Abstract 116: Temporal Trends and Hospital-level Variation in the Incidence and 30-day Mortality of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest within the Veterans Health Administration

Author(s):  
Steven M Bradley ◽  
Kyle M Kepreos ◽  
Paul S Chan ◽  
Theodore J Iwashyna ◽  
Brahmajee K Nallamothu

Background: Improving the quality of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) care within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has received significant attention. Yet there are no national VHA data on the incidence and mortality outcomes of IHCA to guide or evaluate these efforts. We sought to determine overall trends and hospital-level variation in the incidence and 30-day mortality of IHCA within the VHA. Methods: Among 2,731,295 patients hospitalized at 115 VHA hospitals between 2008 and 2012, we defined IHCA using specific ICD-9 procedure codes for cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among patients suffering IHCA, we used the VA Vital Status file to identify 30-day mortality from hospital admission. A severity of illness score was used to account for case-mix and determined from a logistic multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) model fit to our mortality outcome with covariates for age, race, gender, admission diagnosis category, 29 comorbid conditions, and 11 lab values drawn within 24 hours of admission. Hospital-level IHCA incidence and 30-day mortality rates were compared using empirical Bayes random effects estimates from multi-level regression models after risk- and reliability-adjustment. Results: 8,565 (0.3%) patients suffered IHCA between 2008 and 2012 and there was no significant trend in the rate of IHCA over this time period. The hospital-level incidence of IHCA varied and was statistically significantly higher than the median rate at 38 (34%) hospitals and significantly lower at 24 (21%) hospitals (Figure A, p<0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons). Among patients suffering IHCA, the overall 30-day mortality rate was 68.6% and the risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rate decreased from 71.2% in 2008 to 66.1% in 2012 (p for trend <0.01). Hospital-level 30-day mortality was significantly higher than the median rate at 5 (4%) hospitals and significantly lower at 7 (6%) hospitals (Figure B). Conclusions: Within the VHA, the incidence of IHCA has remained stable while 30-day mortality has improved. However, hospital-level variation in IHCA incidence and mortality rates suggest variation in care processes related to IHCA and a target for future investigation to improve patient outcomes.

2017 ◽  
Vol 193 ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Bradley ◽  
Peter Kaboli ◽  
Lee A. Kamphuis ◽  
Paul S. Chan ◽  
Theodore J. Iwashyna ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F Osborne ◽  
Zachary P Veigulis ◽  
David M Arreola ◽  
Satish Mahajan ◽  
Eliane Röösli ◽  
...  

AbstractThere is growing evidence that thrombotic and inflammatory pathways contribute to the severity of COVID-19. Common medications such as aspirin, that mitigate these pathways, may decrease COVID-19 mortality. This assessment was designed to quantify the correlation between aspirin and mortality for COVID-19 positive patients in our care. Data from the Veterans Health Administration national electronic health record database was utilized for the evaluation. Veterans from across the country with a first positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction lab result were included in the evaluation which comprised 28,350 patients from March 2, 2020 to September 13, 2020 for the 14-day mortality cohort and 26,346 patients from March 2, 2020 to August 28, 2020 for the 30-day mortality cohort. Patients were matched via propensity scores and the odds of mortality were then compared. Among COVID-19 positive Veterans, preexisting aspirin prescription was associated with a statistically and clinically significant decrease in overall mortality at 14-days (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.32-0.46) and at 30-days (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.33-0.45), cutting the odds of mortality by more than half. Findings demonstrated that pre-diagnosis aspirin prescription was strongly associated with decreased mortality rates for Veterans diagnosed with COVID-19. Prospective evaluation is required to more completely assess this correlation and its implications for patient care.


2016 ◽  
pp. ehw500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad Nehme ◽  
Emily Andrew ◽  
Stephen Bernard ◽  
Harry Patsamanis ◽  
Peter Cameron ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. e1918324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin L. P. Jump ◽  
Brigid M. Wilson ◽  
Daniel Baechle ◽  
Janet M. Briggs ◽  
Richard E. Banks ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nikola Stankovic ◽  
Lars W. Andersen ◽  
Asger Granfeldt ◽  
Mathias J. Holmberg

Crisis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke A. Levandowski ◽  
Constance M. Cass ◽  
Stephanie N. Miller ◽  
Janet E. Kemp ◽  
Kenneth R. Conner

Abstract. Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) health-care system utilizes a multilevel suicide prevention intervention that features the use of standardized safety plans with veterans considered to be at high risk for suicide. Aims: Little is known about clinician perceptions on the value of safety planning with veterans at high risk for suicide. Method: Audio-recorded interviews with 29 VHA behavioral health treatment providers in a southeastern city were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative methodology. Results: Clinical providers consider safety planning feasible, acceptable, and valuable to veterans at high risk for suicide owing to the collaborative and interactive nature of the intervention. Providers identified the types of veterans who easily engaged in safety planning and those who may experience more difficulty with the process. Conclusion: Additional research with VHA providers in other locations and with veteran consumers is needed.


Author(s):  
Katherine E. Watkins ◽  
◽  
Harold Alan Pincus ◽  
Brad Smith ◽  
Susan M. Paddock ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marcela Horovitz-Lennon ◽  
Katherine E. Watkins ◽  
Harold Alan Pincus ◽  
Lisa R. Shugarman ◽  
Brad Smith ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document