Abstract WMP5: Endovascular Therapy Stroke Outcome in Very Elderly: Meta-analysis

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle P Lin ◽  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
Steven Cen ◽  
William J Mack ◽  
Arun P Amar ◽  
...  

Introduction: Very elderly (age ≥80yo) individuals account for about one-third of all stroke admissions with mixed literature demonstrating relative poor stroke outcomes. With overwhelming recent evidence supporting the use of intra-arterial thrombectomy in addition to IV thrombolysis for large-vessel occlusive stroke, we conducted a metaanalysis to assess long-term functional outcome following mechanical thrombectomy in very elderly. Hypothesis: Very elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombectomy have equally favorable long-term functional outcomes to their younger counterparts Methods: Stroke endovascular trials published in New England Journal of Medicine 2014-2015 were included if they reported odds ratio of good functional outcome (improvement in modified Rankin score, mRS) comparing thrombectomy vs IV-tPA dichotomized by age groups (age ≤ 80yo vs >80yo, 2 studies dichotomized age at 70yo). Multivariate adjusted odds ratios and the corresponding standard errors were used for the metaanalysis. Pooled odds ratio estimates across trials were synthesized by using a random-effects model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. The pooled estimates with 95% confidence interval were compared between elderly and younger age groups. Forest plots constructed. Results: Of the 5 recent intraartrial thrombectomy trials, 4 studies reported subgroup analysis by age with 1,206 participants, 28% (N=334) were above the age of 80yo, 72% (N=872) were ≤80yo. Among very elderly patients undergoing thrombectomy, the pooled odds ratio of good functional outcome at 3 months was 1.91 (1.13-3.24), in the younger group the pooled odds ratio was 1.95 (1.50-2.53). Conclusions: Endovascular therapy was an effective therapy for very elderly individuals presenting with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusive disease. Future studies are needed to further assess the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy in this growing population.

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle P Lin ◽  
Geoffrey P Colby ◽  
Rafael H Llinas

Introduction: Contraindications for intravenous thrombolysis are not infrequent (eg. anticoagulation, recent surgery, unclear last known well). With overwhelming recent evidence supporting the use of endovascular thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusive stroke, we conducted a metaanalysis to compare long-term functional outcome between thrombectomy-alone versus combined IV-tPA and thrombectomy. Hypothesis: Patients with acute ischemic stroke ineligible for IV-tPA treated with thrombectomy-alone have equally favorable long-term functional outcomes to patients treated with combined IV-tPA and thrombectomy Methods: Searched PubMed from 2014-2016 using pre-specified terms for studies that report odds ratio of improvement in mRS score at 90 days comparing thrombectomy vs IV-tPA stratified by whether patients had received IV-tPA. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios were used for the metaanalysis. Pooled odds ratio estimates across trials were synthesized by using a random-effects model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. The pooled estimates were compared between thrombectomy-alone and combined IV-tPA and thrombectomy. Forest plots constructed. Results: Of the 920 studies, 3 studies reported subgroup analysis with 822 participants, 19.5% (N=160) received thrombectomy-alone, 80.5% (N=662) received combined IV-tPA and thrombectomy. Among patients who received thrombectomy-alone, the pooled odds ratio of good functional outcome at 3 months was 2.48 (1.43-4.30), in the combined IV-tPA and thrombectomy group the pooled odds ratio was 1.85 (1.37-2.49). Conclusions: Endovascular therapy was an effective therapy for patients ineligible for IV-tPA presenting with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusive disease. While IV-tPA should not be withheld before thrombectomy in IV-tPA eligible patients, prospective studies are needed to select those who may benefit more from thrombectomy-only treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Proietti ◽  
A.P Mascolo ◽  
F Maramma ◽  
D Morosetti ◽  
V Da Ros ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and purpose Only a restricted number of elderly patients has been included in the majority of recent endovascular stroke trials. We provided an analysis about differences in outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) according to age. Methods A retrospective analysis of an observational registry of patients with anterior large vessel acute ischemic stroke was performed. Main analysis was performed comparing patients <80 vs. ≥80 years old. A sensitivity analysis was performed comparing 3 age groups: i) <80 years; ii) 80–84 years; iii) ≥85 years. Outcomes were: i) any hemorrhagic infarction; ii) alive with disability; iii) death; iv) a composite outcome of alive with disability/death. Results 615 patients were identified. 227 (36.9%) patients were ≥80 years old, with 115 (18.5%) ≥85 years old. Elderly (≥80 years) patients showed a higher modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 3-months follow-up (F=9.819, p=0.001) [Figure 1]. Comparing the three groups (<80 years, 80–84 years, ≥85 years) a progressively higher mRS was found at discharge and 3 months follow-up (F=4.899, p=0.008). A progressively higher rate of death and composite outcome between the age groups was found, both in the main and sensitivity analyses. In the logistic regression analysis age ≥80 years was found associated with an increased risk of death (odds ratio [OR]: 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27–4.00) and showed a trend in higher risk for composite outcome (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.92–2.281). No difference was found between 80–84 years and <80 years patients, while very elderly (≥85 years) had an increased risk of death (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.60–5.10) and composite outcome (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.30–4.33). Conclusions In our analysis elderly patients have an increased risk of death and composite outcome of disability and death. In particular, this risk appears to be significantly higher in very elderly patients (≥85 years old). Figure 1. mRS according to main analysis Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama O Zaidat ◽  
Albert Yoo ◽  
Vallabh Janardhan ◽  
Don Frei ◽  
Lynne Ammar ◽  
...  

