scholarly journals Evaluation of the Accuracy of Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement Devices: Challenges and Proposals

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 1161-1167
Author(s):  
Ramakrishna Mukkamala ◽  
Mohammad Yavarimanesh ◽  
Keerthana Natarajan ◽  
Jin-Oh Hahn ◽  
Konstantinos G. Kyriakoulis ◽  
...  

Several novel cuffless wearable devices and smartphone applications claiming that they can measure blood pressure (BP) are appearing on the market. These technologies are very attractive and promising, with increasing interest among health care professionals for their potential use. Moreover, they are becoming popular among patients with hypertension and healthy people. However, at the present time, there are serious issues about BP measurement accuracy of cuffless devices and the 2021 European Society of Hypertension Guidelines on BP measurement do not recommend them for clinical use. Cuffless devices have special validation issues, which have been recently recognized. It is important to note that the 2018 Universal Standard for the validation of automated BP measurement devices developed by the American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the European Society of Hypertension, and the International Organization for Standardization is inappropriate for the validation of cuffless devices. Unfortunately, there is an increasing number of publications presenting data on the accuracy of novel cuffless BP measurement devices, with inadequate methodology and potentially misleading conclusions. The objective of this review is to facilitate understanding of the capabilities and limitations of emerging cuffless BP measurement devices. First, the potential and the types of these devices are described. Then, the unique challenges in evaluating the BP measurement accuracy of cuffless devices are explained. Studies from the literature and computer simulations are employed to illustrate these challenges. Finally, proposals are given on how to evaluate cuffless devices including presenting and interpreting relevant study results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Carolina Martínez-Reyes

The main objective of this research is based on finding out some assertive and robust Photoplethysmogram’s PPG & Electrocardiogram’s ECG blood pressure-related parameters by the implementation of a novel method with innovations in signal processing and analysis. The biomedical ECG and PPG signals are recorded using a mobile monitor CardioQVark. To increase the cuffless blood pressure measurement accuracy, a technique that involves not only the ECG and PPG joint parameters extraction but also some individual PPG’s morphology features, is proposed in this work. Firstly, the biomedical ECG and PPG signals are time–frequency filtered. Secondly, some novel parameters from the morphology of photoplethysmogram signal, which may be correlated with blood pressure, are considered in addition to the pulse transit time. Additionally, a neural network is built to determine the relationship between the estimated and reference blood pressure. Finally, the correlation coefficient and regression line are obtained to evaluate the feasibility.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-162
Author(s):  
Hannah Broelmann ◽  
Joseph C. Sprenger ◽  
Verena H. Faltenbacher ◽  
Uwe V. Cotte ◽  
Werner von Willich ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-214
Author(s):  
Putri Indes Oktabriani ◽  
Fuad Ughi ◽  
Aulia Arif Iskandar

The continuous blood pressure measurement research is widely known for helpingthe development of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring where it measures blood pressureevery 15 to 30 minutes throughout the day. The cuff is a problem for the patient withAmbulatory Blood Pressure Monitor. It can make a person feel uncomfortable and must staystill when the cuff starts to inflate. It is limiting and disturbing their daily activity when thedevice is starting to measure the blood pressure. Blood pressure measurement without cuff isbeing proposed in this research, called cuff-less blood pressure measurement. It will be based onPhotoplethysmography (PPG) and Electrocardiography (ECG) signal analysis. ECG (Lead 1,Lead 2, and Lead 3) with PPG signal produced from index finger on the left hand are comparedand analyzed. Then the relation of PPG and ECG signal and the optimum location for daily usecan be obtained. The optimum location will be based on the electrode’s position that producedthe optimum ECG lead Signal to measure blood pressure. Based on the result, PPG and ECGsignal have a linear relation with Blood Pressure Measurement and Lead 1 is more stable inproducing the ECG signal. The equation from Lead 1 appeared as one of the optimum equationsfor measuring Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP).


Author(s):  
Annina S. Vischer ◽  
Thenral Socrates ◽  
Clemens Winterhalder ◽  
Jens Eckstein ◽  
Michael Mayr ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thenral Socrates ◽  
Philipp Krisai ◽  
Annina S. Vischer ◽  
Andrea Meienberg ◽  
Michael Mayr ◽  
...  

AbstractA cuffless blood pressure (BP) device (TestBP) using pulse transit time is in clinical use, but leads to higher BP values compared to a cuff-based 24 h-BP reference device (RefBP). We evaluated the impact of a recent software update on BP results and TestBP’s ability to differentiate between normo- and hypertension. 71 individuals had TestBP (Somnotouch-NIBP) and RefBP measurements simultaneously performed on either arm. TestBP results with software version V1.5 were compared to V1.4 and RefBP. Mean 24 h (± SD) BP for the RefBP, TestBP-V1.4 and TestBP-V1.5 were systolic 134.0 (± 17.3), 140.8 (± 20) and 139.1 (± 20) mmHg, and diastolic 79.3 (± 11.7), 85.8 (± 14.1) and 83.5 (± 13.0) mmHg, respectively (p-values < 0.001). TestBP-V1.5 area under the curve (95% confidence interval) versus RefBP for hypertension detection was 0.92 (0.86; 0.99), 0.94 (0.88; 0.99) and 0.77 (0.66; 0.88) for systolic and 0.92 (0.86; 0.99), 0.92 (0.85; 0.99) and 0.84 (0.74; 0.94) for diastolic 24 h, awake and asleep BP respectively. TestBP-V1.5 detected elevated systolic/diastolic mean 24 h-BP with a 95%/90% sensitivity and 65%/70% specificity. Highest Youden’s Index was systolic 133 (sensitivity 95%/specificity 80%) and diastolic 87 mmHg (sensitivity 81%/specificity 98%). The update improved the agreement to RefBP. TestBP was excellent for detecting 24 h and awake hypertensive BP values but not for asleep BP values.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document