent Effect ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Multiple Pass ◽

First Pass

Introduction: In patients with anterior circulation stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO), recent data suggest that successful reperfusion (mTICI≥2b) after a single device pass results in more favourable functional outcomes in comparison to patients requiring multiple passes. It is unclear if this effect represents an epiphenomenon or a true independent effect. Methods: A prospectively maintained database of EVT was interrogated for patients presenting with anterior circulation LVO with onset to groin puncture times of ≤ 6 hours from January 2016 to March 2019. Three-month functional outcomes were compared between first-pass reperfusion and multiple-pass reperfusion patients using logistic regression. Results: A total of 169 patients were identified (mean age 71 yrs, 44% female, median NIHSS 17, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in 47%). Successful reperfusion (mTICI≥2b) was achieved with the first-pass (FP) in 80 patients (47%) and multiple-passes (MP) in 89 patients (53%). First pass patients had better outcomes when compared to MP patients (mRS 0-2 71% vs 31%, p < 0.001). No difference in functional outcomes was seen between FP patients who received IVT and those that did not (mRS 0-2 68% vs 75%, p = 0.459). Multiple-pass patients who received IVT achieved higher rates of functional independence than those who did not (mRS 0-2 40% vs 27%, p = 0.035). Conclusion: Intravenous thrombolysis may improve functional recovery in EVT patients requiring multiple-passes to achieve reperfusion. Prospective studies should be considered.

Download Full-text

Endovascular thrombectomy without versus with intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a non-inferiority meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017667 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. neurintsurg-2021-017667

Author(s):

Chun-Hsien Lin ◽

Jeffrey L Saver ◽

Bruce Ovbiagele ◽

Wen-Yi Huang ◽

Meng Lee

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Randomized Trials ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Risk Difference ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis of randomized trials to comprehensively compare the effect of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus EVT on functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2) after acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO).MethodsWe searched Pubmed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 to February 2021 and abstracts presented at the International Stroke Conference in March 2021 to identify trials comparing EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT in AIS-LVO. Five non-inferiority margins established in the literature were assessed: −15%, −10%, −6.5%, −5%, and −1.3% for the risk difference for functional independence at 90 days.ResultsFour trials met the selection criteria, enrolling 1633 individuals, with 817 participants randomly assigned to EVT alone and 816 to IVT plus EVT. Crude cumulative rates of 90-day functional independence were 46.0% with EVT alone versus 45.5% with IVT plus EVT. Pooled results showed the risk difference of functional independence was 1% (95% CI −4% to 5%) between EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT. The lower 95% CI bound of −4% fell within the non-inferiority margins of −15%, −10%, −6.5%, and −5%, but not −1.3%. Pooled results also showed the risk difference between EVT alone versus IVT plus EVT was 1% (95% CI −3% to 5%) for mRS 0–1, and 1% (95% CI −1% to 3%) for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that EVT alone is non-inferior to IVT plus EVT for several, but not the most stringent, non-inferiority margins.

Download Full-text

Mechanical Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials

European Neurology ◽

10.1159/000520085 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-10

Author(s):

Hang Li ◽

Siyuan Yang ◽

Yi Zhong ◽

Jiahe Wang ◽

Xiang Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Randomized Controlled

Introduction: The combination of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is more effective than IVT alone in patients with large vessel occlusion, which has been proven in recent studies. However, there are still debates over whether IVT benefits patients treated with only direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched on June 15, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Seven RCTs with 2,143 patients were enrolled in our study. Results: MT combined with IVT had comparable efficacy and safety outcome compared with dMT in proximal anterior circulation occlusion at 90 days. For the primary outcome, pooled data showed no significant difference in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2 at 90 days between the dMT and MT+IVT groups (pooled odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval, 0.79, 1.17, p = 0.39). As for the mRS score 0–1 at 90 days, the degree of benefit conferred by dMT was substantial: for every 100 patients treated, the number of patients which had an excellent outcome in the dMT group was 10 higher than that of the MT+IVT group. Conclusion: In this meta-analysis including 7 RCTs, MT had comparable consequences to bridging treatment in efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with ischemic stroke caused by the occlusion of proximal anterior circulation, irrespective of geographical location. These findings support the adoption of dMT in acute ischemic stroke treatments and have higher cost-effectiveness in global applications.

