scholarly journals Impairments in Blood Pressure Regulation and Cardiac Baroreceptor Sensitivity Among Patients With Heart Failure Supported With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Sailer ◽  
Hannah Edelmann ◽  
Cullen Buchanan ◽  
Pedro Giro ◽  
Matthew Babcock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Exercise Testing ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Baroreceptor Sensitivity ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise

Background: Continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). However, the lack of a physiological pulse predisposes to side-effects including uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), and there are little data regarding the impact of CF-LVADs on BP regulation. Methods: Twelve patients (10 males, 60±11 years) with advanced heart failure completed hemodynamic assessment 2.7±4.1 months before, and 4.3±1.3 months following CF-LVAD implantation. Heart rate and systolic BP via arterial catheterization were monitored during Valsalva maneuver, spontaneous breathing, and a 0.05 Hz repetitive squat-stand maneuver to characterize cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity. Plasma norepinephrine levels were assessed during head-up tilt at supine, 30 o and 60 o . Heart rate and BP were monitored during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Results: Cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity, determined by Valsalva as well as Fourier transformation and transfer function gain of Heart rate and systolic BP during spontaneous breathing and squat-stand maneuver, was impaired before and following LVAD implantation. Norepinephrine levels were markedly elevated pre-LVAD and improved—but remained elevated post-LVAD (supine norepinephrine pre-LVAD versus post-LVAD: 654±437 versus 323±164 pg/mL). BP increased during cardiopulmonary exercise testing post-LVAD, but the magnitude of change was modest and comparable to the changes observed during the pre-LVAD cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Conclusions: Among patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, CF-LVAD implantation is associated with modest improvements in autonomic tone, but persistent reductions in cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity. Exercise-induced increases in BP are blunted. These findings shed new light on mechanisms for adverse events such as stroke, and persistent reductions in functional capacity, among patients supported by CF-LVADs. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03078972.

scholarly journals The unsurpassed value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in assessing the prognosis of heart failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.X Avila ◽  
R.C Vivacqua ◽  
S Serra ◽  
M.W Montera ◽  
E Tinoco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Anaerobic Threshold ◽  
Exercise Testing ◽  
Ventilatory Threshold ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise

Abstract Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has become an important clinical tool to predict outcome in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and help to select candidates for heart transplantation (HTx) or left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Purpose To evaluate CPET measurements in advanced CHF patients that are being considered for HTx or LVAD and its association to early mortality regardless of the performed procedure. Methods Maximum intensity CPET was performed on a treadmil and ramp protocol in 65 patients with patients with CHF and reduced ejection fraction, NYHA functional classes III and IV between 2012 and 2018. Measurements derived from CPET were the following: peak V'O2, VO2 at the anaerobic threshold (AT), percentage of the VO2 of the anaerobic threshold in relation to the peak, the VE/VCO2 slope, maximum heart rate (HR), respiratory quotient (R), oxygen kinetics, circulatory power (CP), the recovery HR in the first minute and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) and the relation (VE/VCO2 slope)/VO2 peak. Results Seventy-four percent were male. Mean age of 67±12 years. Amost half (47%) had ischemic etiology. There were no complications related to CPET. Ten patients were transplanted, six had an intracorporeal LVAD implanted and the reminder (49 patients) were kept in supervised physical rehabilitation program. There were 11 deaths, 2 in HTx, 2 in LVAD, 7 in the rehabilitation group. Mean follow-up among the survivors was 43 months ± 40.6 and it was 12.1±10.3 months in those who died. CPET derived measurements between survivors and non-survivors were as follows: V'O2 peak (mL kg–1 min–1): 12.6±4.6 and 8.6±2.7 (p=0.002); the VO2 AT (mL kg–1 min–1): 9.9±3.3 and 6.1±3.0 (p=0.002); VE/VCO2 slope: 34.2±12.1 and 68.1±68.7 (p=0.0003); R peak: 1.1±0.2 and 1.0±0.1 (p=0.009); t1/2, in seconds: 135.8±47.9 and 170.1±82.0 (p=0.03); HR at the first minute 16.6±13 and 7±5 (p=0.009); OUES (L min–1): 1.1±0.4 and 0.9±0.3 (p=0.04) and CP [(ml O2 kg–1 min–1) mmHg] 1.516.2±689. 3 and 960.6±363.6 (p=0.005). and the relation (VE/VCO2 slope)/V'O2 peak were 3.2±2.0 and 11.4±19.5 (p=0.001), respectively. Conclusion The predisposition to early death could be stratified by V'O2 peak, VO2 of the ventilatory threshold, VE/VCO2 slope, t1/2, recovery HR, OUES, CP, and by the relation (VE/VCO2 slope)/V'O2 peak. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): own financing

