Abstract WP19: Reliability of CT Perfusion in the Posterior Circulation in Comparison to the Anterior Circulation
Background: DAWN and DEFUSE-3 excluded posterior-circulation cases, but in practice endovascular therapy (EVT) is common due to life-threatening large-vessel occlusions. Often CT perfusion (CTP) is acquired to aid in the decision-making of these cases, but the reliability of using CT perfusion in the posterior-circulation is unknown Hypothesis: Given the differences in hemodynamics (~20% of total CBF to the basilar, reduced mean velocity, and differences in collateral supply) penumbra estimates using RAPID software will be less accurate in predicting the final infarct volume on DWI. Methods: In patients who did not receive any treatment (tPA or EVT), the Tmax >6s, as operationally defined as penumbra, should approximate the infarct on DWI. As such, only posterior circulation patients without EVT or tPA were included. Anterior circulation patients were matched on demographics, medical history, outcomes. A ratio of Tmax/DWI was calculated to assess how closely perfusion approximated final infarct folume. Nonparametric correlation with Kendall’s tau-b was also performed. Results: Eleven patients with a posterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (pc-LVO) were compared to 30-matched patients with anterior circulation (ac-LVO). Age was 62.4±16 for ac-LVO vs. 64.5±13 for pc-LVO. Significant differences were seen in sex with ac-LVO 82% male, and pc-LVO 46% male (t=-2.06 p=0.046). Pc-LVO also had more subjects with an unknown last known well. Mean admission NIHSS was 15.6±8 ac-LVO, and 16.4±10 in pc-LVO group was similar. Mean discharge NIHSS was 12.6±9 ac-LVO vs 12.4±10 pc-LVO. NO signficicant difference in 30d mRS, 24h NIHSS, or mortality within 90d. As excpected in the anterior circulation cases final infarct volume correlated with Tmax>6s Kendall’s tau-b=0.57 (p=0.000013), and Tmax>8s (tau-b=0.55), Tmax>10s (tau-b=0.55. Whereas, In the posterior circulation Tmax>6s (tau-b=0.41, N.S.), but Tmax>8s (tau-b=0.64, p=0.007) and Tmax>10(tau-b=0.69, p=0.005). Seen another way the ratio of Tmax>6s:DWI = 2.47 (ac-LVO) vs 5.84 (pc-LVO) (t=-1.22, p=0.004, but Tmax>8s 1.57 vs 1.50 (t=0.11, p=9.12). Conclusion: Final infarct volume was not significantly associated with Tmax>6s in posterior circulation cases. Instead Tmax>8s is more reliable.