Download Full-text

Delayed Neurological Improvement After Full Endovascular Reperfusion in Acute Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.032066 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Blanca Talavera ◽

Beatriz Gómez-Vicente ◽

Mario Martínez-Galdámez ◽

Elena López-Cancio ◽

Carmen García-Cabo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Cerebral Infarction ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

National Institutes Of Health ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Neurological Improvement ◽

Male Sex

Background and Purpose: We aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of delayed neurological improvement (DNI) after complete endovascular reperfusion in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of an online multicenter prospective reperfusion registry of patients with consecutive anterior circulation AIS treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) from January 2018 to June 2019 in tertiary stroke centers of the NORDICTUS (NORD-Spain Network for Research and Innovation in ICTUS) network. We included patients with AIS with a proximal occlusion in whom a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3 reperfusion pattern was obtained. DNI was defined if, despite absence of early neurological improvement during the first 24 hours, patients achieved functional independence on day 90. Clinical and radiological variables obtained before EVT were analyzed as potential predictors of DNI. Results: Of 1565 patients with consecutive AIS treated with EVT, 1381 had proximal anterior circulation occlusions, 803 (58%) of whom achieved a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3. Of these, 628 patients fulfilled all selection criteria and were included in the study. Mean age was 73.8 years, 323 (51.4%) were female, and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 16. Absence of early neurological improvement was observed in 142 (22.6%) patients; 32 of these (22.5%) achieved good long-term outcome and constitute the DNI group. Predictors of DNI in multivariable-adjusted logistic regression were male sex (odds ratio, 6.4 [95% CI, 2.1–22.3] P =0.002), lower pre-EVT National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (odds ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.2–1.5], P <0.001), and intravenous thrombolysis (odds ratio, 9.1 [95% CI, 2.7–30.90], P <0.001). Conclusions: One-quarter of patients with anterior circulation AIS who do not clinically improve within the first 24 hours after complete cerebral endovascular recanalization will achieve long-term functional independence, regardless of the poor early clinical course. Male sex, lower initial clinical severity, and use of intravenous thrombolysis before EVT predicted this clinical pattern.

Download Full-text

Endovascular thrombectomy beyond 12 hours of stroke onset: a stroke network’s experience of late intervention

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013575 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 10 (11) ◽

pp. 1043-1046 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Ronan Motyer ◽

John Thornton ◽

Sarah Power ◽

Paul Brennan ◽

Alan O’Hare ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Scale Score ◽

Patient Selection ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Stroke Onset ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Safety Parameters ◽

Multiphase Ct ◽

Contrast Ct

BackgroundSelected patients with proximal anterior circulation ischemic stroke who demonstrate limited infarct and sufficient penumbra may benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) beyond conventional time limits.ObjectiveTo perform a retrospective review of all cases of EVT performed at our institution for proximal anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke with onset >12 hours.Materials and methodsPatients were assessed with non-contrast CT brain and multiphase CT angiography, with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and collateral grade informing patient selection. Data, including patient demographics, workflow, neuroimaging findings, procedural details, recanalization rates, and 90-day functional outcomes, were collected.ResultsOf the 542 consecutive endovascular thrombectomy cases performed during the study period, 25 (4.6%) were >12 hours from stroke onset. Median age was 69 years (IQR 55–80), median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score on presentation was 14 (IQR 11–18.5), median ASPECTS was 8 (IQR 8–9), and rate of moderate–good collateral status was 96% (n=24). Median time to groin puncture was 14 hours 40 min (IQR 12 hours 36 min – 16 hours 18 min). Rate of successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral infarction 2b–3) was 88% (n=22). Rate of functional independence (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was 52% (n=13). There were no cases of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and 90-day mortality rate was 12% (n=3).ConclusionWith the use of ASPECTS and collateral grade to guide patient selection, good functional outcome with acceptable safety parameters may be achieved in patients undergoing EVT beyond 12 hours from stroke onset.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis With Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Neurology ◽

