Abstract TP519: The Effect of Different Oral Anticoagulants on Vascular Outcomes in Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-world Data

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo-Keun Seo ◽  
Joon-Tae Kim ◽  
Jong-Won Chung ◽  
Tae-Jin Song ◽  
Yong-Jae Kim ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 440-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara L. Rodriguez-Bernal ◽  
Salvador Peiró ◽  
Isabel Hurtado ◽  
Aníbal García-Sempere ◽  
Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno

Author(s):  
M. Rosa Dalmau Llorca ◽  
Carina Aguilar Martín ◽  
Noèlia Carrasco-Querol ◽  
Zojaina Hernández Rojas ◽  
Emma Forcadell Drago ◽  
...  

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OAs) are the treatment to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). Anticoagulant treatment choice in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) must be individualized, taking current guidelines into account. Adequacy of anticoagulant therapy under the current criteria for NVAF in real-world primary care is presented. Methods: Cross-sectional study, with real-world data from patients treated in primary care (PC). Data were obtained from the System for the Improvement of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) database, covering 60,978 NVAF-anticoagulated patients from 287 PC centers in 2018. Results: In total, 41,430 (68%) were treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and 19,548 (32%) NVAF with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Inadequate prescription was estimated to be 36.0% and 67.6%, respectively. Most DOAC inadequacy (77.3%) was due to it being prescribed as a first-line anticoagulant when there was no history of thromboembolic events or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). A total of 22.1% had missing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values. Common causes of inadequate VKA prescription were poor control of time in therapeutic range (TTR) (98.8%) and ICH (2.2%). Conclusions: Poor adequacy to current criteria was observed, being inadequacy higher in DOACs than in VKAs. TTR and GFR should be routinely calculated in electronic health records (EHR) to facilitate decision-making and patient safety.


Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2020-317299
Author(s):  
Toshiki Maeda ◽  
Takumi Nishi ◽  
Shunsuke Funakoshi ◽  
Kazuhiro Tada ◽  
Masayoshi Tsuji ◽  
...  

ObjectiveAmong patients with atrial fibrillation, the risks of ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism (IS/SE) are high even with effective anticoagulation. Using large-scale, real-world data from Japan, this study aims to clarify residual risks of IS/SE attributable to modifiable risk factors among patients with atrial fibrillation who are taking oral anticoagulants.MethodsThe study design we employed was a retrospective cohort. Health check-ups and insurance claims data of Japanese health insurance companies were accumulated from January 2005 to June 2017. We identified 11 848 participants with atrial fibrillation who were on oral anticoagulants during the study period. We set the modifiable risk factors as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to obtain the effects of the risk factors for IS/SE.ResultsDuring an average of 3 years’ follow-up, 200 cases of IS/SE occurred (incidence rate 0.57 per 100 person-years). In multivariable analyses, older age (65–74 vs <65 years; adjusted HR 2.02 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.73)), hypertension (adjusted HR 1.41 (1.04 to 1.92)) and dyslipidaemia (adjusted HR 1.46 (1.07 to 1.98)) were significantly associated with increased risk of IS/SE. Percentage of IS/SE risk attributable to modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia) was 30.0% (16.1% to 41.6%).ConclusionAmong patients with atrial fibrillation on anticoagulant therapy, approximately one-third of the residual risks were estimated to be attributable to modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara L. Rodríguez-Bernal ◽  
Isabel Hurtado ◽  
Aníbal García-Sempere ◽  
Salvador Peiró ◽  
Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document