Abstract W P8: "Double Trouble": Endovascular Treatment of Tandem Arterial Occlusions in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikayel Grigoryan ◽  
Diogo Haussen ◽  
Andrey Lima ◽  
Jonathan Grossberg ◽  
Shannon Doppelheuer ◽  
...  

Background: Tandem extracranial/intracranial arterial occlusions in acute stroke present treatment challenges both due to suboptimal response to systemic intravenous thrombolysis as well as complex endovascular approach. We report our experience in treating this cohort of acute stroke patients with the analysis of angiographic and clinical outcomes Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and imaging data of all consecutive acute stroke patients with proximal intracranial arterial occlusion and additional extracranial occlusion/critical stenosis, treated with endovascular techniques between February 2011 and February 2014 at two hospitals. We analyzed patients’ demographics, clinical presentation, treatment strategies, time to recanalization, imaging and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 66 patients were included. The mean NIHSS on presentation was 19. Extracranial carotid with concomitant intracranial anterior circulation occlusions were present in 95% of the patients (63/66), while 5% (3/66) had tandem vertebrobasilar occlusions. 41% of the patients (27/66) received intravenous rt-PA. With regards to endovascular treatment, in 70% of the cases (46/66), extracranial lesion was treated with a stent placement. Stentrievers were used in 50% (33/66) of the patients for intracranial thrombectomy. Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) >= 2B reperfusion was achieved in 77% of all the patients (51/66) and in 97% (32/33) of the stentriever patients. Good clinical outcome at 90 days (mRS<=2) was seen in 42% of the patients. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (PH-2)occurred in 9% (6/66) of the patients. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment of tandem arterial occlusions in acute ischemic stroke is relatively safe, feasible, and may yield excellent angiographic and good clinical outcomes.

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunari Homma ◽  
Shunya Takizawa ◽  
Youichi Ohnuki

Background: Stroke guidelines recommend that thrombolytic therapy should be carried out within 60 minutes from the arrival at the hospital. CT may decrease door-to-treatment interval compared to MRI. However, MRI may provide more information on brain pathology to select the treatment than CT. Thus, it remains controversial which is informative for selecting thrombolysis and endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke between CT and MRI. Purpose: Purpose of this study is to evaluate which clinical risk score using CT or MRI presents the best predictive performance for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Methods: Consecutive stroke patients suffering anterior circulation were analyzed, who were received IV rt-PA therapy between October 2005 and March 2016. We calculated nine scores for each patient: DRAGON, MRI-DRAGON, HAT, SEDAN, SITS-ICH, SPAN-100, ASTRAL, PRS, and GRASPS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to determine the predictive performance of each SICH predictive score according to two criteria: NINDS and ECASS-II. Logistic regression determined the odds ratio for two SICH criteria. Results: A total of 166 acute ischemic stroke patients were analyzed (113 men, 72±12 years old). SICH defined following NINDS criteria occurred in 14 patients, SICH defined following ECASS criteria occurred in 11 patients. 144 patients were performed both CT and MRI [median time between CT and MRI, 11; IQR 8-16]. Only 2 scores predicted SICH (NINDS criteria) with good accuracy (ROC area> 0.7, Figure1). Only one score predicted SICH (NINDS criteria) with good accuracy (Figure2). Conclusion: We concluded that MRI-DRAGON presented the best predictive performance for SICH, and MRI may be more useful for selecting thrombolysis and endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke than CT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642110211
Author(s):  
Georgios Magoufis ◽  
Apostolos Safouris ◽  
Guy Raphaeli ◽  
Odysseas Kargiotis ◽  
Klearchos Psychogios ◽  
...  

Recent randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have revolutionized acute ischemic stroke care by extending the use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies in time windows that have been originally considered futile or even unsafe. Both systemic and endovascular reperfusion therapies have been shown to improve outcome in patients with wake-up strokes or symptom onset beyond 4.5 h for intravenous thrombolysis and beyond 6 h for endovascular treatment; however, they require advanced neuroimaging to select stroke patients safely. Experts have proposed simpler imaging algorithms but high-quality data on safety and efficacy are currently missing. RCTs used diverse imaging and clinical inclusion criteria for patient selection during the dawn of this novel stroke treatment paradigm. After taking into consideration the dismal prognosis of nonrecanalized ischemic stroke patients and the substantial clinical benefit of reperfusion therapies in selected late presenters, we propose rescue reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients not fulfilling all clinical and imaging inclusion criteria as an option in a subgroup of patients with clinical and radiological profiles suggesting low risk for complications, notably hemorrhagic transformation as well as local or remote parenchymal hemorrhage. Incorporating new data to treatment algorithms may seem perplexing to stroke physicians, since treatment and imaging capabilities of each stroke center may dictate diverse treatment pathways. This narrative review will summarize current data that will assist clinicians in the selection of those late presenters that will most likely benefit from acute reperfusion therapies. Different treatment algorithms are provided according to available neuroimaging and endovascular treatment capabilities.


