Abstract 9: Alirocumab Prior Authorization Approval and Prescription Fill Rates Among Medicare Advantage Patients in a Large US Managed Care Plan

Author(s):  
Kelley C Dacus ◽  
Libby Horter ◽  
Jennifer Hayden ◽  
Raymond A Harvey ◽  
Stephen Thompson ◽  
...  

Introduction: Alirocumab is a proprotein convertase subtilisin/ kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor approved as an adjunct to diet and maximally tolerated statin therapy for treatment of adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who require additional lowering of LDL-cholesterol. Barriers to possession, including therapy cost and cost-sharing implications, may contribute to low utilization of this therapy. Objective: To explore differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with prior authorization (PA) approvals or denials for alirocumab as evidenced through filled alirocumab prescription claims. Methods: A retrospective claims-based database analysis of patients with a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan was conducted to identify patients with evidence of a PA approval for alirocumab. Among the group of patients with a PA for alirocumab, the pharmacy claims database was searched for evidence of a corresponding prescription claim within 30 days following the first PA request (index date). The analysis was stratified by evidence of Federal low income subsidy (LIS) support, a program that provides extra assistance with prescription drug costs for eligible individuals whose income and resources are limited, and/ or dual eligibility (DE) status, eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, (LIS/DE) at index. Results: A total of 2,098 MAPD patients meeting study inclusion/exclusion criteria and with a PA for alirocumab were identified between March 1, 2016 and February 28, 2017. Non-LIS/DE patients comprised approximately 82% of the eligible population (n=1,730). There were several notable differences in baseline demographics between the non-LIS/DE vs. the LIS/DE cohorts with an approved PA claim, including Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.2 vs. 3.0), prevalence of diabetes mellitus (39.2% vs. 54.7%), and prevalence of HeFH (11.8% vs. 15.6%). While the percentage of patients with an approved PA was similar between the LIS/DE and non-LIS/DE cohorts, 88.9% and 91.2%, respectively, substantially more patients in the LIS/DE cohort had evidence of alirocumab possession based on a paid claim (60.6%) vs. those in the non-LIS/DE cohort (17.3%). Conclusion: Although a high percentage of MAPD patients had evidence of an approved PA, there were notable differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between those with and without LIS/ DE status. Further, the proportion of patients with an approved PA and a paid prescription claim differed markedly amongst MAPD patients with and without LIS/DE status, suggesting further research is needed to understand potential barriers to obtaining PCSK9i therapy.

Author(s):  
Merrile Sing ◽  
Beth Stevens

The Medicare Advantage program gives Medicare beneficiaries the opportunity to choose from an array of insurance options instead of receiving prescribed benefits. In 2006, beneficiaries who want prescription drug benefits will need to enroll in a Medicare managed care plan or a private prescription drug plan. To examine awareness and use of Medicare information programs, and the extent to which these programs are associated with beneficiary knowledge about Medicare and managed care, we conducted a national survey of Medicare beneficiaries six to 12 months after the nationwide mailing of the Medicare & You 2000 handbook. Beneficiary information-gathering behavior and experience with Medicare managed care were more highly associated with knowledge about Medicare managed care than formal education, age, income, or membership in a managed care plan before enrolling in Medicare. Practical life experience appears to outweigh traditional factors in beneficiary knowledge of Medicare and managed care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S303
Author(s):  
C. Chinthammit ◽  
S. Bhattacharjee ◽  
M. Slack ◽  
W. Lo-Ciganic ◽  
J.P. Bentley ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Acquah ◽  
Javier Valero-Elizondo ◽  
Miguel Cainzos Achirica ◽  
Rahul Singh ◽  
Karan Shah ◽  
...  