10.3389/fneur.2021.602370 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Zhao-Ji Chen ◽

Xiao-Fang Li ◽

Cheng-Yu Liang ◽

Lei Cui ◽

Li-Qing Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Bridging Therapy ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Whether bridging treatment combining intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is superior to direct EVT alone for emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation is unknown. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to investigate and assess the effect and safety of bridging treatment vs. direct EVT in patients with LVO in the anterior circulation.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched to assess the effect and safety of bridging treatment and direct EVT in LVO. Functional independence, mortality, asymptomatic and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aICH and sICH, respectively), and successful recanalization were evaluated. The risk ratio and the 95% CI were analyzed.Results: Among the eight studies included, there was no significant difference in the long-term functional independence (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 0.845–1.204, P = 0.926), mortality (OR = 1.060, 95% CI = 0.840–1.336, P = 0.624), recanalization rate (OR = 1.015, 95% CI = 0.793–1.300, P = 0.905), and the incidence of sICH (OR = 1.320, 95% CI = 0.931–1.870, P = 0.119) between bridging therapy and direct EVT. After adjusting for confounding factors, bridging therapy showed a lower recanalization rate (effect size or ES = −0.377, 95% CI = −0.684 to −0.070, P = 0.016), but there was no significant difference in the long-term functional independence (ES = 0.057, 95% CI = −0.177 to 0.291, P = 0.634), mortality (ES = 0.693, 95% CI = −0.133 to 1.519, P = 0.100), and incidence of sICH (ES = −0.051, 95% CI = −0.687 to 0.585, P = 0.875) compared with direct EVT. Meanwhile, in the subgroup analysis of RCT, no significant difference was found in the long-term functional independence (OR = 0.927, 95% CI = 0.727–1.182, P = 0.539), recanalization rate (OR = 1.331, 95% CI = 0.948–1.867, P = 0.099), mortality (OR = 1.072, 95% CI = 0.776–1.481, P = 0.673), and sICH incidence (OR = 1.383, 95% CI = 0.806–2.374, P = 0.977) between patients receiving bridging therapy and those receiving direct DVT.Conclusion: For stroke patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion and who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, there is no significant difference in the clinical effect between direct EVT and bridging therapy, which needs to be verified by more randomized controlled trials.

Download Full-text

Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy or With Prior Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Neurology ◽

10.3389/fneur.2021.752698 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Jing Chen ◽

Teng-Fei Wan ◽

Tian-Ce Xu ◽

Guo-Can Chang ◽

Hui-Sheng Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Excellent Outcome ◽

Randomized Controlled

Background and purpose: It is unclear whether endovascular thrombectomy alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis combination with endovascular thrombectomy can achieve similar neurological outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare endovascular thrombectomy alone or intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy in this population.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We restricted our search to randomized clinical trials that examined the clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy alone vs. intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality. Random-effects meta-analyses were used for evaluating all outcomes.Results: Total three randomized controlled trials with 1,092 individuals enrolled were included in the meta-analysis, including 543 (49.7%) who received endovascular thrombectomy alone and 549 (50.3%) who received intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy. The primary outcome of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 2) was 44.6% (242/543) in the endovascular thrombectomy alone group vs. 42.8% (235/549) in the alteplase with endovascular thrombectomy group (odds ratio (OR), 1.08 [95% CI, 0.85–1.38]; P = 0.0539). Among pre-specified secondary outcomes, no significant between-group differences were found in excellent outcome (mRS score ≤ 1) (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.85–1.47]; P = 0.418), mortality at 90 days (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.68–1.29]; P = 0.673), successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3) (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.54–1.05]; P = 0.099), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.45–1.15]; P = 0.171).Conclusions: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 4.5 h from the onset, endovascular thrombectomy alone was non-inferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy.

Download Full-text