2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2021-017963
Author(s):  
Gang Deng ◽  
Jun Xiao ◽  
Haihan Yu ◽  
Man Chen ◽  
Ke Shang ◽  
...  

BackgroundDespite successful recanalization after endovascular treatment, many patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion still show functional dependence, namely futile recanalization.MethodsPubMed and Embase were searched up to April 30, 2021. Studies that reported risk factors for futile recanalization following endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke were included. The mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of each study were pooled for a meta-analysis.ResultsTwelve studies enrolling 2138 patients were included. The pooled analysis showed that age (MD 5.81, 95% CI 4.16 to 7.46), female sex (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.68), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (MD 4.22, 95% CI 3.38 to 5.07), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (MD −0.71, 95% CI −1.23 to –0.19), hypertension (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.09), diabetes (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.24), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.51), admission systolic blood pressure (MD 4.98, 95% CI 1.87 to 8.09), serum glucose (MD 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.81), internal carotid artery occlusion (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.95), pre-treatment intravenous thrombolysis (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.83), onset-to-puncture time (MD 16.92, 95% CI 6.52 to 27.31), puncture-to-recanalization time (MD 12.37, 95% CI 7.96 to 16.79), and post-treatment symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 6.09, 95% CI 3.18 to 11.68) were significantly associated with futile recanalization.ConclusionThis study identified female sex, comorbidities, admission systolic blood pressure, serum glucose, occlusion site, non-bridging therapy, and post-procedural complication as predictors of futile recanalization, and also confirmed previously reported factors. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Mayank Goyal ◽  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
Reza Jahan ◽  
...  

Background: Recent single center studies have suggested that “procedural time” independent of “time to procedure” can affect outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment (ET). We performed a pooled analysis from three ET trials to determine the effect of procedural time on angiographic and clinical outcomes. Objective: To determine the relationship between procedural time and clinical outcomes among acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing successful recanalization with ET. Methods: We analyzed data from SWIFT, STAR and SWIFT PRIME trials. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, NIHSS score on admission, intracranial hemorrhage rates and mRS at 3 months post procedure were analyzed. TICI scale was used to grade post procedure angiographic recanalization. Procedural time was defined by the time interval between groin puncture and recanalization. We estimated the procedural time after which favorable clinical outcome was unlikely even after recanalization (futile) after age and NIHSS score adjustment. Results: We analyzed 301 patients who underwent ET and had near complete or complete recanalization (TICI 2b or 3). The procedural time (±SD) was significantly shorter in patients who achieved a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) compared with those who did not achieve favorable outcome (44±25 vs 51±33 minutes, p=0.04). Table 1. In the multivariate analysis (including all baseline characteristics with a p value <0.05 as independent variables), shorter procedural time was a significant predictor of lower odds of unfavorable outcome (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28, 0.85, p=0.012). The rates of favorable outcomes were significantly higher when the procedural time was <60 minutes compared with ≥60 minutes (62% vs 45%, p=0.020). Conclusion: Procedural time in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is an important determinant of favorable outcomes in those with near complete or complete recanalization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Alexander A. Khalessi ◽  
J Mocco ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
...  

Various endovascular intraarterial approaches are available for treating patients with acute ischemic stroke who present with severe neurological deficits. Three recent randomized trials—Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III, Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy (MR RESCUE), and Synthesis Expansion: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Intra-Arterial Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke (SYNTHESIS Expansion)—evaluated the efficacy of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke and, after failing to demonstrate any significant clinical benefit of endovascular therapies, raised concerns and questions in the medical community regarding the future of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. In this paper, the authors review the evolution of endovascular treatment strategies for the treatment of acute stroke and provide their interpretation of findings and potential limitations of the three recently published randomized trials. The authors discuss the advantage of stent-retriever technology over earlier endovascular approaches and review the current status and future directions of endovascular acute stroke studies based on lessons learned from previous trials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1181-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Zhen-Ni Guo ◽  
Xin Sun ◽  
Yingkai Zhao ◽  
Yi Yang

