scholarly journals Correction to: Particulate Matter Air Pollution Exposure and Heart Disease Mortality Risks by Race and Ethnicity in the United States: 1997 to 2009 National Health Interview Survey With Mortality Follow-Up Through 2011

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (6) ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trang VoPham ◽  
Kimberly A. Bertrand ◽  
Rulla M. Tamimi ◽  
Francine Laden ◽  
Jaime E. Hart

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Fang ◽  
Keming Yuan ◽  
Carma Ayala ◽  
Renee Gindi ◽  
Brian Ward

Introduction: The proportion of US adults who are foreign-born has almost tripled since 1970. While foreign-born adults have lower cardiovascular disease mortality and risk factors (e.g., hypertension) than US-born adults, less is known about the morbidity of stroke in this population. Objective: To compare the prevalence of stroke among US adults by birthplace. Methods: We used data on 223,842 non-institutionalized adults from the 2006-2013 National Health Interview Survey. Birthplace was categorized as US- and foreign-born, and foreign-born was then grouped into 7 regions. Data on years of living in the US was included. Self-reported stroke was defined as ever being told by doctor or other health professional that s/he had a stroke. Select descriptive (age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, health insurance, language of interview, use of interpreter) and health characteristics (hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, alcohol use, smoking status) were used in analysis. Age-standardized prevalence of stroke was compared between US- and foreign-born and then by birthplace regions among foreign-born. Adjusted odd ratios (AORs) were used to assess stroke risk between US- and foreign-born after adjusting for demographic and health characteristics. Results: Sixteen percent of US adults were classified as foreign-born. Age-standardized prevalence of stroke was higher among US- than foreign-born adults overall (2.7% vs 2.0%, p<0.0001) and by race/ethnicity: non-Hispanic blacks (4.1% (US) vs 2.2% (foreign-born), p<0.0001), Hispanics (2.8% vs 2.2%, p=0.03) and non-Hispanic whites (2.5% vs 1.7%, p<0.0001). Compared to US-born men, AORs of stroke for foreign-born men by region of birth, ranged from 0.24 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.69) for Africa to 1.05 (0.74-1.51) for Europe. Among foreign-born women, AORs ranged from 0.07 (0.01-0.43) for the Middle East to 1.13 (0.54-2.34) for Africa, after adjustment for selected characteristics. Among foreign-born adults, there was no association between age-standardized stroke prevalence and the number of years living in the US. Conclusion: Overall, foreign-born US adults had a lower prevalence of stroke than US-born adults. However, considerable heterogeneity of stroke risk was noted by region of birth.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Liu ◽  
Lara P. Clark ◽  
Matthew Bechle ◽  
Anjum Hajat ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
...  

All data used are publicly available. Demographic data are available via IPUMS National Historic Geographic Information Systems [<a href="http://www.nhgis.org/" target="_blank">www.nhgis.org</a>]; air pollution estimates are available via the EPA CACES project [<a href="http://www.caces.us/" target="_blank">www.caces.us</a>]).


2017 ◽  
Vol 195 (10) ◽  
pp. 1373-1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gref ◽  
Simon K. Merid ◽  
Olena Gruzieva ◽  
Stéphane Ballereau ◽  
Allan Becker ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (13) ◽  
pp. 6001-6006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Tessum ◽  
Joshua S. Apte ◽  
Andrew L. Goodkind ◽  
Nicholas Z. Muller ◽  
Kimberley A. Mullins ◽  
...  

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5pollution. We use these results to explore “pollution inequity”: the difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial–ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a “pollution advantage”: They experience ∼17% less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a “pollution burden” of 56% and 63% excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5exposures declined ∼50% during 2002–2015 for all three racial–ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Liu ◽  
Lara P. Clark ◽  
Matthew Bechle ◽  
Anjum Hajat ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
...  

All data used are publicly available. Demographic data are available via IPUMS National Historic Geographic Information Systems [<a href="http://www.nhgis.org/" target="_blank">www.nhgis.org</a>]; air pollution estimates are available via the EPA CACES project [<a href="http://www.caces.us/" target="_blank">www.caces.us</a>]).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document