Purpose: The infarct core has been hypothesized to be highly predictive of treatment effect for endovascular intervention in acute ischemic stroke from large vessel proximal occlusion. The purpose of this study was to determine how it affects the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) by this therapy to improve long term functional status. Methods: Patients with acute stroke not eligible and/or refractory to IV rtPA, treated by the Penumbra System (N=463) were pooled from various studies: Pivotal (N=83), PICS (N=174), RetroSTART (N=96) and START (N=110). They were compared with 62 control patients who were eligible for but not treated by endovascular therapy. The NNT for both groups to achieve 90 day functional independence as defined by an mRS score of ≤2 were compared. The impact of the infarct core at presentation defined by ASPECTS trichotomized as small (8-10), medium (5-7) and large (0-4) was assessed. The distribution of the infarct core (N) for Penumbra:control patients were: 257:50, 155:7 and 51:3, respectively for small, medium and large. Two control patients did not have ASPECTS scores. Results: There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two group median values (Control;Penumbra): Age (72;68), NIHSS (18;17), ASPECTS (ASP) (9;8). There were significant differences in rate of recanalization, all-cause mortality and good functional outcome (mRS ≤2) but not symptomatic ICH (Table). The NNT to improve functional status was 5.6 for the entire cohort of treated patients, 4.7 for those with small core, 4.1 for medium and 12.8 for large. Conclusion: These data indicate that endovascular treatment may not be effective in patients with a large infarct core and could contribute to the high NNT needed to achieve long term good functional status. Eliminating this group at time of triage may significantly lower the NNT and improve the treatment effect of this therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhong Yu ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Tan Zhang ◽  
Chenrong Huang ◽  
Yu Fu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It has been shown that eosinophils are decreased and monocytes are elevated in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the impact of eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio (EMR) on clinical outcomes among AIS patients remains unclear. We aimed to determine the relationship between EMR on admission and 3-month poor functional outcome in AIS patients. Methods A total of 521 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital within 24 h after onset of AIS were prospectively enrolled and categorized in terms of quartiles of EMR on admission between August 2016 and September 2018. The endpoint was the poor outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 6 at month 3 after admission. Results As EMR decreased, the risk of poor outcome increased (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that EMR was independently associated with poor outcome after adjusting potential confounders (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI 0.03–0.34; p = 0.0003), which is consistent with the result of EMR (quartile) as a categorical variable (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI 0.10–0.52; ptrend < 0.0001). A non-linear relationship was detected between EMR and poor outcome, whose point was 0.28. Subgroup analyses further confirmed these associations. The addition of EMR to conventional risk factors improved the predictive power for poor outcome (net reclassification improvement: 2.61%, p = 0.382; integrated discrimination improvement: 2.41%, p < 0.001). Conclusions EMR on admission was independently correlated with poor outcome in AIS patients, suggesting that EMR may be a potential prognostic biomarker for AIS.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Kass-Hout ◽  
Tareq Kass-Hout ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
David Orion ◽  
Shadi Jahshan ◽  
...  