Abstract Introduction The existence of the smoker’s paradox is controversial and potential mechanisms have not been explained. We aimed to explore the association between cigarette smoking and functional outcome at 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies exploring the association between smoking and good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) following IVT or EVT were searched via the databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 8, 2018. Information on the characteristics of included studies was independently extracted by two investigators. Data were pooled using a random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis according to the heterogeneity of included studies. Results Among 20 identified studies, 15 reported functional outcomes following IVT, and five reported functional outcomes following EVT. Unadjusted analyses showed that smoking increased the odds of good functional outcomes with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36–1.60) after IVT and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.47–3.20) after EVT. Of IVT studies, only eight reported outcomes adjusted for covariates and none of the EVT studies reported adjusted outcomes. After adjustment, the relation between smoking and good functional outcome following IVT lost statistical significance (OR 1.14 [95% CI: 0.81–1.59]). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggested that smoking was not associated with good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Implications The existence of the smoker’s paradox is controversial. A previous letter by Plas et al. published in 2013 reported a positive result for the association between smoking and good functional outcome at 3 months in acute ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). However, a major limitation of their meta-analysis was that the process of data synthesis was based on unadjusted data. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the association based on adjusted data and a larger sample size. Our meta-analysis suggested that smoking was not associated with good functional outcome after adjusting for covariates.


2020 ◽  
pp. 174749302095460
Author(s):  
Charith Cooray ◽  
Michal Karlinski ◽  
Adam Kobayashi ◽  
Peter Ringleb ◽  
Janika Kõrv ◽  
...  

Background There are limited data on intravenous thrombolysis treatment in ischemic stroke patients with prestroke disability. Aim We aimed to evaluate safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis treatment in stroke patients with prestroke disability. Methods We analyzed 88,094 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, recorded in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) International Thrombolysis Register between January 2003 and December 2017, with available NIHSS data at stroke-onset and after 24 h. Of them, 4566 patients (5.2%) had prestroke disability, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 3–5. Safety outcome measures included Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, any type of parenchymal hematoma on 24 h imaging scans irrespective of clinical symptoms, and death within seven days. Early outcome measures were 24-h NIHSS improvement (≥4 from baseline to 24 h). Results Patients with prestroke disability were older, had more severe strokes, and more comorbidities than patients without prestroke disability. When comparing patients with prestroke disability with patients without prestroke disability, there was however no significant increase in adjusted odds for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 0.83 (95% CI 0.60–1.15) (absolute difference in proportion 1.17% vs. 1.27%)) or for parenchymal hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio 0.96 (0.83–1.11) (7.51% vs. 6.34%)). The prestroke disability group had a significantly lower-adjusted odds ratio for a 24-h NIHSS improvement (adjusted odds ratio 0.79 (0.73–0.85) (45.95% vs. 48.45%)) and a higher adjusted odds ratio for seven-day mortality (aOR 1.40 (1.21–1.61) (10.40% vs. 4.93%)). Conclusions Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with prestroke disability was not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or parenchymal hemorrhage. Prestroke disability was however associated with a higher risk of early mortality compared to patients without prestroke disability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 277-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyi Shang ◽  
Wenbo Zhao ◽  
Chuanhui Li ◽  
Kai Dong ◽  
Haiqing Song ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Intravenous thrombolysis is known as the only effective reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by small branches occlusion. However, it is still unclear whether intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) is safe and effective for patients without detectable arterial occlusion. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IAT in these patients. Methods: Data were collected on consecutive patients from December 2012 to February 2017 at the Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. AIS patients without large artery occlusion during digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were divided into 2 groups: (1) Intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis group (UK group): received intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis treatment; (2) Control group: cerebral angiography examination only. The primary outcome was 3-month favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2). Results: A total of 48 patients received urokinase thrombolysis, and 34 patients underwent DSA examination only. The UK group had more frequent favorable functional outcomes (70.8 vs. 50%, p = 0.032) at 3-month follow-up and higher score of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement on the second day (p = 0.007). One patient (2%) had symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and 3 patients (6.3%) had asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (asICH) in the UK group. One patient (3.3%) had asICH in the control group. There were no significant differences about ICH. Conclusions: AIS caused by small branches occlusion could benefit from intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis, and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage was not significantly higher.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document