scholarly journals SPRINT Revisited: Updated Results and Implications

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1701-1710
Author(s):  
Jackson T. Wright ◽  
Paul K. Whelton ◽  
Karen C. Johnson ◽  
Joni K. Snyder ◽  
David M. Reboussin ◽  
...  

The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) results have influenced clinical practice but have also generated discussion regarding the validity, generalizability, and importance of the findings. Following the SPRINT primary results manuscript in 2015, additional results and analyses of the data have addressed these concerns. The primary objective of this article is to respond to key questions that have been raised.

2020 ◽  
Vol 180 (12) ◽  
pp. 1655
Author(s):  
Paul E. Drawz ◽  
Anil Agarwal ◽  
Jamie P. Dwyer ◽  
Edward Horwitz ◽  
James Lash ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e0203305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Supiano ◽  
Laura Lovato ◽  
Walter T. Ambrosius ◽  
Jeffrey Bates ◽  
Srinivasan Beddhu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 814-824
Author(s):  
Carolyn H Still ◽  
Nicholas M Pajewski ◽  
Gordon J Chelune ◽  
Stephen R Rapp ◽  
Kaycee M Sink ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To examine the association of global cognitive function assessed via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and deficiencies in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) on the Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ) in hypertensive older adults in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Methods In cross-sectional analysis, 9,296 SPRINT participants completed the MoCA at baseline. The FAQ was obtained from 2,705 informants for SPRINT participants scoring <21 or <22 on the MoCA, depending on education. FAQ severity ranged from no dysfunction (Score = 0) to moderate/severe dysfunction (Score = 5+). Results Participants who triggered FAQ administration were older, less educated, and more likely to be Black or Hispanic (p < 0.001). Sixty-one percent (n = 1,661) of participants’ informants reported no functional difficulties in IADLs. An informant report, however, of any difficulty on the FAQ was associated with lower MoCA scores after controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education (p < 0.05). Partial proportional odds regression indicates that participants scoring lower on the MoCA (in the 10th to <25th, fifth to <10th, and <fifth percentiles) had higher adjusted odds of their informant indicating dysfunction on the FAQ, relative to participants scoring at or above the 25th percentile on the MoCA (p < 0.001). Conclusions While lower global cognitive function was strongly associated with IADL deficits on FAQ, informants indicated no functional difficulties for the majority of SPRINT participants, despite low MoCA scores. These findings can help with designing future studies which aim to detect mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia in large, community-dwelling populations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos J. Rodriguez ◽  
Carolyn H. Still ◽  
Katelyn R. Garcia ◽  
Lynne Wagenknecht ◽  
Suzanne White ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document