The role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in a contemporary heart failure population

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Garcia Bras ◽  
A Valentim Goncalves ◽  
J Reis ◽  
T Pereira Da Silva ◽  
R Ilhao Moreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Exercise Testing ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Discriminative Power ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used for risk stratification in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, there is a lack of information regarding CPET prognostic power in patients under new HF therapies such as sacubitril/valsartan, Mitraclip, IV iron or SGLT2 inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of CPET parameters in a contemporary subset of patients with optimal medical and device therapy for CHF. Methods Retrospective evaluation of patients with CHF submitted to CPET in a tertiary center. Patients were followed up for 24 months for the composite endpoint of cardiac death, urgent heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device. CPET parameters, including peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) and VE/VCO2 slope, were analysed and their predictive power was measured. HF events were stratified according to cut-off values defined by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines: pVO2 of ≤12 mL/Kg/min and VE/VCO2 slope of >35. Results CPET was performed in 204 patients, from 2014 to 2018. Mean age was 59 ± 13 years, 83% male, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33 ± 8%, and a mean Heart Failure Survival Score of 8.6 ± 1.3. The discriminative power of CPET parameters is displayed in the Table. In patients with pVO2 ≤12 mL/Kg/min, the composite endpoint occurred in 18% of patients. A pVO2 value of ≤12 mL/Kg/min had a positive predictive power of 18% while pVO2 >12 had a negative predictive power of 93%. Regarding VE/VCO2 slope >35, the composite endpoint occurred in 13% of patients. A VE/VCO2 slope value of >35 had a positive predictive power of 13% while VE/VCO2 slope <35 had a negative predictive power or 94%. Conclusion Using ISHLT guideline cut-off values for advanced HF therapies patient selection, there was a reduced number of HF events (<20%) at 24 months in patients under optimal CHF therapy. While pVO2 and VE/VCO2 slope are still valuable parameters in risk stratification, redefining cut-off values may be necessary in a modern HF population. Discriminative power of CPET parameters Parameters HR; 95% CI AUC p-value Peak VO2 0.824 (0.728-0.934) 0.781 0.001 Percent of predicted pVO2 0.942 (0.907-0.978) 0.774 0.002 VE/VCO2 slope 1.068 (1.031-1.106) 0.756 0.008 Cardiorespiratory optimal point 1.118 (1.053-1.188) 0.746 0.004 PETCO2 maximum exercise 0.854 (0.768-0.950) 0.775 0.003 Ventilatory Power 0.358 (0.176-0.728) 0.796 0.002 HR Hazard ratio, AUC: Area under the curve, PETCO2: end-tidal CO2 pressure

