Abstract TP250: Defining Technical Quality Standards for Mobile Telestroke Assessment: A Substudy of the Improving Treatment with Rapid Evaluation of Acute Stroke via Mobile Telemedicine (iTREAT) Mobile Telestroke Platform

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M Lippman ◽  
Zachary G Sutton ◽  
Timothy L McMurry ◽  
Brian Gunnell ◽  
Jack Cote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Video Quality ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Video Data ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Technical Standards ◽  
Quality Ratings ◽  
Transmission Quality

Introduction: In-ambulance use of remote videoconferencing for prehospital stroke assessment (mobile telestroke) is an emerging innovation in acute stroke care. As a new technology, there is a dearth of technical standards to ensure transmission quality and guide deployment in various EMS settings. Hypothesis: Subjective video quality ratings during in-vehicle mobile telestroke assessment correlate to objective video data transmission metrics. Methods: We performed videoconferencing via a low-cost, utilitarian mobile telestroke platform: tablet endpoint, high-speed 4G LTE modem, external antennae, HIPAA-secure videoconferencing application, and portable bracket mounting. We held test calls along typical ambulance routes recording transmission quality by a stationary and a mobile rater. We used a standardized 6-point scale of video quality: rating ≥ 4 deemed acceptable for mobile telestroke assessment. We recorded jitter, the variance in transmission data reception order, as simultaneously reported by the videoconferencing application. Results: We completed five test runs yielding 64 data ratings. Average jitter for ratings 1 through 6 was 434.9ms (SD = 407), 106.1ms (SD = 110), 41.4ms (SD = 29), 35.3ms (SD = 15), 29.5ms (SD = 6), and 29.0ms (SD = 2) respectively. Analyzing the raw data yielded an R2 of 0.41. As seen in Chart 1, video quality decreased as average jitter increased, but jitter values as low as 30ms were still seen across video transmission of all qualities. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest modest correlation of transmission variance with subjective quality ratings using a low-cost mobile telestroke platform along rural-based ambulance routes. However, average transmission variance correlated highly (R2 = 0.93) suggesting more data ratings may improve the correlation. Testing of our mobile telestroke platform to assess performance and clinical efficacy as well as incorporate live acute stroke encounters is ongoing.

Abstract TP246: Emergency Medical Services Survey of a Low-cost, Ambulance-based System for Mobile Neurological Assessment: The iTREAT Study

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William M Clark ◽  
Nicole A Chiota-McCollum ◽  
Jack Cote ◽  
Brett J Schneider ◽  
Haydon Pitchford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Neurological Assessment ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Prehospital Diagnosis ◽  
Technical Challenges ◽  
Survey Responses

Introduction: Modern advances in acute stroke care place an added emphasis on accurate prehospital diagnosis and triage. As part of the Improving Treatment with Rapid Evaluation of Acute Stroke via mobile Telemedicine (iTREAT) study, we assessed the EMS provider experience with a novel system for mobile telestroke assessment. Methods: We developed a 12-question survey with input from local participants in an EMS Council serving rural counties in central Virginia. Providers rated the iTREAT system on feasibility for acute stroke triage, potential effectiveness in prehospital neurological assessment, and interactions with prehospital care. All survey responses were voluntary and anonymous. Results: Since initiation of live patient enrollment, we have completed 34 ambulance-based telestroke encounters with the iTREAT system. Among 7 participating agencies, 19 EMS providers have served as tele-presenters during the telestroke assessment, and 17 EMS providers completed the voluntary survey. Of the respondents, 71% were certified EMS providers for over 5 years. Regarding technical feasibility, 69% experienced issues related to maintaining a video connection, 41% with logging in to the videoconferencing application, and 18% powering on the tablet. Of technical challenges, 41% of providers resolved the issue on their own, 18% with guidance from study staff, and 24% could not resolve the issue. Concerning patient care, 23% felt the system interfered, 35% were neutral, and 41% felt there was no interference. The majority of respondents (71%) agreed that the iTREAT system is feasible for acute stroke triage, and an effective tool (59%) for prehospital neurological assessment. In commentary, EMS participants emphasized the system’s utility in rural areas. Conclusion: This survey of the EMS experience with a low-cost, ambulance-based system for prehospital telestroke assessment reveals both technical challenges and clinical promise. Importantly, technical issues are mostly solvable in real time and correctable for further system refinement. As a novel tool for prehospital neurological assessment and acute stroke triage, the initial EMS evaluation supports further investigation of clinical efficacy, particularly in rural and underserved areas.