Background: Large vessel occlusions with a high clot burden are less likely to improve with the FDA-approved IV strategy. Endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke symptom onset provides an effective alternative treatment in patients with large vessel occlusion. It is not clear if combination of IV thrombolysis and endovascular approach is superior to endovascular treatment alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated within the first 3 h stroke onset during the 2005-2010 period. First group received endovascular therapy within the first 3 h of stroke onset. Second group consisted of patients who received IV thrombolysis within the first 3 h followed by endovascular therapy. We compared the following outcomes: revascularization rates, NIHSS score at discharge, mRS at discharge and 3months, symptomatic hemorrhage rates and mortality. Results: Among 104 patients identified, 42 received combined therapy, and 62 received endovascular therapy only. The two groups had similar demographic (age and sex distribution) and vascular risk factors distribution, as well as NIHSS score on admission (14.8±4.7 and 16.0±5.3; p=0.23). We found no difference in TIMI recanalization rates (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scale score of 2 or 3) following combined or endovascular therapy alone (83.3% and 79.0%; p=0.59). A preferred outcome, defined as a mRS of 2 or less at 90 days also did not differ between the combined therapy group and the endovascular only group (37.5% and 34.5%; p=0.76). There was no difference in mortality rate (22.5% and 31.0%; p=0.36) and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (9.5% and 8.1%; p=0.73). There was a significant difference in mean time from symptom onset to endovascular treatment between the combined group (227±88 min) and endovascular only group (125±40 min; p<0.0001).Patients with good TIMI recanalization rate of 2 or 3 showed a trend of having a better mRS at 90 days in both bridging (16.67% vs. 41.18%, p-value: 0.3813) and endovascular groups (25% vs. 34.78%, p-value: 0.7326).When analyzing the correlation of mRS at 90 days with the site of occlusion, patients in the bridging group showed a trend of a better outcome when the site of occlusion was ICA (33.3% vs 30%) and MCA (66.67% vs. 27.59%) and worse outcome when the site of occlusion was in the posterior circulation (26.32% vs. 50%), however, these results were not statistically significant (p-values: 0.1735& 0.5366). Conclusion: Combining IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy achieves similar rates of clinical outcomes, revascularization rates, complications and mortality rates, when compared with endovascular treatment alone. The combined therapy, however, significantly delays initiation of endovascular treatment. A randomized prospective trial comparing both treatment strategies in acute ischemic stroke is warranted


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Hartmann ◽  
Simon Winzer ◽  
Timo Siepmann ◽  
Lars-Peder Pallesen ◽  
Alexandra Prakapenia ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hypothermia may be neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO) who receive endovascular therapy (EVT) are frequently hypothermic after the procedure. We sought to analyze whether this unintended hypothermia was associated with improved functional outcome. Methods: We extracted data of consecutive patients (01/2016-04/2019) from our prospective EVT database that includes all patients screened for EVT at our center. We included patients with acLVO who received EVT and analyzed recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) and complications (i.e., pneumonia, bradyarrhythmia, venous thromboembolism) during the hospital course. We assessed functional outcome at 3 months and analyzed risk ratios (RR) for good outcome (mRS scores 0-2) and mortality of patients who were hypothermic (<36°C) compared to patients who were normothermic ( > 36°C) after EVT. We compared the frequency of complications and calculated RRs for good outcome and mortality in the subgroup with recanalization. Results: Among 674 patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke, 372 patients received EVT for acLVO (178 [47%] male, age 77 years [65-82], NIHSS score 16 [12 - 20]). Of these, 186 patients (50%) were hypothermic (median [IQR] temperature 35.2°C [34.7-35.6]) and 186 patients were normothermic (media temperature 36.4 [36.2-36.8]) after EVT. At 3 months, 54 of 186 (29.0%) hypothermic patients compared with 65 of 186 (35.0%) normothermic patients had a good outcome (RR, 0.83; 95%CI 0.62-1.12) and 52 of 186 (27.9%) hypothermic patients compared with 46 of 186 (24.7%) normothermic patients had died (RR, 1.13; 95%CI 0.8-1.59). This relation was consistent in 307 patients (82.5% of all EVTs) with successful recanalization (good outcome: RR, 0.85; 95%CI 0.63-1.14.; mortality: RR, 1.05; 95%CI 0.7-1.57). More hypothermic patients suffered pneumonia (37.8% vs. 24.7%; p=0.003) or bradyarrhythmia (55.6% vs. 18.3%; p<0.001). Venous thromboembolism was distributed similarly (5.4% vs. 6.5%; p=0.42). Conclusion: Unintended hypothermia following EVT for acLVO was not associated with improved functional outcome or reduced mortality but an increased complication rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-426
Author(s):  
Christoph Johannes Griessenauer ◽  
David McPherson ◽  
Andrea Berger ◽  
Ping Cuiper ◽  
Nelson Sofoluke ◽  
...  

