scholarly journals Family History and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death as a Manifestation of an Acute Coronary Event

Circulation ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 114 (14) ◽  
pp. 1462-1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari S. Kaikkonen ◽  
Marja-Leena Kortelainen ◽  
Eeva Linna ◽  
Heikki V. Huikuri
Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari S Kaikkonen ◽  
Marja-Leena Kortelainen ◽  
Heikki V Huikuri

Introduction. There is little information on the specific risk factors leading to sudden cardiac death (SCD) during an acute coronary event, because the risk variables may overlap with those of non-fatal coronary event. This study was designed to compare the risk profiles of SCD victims and survivors of an acute coronary event. Methods and Results. A case-control study included consecutive victims of SCD (n=425, mean age 64±11 years) verified to be due to an acute coronary event at medicolegal autopsy and consecutive patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n=644, mean age 62±10 years). Common cardiovascular risk factors, cardiac hypertrophy, and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) were assessed in both groups. Family history of SCD (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.2, p=0.03), male gender (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.4, p<0.001), current smoking (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.6, p<0.001), cardiac hypertrophy (odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.9, p<0.001) and 3-vessel CAD (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 3.6 to 8.2, p<0.001) were more common among the victims of SCD as compared to survivors of AMI. On the contrary, history of hypercholesterolemia (p<0.001) was less common among the SCD victims. There was a cumulative increase of risk of being a SCD victim vs. AMI survivor when more than one risk factor was present, the odds ratio being 44.3 (95% CI 8.0 to 246.7) in a current male smoker with a family history of SCD and cardiac hypertrophy. When 3-vessel CAD was added to the combined risk score, all subjects (7% of the SCD victims) were in the group of SCD giving a 100% sensitivity and specificity, respectively, in differentiating between the SCD victims and AMI survivors. Conclusions. There are specific features that differentiate the victims of SCD from survivors of an acute coronary event. Clustering of several variables, such as family history of SCD, smoking, cardiac hypertrophy, and 3-vessel CAD indicate a very high risk of SCD.


2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eeva Hookana ◽  
Hanna Ansakorpi ◽  
Marja-Leena Kortelainen ◽  
M. Juhani Junttila ◽  
Kari S Kaikkonen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 714-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jani T. Tikkanen ◽  
Viktor Wichmann ◽  
M. Juhani Junttila ◽  
Meri Rainio ◽  
Eeva Hookana ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 745-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Honkola ◽  
E. Hookana ◽  
S. Malinen ◽  
K. S. Kaikkonen ◽  
M. J. Junttila ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari S. Kaikkonen ◽  
Marja-Leena Kortelainen ◽  
Heikki V. Huikuri

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Zhang ◽  
I T Fazmin ◽  
A Porto ◽  
K Divulwewa ◽  
A Reddy ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Little is known regarding the aetiology or outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring in young adults. This retrospective analysis was performed to explore the demographics and efficacy of AF ablation in this population. Methods Patients were included who had undergone ≥1 AF ablation under the age of 40 between 2006-2018. Recurrence was defined as return of either documented AF or previous symptoms for &gt;30s following a 3-month blanking period. Initial exploratory co-variates were included in a univariate analysis and those terms with P-value of &lt;0.1 were then used to generate a Cox proportional-hazards multivariate model. Results 124 patients (33.6 ± 4.7 yrs, 77% men), initially presenting with paroxysmal AF (pAF; n = 97) or persistent AF (n = 27), underwent 175 AF ablation procedures. 22.6% (n = 28) also had atrial flutter. Time from symptom onset to first ablation was 50.7 ± 46.2 months. Relevant cardiovascular-related demographics were analysed: hypertension in 8.9% (n = 11); diabetes in 1.6% (n = 2); positive family history of AF in 12.9% (n = 16); and family history of sudden cardiac death in 2.4% (n = 3). Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0.35. Of those patients with documented echocardiogram imaging (n = 91), 26.4% (n = 24) had LA dilatation and 6.6% (n = 6) had LV dysfunction. Patients with LA dilatation underwent more ablations (2.3 ± 0.3) compared to controls (1.5 ± 0.1; p &lt; 0.001). Ablation strategy was pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only in 67.2% (n = 119), with additional ablation in the remaining: roof line in 18.9% (n = 33); cavotricuspid isthmus line in 13.1% (n = 23); mitral isthmus line in 2.3% (n = 4); superior vena cava isolation in 2.3% (n = 4); complex fractionated atrial electrograms in 14.9% (n = 26). Mean procedure time was 155 ± 41 min, mean ablation time was 1657 ± 991 s and mean fluoroscopy time was 32.6 ± 23.4 min. General anaesthesia was used in 43.4% (n = 76). Complications included femoral haematoma (n = 2), tamponade (n = 1) and pulmonary vein stenosis (n = 2). 90 days of follow-up was available for 137 procedures performed for pAF (n = 105) and persistent AF (n = 32). For pAF, overall recurrence was 61.9% for first ablations and 62.9% overall. Recurrence was 56.3% for persistent AF. Factors significantly associated with increased AF recurrence in univariate analysis were male gender (hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-4.4, p = 0.011), hypertension (HR 0.5, CI: 0.2-1.1, p = 0.067), family history of sudden cardiac death (HR 6.8, CI: 1.6-29.0 , p = 0.010) and enlarged LA size (HR 2.2, CI: 1.3-3.6, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of poor outcome was enlarged LA size (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.5, p = 0.011). Conclusions Young patients with AF may have structurally abnormal hearts, and therefore do not only present with lone AF. LA size may be used as a predictor for success. Surveillance imaging may be useful to detect future structural change, which will be the subject of future prospective studies. Abstract Figure. AF ablation recurrence in young adults


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnni Rudbeck-Resdal ◽  
Jens Cosedis Nielsen ◽  
Henning Bundgaard ◽  
Henrik K. Jensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document