Abstract 225: Frequency and Assessment of Poor Global Outcome in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J Fendler ◽  
Michael E Nassif ◽  
Kevin F Kennedy ◽  
John A Spertus ◽  
Shane J LaRue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Bridge To Transplant ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy can improve survival and quality of life in advanced heart failure (HF), but some patients may still do poorly after LVAD. Understanding the likelihood of experiencing poorer outcomes after LVAD can better inform patients and calibrate their expectations. Methods: We analyzed patients receiving LVAD therapy from January 2012 to October 2013 at a single, high-volume, high-acuity center. We defined a poor global outcome at 1 year after LVAD as the occurrence of death, disabling stroke (precluding transplant), poor patient-reported health status (most recent KCCQ at 3, 6, or 12 months < 45, corresponding to NYHA class IV), or recurrent HF (≥2 HF readmissions post-implant). We compared characteristics of those with and without poor global outcome. Results: Among 164 LVAD recipients who had 1-year outcomes data, mean age was 56, 76.7% were white, 20.9% were female, and 85.9% were INTERMACS Profile 1 or 2 (cardiogenic shock or declining despite inotropes). Poor global outcome occurred in 58 (35.4%) patients at 1 year, of whom 37 (63.8%) died, 17 (29.3%) had a most recent KCCQ score < 45, 3 (5.2%) had ≥2 HF readmissions, and 1 (1.7%) had a disabling stroke (Figure). Eight of the patients who died also experienced one of the three other poor outcomes prior to death. Patients who experienced a poor global outcome were more likely to be designated for destination therapy (46.4% vs. 23.6%, p=0.01) than bridge to transplant, have longer index admissions (median [IQR]: 39 [24, 57] days vs. 25 [18, 35] days, p=0.003), and have major GI bleeding (44.2% vs. 27.7%, p=0.056), and were less likely to undergo LVAD exchange (0% vs. 12.3%, p=0.004). Conclusion: In this large, single-center study assessing global outcome after LVAD implantation, we found that about a third of all patients had experienced a poor global outcome at 1 year. While LVAD therapy remains life-saving and the standard of care for many patients with advanced heart failure, these findings could help guide discussions with eligible patients and families. Future work should compare patients’ pre-LVAD expectations with likely outcomes and create risk models to estimate the probability of poorer outcomes for individual patients using pre-procedural factors.

scholarly journals Differences in the prognoses of patients referred to an advanced heart failure center from hospitals with different bed volumes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Narita ◽  
Eisuke Amiya ◽  
Masaru Hatano ◽  
Junichi Ishida ◽  
Hisataka Maki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

AbstractFew reports have discussed appropriate strategies for patient referrals to advanced heart failure (HF) centers with available left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We examined the association between the characteristics and prognoses of referred patients with advanced HF and the bed volume of the referring hospitals. This retrospective analysis evaluated 186 patients with advanced HF referred to our center for consultation about the indication of LVAD between January 1, 2015, and August 31, 2018. We divided the patients into two groups according to the bed volume of their referring hospital (high bed volume hospitals (HBHs): ≥ 500 beds in the hospital; low bed volume hospitals (LBHs): < 500 beds). We compared the primary outcome measure, a composite of LVAD implantation and all-cause death, between the patients referred from HBHs and patients referred from LBHs. The 186 patients with advanced HF referred to our hospital, who were referred from 130 hospitals (87 from LBHs and 99 from HBHs), had a mean age of 43.0 ± 12.6 years and a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 22% [15–33%]. The median follow-up duration of the patients was 583 days (119–965 days), and the primary outcome occurred during follow-up in 42 patients (43%) in the HBH group and 20 patients (23%) in the LBH group. Patients referred from HBHs tended to require catecholamine infusion on transfer more often than those referred from LBLs (36.5% (HBH), 20.2% (LBL), P = 0.021). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicates that the occurrence of the primary outcome was significantly higher in the HBH patients than in the LBH patients (log-rank P = 0.0022). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that catecholamine support on transfer and long disease duration were statistically significant predictors of the primary outcome. Patients from HBHs had a greater risk of the primary outcome. However, the multivariate analysis did not indicate an association between referral from an HBH and the primary outcome. In contrast, catecholamine support on transfer, long duration of disease, and low blood pressure were independent predictors of the primary outcome. Therefore, these should be considered when determining the timing of a referral to an advanced HF center, irrespective of the bed volume of the referring hospital.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document