Introduction: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden is a critically important cerebrovascular phenotype related to the diagnosis and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke. The effect of WMH burden on functional outcome in large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke has only been sparsely assessed, and direct LVO and non-LVO comparisons are currently lacking. Material and Methods: We reviewed acute ischemic stroke patients admitted between 2009 and 2017 at a large healthcare system in the USA. Patients with LVO were identified and clinical characteristics, including 90-day functional outcomes, were assessed. Clinical brain MRIs obtained at the time of the stroke underwent quantification of WMH using a fully automated algorithm. The pipeline incorporated automated brain extraction, intensity normalization, and WMH segmentation. Results: A total of 1,601 acute ischemic strokes with documented 90-day mRS were identified, including 353 (22%) with LVO. Among those strokes, WMH volume was available in 1,285 (80.3%) who had a brain MRI suitable for WMH quantification. Increasing WMH volume from 0 to 4 mL, age, female gender, a number of stroke risk factors, presence of LVO, and higher NIHSS at presentation all decreased the odds for a favorable outcome. Increasing WMH above 4 mL, however, was not associated with decreasing odds of favorable outcome. While WMH volume was associated with functional outcome in non-LVO stroke (p = 0.0009), this association between WMH and functional status was not statistically significant in the complete case multivariable model of LVO stroke (p = 0.0637). Conclusion: The burden of WMH has effects on 90-day functional outcome after LVO and non-LVO strokes. Particularly, increases from no measurable WMH to 4 mL of WMH correlate strongly with the outcome. Whether this relationship of increasing WMH to worse outcome is more pronounced in non-LVO than LVO strokes deserves additional investigation.


Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 2842-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter H. Hinsenveld ◽  
Inger R. de Ridder ◽  
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge ◽  
Jan A. Vos ◽  
Adrien E. Groot ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with acute ischemic stroke because of large vessel occlusion involves complicated logistics, which may cause a delay in treatment initiation during off-hours. This might lead to a worse functional outcome. We compared workflow intervals between endovascular treatment–treated patients presenting during off- and on-hours. Methods— We retrospectively analyzed data from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study in the Netherlands and included patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who presented between March 2014 and June 2016. Off-hours were defined as presentation on Monday to Friday between 17:00 and 08:00 hours, weekends (Friday 17:00 to Monday 8:00) and national holidays. Primary end point was first door to groin time. Secondary end points were functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale) and workflow time intervals. We stratified for transfer status, adjusted for prognostic factors, and used linear and ordinal regression models. Results— We included 1488 patients of which 936 (62.9%) presented during off-hours. Median first door to groin time was 140 minutes (95% CI, 110–182) during off-hours and 121 minutes (95% CI, 85–157) during on-hours. Adjusted first door to groin time was 14.6 minutes (95% CI, 9.3–20.0) longer during off-hours. Door to needle times for intravenous therapy were slightly longer (3.5 minutes, 95% CI, 0.7–6.3) during off-hours. Groin puncture to reperfusion times did not differ between groups. For transferred patients, the delay within the intervention center was 5.0 minutes (95% CI, 0.5–9.6) longer. There was no significant difference in functional outcome between patients presenting during off- and on-hours (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74–1.14). Reperfusion rates and complication rates were similar. Conclusions— Presentation during off-hours is associated with a slight delay in start of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This treatment delay did not translate into worse functional outcome or increased complication rates.


2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016725
Author(s):  
Julien Allard ◽  
Sam Ghazanfari ◽  
Mehdi Mahmoudi ◽  
Julien Labreuche ◽  
Simon Escalard ◽  
...  

BackgroundEndovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) can be challenging in older patients with supra-aortic tortuosity. Rescue carotid puncture (RCP) can be an alternative in case of supra-aortic catheterization failure by femoral access, but data regarding RCP are scarce. We sought to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of RCP for AIS treated by EVT.MethodsPatients treated by EVT with RCP were included from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) multicentric registry. Main outcomes included reperfusion rates (≥TICI2B), 3 month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) and 3 month mortality. We also performed an additional systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA checklist to summarize previous studies on RCP.Results25 patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from the ETIS registry. RCP mainly concerned elderly patients (median age 85 years, range 73–92) with supra-aortic tortuosity (n=16 (64%)). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was used for nine patients (36%). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 64%, 87.5% of patients were dependent at 3 months, and 3 month mortality was 45.8%. The systematic review yielded comparable results. In pooled individual data, there was a shift toward better functional outcome in patients with successful reperfusion (median (IQR) 4 (2–6) vs 6 (4–6), p=0.011).ConclusionRCP mainly concerned elderly patients admitted for AIS with anterior LVO with supra-aortic tortuosity. The procedure seemed feasible, notably for patients treated with IVT, and led to significant reperfusion rates at the end of procedure, but with pronounced unfavorable outcomes at 3 months. RCP should be performed under general anesthesia to avoid life-threatening complications and ensure airways safety. Finally, RCP led to low rates of closure complications, emphasizing that this concern should not withhold RCP, if indicated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document