Abstract 13146: Clinical Significance of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function on Exercise Capacity and Prognosis: Comparisons Among Heart Failure Patients With Reduced, Preserved and Mid-range Ejection Fraction
Introduction: American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging have proposed the estimation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures and grading LV diastolic function in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the associations of LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) grade with exercise capacity and prognosis have not been fully elucidated among HF patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF ≤40%), preserved EF (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%) and mid-range EF (HFmrEF, LVEF 41% to 49%). We aimed to determine the differences in the associations of LVDD grade with parameters of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and prognosis in patients with HFrEF, HFpEF and HFmrEF. Methods and Results: We analyzed data on 891 hospitalized patients with HF and sinus rhythm (SR), who had discharged alive and undergone CPX at stable condition in prior to discharge. Of 891 patients, 38.9% had HFrEF, 40.6% had HFpEF and 20.4% had HFmrEF. The HFrEF group had higher rates of adverse cardiac events, defined as cardiac death and re-hospitalizations for worsening HF, than HFpEF and HFmrEF groups. In HFrEF group, the patients with LVDD grade 1 had the highest peak oxygen uptake (peak VO 2 ), the lowest minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO 2 slope), the highest oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) and the lowest adverse cardiac event rates. However, there was no difference in CPX parameters and adverse cardiac event rates between patients with LVDD grade 2 and 3. In HFpEF group, the patients with LVDD grade 1 had the highest peak VO 2 , the lowest VE/VCO 2 slope and the highest OUES. In contrast, CPX parameters did not differ between patients with LVDD grade 2 and grade 3. Patients with LVDD grade 3 had the highest adverse cardiac event rates, followed by patients with grade 2 and 1. In HFmrEF group, the patients with LVDD grade 1 had the highest peak VO 2 , the lowest VE/VCO 2 slope and the highest OUES. Patients with grade 1 had the lowest adverse cardiac event rates. However, CPX parameters and adverse cardiac event rates did not differ between patients with grade 2 and 3. Conclusions: LVDD grade was associated with poor exercise capacity and adverse prognosis in patients with HF and SR, regardless of their LVEF.