Introduction: Barriers to healthcare - financial and nonfinancial - may result in unmet health needs and adverse outcomes. Despite this, the nonfinancial barriers to care among adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is poorly defined in the US. We aimed to explore the scope and determinants of nonfinancial barriers to care among individuals with ASCVD. Methods: We analyzed data from the 2013-17 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We included adults with self-reported ASCVD (heart attack, angina, and/or stroke). Nine key variables in the NHIS that represent nonfinancial barriers to healthcare were assessed as absent/present, and participants were classified as having 0-1, 2, or ≥3 barriers. Multinomial logistic regression (using 0-1 nonfinancial barriers as reference) was used to evaluate the relationship between various sociodemographic factors, and an increasing number of nonfinancial barriers. Results: Of all the 15,758 adults with ASCVD (8.1% annually in the US; representing 19.6 million), 23.4% reported having at least one nonfinancial barrier to care while 4.9% reported 3 nonfinancial barriers. In a multivariable multinomial logistic regression, after stratifying by age, individuals from low-income families had an almost 2-fold relative prevalence of 3 nonfinancial barriers ( Figure) . In the elderly, however, lack of insurance was the strongest predictor (relative prevalence ratio of 6.51 [95% confidence interval; 2.25, 18.87]) of having ≥3 barriers. Conclusion: Among adults with ASCVD, the relative prevalence of ≥3 nonfinancial barriers was low (4.9%) with low-income being the only modifiable predictor of reporting ≥3 nonfinancial barriers and lack of insurance being the strongest predictor in the elderly. Addressing financial barriers to healthcare may help alleviate these nonfinancial barriers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. A120
Author(s):  
A Bhansali ◽  
SS Sansgiry ◽  
O Serna ◽  
ML Fleming ◽  
S Abughosh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emily B Schroeder ◽  
Jennifer L Ellis ◽  
Nikki M Carroll ◽  
Elizabeth A Bayliss ◽  
Marsha A Raebel

Background: Medication adherence is extremely important in the treatment of hypertension. Most medication adherence metrics are based on refill rates from pharmacy claims databases and require at least two drug dispensings for the calculations. Little is known about individuals who demonstrate early non-adherence to antihypertensive medications, either by never filling a prescription (primary non-adherence) or by filling a prescription only once (early non-persistence). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 6,393 Kaiser Permanente Colorado enrollees with hypertension who received a first prescription for an antihypertensive medication between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008. We linked prescription orders to medication dispensings and then classified patients into primary non-adherent, early non-persistent, or ongoing dispensings groups. Multivariate logistic modeling was performed to investigate potential predictors of primary non-adherence compared to ongoing dispensings. Results: Five percent (331 of 6,393) of patients were primarily non-adherent, 26% (1,672 of 6,393) demonstrated early non-persistence, and 69% (4,390 of 6,393) received ongoing dispensings. In a multivariate model, the following characteristics were associated with a higher likelihood of exhibiting primary non-adherence compared to receiving ongoing dispensings: Hispanic (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.20-2.52) or other racial/ethnic minority (1.48, 1.13-1.95), an enrollment period less than 10 years (1.28,1.00-1.62), more than four comorbidities compared to no comorbidities (1.76, 1.02-3.02), and fewer than five health care contacts in the six months after the medication was prescribed (1.31, 1.02-1.67). The copayment amount for office visits or medications was not associated with primary non-adherence. The c-statistic for the model containing demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and health care plan information was 0.63. Conclusions: A substantial number of individuals newly prescribed an antihypertensive medication exhibited early non-adherence. Our multivariate model had limited discrimination, indicating that further research is needed to better characterize these individuals and explore barriers to early adherence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacie B. Dusetzina ◽  
Nancy L. Keating

Purpose Orally administered anticancer medications are among the fastest growing components of cancer care. These medications are expensive, and cost-sharing requirements for patients can be a barrier to their use. For Medicare beneficiaries, the Affordable Care Act will close the Part D coverage gap (doughnut hole), which will reduce cost sharing from 100% in 2010 to 25% in 2020 for drug spending above $2,960 until the beneficiary reaches $4,700 in out-of-pocket spending. How much these changes will reduce out-of-pocket costs is unclear. Methods We used the Medicare July 2014 Prescription Drug Plan Formulary, Pharmacy Network, and Pricing Information Files from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for 1,114 stand-alone and 2,230 Medicare Advantage prescription drug formularies, which represent all formularies in 2014. We identified orally administered anticancer medications and summarized drug costs, cost-sharing designs used by available plans, and the estimated out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries without low-income subsidies who take a single drug before and after the doughnut hole closes. Results Little variation existed in formulary design across plans and products. The average price per month for included products was $10,060 (range, $5,123 to $16,093). In 2010, median beneficiary annual out-of-pocket costs for a typical treatment duration ranged from $6,456 (interquartile range, $6,433 to $6,482) for dabrafenib to $12,160 (interquartile range, $12,102 to $12,262) for sunitinib. With the assumption that prices remain stable, after the doughnut hole closes, beneficiaries will spend approximately $2,550 less. Conclusion Out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries taking orally administered anticancer medications are high and will remain so after the doughnut hole closes. Efforts are needed to improve affordability of high-cost cancer drugs for beneficiaries who need them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document