Abstract 90: NIH Stroke Scale Assessment via iPad-based Mobile Telestroke During Ambulance Transport is Feasible - Pilot data from the Improving Treatment with Rapid Evaluation of Acute Stroke via Mobile Telemedecine (iTREAT) Study

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M Padrick ◽  
Sherita N Chapman Smith ◽  
Timothy L McMurry ◽  
Prachi Mehndiratta ◽  
Christina Y Chee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Telemedicine System ◽  
Statistical Measures ◽  
Quality Ratings ◽  
Ambulance Transport ◽  
Stroke Mimic ◽  
4G Lte

Introduction: The AHA-ASA Target:Stroke Program calls for innovative approaches to prehospital stroke care. We previously showed that mobile videoconferencing during ambulance transport is technically feasible in a rural EMS setting using an iPad-based telemedicine system. We now hypothesize that this mobile telestroke system is clinically feasible as measured by agreement of the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) between face-to-face (FTF) and remote ambulance-based assessments (iTREAT). Methods: The iTREAT system comprises an Apple iPad® with retina display, high-speed 4G LTE modem, Cisco Jabber secure video conferencing application, mounting apparatus, and magnetic external antenna. We developed 4 unique stroke and 2 unique stroke-mimic scenarios to simulate prehospital stroke alerts. We recruited 3 standardized patients each assigned two scenarios, and randomly assigned each scenario to one of 6 major ambulance routes triaging to UVA Medical Center. To eliminate bias, we alternated the order of FTF and iTREAT evaluations. Statistical measures were inter- and intra-rater correlation coefficient for the NIHSS and audio/visual(AV) quality ratings on a 6-point scale (>4 indicating “good” or “excellent” connectivity). Results: For the 12 iTREAT and 10 FTF evaluations (two FTF missing data), intra-rater correlation of NIHSS scores was consistently >0.91 (mean=0.96). Inter-rater correlation for FTF evaluations was >0.89 (mean 0.96), and inter-rater correlation for iTREAT evaluations was >0.84 (mean=0.94). AV quality ratings during all iTREAT evaluations were deemed “good” or “excellent” (audio mean=5.3, median=5.5; video mean=4.67, median=4.5). Both NIHSS correlation and AV quality rating increased over the study period. Conclusion: In this pilot feasibility study, NIHSS scores obtained via ambulance using our iPad-based mobile telestroke system correlated well with in person assessments. These results support further research to determine feasibility and efficacy of this low-cost mobile telestroke system in prehospital stroke care.

scholarly journals Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽  
Álvaro García-Tornel ◽  
Mònica Millán ◽  
Marc Ribó ◽  
Sergi Amaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Prehospital Delays ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], <i>p</i> 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], <i>p</i> 0.015) during the pandemic period. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

scholarly journals Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Gabriel Velilla-Alonso ◽  
Andrés García-Pastor ◽  
Ángela Rodríguez-López ◽  
Ana Gómez-Roldós ◽  
Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Group Data ◽  
Radiological Data ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prehospital Delays

Introduction: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). Results: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7–10] vs. 10 [8–10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2–14] vs. 4 [2–8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93–760] vs. 197 [91.25–645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the CO­VID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. Conclusion: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.

Remote Longitudinal Inpatient Acute Stroke Care Via Telestroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 105749
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Sobhani ◽  
Shashvat Desai ◽  
Evan Madill ◽  
Matthew Starr ◽  
Marcelo Rocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Acute Stroke Care

Effect of Acute Stroke Care Regionalization on Intravenous Alteplase Use in Two Urban Counties

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanthi Govindarajan ◽  
Stephen Shiboski ◽  
Barbara Grimes ◽  
Lawrence J. Cook ◽  
David Ghilarducci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Intravenous Alteplase

scholarly journals Disabling stroke in persons already with a disability

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Young ◽  
Robert W. Regenhardt ◽  
Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi ◽  
Michael Ashley Stein
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Stroke Research ◽  
Scant Attention

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and a leading cause of adult disability worldwide. More than a third of individuals presenting with strokes are estimated to have a preexisting disability. Despite unprecedented advances in stroke research and clinical practice over the past decade, approaches to acute stroke care for persons with preexisting disability have received scant attention. Current standards of research and clinical practice are influenced by an underexplored range of biases that may hinder acute stroke care for persons with disability. These trends may exacerbate unequal health outcomes by rendering novel stroke therapies inaccessible to many persons with disabilities. Here, we explore the underpinnings and implications of biases involving persons with disability in stroke research and practice. Recent insights from bioethics, disability rights, and health law are explained and critically evaluated in the context of prevailing research and clinical practices. Allowing disability to drive decisions to withhold acute stroke interventions may perpetuate disparate health outcomes and undermine ethically resilient stroke care. Advocacy for inclusion of persons with disability in future stroke trials can improve equity in stroke care delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document